Identifying risk factors for anal cancer in people with HIV in Spain: a multicentre retrospective cohort study nested in the PISCIS cohort.

BACKGROUND: People with HIV have a substantially higher risk of anal cancer than the general population. We aimed to identify risk factors associated with the development of anal cancer among people with HIV to implement more effective and targeted screening strategies. METHODS: We conducted a multicentre retrospective cohort study in 16 hospitals across Catalonia and the Balearic Islands, Spain, between Jan 1, 1998, and Dec 31, 2022. Treatment-naive people with HIV nested in the PISCIS cohort aged 16 years and older with biopsy-proven squamous cell carcinoma of the anus or anal canal were eligible for inclusion. Data were retrieved from every hospital registry and were centrally validated in the PISCIS cohort and the Public Data Analysis for Health Research and Innovation Program. The primary outcome was the incidence rate (IR) of histologically confirmed anal cancer. We used Poisson regression to examine the association between the following risk factors and incidence of anal cancer: age, mode of HIV transmission, nadir CD4 cell count, and time period of HIV diagnosis. FINDINGS: Among 14 238 people with HIV, 107 (0·8%) developed anal cancer, with an overall IR of 72·5 cases per 100 000 person-years (95% CI 59·4-87·6) and median follow-up of 9·5 years (IQR 4·4-15·7). Of these patients with anal cancer, 37 (34·6%) died, of which 24 (64·9%) deaths were related to anal cancer. Incidence was highest among people with HIV with historical nadir CD4 counts of less than 200 cells per µL (IR 105·0 person-years, 95% CI 82·0-132·5) and lowest among those with counts of more than 350 cells per µL (2·9 person-years, 0·1-16·0). Among men who have sex with men (MSM), the IR was 211·5 person-years (95% CI 151·1-211·7) among those with a CD4 count of less than 200 cells per µL, 37·6 person-years (16·2-74·1) among those with a count of 200-350 cells per µL, and 4·8 person-years (0·1-26·9) among those with a count of more than 350 cells per µL. Among people with HIV younger than 30 years, there were no cases of anal cancer among women or men who do not have sex with men, and one case among MSM with a nadir CD4 count of more than 350 cells per µL (IR 4·8 person-years, 95% CI 0·1-26·9). In the multivariable analysis, people with HIV with nadir CD4 counts of more than 350 cells per µL had the lowest risk of developing anal cancer, compared with people with HIV with counts of less than 200 cells per µL (adjusted IR ratio 0·03, 95% CI 0·00-0·25; p=0·0010) or 200-350 cells per µL (0·30, 0·17-0·55; p<0·0001). Compared with people with HIV younger than 30 years, people with HIV aged 60 years and older had an adjusted IR ratio of 27·6 (3·7-206·9; p=0·0010) and people with HIV aged 45-59 years of 21·6 (3·0-156·4; p=0·0020). Compared with individuals diagnosed after 2015, a diagnosis of HIV before 1998 had an adjusted IR ratio of 33·0 (7·9-137·5; p<0·0001). INTERPRETATION: A nadir CD4 count threshold below 350 cells per µL, particularly less than 200 cells per µL, has the potential to identify people with HIV at heightened risk of developing anal cancer. Customised screening strategies that prioritise screening for individuals at high risk with this surrogate marker could maximise available resources. External validation of these data with other cohorts is required before screening recommendations can be updated. FUNDING: Catalan Health Department, Generalitat de Catalunya.

Disparities in Coronavirus Disease 2019 Clinical Outcomes and Vaccination Coverage Among Migrants With Human Immunodeficiency Virus in the PISCIS Cohort: A Population-Based Propensity Score-Matched Analysis.

