Clinical pharmacokinetics of antibacterials in cerebrospinal fluid.

In the past 20 years, an increased discrepancy between new available antibacterials and the emergence of multidrug-resistant strains has been observed. This condition concerns physicians involved in the treatment of central nervous system (CNS) infections, for which clinical and microbiological success depends on the rapid achievement of bactericidal concentrations. In order to accomplish this aim, the choice of drugs is based on their disposition toward the cerebrospinal fluid (CSF), which is influenced by the physicochemical characteristics of antibacterials. A reduced distribution into CSF has been documented for beta-lactams, especially cephalosporins and carbapenems, on the basis of their hydrophilic nature. However, they represent a cornerstone of the majority of combined therapeutic schemes for their ability to achieve bactericidal concentrations, especially in the presence of inflamed meninges. The good tolerability of beta-lactams makes possible high daily dose intensities, which may be associated with increased probability of cure. Furthermore, the adoption of continuous infusion seems to be a fruitful option. Fluoroquinolones, namely moxifloxacin, and antituberculosis drugs, together with the agents such as linezolid, reach the highest CSF/plasma concentration ratio, which is greater than 0.8, and for most of these drugs it is near 1. For all drugs that are currently used for the treatment of CNS infections, the evaluation of pharmacokinetic/pharmacodynamic parameters, on the basis of dosing regimens and their time-dependent or concentration-dependent pattern of bacterial killing, remains an important aspect of clinical investigation and medical practice.

Time-dependent pharmacokinetics of 5-fluorouracil and association with treatment tolerability in the adjuvant setting of colorectal cancer.

The authors evaluated the influence of 5-fluorouracil (5-FU) on treatment tolerability in 81 colorectal cancer patients given adjuvant 5-FU intravenously plus folinic acid for 6 cycles. The pharmacokinetics of 5-FU and its inactive metabolite 5-fluoro-5,6-dihydrouracil (5-FDHU) were measured on days 1 and 5 of the first chemotherapy cycle, 5 and 45 minutes after bolus administration. 5-FU clearance was significantly lower on day 5 (62.64 ± 20.16 L/h/m(2)) than on day 1 (74.83 ± 31.61 L/h/m(2)). The lower 5-FU clearance values also predicted the side effects during the entire course of chemotherapy. In particular, patients with low clearance values on day 1 had a further reduction in this parameter on day 5, associated with severe toxicities. In conclusion, 5-FU alters its clearance, which could be partly due to a reduction in 5-FDHU biotransformation. These findings have safety implications for poor metabolizers whose drug clearance may fall below the threshold during repeated treatment cycles.

Synergistic cytotoxicity, inhibition of signal transduction pathways and pharmacogenetics of sorafenib and gemcitabine in human NSCLC cell lines.

INTRODUCTION: Lung cancer is one of the most lethal tumors and, although standard chemotherapy produces clinical response, there has been little improvement in prognosis. Therefore, research effort has focused on target-specific agents, such as sorafenib, which blocks both the RAF/MEK/ERK signalling pathways and receptors involved in neovascularization and tumor progression, including VEGFR-2 and c-Kit. We investigated whether sorafenib would be synergistic with gemcitabine against NSCLC cell lines. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Human lung cancer cells A549, CALU-1, CALU-6, H23 and HCC 827 were treated with sorafenib and gemcitabine, alone or in combination, and the cytotoxicity was assessed with CellTiter 96 Non-radioactive cell proliferation kit. Cell cycle and apoptosis were investigated with flow cytometry and fluorescence microscopy, respectively. Moreover, the effects of drugs on Akt (S473), c-Kit (Y823) and ERK (pTpY185/187) phosphorylation were studied with ELISA. Finally, quantitative PCR analysis was performed to assess whether sorafenib and gemcitabine modulated the expression of genes related to drug activity. RESULTS: Gemcitabine and sorafenib synergistically interacted on the inhibition of cell proliferation, and assessment of apoptosis demonstrated that drug associations increased the apoptotic index. Sorafenib reduced c-Kit and ERK activation and gemcitabine inhibited Akt phosphorylation. Moreover quantitative PCR showed that sorafenib modulated the expression of targets related to gemcitabine activity, while gemcitabine induced the expression of RKIP. CONCLUSIONS: These data demonstrate that sorafenib and gemcitabine synergistically interact against NSCLC cells, through suppression of Akt, c-Kit and ERK phosphorylation, induction of apoptosis and modulation of dCK, RRM1, RRM2 and RKIP gene expression. The association between traditional cytotoxic agents with new target-specific agents, such as sorafenib, is a challenge for both clinical and preclinical future investigations in lung cancer treatments.

