The impact of the two-year COVID-19 pandemic on hospital admission and readmissions of children and adolescents because of mental health problems.

Purpose: This study aimed to investigate the specific risk factors and psycho-social and clinical features of hospitalized neuropsychiatric patients during the COVID pandemic and to analyze the hospital readmission phenomenon, which, according to recent studies, increased in frequency during the first pandemic period. Patients and methods: This observational retrospective cohort study examined 375 patients aged between 0 and 17 years who were hospitalized between 1 February 2018 and 31 March 2022 due to neuropsychiatric issues. The majority of the patients were girls: there were 265 girls compared to 110 boys (M = 13.9 years; SD 2.30 years). The total sample was divided into two groups: the pre-COVID-19 group (160 inpatients hospitalized between February 2018 and February 2020) and the COVID-19 group (215 inpatients hospitalized between March 2020 and March 2022). To explore the readmission phenomenon (second aim), we selected from the two groups of patients with at least one hospital readmission within 365 days after the first discharge. Multiple variables (sociodemographic, clinical, psychological, and related to hospitalization) were collected for each patient by reviewing their medical records. Results: The risk factors for mental health disorders were similar between the two groups, except for the significantly increased use of electronic devices in the COVID-19 group, increasing from 8.8% in the pre-COVID-19 group to 29.2% in the COVID-19 group. Patients suffering from eating disorders increased from 11.3% in the pre-COVID-19 group to 23.8% in the COVID-19 group. Hospital readmissions nearly increased from 16.7% in the 2-year pre-COVID-19 period to 26.2% in the 2-year COVID-19 period. A total of 75% of patients hospitalized three or more times in the last 2 years and 85.7% of the so-called "revolving door" patients (with relapse within 3 months after discharge) were identified in the COVID-19 group. However, the comparison between the two groups of patients readmitted before and during the COVID-19 pandemic did not show any differences in terms of sociodemographic and clinical characteristics. Conclusion: In conclusion, there was a significant increase in hospital readmissions, but these results suggest the need for better coordination between hospital and territorial services in managing the complexity of mental health problems related to situations arising from the COVID-19 pandemic and the necessity to implement prevention strategies and services.

Children with Psychopathology and Their Parents Facing the Covid-19 Pandemic: A Case-Control Study.

OBJECTIVE: This case-control study aimed to explore the effects of the COVID-19 outbreak on the mental well-being of pediatric psychiatric outpatients and their families, comparing them with children/adolescents and their parents from the general population. METHOD: The case group consisted of 168 subjects: 56 patients (6-18 years old) with psychiatric disorders, and their 112 parents. The healthy control group included 189 subjects: 63 children and adolescents with no psychopathologies, and their 126 parents. Both groups were assessed during the first COVID-19 lockdown in Italy (T0) and 4 months later (T1), by administering the CBCL6-18 and DASS-21. RESULTS: Patients showed a good adaptation to the pandemic situation, while the children/adolescents in the healthy sample showed a greater variation in their general habits and a higher prevalence of stress symptoms during the lockdown. The patients' parents likewise had fewer stress-related symptoms than caregivers in the healthy control group, both during the lockdown and 4 months later. At T0, patients' mothers reported higher anxiety levels than mothers in the healthy group, while at T1 fathers of healthy children scored higher on the DASS-21 anxiety and stress scales than patients' fathers. As concerns changes over time (T0-T1) in the parents' psychological well-being, a general improvement was detected in both groups. CONCLUSIONS: The pandemic and quarantine measures were confirmed as significant stressors for all children and adolescents, and negatively affected their parents' adaptation. The findings of this study point to the need for preventive interventions to support the mental health of all parents and their children in uncertain and stressful times.

Emozioni, comportamenti e relazioni: uno studio caso-controllo sul self-cutting in adolescenza.

