Margin convergence vs. superior capsular reconstruction for massive irreparable rotator cuff tears: outcomes are equivalent unless there is preoperative pseudoparesis.

BACKGROUND: Margin convergence (MC) and superior capsular reconstruction (SCR) are common treatment options for irreparable rotator cuff tears in younger patients, although they differ in associated costs and operative times. The purpose of this study was to compare range of motion, patient-reported outcomes (PROs), and reoperation rates following MC and SCR. We hypothesized superior outcomes after SCR relative to MC regarding functional outcomes, subjective measures, and reoperation rates. METHODS: This was a multicenter retrospective review of 59 patients from 3 surgeons treating irreparable rotator cuff tears with either MC (n = 28) or SCR (n = 31) and minimum 1-year follow-up from 2014-2019. Visual analog scale (VAS) for pain, Subjective Shoulder Value (SSV), active forward flexion (FF), external rotation (ER), retear rate, and conversion rate to reverse shoulder arthroplasty were evaluated. t tests and χ2 tests were used for continuous and categorical variables, respectively (P < .05). RESULTS: Baseline demographics, range of motion, and magnetic resonance imaging findings were similar between groups. Average follow-up was 31.5 months and 17.8 months for the MC and SCR groups, respectively (P < .001). The MC and SCR groups had similar postoperative FF (151° ± 26° vs. 142° ± 38°; P = .325) and ER (48° ± 12° vs. 46° ± 11°; P = .284), with both groups not improving significantly from their preoperative baselines. However, both cohorts demonstrated significant improvements in VAS score (MC: 7.3 to 2.5; SCR: 6.4 to 1.0) and SSV (MC: 54% to 82%; SCR: 38% to 87%). There were no significant differences in postoperative VAS scores, SSV, and rates of retear or rates of conversion to arthroplasty between the MC and SCR groups. In patients with preoperative pseudoparesis (FF < 90°), SCR (n = 9) resulted in greater postoperative FF than MC (n = 5) (141° ± 38° vs. 67° ± 24°; P = .002). CONCLUSION: Both MC and SCR demonstrated excellent postoperative outcomes in the setting of massive irreparable rotator cuff tear, with significant improvements in PROs and no significant differences in range of motion. Specifically for patients with preoperative pseudoparesis, SCR was more effective in restoring forward elevation. Further long-term studies are needed to compare outcomes and establish appropriate indications.

The impact of the COVID-19 pandemic on frozen shoulder incidence rates and severity.

BACKGROUND: Although there is evidence that the COVID-19 pandemic had profound physiological and psychological effects, there is no research aimed at understanding if the pandemic has had an impact on the incidence or severity of frozen shoulder (FS). The aim of this study was to compare the incidence and severity of idiopathic FS before and during the pandemic. METHODS: A retrospective cohort study was performed to establish the incidence of FS during the pandemic, from March 2020 to January 2021 (pandemic study period), compared to the same time period 1 year earlier, before the pandemic (control group). All patients who were diagnosed with idiopathic FS were included. To assess the severity of the condition, visual analog scale (VAS) for pain score and Subjective Shoulder Value (SSV) on presentation were recorded and the patients were categorized into 5 different treatment groups (0 injections, 1 injection, 2 injections, 3 injections, or capsular release). As the pandemic and public health restrictions could have influenced the availability of appointments, the waiting time between referral and first appointment was calculated as a possible confounding factor. Statistical analysis was performed using the chi-square and Student t test for categorical and continuous variables, respectively. RESULTS: There were 847 new patient consultations during the pandemic study period; of these, 232 were for idiopathic FS. One year earlier, there were 898 initial consultations for a new shoulder problem; of these, 176 were for idiopathic FS. This represents a relative increase of 39.8% (P < .001) in the incidence of patients with FS. The mean SSV in the control group was 50% ± 20% vs. 45% ± 18% in the pandemic group-statistically significant (P = .013) but unlikely to be clinically significant. The VAS pain score was similar in both groups: mean 6 ± 2 and 7 ± 2, respectively (P = .06). There was no significant difference between the control and the pandemic group in the distribution of patients per treatment group (P = .94). The mean waiting time from referral to appointment was not significantly different between the control and the pandemic group: 58 ± 30 days vs. 55 ± 27 days (P = .30). CONCLUSION: During the COVID-19 pandemic, there was a significant increase in the incidence of patients with FS. No significant difference in severity was observed. Further research is needed to evaluate a causal relationship between the COVID-19 pandemic and FS.

One-stage revision anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction in cases with excessive tunnel osteolysis. Results of a new technique using impaction bone grafting.

BACKGROUND: This level IV study describes a new one-stage procedure for revision ACL reconstruction in cases with extreme tunnel widening. METHODS: Eight consecutively treated subjects requiring ACL revision and presenting with excessive tunnel widening (87.5% to 250% tunnel enlargement) were included in this study. The graft-tunnel mismatch was resolved in this one-stage revision procedure by the use of custom-made eight to 10 mm cylindrical shaped bone allografts in a press-fit construct with the ACL-graft in combination with the usual fixation devices for ACL-reconstruction. All subjects were evaluated pre-operatively and at a minimum follow-up of one year by the IKDC objective and subjective scores, KOOS, and Tegner activity scale. RESULTS: Mean improvement was 24.8 ±â€¯16.1 on the KOOS evaluation (P-value 0,006) and 38.1 ±â€¯16.8 on the IKDC subjective score (P-value 0,001). The objective IKDC scores improved significantly with an average of one grade (P-value 0,038). Anterior laxity as determined on the KT-1000 arthrometer improved with an average of 3.63 mm compared to the situation before primary reconstruction, and the Pivot-shift test was negative in all but one patient after the revision procedure while positive in all patients before primary reconstruction. CONCLUSION: This new surgical technique using eight to 10 mm allograft bone cylinders for the management of excessive tunnel enlargement at single stage revision ACL reconstruction delivers excellent results after minimum one year of follow-up. The results of this study have the potential to lower the threshold for one-stage surgery in ACL revision complicated by extreme tunnel widening.