Linezolid in the central nervous system: comparison between cerebrospinal fluid and plasma pharmacokinetics.

BACKGROUND: Linezolid is effective against methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus, which may cause central nervous system (CNS) infections, but drug concentrations in plasma are characterized by a large inter-patient variability. Therefore, the present study was aimed at evaluating linezolid pharmacokinetics in plasma and cerebrospinal fluid (CSF) in 7 patients with external ventricular drainage, who received linezolid 600 mg twice daily as 1-h intravenous infusion to prevent CNS infections. METHODS: Plasma and CSF linezolid concentrations were measured by high-performance liquid chromatography (HPLC) after the 1(st) and 5(th) dose, and pharmacokinetics were evaluated by non-compartmental analysis. RESULTS: Values of the CSF area under the time/concentration curve (AUC) (range 18.2-85.5 and 19.6-160.5 h × mg/l at the 1st and 5th dose, respectively) were lower than those calculated in plasma (range 27.6-224.0 and 27.5-166.1 h × mg/l, respectively). For minimum inhibitory concentration (MIC) = 1 mg/l, CSF AUC/MIC values were nearly equal to or greater than 100 only in 2 subjects after the 1st and 5th dose, whereas mean time above the MIC (T > MIC) values were higher than 75% in only 3 patients. Similar results were obtained when pharmacokinetic/pharmacodynamic parameters were evaluated in plasma. CONCLUSION: The present results suggest that changes in linezolid doses and measurement of drug concentrations should be considered as useful strategies to optimize treatment in some patients.

Irinotecan synergistically enhances the antiproliferative and proapoptotic effects of axitinib in vitro and improves its anticancer activity in vivo.

AIMS: To demonstrate the synergistic antiproliferative and proapoptotic activity of irinotecan and axitinib in vitro and the improvement of the in vivo effects on angiogenesis and pancreatic cancer. METHODS: Proliferation and apoptotic assays were performed on human dermal microvascular endothelial cells and pancreas cancer (MIAPaCa-2, Capan-1) cell lines exposed to SN-38, the active metabolite of irinotecan, axitinib, or their simultaneous combination for 72 hours. ERK1/2 and Akt phosphorylation, the vascular endothelial growth factor (VEGF), VEGF receptor-2, and thrombospondin-1 (TSP-1) concentration were measured by ELISAs. ATP7A and ABCG2 gene expression was performed with real-time polymerase chain reaction and SN-38 intracellular concentrations were measured by high-performance liquid chromatography. Capan-1 xenografts in nude mice were treated with irinotecan and axitinib alone or in simultaneous combination. RESULTS: A strong synergistic effect on antiproliferative and proapoptotic activity was found with the axitinib/SN-38 combination on endothelial and cancer cells. ERK1/2 and Akt phosphorylation were significantly inhibited by lower concentrations of the combined drugs in all the cell lines. Axitinib and SN-38 combined treatment greatly inhibited the expression of the ATP7A and ABCG2 genes in endothelial and cancer cells, increasing the SN-38 intracellular concentration. Moreover, TSP-1 secretion was increased in cells treated with both drugs, whereas VEGFR-2 levels significantly decreased. In vivo administration of the simultaneous combination determined an almost complete regression of tumors and tumor neovascularization. CONCLUSIONS: In vitro results show the highly synergistic properties of simultaneous combination of irinotecan and axitinib on endothelial and pancreas cancer cells, suggesting a possible translation of this schedule into the clinics.

Differential recruitment of high affinity A1 and A2A adenosine receptors in the control of colonic neuromuscular function in experimental colitis.

