Metalloproteinases and colorectal cancer. Correlation of gene expression and clinical-pathological parameters.

PURPOSE: To analyze gene and protein expression of metalloproteinases 1, 2, 9, 11 and 16 and their correlation with clinicopathological variables in colorectal adenocarcinoma. METHODS: A retrospective study of 114 patients with colorectal adenocarcinoma treated surgically in the period 2006 to 2008 in Hospital de Câncer de Barretos - Fundação Pio XII. The evaluation of gene expression was performed by RT-PCR, and protein by immunohistochemistry. The analysis of gene expression was classified as overexpressed genes and poorly expressed (fold change of approximately 2, p<0.05). The positivity of the markers in the immunohistochemical study was performed by semi-quantitative analysis. The tissue of TMA (Tissue Microarray) was done by two independent pathologists. RESULTS: The gene expression validated by immuno - histochemical was MMP-1(p= 0.00 and 1.57 fold change) and MMP - 2 (p= 0.01 and - 1.84 to fold change) when correlated with the histological types mucinous and adenocarcinoma NOS, MMP9 (p=0.01 and fold change of 1.13) and MMP-16 (p=0.03 and 1.61 fold change) when compared with the histological types villous and adenocarcinoma NOS, MMP - 11 statistically significant in relation to male (p = 0.04 and 1.65 fold change). CONCLUSIONS: The MMPs 1, 2, 9, 11 and 16 gene and protein expression with statistical significance in at least one of the clinicopathological variables studied. Thus, we conclude that these MMPs have potential as a prognostic factor in colorectal adenocarcinoma.

Genetic and Immunohistochemical Expression of Integrins ITGAV, ITGA6, and ITGA3 As Prognostic Factor for Colorectal Cancer: Models for Global and Disease-Free Survival.

OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the relationship between the expression profiles of 84 extracellular matrix (ECM) genes and the prognosis of patients with colorectal cancer (CRC). METHODS: This retrospective study included 114 patients with stage I-IV CRC who underwent primary tumour resection. Quantitative real-time PCR and immunohistochemistry assays were conducted using primary tumour samples. Kaplan-Meier survival curves were also generated to identify differences in global survival (GS) and disease-free survival (DFS) for the hypo- or hyperexpression status of each marker. The log-rank test was used to verify whether the differences were significant. Stepwise Cox regression models were also used to identify the risk factors associated with GS and DFS in a multivariate mode, and then were used to score the risk of death associated with each marker, either independently or in association. RESULTS: In the univariate analyses, significant differences in GS in relation to the expression profiles of ITGAV (p = 0.001), ITGA3 (p = 0.002), ITGA6 (p = 0.001), SPARC (p = 0.036), MMP9 (p = 0.034), and MMP16 (p = 0.038) were observed. For DFS, significant differences were observed in associated with ITGAV (p = 0.004) and ITGA3 (p = 0.001). However, only the ITGAV and ITGA6 gene markers for GS (hazard ratio (HR) = 3.209, 95% confidence interval (CI) = 1.412-7.293, p = 0.005 and HR = 3.105, 95% CI = 1.367-7.055, p = 0.007, respectively), and ITGA3 for DFS (HR = 3.806, 95% CI = 1.573-9.209, p = 0.003), remained in the final Cox regression models. A scoring system was developed to evaluate the risk of patient death based on the number of markers for the components of the final GS model. Scores of 0, 1, or 2 were associated with the following mean survival rates [CI]: 47.162 [44.613-49.711], 39.717 [35.471-43.964], 30.197 [24.030-36.327], respectively. CONCLUSIONS: Multivariate mathematical models demonstrated an association between hyperexpression of the ITGAV and ITGA6 integrins and GS, and also between the ITGA3 integrin and DFS, in patients with colorectal tumours. A risk scoring system based on detected hyperexpression of 0, 1, or 2 markers (e.g., ITGAV and/or ITGA6) was also found to accurately correlate with the GS curves generated for the present cohort.

Overexpression of the ITGAV gene is associated with progression and spread of colorectal cancer.

BACKGROUND/AIM: The interaction of neoplastic cells with the extracellular matrix is a critical event for the initiation of cancer invasion and metastasis. We evaluated the relationship between the expression of SPARC, ITGAV, THBS1 and VCAM-1 genes of extracellular matrix in the progression and dissemination of colorectal cancer (CRC). PATIENTS AND METHODS: Adult patients (N=114) underwent resection of CRC. Gene expression in CRC was determined by quantitative real-time polymerase chain reaction (PCR). Protein expression was analyzed by immunohistochemistry (IHC). Correlation with pathway-related molecules (p53, Bcl-2, Ki-67, EGFR and VEGF) was assessed. RESULTS: Tumors with perineural invasion showed overexpression (p=0.028) of the ITGAV gene with regard to cancers without perineural invasion and validation of the result through IHC expression of the corresponding proteins, was significant for the expression of ITGAV protein (p=0.001). CONCLUSION: The overexpression of ITGAV gene was associated with higher progression and spread of CRC via perineural invasion.