Scopo. Lo scopo del presente studio caso-controllo è di approfondire i correlati psicopatologici e alcuni tratti psicologici come alessitimia e impulsività inerenti al self-cutting. È stato anche approfondito il tema dell'ideazione suicidaria nei soggetti con tale forma di autolesionismo. Metodi. Lo studio caso-controllo ha coinvolto 55 pazienti con self-cutting non suicidario, di età compresa tra i 12 e i 18 anni, e un gruppo di controllo composto da 277 adolescenti di età compresa tra i 13 e i 19 anni. La batteria testale utilizzata è stata composta da YSR 11-18 anni, CBCL 6-18 anni, SCL-90-R, TAS-20, CDI e BIS-11. Risultati. Dalle analisi effettuate sono emerse differenze statisticamente significative tra casi e controlli in relazione alla maggioranza delle scale psicopatologiche considerate. È risultata una differenza significativa tra i due gruppi anche in merito all'ideazione suicidaria. Infine, tra i self-cutter si sono evidenziate differenze significative di alcune variabili psico-relazionali (alessitimia e competenze sociale) in relazione alla frequenza di attuazione dell'atto autolesivo. Conclusioni. Il self-cutting correla con un'ampia varietà di quadri psichiatrici, senza presentare legami specifici con una particolare categoria psicopatologica. Gli elementi di alessitimia, impulsività e difficoltà relazionali degli adolescenti self-cutter dicono di come la programmazione di interventi di prevenzione primaria e secondaria dovrebbero mirare alla psico-educazione all'affettività, all'autocontrollo e ai social skill. Nello specifico, i nostri dati suggeriscono che la focalizzazione dell'intervento, in termini di lavoro sull'emotività piuttosto che sulla socializzazione, dovrebbe tener conto della frequenza degli agiti. Nella gestione clinica di questi pazienti non va esclusa a priori la possibilità di passaggio all'atto suicidario, con relative attenzioni anamnestico-cliniche da avere sia al momento della valutazione diagnostica sia lungo il follow-up della presa in carico.

[Parental Stress and psychopathological traits in children and adolescents. A controlled study]. / Stress genitoriale e psicopatologia in età evolutiva. Uno studio caso-controllo.

AIM: Since parental stress and family empowerment were shown to influence children's and adolescents' outcome, especially in the case of psychotherapeutic treatments, the present study aims to deeply explore factors that are likely to impact on stress and empowerment in parents of children with a psychiatric diagnosis. METHODS: Parenting stress and empowerment have been compared between 45 parents of children with a psychiatric disorder and 96 parents of children without psychiatric disorders. RESULTS: Parenting stress appeared to be higher in patients' parents and it varied according to disorder severity, while socio-demographic variables seemed to influence the stress levels only to a slight extent. Moreover parental stress and empowerment influenced each other within the parental couple. CONCLUSIONS: Developing interventions aimed to support parenting and to involve fathers in the parent-child relationship, focused on increasing parents empowerment and self-efficacy, could contribute to decrease stress and positively influence children's psychopathology.

Psychological and behavioral disease during developmental age: the importance of the alliance with parents.

The aim of the study is to analyze the clinician's alliance with parents during the diagnostic process in relation to therapeutic compliance and clinical evolution of individuals aged 0-11 years. The sample was formed by 84 individuals aged 0 to 11 years (18 < 6 years, 66 aged 6 to 11 years; 62 males and 22 females) who came to the Neuropsychiatric Unit for Children and Adolescents for a consultation regarding psychorelational and behavioral problems. Neuropsychiatric consultation took place in five diagnostic interviews with child and parents, separately. The last session was devoted to communication of psychiatric diagnosis (according to ICD 10) and therapeutic suggestions, if any. The clinician's relationship with parents and patients' participation were evaluated in terms of collaboration and quality of interaction, on the basis of pre-established criteria. Data about patients' therapeutic compliance and clinical outcome were collected during a follow-up visit eight months after the last session. Results suggest that the better the alliance between parents and clinician, the higher the therapeutic compliance and the likelihood of a positive outcome for patients. Our data suggest that good communication with parents benefits child patients, both in terms of response to the parents' need to report their children's worrying behavior and as a response to the discomfort expressed by children when they come in for consultation.