This study investigated the expression of A(1) and A(2A) receptors in the rat colonic neuromuscular compartment, and characterized their roles in the control of motility during inflammation. Colitis was induced by 2,4-dinitrobenzenesulfonic acid. A(1), A(2A) receptors, and ecto-5'-nucleotidase (CD73, adenosine producing enzyme) mRNA expression was examined by RT-PCR. The effects of DPCPX (A(1) receptor antagonist), CCPA (A(1) receptor agonist), 4-(2-[7-amino-2-(2-furyl)[1,2,4]triazolo[2,3-a][1,3,5]triazin-5-ylamino]ethyl)phenol (A(2A) receptor antagonist), 4-[2-[[6-amino-9-(N-ethyl-b-D-ribofuranuronamidosyl)-9H-purin-2-yl]amino]ethyl]benzenepropanoic acid hydrochloride (A(2A) receptor agonist), AOPCP (CD73 inhibitor) were tested on electrically or carbachol-evoked contractions in colonic longitudinal muscle preparations. In normal colon, RT-PCR revealed the presence of A(1) receptors, A(2A) receptors and CD73, and an increased expression of A(2A) receptors and CD73 was detected in inflamed tissues. In normal colon, DPCPX or 4-(2-[7-amino-2-(2-furyl)[1,2,4]triazolo[2,3-a][1,3,5]triazin-5-ylamino]ethyl)phenol enhanced electrically-induced contractions, while in inflamed preparations the effect of DPCPX no longer occurred. In normal colon, CCPA or 4-[2-[[6-amino-9-(N-ethyl-b-D-ribofuranuronamidosyl)-9H-purin-2-yl]amino]ethyl] benzenepropanoic acid hydrochloride decreased electrically-induced contractions. Under inflammation, 4-[2-[[6-amino-9-(N-ethyl-b-D-ribofuranuronamidosyl)-9H-purin-2-yl]amino]ethyl] benzenepropanoic acid hydrochloride reduced electrically evoked contractions with higher efficacy, while the inhibition by CCPA remained unchanged. A(1) and A(2A) receptor ligands did not affect carbachol-induced contractions. AOPCP enhanced electrically-induced contractions and prevented the contractile effects of 4-(2-[7-amino-2-(2-furyl)[1,2,4]triazolo[2,3-a][1,3,5]triazin-5-ylamino]ethyl)phenol, without interfering with DPCPX, both in normal and inflamed colons. These results indicate that, in normal colon, both A(1) and A(2A) receptors contribute to the inhibitory control of motor functions at neuronal level. Under bowel inflammation, A(1) receptor loses its modulating actions, while the recruitment of A(2A) receptor by CD73-dependent endogenous adenosine drives an enhanced inhibitory control of colonic neuromotility.

Esomeprazole-induced hyperchromograninemia in the absence of concomitant hypergastrinemia.

BACKGROUND: A 37-year-old female, who had a neuroendocrine pancreatic neoplasm, underwent duodeno-cephalo-pancreatectomy. In the 2 years following surgery, she had normal levels of serum chromogranin A (CgA), gastrin and other tumor markers. About 3 years after surgery, owing to the onset of reflux-like dyspeptic symptoms, the patient started treatment with the PPI esomeprazole. During PPI treatment, the patient's serum CgA level rose to more than three times the upper limit of normal, although her gastrin levels remained in the normal range. These findings were interpreted as being suggestive of neuroendocrine tumor relapse. INVESTIGATIONS: Thoraco-abdominal CT, In¹¹¹-octreotide total body scan, CT of sella turcica, Tc(99m)-sestamibi neck scan, mutational analysis of chromosome 11q13 (site of multiple endocrine neoplasia type 1 [MEN1] gene). Discontinuation of, and rechallenge with, esomeprazole. DIAGNOSIS: Esomeprazole-induced hyperchromograninemia in the absence of elevated levels of fasting serum gastrin. MANAGEMENT: Discontinuation of acid-suppressive treatment and continuation of oncologic follow-up.

Synergistic cytotoxicity and molecular interaction on drug targets of sorafenib and gemcitabine in human pancreas cancer cells.

BACKGROUND: Current treatments have a modest impact on survival of pancreatic cancer patients and this study investigates the interaction between sorafenib and gemcitabine and the molecular pharmacodynamics of this combination. METHODS: The pancreatic cancer cells were treated with sorafenib and gemcitabine, alone or in combination. The effects of treatments were evaluated on cell proliferation, cell cycle, apoptosis, phosphorylation of Akt, c-Kit, ERK and VEGFR2, and expression of genes related to drug activity. RESULTS: Gemcitabine and sorafenib synergistically interacted on the inhibition of cell proliferation, and assessment of apoptosis demonstrated that drug associations increased the apoptotic index. Sorafenib reduced c-Kit, ERK and VEGFR2 activation and on the other hand, gemcitabine inhibited Akt phosphorylation. Moreover, quantitative PCR showed that sorafenib modulated the expression of genes related to gemcitabine activity, while gemcitabine induced the expression of RKIP. CONCLUSION: These data demonstrate that gemcitabine and sorafenib combination displays a synergistic effect in pancreatic cancer cells.