Expression profiling using a cDNA array and immunohistochemistry for the extracellular matrix genes FN-1, ITGA-3, ITGB-5, MMP-2, and MMP-9 in colorectal carcinoma progression and dissemination.

Colorectal cancer dissemination depends on extracellular matrix genes related to remodeling and degradation of the matrix structure. This investigation intended to evaluate the association between FN-1, ITGA-3, ITGB-5, MMP-2, and MMP-9 gene and protein expression levels in tumor tissue with clinical and histopathological neoplastic parameters of cancer dissemination. The expression associations between ECM molecules and selected epithelial markers EGFR, VEGF, Bcl2, P53, and KI-67 have also been examined in 114 patients with colorectal cancer who underwent primary tumor resection. Quantitative real-time PCR and immunohistochemistry tissue microarray methods were performed in samples from the primary tumors. The gene expression results showed that the ITGA-3 and ITGB-5 genes were overexpressed in tumors with lymph node and distant metastasis (III/IV-stage tumors compared with I/II tumors). The MMP-2 gene showed significant overexpression in mucinous type tumors, and MMP-9 was overexpressed in villous adenocarcinoma histologic type tumors. The ECM genes MMP9 and ITGA-3 have shown a significant expression correlation with EGFR epithelial marker. The overexpression of the matrix extracellular genes ITGA-3 and ITGB-5 is associated with advanced stage tumors, and the genes MMP-2 and MMP-9 are overexpressed in mucinous and villous adenocarcinoma type tumors, respectively. The epithelial marker EGFR overactivity has been shown to be associated with the ECM genes MMP-9 and ITGA-3 expression.

Relationship between the expression of the extracellular matrix genes SPARC, SPP1, FN1, ITGA5 and ITGAV and clinicopathological parameters of tumor progression and colorectal cancer dissemination.

OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the relationship between the expression of the extracellular matrix (ECM) genes SPARC, SPP1, FN1, ITGA5 and ITGAV and the histopathologic parameters of neoplastic progression and colorectal carcinoma (CRC) dissemination. METHODS: A retrospective study was conducted in 114 patients with stage I-IV CRC who underwent primary tumor resection. Quantitative real-time PCR and immunohistochemistry (IHC) assays were performed in samples obtained from the primary tumors. The correlation between the expression of these markers and the expression of p53, Bcl-2, Ki67, epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR) and vascular endothelial growth factor was assessed with the Spearman coefficient (r). RESULTS: The ITGAV gene was found to be significantly amplified in tumors with positive perineural invasion (p = 0.028). Expression of the SPARC, SPP1, FN1, ITGA5 and ITGAV genes did not correlate with TNM staging. A direct relationship between ITGAV and EGFR expression (r = 0.774; p < 0.001) was observed by IHC. CONCLUSIONS: ECM gene expression did not correlate with classical prognostic factors for CRC, but overexpression of the ITGAV gene and protein was correlated with an increased risk of perineural invasion. The relationship between ITGAV and EGFR expression suggests the possibility of crosstalk in this signal pathway.

Estudo da relação entre a imunoexpressão das proteínas caderina-E e DCC com o grau de diferenciação celular e o estadiamento TNM do adenocarcinoma colorretal / Study of the expression of E-cadherin and DCC proteins with cell differentiation degree and staging in colorectal adenocarcinoma

OBJETIVO: Avaliar a relação de duas proteínas que participam do mecanismo de adesão celular com o grau de diferenciação celular e os estadiamentos TNM (T: tumor, N: linfonodo, M: metástase) I e IV no câncer de cólon e reto. MÉTODOS: Foram estudados cem pacientes (54 homens e 46 mulheres) tratados por adenocarcinoma colorretal, estádios I (44) e IV (56). Os cortes histológicos do tecido tumoral foram examinados por técnica de imuno-histoquímica em relação à imunoexpressão das proteínas caderina-E e delect in colon cancer (DCC), sendo classificados como positivos quando se detectou a imunoexpressão dessas proteínas em 50 por cento ou mais das células tumorais. RESULTADOS: Para o TNM, imunoexpressão da caderina-E estádio I: positiva em 72,7 por cento e negativa em 35,7 por cento ; estádio IV: positiva em 64,3 por cento e negativa em 35,7 por cento. Proteína DCC: 43,2 por cento positiva e 56,8 por cento negativa no estádio I, e 50 por cento positiva e 50 por cento negativa no estádio IV. Em relação ao grau de diferenciação celular, imunoexpressão da caderina-E - GI: positiva em 70 por cento e negativa em 30 por cento; GII: positiva em 68,4 por cento e 31,6 por cento negativa; GIII: 63,6 por cento positiva e 36,4 por cento negativa. Imunoexpressão da DCC - GI: 40 por cento positiva e 60 por cento negativa; GII: 46,8 por cento positiva e 53,2 por cento negativa; GIII: 54,5 por cento positiva e 45,5 por cento negativa. Não houve diferença significativa entre os grupos. CONCLUSÃO: Os resultados dessa pesquisa permitem concluir que não há relação da imunoexpressão das proteínas caderina-E e DCC com o estadiamento TNM (I e IV) e o grau de diferenciação celular no carcinoma colorretal.