Background: Coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) disproportionately affects migrants and ethnic minorities, including those with human immunodeficiency virus (HIV). Comprehensive studies are needed to understand the impact and risk factors. Methods: Using data from the PISCIS cohort of people with HIV (PWH) in Catalonia, Spain, we investigated COVID-19 outcomes and vaccination coverage. Among 10 640 PWH we compared migrants and non-migrants assessing rates of severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2) testing, diagnosis, and associated clinical outcomes through propensity score matching and multivariable Cox regression. Results: The cohort (mean age, 43 years; 83.5% male) included 57.4% (3053) Latin American migrants. Migrants with HIV (MWH) had fewer SARS-CoV-2 tests (67.8% vs 72.1%, P < .0001) but similar COVID-19 diagnoses (29.2% vs 29.4%, P = .847) compared to Spanish natives. Migrants had lower complete vaccination (78.9% vs 85.1%, P < .0001) and booster doses (63.0% vs 65.5%, P = .027). COVID-19 hospitalizations (8.1% vs 5.1%, P < .0001) and intensive care unit (ICU) admissions (2.9% vs 1.2%, P < .0001) were higher among migrants, with similar hospitalization duration (5.5 vs 4.0 days, P = .098) and mortality (3 [0.2%] vs 6 [0.4%], P = .510). Age ≥40 years, CD4 counts <200 cells/µL, ≥2 comorbidities, and incomplete/nonreception of the SARS-CoV-2 vaccine increased the risk of severe COVID-19 among migrants. Conclusions: MWH had lower rates of SARS-CoV-2 testing and vaccination coverage, although the rates of COVID-19 diagnosis were similar between migrants and non-migrants. Rates of COVID-19-associated hospitalizations and ICU admissions were higher among migrants in comparison with non-migrants, with similar hospitalization duration and mortality. These findings can inform policies to address disparities in future pandemic responses for MWH.

Impact of tenofovir on SARS-CoV-2 infection and severe outcomes among people living with HIV: a propensity score-matched study.

BACKGROUND: Reports on the impact of some antiretrovirals against SARS-CoV-2 infection and disease severity are conflicting. OBJECTIVES: We evaluated the effect of tenofovir as either tenofovir alafenamide/emtricitabine (TAF/FTC) or tenofovir disoproxil fumarate/emtricitabine (TDF/FTC) against SARS-CoV-2 infection and associated clinical outcomes among people living with HIV (PLWH). METHODS: We conducted a propensity score-matched analysis in the prospective PISCIS cohort of PLWH (n = 14 978) in Catalonia, Spain. We used adjusted Cox regression models to assess the association between tenofovir and SARS-CoV-2 outcomes. RESULTS: After propensity score-matching, SARS-CoV-2 diagnosis rates were similar in TAF/FTC versus ABC/3TC recipients (11.6% versus 12.5%, P = 0.256); lower among TDF/FTC versus ABC/3TC recipients (9.6% versus 12.8%, P = 0.021); and lower among TDF/FTC versus TAF/FTC recipients (9.6% versus 12.1%, P = 0.012). In well-adjusted logistic regression models, TAF/FTC was no longer associated with reduced SARS-CoV-2 diagnosis [adjusted odds ratio (aOR) 0.90; 95% confidence interval (CI), 0.78-1.04] or hospitalization (aOR 0.93; 95% CI, 0.60-1.43). When compared with ABC/3TC, TDF/FTC was not associated with reduced SARS-CoV-2 diagnosis (aOR 0.79; 95% CI, 0.60-1.04) or hospitalization (aOR 0.51; 95% CI, 0.15-1.70). TDF/FTC was not associated with reduced SARS-CoV-2 diagnosis (aOR 0.79; 95% CI, 0.60-1.04) or associated hospitalization (aOR 0.33; 95% CI, 0.10-1.07) compared with TAF/FTC. CONCLUSIONS: TAF/FTC or TDF/FTC were not associated with reduced SARS-CoV-2 diagnosis rates or associated hospitalizations among PLWH. TDF/FTC users had baseline characteristics intrinsically associated with more benign SARS-CoV-2 infection outcomes. Tenofovir exposure should not modify any preventive or therapeutic SARS-CoV-2 infection management.

[Barriers to ART initiation in HIV infected subjects and with treatment indication in Spain. Why don't they start their treatment? Bridgap Study]. / Barreras para el inicio del tratamiento antirretroviral en pacientes con virus de la inmunodeficiencia humana e indicación de tratamiento en España. ¿Por qué no inician tratamiento quienes lo tienen indicado? Estudio Bridgap.