Augmentation of clozapine with aripiprazole in severe psychotic bipolar and schizoaffective disorders: a pilot study.

AIM: To evaluate the efficacy and safety of the augmentation of clozapine with aripiprazole in patients with treatment-resistant schizoaffective and psychotic bipolar disorders in a retrospective manner. Pharmacodynamic and pharmacokinetic interactions between the two drugs were also investigated. PATIENTS: Three men and 4 women (median age 36 and 40 years, respectively) who had mean scores at BPRS and CGI-Severity of 59.1+/-12.0 and 5.4+/-0.5, respectively, were treated with clozapine (mean dose 292.9+/-220.7 mg/day). Patients received an adjunctive treatment with aripiprazole (mean dose 6.8 +/- 3.7 mg/day). Clozapine, norclozapine and aripiprazole plasma levels were measured by means of a high performance liquid chromatograpy with UV detection. RESULTS: Total scores at BPRS decreased significantly (from 59.1+/-12.0 to 51.1+/-15.6, p=0.007) after aripirazole augmentation. In particular, the factors "thought disorder" (from 10.4+/-4.4 to 9.0+/-4.5, p=.047) and "anergia" (from 10.0+/-2.7 to 8.0+/-2.4, p=.018) significantly improved. Concomitant administration of aripiprazole and clozapine did not result in an increase in side effects over the period of treatment. Dose-normalized plasma levels of both clozapine and norclozapine and the clozapine/norclozapine metabolic ratio in all patients did not vary as well. CONCLUSION: The augmentation of clozapine with aripirazole was safe and effective in severe psychotic schizoaffective and bipolar disorders which failed to respond to atypical antipsychotics. A possible pharmacokinetic interaction between clozapine and aripiprazole does not account for the improved clinical benefit obtained after aripiprazole augmentation.

Pharmacological issues of linezolid: an updated critical review.

Linezolid is the first oxazolidinone agent introduced into clinical practice for use against Gram-positive bacteria that are resistant to beta-lactams and glycopeptides, including methicillin (meticillin)-resistant Staphylococcus aureus (MRSA) and vancomycin-resistant enterococci (VRE). An optimal antibacterial effect is achieved when plasma drug concentrations are above the minimum inhibitory concentration (MIC) [T>MIC] for the entire length of treatment and the ratio between the area under the plasma concentration-time curve (AUC) and the MIC (AUC/MIC) is greater than 100, as is most commonly obtained with administration of the standard dosage of linezolid 600 mg twice daily. A wide tissue distribution, including the CNS and respiratory tract, nearly linear pharmacokinetics and good tolerability are additional characteristics of linezolid. However, variability in the drug pharmacokinetics associated with clinical conditions (e.g. sepsis, burn injuries, end-stage renal disease, cystic fibrosis), haemodialysis and/or young age may lower the T>MIC and the AUC/MIC ratio, thus impairing both antibacterial activity and prevention of mutants. In most cases, changes in the dosage or in the schedule of administration (e.g. an additional [third] daily dose) may improve the effectiveness of linezolid. It is worth noting that linezolid could affect its own metabolism as a result of protein synthesis inhibition in mitochondria, and this could lead to high plasma concentrations and an increased risk of non-negligible toxicities. The latter may be reported during long-term administration of linezolid or in the presence of some pathological conditions (e.g. renal disease or kidney transplantation) associated with high plasma drug concentrations. Therefore, treatment optimization should be considered a requirement for more effective and tolerable use of the drug, particularly in special populations.

Healthy volunteers and early phases of clinical experimentation.