OBJECTIVE: Evaluate the relationship of two proteins, which take part in the same mechanism of cell adhesion, with the cell differentiation degree and TNM staging I and IV in colorectal cancer. METHODS: One-hundred patients (54 men and 46 women), who have received treatment for colorectal cancer, stages I (44) and IV (56), have been studied. Histological cuts of tumor tissue were examined by the immunohistochemical technique as to the expression of E-cadherin and delect in colon cancer (DCC) proteins, being classified as positive whenever it was detected immunoexpression of such proteins in 50 percent or more tumor cells. RESULTS: For TNM, E-cadherin immunoexpression for stage I: positive in 72.7 percent and negative in 35.7 percent; stage IV: positive in 64.3 percent and negative in 35.7 percent. For DCC protein: 43.2 percent positive and 56.8 percent negative in stage I, and 50 percent positive and 50 percent negative in stage IV. Regarding the cell differentiation degree, the immunoexpression of E-cadherin - GI: positive in 70 percent and negative in 30 percent; GII: positive in 68.4 percent and negative in 31.6 percent; GIII: positive in 63.6 percent and negative in 36.4 percent. The immunoexpression of DCC - GI: 40 percent positive and 60 percent negative; GII: 46.8 percent positive and 53.2 percent negative; GIII: 54.5 percent positive and 45.5 percent negative. There was no significant difference among groups. CONCLUSION: The results of this research make it possible to come to the conclusion that there is no relationship between the immunoexpression of E-cadherin and DCC proteins with TNM staging (I and IV) and cell differentiation degree in colorectal cancer.

Estudo da expressão da proteína caderina-E correlacionada com o grau de diferenciação celular e o estadiamento TNM do adenocarcinoma colorretal / Relationship study between the cadherin-E protein cell diferentiation and TNM staging

OBJETIVO: Avaliar a relação de uma proteína que participa do mecanismo de adesão celular com o grau de diferenciação celular e o estadiamento TNM I e IV no CCR. MÉTODOS: Foram estudados 100 pacientes (54 homens e 46 mulheres) tratados por CCR, estádio I - 44 pacientes, estádio IV - 56 pacientes. Os cortes histológicos do tecido tumoral foram examinados por técnica de imunohistoquímica em relação à expressão da proteína caderina-E. Os cortes histológicos foram classificados como positivos ou negativos pelo método semiquantitativo. RESULTADOS: Para o TNM, expressão da caderina-E estádio I: positiva em 72,7 por cento e negativa em 35,7 por cento ; estádio IV: positiva em 64,3 por cento e negativa em 35,7 por cento. Em relação ao grau de diferenciação celular, expressão da caderina-E; G I: positiva em 70 por cento e negativa em 30 por cento; G II: positiva em 68.4 por cento e 31,6 por cento negativa; G III: 63.6 por cento positiva e 36,4 por cento negativa.. Não houve diferença significativa entre os grupos. CONCLUSÃO: Os resultados dessa pesquisa permitem concluir que não há relação da expressão da proteína caderina-E com o estadiamento TNM (I e IV) e o grau de diferenciação celular no CCR.

OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the relationship of a protein that take part in the same mechanism of cell adhesion with the cell differentiation degree and TNM staging I and IV in CRA. METHODS: One-hundred patients (54 men and 46 women), who have received treatment for CRA, stage I - 44 patients and stage IV - 56 patients, have been studied. Histological cuts of tumor tissue were examined by the immunohistochemical technique as to the expression of E-cadherin proteins. Such histological cuts were classified as positive or negative through the semi-quantitative method. RESULTS: For TNM, the E-cadherin expression for stage I: positive in 72.7 percent and negative in 35.7 percent; stage IV: positive in 64.3 percent and negative in 35.7 percent. Regarding the cell differentiation degree, the expression of E-cadherin, GI: positive in 70 percent and negative in 30 percent; GII: positive in 68.4 percent and negative in 31.6 percent; GIII: positive in 63.6 percent and negative in 36.4 percent. There was no significant difference among the groups. CONCLUSION: The results of this research come to the conclusion that there is no relationship between the expression of E-cadherin protein with TNM staging (I and IV) and cell differentiation degree in CRA.