INTRODUCTION: In Spain, HIV treatment guidelines are well known and generally followed. However, in some patients there are no plans to initiate ART despite having treatment indications. The current barriers to ART initiation are presented. METHODS: A cross-sectional survey including every HIV infected patient in care in 19 hospitals across Spain in 2012, with ≥1 indication to start ART according to 2011 national treatment guidelines, who had not been scheduled for ART initiation. Reasons for deferring treatment were categorized as follows (non-exclusive categories): a) The physician thinks the indication is not absolute and prefers to defer it; b) The patient does not want to start it; c) The physician thinks ART must be started, but there is some limitation to starting it, and d) The patient has undetectable viral load in absence of ART. RESULTS: A total of 256 patients, out of 784 originally planned, were included. The large majority (84%) were male, median age 39 years, 57% MSM, 24% heterosexuals, and 16% IDUs. Median time since HIV diagnosis was 3 years, median CD4 count, 501 cells/mm3, median viral load 4.4 log copies/ml. Main ART indications were: CD4 count <500 cells/mm(3), 48%; having an uninfected sexual partner, 28%, and hepatitis C coinfection, 23%. Barriers due to, the physician, 55%; the patient, 28%; other limitations, 23%; and undetectable viral load, 6%. CONCLUSIONS: The majority of subjects with ART indication were on it. The most frequent barriers among those who did not receive it were physician-related, suggesting that the relevance of the conditions that indicate ART may need reinforcing.

Efficacy, safety and pharmacokinetics of 900/100 mg of darunavir/ritonavir once daily in treatment-experienced patients.

OBJECTIVES: To evaluate the virological efficacy, safety, tolerability and pharmacokinetics of a regimen containing 900/100 mg of ritonavir-boosted darunavir once daily in patients with antiretroviral experience but no darunavir resistance. PATIENTS AND METHODS: An observational, prospective, multicentre study was conducted. Patients were included if 900/100 mg of darunavir/ritonavir once daily and at least one other active drug had been started due to virological failure, simplification or toxicity. Minimum follow-up was 24 weeks, or less if there was premature discontinuation of any drug or loss to follow-up. In a subgroup of patients, a complete 24 h pharmacokinetic study was performed by HPLC. RESULTS: One hundred and three patients (47 switch strategies, 56 early salvage therapies) were included. After 6 months, 85/103 (83%; 95% CI: 74%-89%) and 85/93 (91%; 95% CI: 84%-97%) patients had <50 copies/mL HIV-RNA by intention-to-treat and on-treatment analyses, respectively. The respective values were 42/47 (89%; 95% CI: 72%-96%) and 42/43 (98%; 95% CI: 88%-100%) in switch therapy, and 43/56 (77%; 95% CI: 64%-87%) and 43/50 (86%; 95% CI: 73%-94%) in salvage therapy. There was a significant increase in CD4 cell counts [+73 cells/mm(3) (95% CI: 43%-102%), P<0.001]. There were no interruptions due to rash or liver toxicity. Significant decreases in cholesterol and triglycerides were seen in patients with abnormal lipids at baseline. Ten patients discontinued antiretrovirals (5 were lost to follow-up and 5 due to side effects). Twenty-five patients were included in the pharmacokinetic study. All patients had trough plasma concentrations >0.05 µg/mL. CONCLUSIONS: Darunavir/ritonavir at 900/100 mg once daily is highly effective, safe and well tolerated in treatment-experienced patients with no darunavir resistance, both in early salvage and switch strategies. Adequate drug plasma levels were achieved in all patients.

Effect of nevirapine on the steady-state trough concentrations of atazanavir in HIV-infected patients receiving atazanavir/ritonavir.