The main goal of early phase trials is to gain knowledge about the clinical suitability of novel compounds, without pursuing specific therapeutic purposes. Healthy volunteers usually represent the ideal model for conducting phase I clinical trials, in order to investigate pharmacokinetics and pharmacodynamics as well as to document safety and tolerability without interference by concomitant pathological conditions. The increasing cost of novel drug development, in conjunction with ethical considerations, has fostered a new procedure for first-in-man trials, designated as "phase 0," which is conducted very early on a limited number of healthy volunteers who are exposed to low drug levels. The present review discusses issues concerning the enrollment of healthy volunteers in the early phase of drug development from different points of view, with some focus on the Italian experience. From the ethical standpoint, much discussion revolves around payments to healthy volunteers. Most authors agree that an adequate remuneration must be provided to healthy subjects, while avoiding coercion and excessive psychological pressure. Pending the lack of international and national guidelines, our center for clinical drug experimentation has implemented an operative procedure to estimate payments for healthy volunteers based on specific items, including restriction, time spent, discomfort, and risk. Other unresolved issues about the recruitment of healthy volunteers are represented by the lack of international consensus on the definition of healthy status and the need for guidelines about advertisement on clinical trials addressed to potential participants.

A rapid high-performance liquid chromatography method to measure linezolid and daptomycin concentrations in human plasma.

Daptomycin and linezolid, recently introduced to treat severe Gram-positive infections, are effective against multidrug-resistant Gram-positive microorganisms such as methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus, methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus epidermidis, and vancomycin-resistant Enterococci bacteria that are less sensitive or frankly resistant, including methicillin-resistant S. aureus. However, alteration of their plasma profile has been described in some patients and this may be associated with toxicities or selection of resistant strains. The measurement of plasma concentrations of both drugs may allow the identification of those subjects at major risk of adverse events. Therefore, a rapid and sensitive high-performance liquid chromatography method for the analysis of daptomycin and linezolid was developed and applied in clinical settings. Drugs were extracted from plasma by adding methanol and, after centrifugation, clear supernatants were injected into the high-performance liquid chromatography system. Isocratic elution (1.5 mL/min) was performed using a mobile phase consisting of ammonium phosphate buffer 40 mM, pH 4.0, acetonitrile (70:30, vol/vol) through a BDS C8 Hypersil stationary phase (250 x 4.6 mm, 5 mum); ultraviolet detection was used at 214 nm. Linezolid and daptomycin eluted within 20 minutes from the injection, and mean recoveries ranged between 95.4% and 112.1%, respectively. The method was linear (coefficient of linearity, 0.998-0.999) over the full range of concentrations assayed, from 0.78125 mg/L (limit of quantitation) to 100 mg/L for both drugs. The Sy.x values were equal to 0.25 +/- 0.10 and 0.29 +/- 0.18 mg/L for daptomycin and linezolid, respectively. Precision values were lower than 20% over the entire range of calibration standard, and accuracy was within the range of 80% to 120% for all concentrations. The present method proved to be sensitive and specific to measure daptomycin and linezolid plasma concentrations in patients affected by severe Gram-positive infections, allowing therapeutic drug monitoring in those patients at major risk of severe adverse events.

Targeting vascular endothelial growth factor pathway in first-line treatment of metastatic colorectal cancer: state-of-the-art and future perspectives in clinical and molecular selection of patients.

Targeting vascular endothelial growth factor (VEGF) pathway represents a successful strategy in the treatment of metastatic colorectal cancer (mCRC). Since the approval of the first antiangiogenic drug, the anti-VEGF monoclonal antibody bevacizumab, a number of other molecules have been tested in preliminary trials and are currently under investigation in phase III randomized studies. At present, no clinical tools are available to select patients more likely to benefit from VEGF pathway inhibitors nor to exclude those who are proner to suffer from specific adverse events, so that almost all mCRC patients are potentially candidate to receive an antiangiogenic-containing regimen. To overcome this substantial limit, a consistent aid is awaited by the identification of molecular tools of selection. Retrospective analyses and translational studies have been conducted and are currently ongoing to address this major question, investigating molecular, biological and genetic markers. This review aims at resuming the state-of-the-art about the role of VEGF pathway inhibitors in the treatment of mCRC and at focusing on the present knowledge about candidate biomarkers as predictors of activity and toxicity.

Emerging role of cyclooxygenase isoforms in the control of gastrointestinal neuromuscular functions.

Since the discovery of two cyclooxygenase isoforms (COX-1, COX-2), efforts have been made to characterize the roles played by these enzymes in the regulation of physiological functions, as well as to explore their involvement in the pathophysiology of inflammatory disorders. In the digestive tract, the majority of evidence has been obtained at mucosal level, where both isoforms regulate various functions, and contribute to the development of inflammatory and neoplastic disorders. The role of COX isoforms in the gut neuromuscular compartment, where their expression has been detected in different species, is still unclear. However, the characterization of actions exerted by COX-derived prostanoids on gut motility has been under investigation for many years, and it is becoming increasingly appreciated that these mediators subserve complex regulatory patterns of COX on digestive motility. More recently, several studies have strengthened the concept that both COX-1 and COX-2 are involved in the modulation of gastrointestinal neuromuscular activity under normal conditions, and that changes in their regulatory activities occur in the presence of various digestive disorders, including inflammatory bowel diseases and postoperative ileus. Despite a large body of preclinical evidence, studies aimed at translating these findings into clinically relevant applications are needed, in an attempt to identify novel therapeutic approaches for treatment of gut disorders associated with motility alterations. This review illustrates and discusses current knowledge of the roles played by COX pathways in the regulation of gastrointestinal neuromuscular functions, both under normal conditions and in the presence of gut disorders.

Periorbital necrotising fasciitis.

Necrotising fasciitis involving the periorbita is a devastating infection. Potential outcomes range from severe disfigurement, loss of the eye and even to death. Early recognition is critical, although its initially non-distinctive appearance frequently delays diagnosis and treatment. Herein, the authors have performed a systematic review of previously published cases including clinical features, diagnoses and differential diagnoses, pathological characteristics and management. Periorbital necrotising fasciitis is seen mainly in adults with a female predominance (54%); about one-half (47%) of the patients were previously healthy. The infection can follow local blunt trauma (17%), penetrating injuries (22%) and face surgery (11%), but in about one-third of cases (28%) no cause was identified. Non-specific erythema and localised painful swelling of the eyelids characterise the earliest manifestation of the disease, followed by formation of blisters and necrosis of the periorbital skin and subcutaneous tissues. The causative organism in periorbital infection was mainly ß-haemolytic Streptococcus alone (50%), occasionally in combination with Staphylococcus aureus (18%). The overall mortality rate was 14.42%. The main risk factor for mortality was the type of causative organism, since all reported cases of death were caused by ß-haemolytic Streptococcus alone or associated with other organisms. Unlike necrotising fasciitis affecting other body sites, there was not a strong correlation with age >50 years or the presence of associated chronic illness. Management of periorbital necrotising fasciitis is then based on early distinction of symptoms and signs and aggressive multidisciplinary treatment. Thus, the delay between initial debridement and initiating parenteral broad-spectrum antibiotic therapy should be considered the most critical factor influencing morbidity and mortality.

Expression of nucleoside transporters, deoxycitidine kinase, ribonucleotide reductase regulatory subunits, and gemcitabine catabolic enzymes in primary ovarian cancer.

PURPOSE: Gemcitabine (2',2'-difluorodeoxycytidine) (GEM) is one of the most actively investigated drugs in ovarian cancer. Many molecular mechanisms have been proposed to be involved in GEM sensitivity/resistance including the equilibrative nucleoside transporter-1 (hENT1), the concentrative nucleoside transporter-1 (hCNT1), and deoxycytidine kinase (dCK). The expression of the ribonucleotide reductase regulatory subunits M1 (RRM1) and M2 (RRM2), and the catabolic enzymes 5'nucleotidase (5'NT), and cytidine deaminase (CDA) play also an important role. The aim of the study is to investigate the potential clinical role of hENT1, hCNT1, dCK, RRM1, RRM2, CDA, and 5'NT in a single institutional series of 25 primary ovarian carcinomas. METHODS: The expression levels of the target genes were assayed by means of real-time quantitative PCR. The clinical role of the expression levels of each parameter was analyzed by Kaplan and Meier method and the Cox's proportional hazards model. RESULTS: hENT1, hCNT1, dCK, CDA, 5'NT, RRM1, and RRM2 gene expression was documented in all samples; undifferentiated and clear cell carcinoma exhibited higher levels of hENT1, dCK, 5'NT, and RRM1 compared to serous ovarian tumors. As of May 2009, the median follow-up was 32 months (range 10-80), and death of disease were observed in 17 cases (68.0%). A statistically significant direct association of RRM2 expression levels and the relative risk of death was observed (Chi (2) = 8.18, P = 0.0043). Moreover, cases with high RRM2 expression had a shorter OS (median OS = 19 months) than cases with low RRM2 levels (median OS = 36 months) (P = 0.0506). CONCLUSIONS: We first reported that the most relevant genes involved in gemcitabine metabolism are expressed in ovarian carcinoma, and might be associated with more aggressive histotypes. The assessment of the expression levels of RRM2 as marker of clinical outcome deserves further investigation in a larger series of ovarian cancer patients.