MATERIAL AND METHODS: To evaluate the influence of nevirapine on atazanavir trough concentrations (Ctrough) in a group of HIV-infected patients, we performed an open-label pilot study enrolling patients receiving 300/100 mg atazanavir/ritonavir once daily for 2 weeks or longer. Nevirapine was added at a dose of 200 mg once daily from Days 0 to 14 and 200 mg twice daily from Days 14 to 28. Atazanavir and nevirapine plasma Ctroughs were determined at Days 0 and 28. Atazanavir Ctroughs were compared between Days 0 and 28. Atazanavir and nevirapine Ctroughs at Day 28 were compared with historical controls receiving either 400 mg atazanavir once daily or 200 mg nevirapine twice daily. RESULTS: Fourteen patients were enrolled and 11 completed the study. The geometric mean (range) atazanavir Ctrough decreased from 0.631 mg/L (range, 0.235-1.87 mg/L) at Day 0 to 0.316 mg/L (range, 0.142-1.109 mg/L) at Day 28 to give a geometric mean ratio of 0.59 (95% confidence interval, 0.38-0.80; P = 0.026); nonetheless, the atazanavir Ctrough remained higher than the minimum effective concentration in 80% of the participants and higher than the median concentration in the control subjects receiving 400 mg atazanavir once daily without ritonavir (geometric mean ratio, 3.20; 95% confidence interval, 1.65-6.22; P = 0.001). The nevirapine Ctrough at Day 28 was slightly higher than in the historical controls on 200 mg nevirapine twice daily without atazanavir (geometric mean ratio, 1.46; 95% confidence interval, 1.04-2.06; P = 0.030). CONCLUSION: We conclude that coadministration of 300/100 mg atazanavir/ritonavir once daily plus 200 mg nevirapine twice daily was safe and well tolerated but resulted in a decrease of atazanavir Ctrough by nearly half. Therefore, monitoring atazanavir Ctrough is recommended in patients treated with this drug combination, and increasing the atazanavir dose might be necessary.

Influence of HAART on the clinical course of HIV-1-infected patients with progressive multifocal leukoencephalopathy: results of an observational multicenter study.

BACKGROUND: The aim of this study was to analyze the incidence of new cases, survival of HIV-1-infected patients with progressive multifocal leukoencephalopathy (PML), and the characteristics of PML-associated immune reconstitution inflammatory syndrome (IRIS). METHODS: Multicenter observational cohort study of all HIV-1-infected patients newly diagnosed of PML in 7 hospitals in Barcelona (Spain) from 2002 to 2006. The annual incidence of PML was calculated. Survival was estimated using the Kaplan-Meier method. IRIS was defined as new onset or rapid worsening of PML shortly after initiation of highly active antiretroviral therapy together with a decline in HIV-1 viral load and rising of CD4 lymphocytes. RESULTS: Sixty-one new cases of PML were diagnosed. The mean survival time was 15 months [95% confidence interval (CI), 11 to 19]. The Kaplan-Meier estimates of the probability of survival were 47.7% (95% CI, 35 to 59) at 6 months, 38.6% (95% CI, 25 to 51) at 12 months, 35.1% (95% CI, 22 to 48) at 24 months, and 25.1% (95% CI, 10 to 40) at 36 months. IRIS was diagnosed in 14 (23%) cases. Mortality was similar in patients with and without IRIS. CONCLUSIONS: PML continues to be one of the deadliest opportunistic infections in acquired immunodeficiency syndrome patients. The development of PML-associated IRIS has no influence on prognosis.

[Efficacy and safety of a reduced-dose of stavudine in HIV-infected patients under immunological and virological stable conditions]. / Impacto de la reducción de dosis de estavudina en su perfil de eficacia/seguridad en pacientes con infección por el virus de la inmunodeficiencia humana inmunológica y virológicamente estables.

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVE: Stavudine (d4T) has shown a favourable short and long-term tolerability profile. Nevertheless, its usage is currently decreasing due to some safety concerns. We aimed to evaluate the efficacy and safety of d4T low-dose-based regimens. PATIENTS AND METHOD: This was a multicenter and retrospective review chart of patients receiving standard doses of d4T for > or = 6 months (weight > 60 kg: 40 mg/12 h; weight < 60 kg: 30 mg/12 h) and having undetectable viral load for at least 3 months before the d4T dose reduction (weight > 60 kg: 30 mg/12 h; weight < 60 kg: 20 mg/12 h). Immunological and viral parametres, lipid profile and side effects were determined. RESULTS: A total of 982 patients were included. The main reason for reducing the dose was prevention of toxicity (76%). After 6 months of follow-up, 97% and 84% patients had less than 400 and 50 cp/ml, respectively, and the CD4 cell count increased by 38 cel/ml. Lipids, lipodystrophy and peripheral polineuropathy improved but there was no statistical significance. CONCLUSIONS: A d4T dose reduction in an immuno-virologically stable population does not affect treatment efficacy. Longer follow-ups are required to confirm improvements in the safety profile.