Cellular and molecular mechanisms for the synergistic cytotoxicity elicited by oxaliplatin and pemetrexed in colon cancer cell lines.

PURPOSE: Oxaliplatin effect in the treatment of colorectal cancer is improved upon combination with thymidylate synthase (TS) inhibitors. Pemetrexed is polyglutamated by the folylpolyglutamate synthase (FPGS) and blocks folate metabolism and DNA synthesis by inhibiting TS, dihydrofolate reductase (DHFR) and glycinamide ribonucleotide formyltransferase (GARFT). The present study evaluates the pharmacological interaction between oxaliplatin and pemetrexed in colorectal cancer cells. METHODS: Human HT29, WiDr, SW620 and LS174T cells were treated with oxaliplatin and pemetrexed. Drug interaction was studied using the combination index method, while cell cycle was investigated with flow cytometry. The effects of drugs on Akt phosphorylation and apoptosis were studied with ELISA and fluorescence microscopy, respectively. RT-PCR analysis was performed to assess whether drugs modulated the expression of pemetrexed targets and of genes involved in DNA repair (ERCC1 and ERCC2). Finally, platinum-DNA adduct levels were detected by ultra-sensitive multi-collector inductively coupled plasma mass spectrometry (ICP-MS). RESULTS: A dose-dependent inhibition of cell growth was observed after drug exposure, while a synergistic interaction was detected preferentially with sequential combinations. Oxaliplatin enhanced cellular population in the S-phase. Drug combinations increased apoptotic indices with respect to single agents, and both drugs inhibited Akt phosphorylation. RT-PCR analysis showed a correlation between the FPGS/(TS x DHFR x GARFT) ratio and pemetrexed sensitivity, as well as a downregulation of ERCC1, ERCC2, TS, DHFR and GARFT after drug exposure. In addition, pretreatment with pemetrexed resulted in an increase of oxaliplatin-DNA adducts. CONCLUSION: These data demonstrate that oxaliplatin and pemetrexed synergistically interact against colon cancer cells, through modulation of cell cycle, inhibition of Akt phosphorylation, induction of apoptosis and modulation of gene expression.

Safety concerns associated with the use of serotonin reuptake inhibitors and other serotonergic/noradrenergic antidepressants during pregnancy: a review.

BACKGROUND: There is ongoing debate about the safety of selective serotonin reuptake inhibitors (SSRIs) and other serotonergic/noradrenergic antidepressants when used during pregnancy. OBJECTIVE: This article reviews the available literature on the main safety concerns associated with the use of SSRIs and other serotonergic/noradrenergic antidepressants (serotonin-norepinephrine reuptake inhibitors, norepinephrine reuptake inhibitors, noradrenergic and specific serotonergic antidepressants) during pregnancy. METHODS: English-language reports of analytical and descriptive studies, including case reports, case series, and meta-analyses, were identified through searches of MEDLINE, EMBASE, and PsycINFO (1966-April 2009). The search terms were fluoxetine, paroxetine, sertraline, Citalopram, escitalopram, fluvoxamine, venlafaxine, mirtazapine, reboxetine, duloxetine, SSRI, SNRI, NaSSA, and NRI in association with depression, pregnancy, prenatal exposure, miscarriage, spontaneous abortion, malformation, in utero exposure, and neonatal complications. RESULTS: Paroxetine has been associated with significant risks of major malformation, particularly cardiac defects, when used during pregnancy. Significant associations between maternal exposure to SSRIs and both persistent pulmonary hypertension of the newborn and a self-limiting neonatal behavioral syndrome have been reported in a number of recent original studies and meta-analyses. Some studies have suggested a relationship between the use of SSRIs or other serotonergic/noradrenergic antidepressants and the occurrence of miscarriage, although these studies had methodologic limitations that affected the strength of the data. Evidence for a possible association between in utero exposure to SSRIs or other serotonergic/noradrenergic antidepressants and alterations in neurobehavioral development, bleeding, and QTc-interval prolongation is currently weak. CONCLUSION: The available evidence suggests that SSRIs and other serotonergic/noradrenergic antidepressants should be used with caution during pregnancy, with careful follow-up of infants exposed to these agents in utero.