Comparison of lateral shuffle and side-step cutting in young recreational athletes.

This study compared three-dimensional (3-D) hip and knee kinematics and kinetics between lateral shuffle and side-step cutting movements to determine whether the simpler lateral shuffle movement can be used in place of cutting to assess knee injury risk. A total of 78 patients (52 female) and 34 controls (16 female) aged 8-19 years performed lateral shuffle and 45° side-step cutting movements. Hip and knee kinematics and kinetics between initial contact and peak knee flexion were calculated using the Plug-in-Gait model and compared between activities using Pearson's correlation and paired t-tests. Peak knee valgus angle correlated strongly (r=0.86, p<0.0001), while minimum (r=0.25, p=0.0001) and peak hip abduction (r=0.24, p=0.0003), and peak hip internal rotation (r=0.33, p<0.0001) correlated only weakly between the two activities. Peak external knee valgus moment (r=0.32, p<0.0001) and average external knee (r=0.42, p<0.0001) and hip (r=0.37, p<0.0001) flexion moments correlated weakly to moderately between activities. Subjects were more internally rotated (3.6°, p<0.0001) and less abducted (16.7° and 17.3° for minimum and maximum, p<0.0001) at the hip during cutting, with higher hip (0.12, p<0.0001) and lower knee (-0.02, p=0.0001) non-dimensional flexion moments. These results suggest that the lateral shuffle movement may be useful for evaluating knee valgus, particularly during initial visual assessment. However, the lateral shuffle may not be challenging enough to reveal poor neuromuscular control over hip ab/adduction and rotation, necessitating follow-up assessment of cutting, ideally using 3-D motion analysis.

Comparison of 2 Orthotic Approaches in Children With Cerebral Palsy.

PURPOSE: To compare dynamic ankle-foot orthoses (DAFOs) and adjustable dynamic response (ADR) ankle-foot orthoses (AFOs) in children with cerebral palsy. METHODS: A total of 10 children with cerebral palsy (4-12 years; 6 at Gross Motor Function Classification System level I, 4 at Gross Motor Function Classification System level III) and crouch and/or equinus gait wore DAFOs and ADR-AFOs, each for 4 weeks, in randomized order. Laboratory-based gait analysis, walking activity monitor, and parent-reported questionnaire outcomes were compared among braces and barefoot conditions. RESULTS: Children demonstrated better stride length (11-12 cm), hip extension (2°-4°), and swing-phase dorsiflexion (9°-17°) in both braces versus barefoot. Push-off power (0.3 W/kg) and knee extension (5°) were better in ADR-AFOs than in DAFOs. Parent satisfaction and walking activity (742 steps per day, 43 minutes per day) were higher for DAFOs. CONCLUSIONS: ADR-AFOs produce better knee extension and push-off power; DAFOs produce more normal ankle motion, greater parent satisfaction, and walking activity. Both braces provide improvements over barefoot.

Outcomes of lower extremity orthopedic surgery in ambulatory children with cerebral palsy with and without gait analysis: results of a randomized controlled trial.

This study examined the impact of gait analysis on surgical outcomes in ambulatory children with cerebral palsy (CP) through a randomized controlled trial. 156 children with CP (94 male; age 10.2 ± 3.7 years) underwent gait analysis and were randomized to two groups: Gait Report group (N = 83), where the referring surgeon received the patient's gait analysis report, and Control group (N = 73), where the surgeon did not receive the gait report. Outcomes were assessed pre- and 1.3 ± 0.5 years post-operatively. An intent-to-treat analysis compared outcomes between the two groups. Outcome measures included the Gillette Functional Activity Questionnaire (FAQ), Gait Deviation Index (GDI), oxygen cost, gross motor function measure, Child Health Questionnaire (CHQ), Pediatric Outcomes Data Collection Instrument (PODCI), and Pediatric Evaluation and Disability Inventory. The outcomes that differed significantly between groups were change in health from the CHQ, which was rated as much better for 56% (46/82) of children in the Gait Report group compared with 38% (28/73) in the Control group (p = 0.04), and upper extremity physical function from the PODCI. Gait outcomes (FAQ and GDI) improved more when over half of the recommendations for a patient were followed or the recommended extent of surgery (none, single, or multi-level) was done (p ≤ 0.04). On average, however, only 42% of the recommendations were followed in the Gait Report group, compared with 35% in the Control group (p = 0.23). This is much less than the >85% reported in previous studies and may account for the lack of differences between groups for some of the outcome measures.

Reliability and validity of visual assessments of gait using a modified physician rating scale for crouch and foot contact.

This study evaluates the visual assessment of gait using portions of the Physicians' Rating Scale (PRS). Thirty children with pathologic gait were evaluated "live" and using full- and slow-speed video. Interobserver reliability (weighted kappa) was 0.57 to 0.74 for foot contact, 0.69 to 0.71 for crouch, 0.30 to 0.40 for hip flexion, 0.57 to 0.65 for knee flexion, and 0.42 to 0.52 for dorsiflexion in stance. Intraobserver reliability (comparing the three conditions) was 0.50 to 0.78 for foot contact, 0.71 to 0.80 for crouch, 0.26 to 0.44 for hip flexion, 0.60 to 0.86 for knee flexion, and 0.39 to 0.61 for dorsiflexion. Observers were correct only 12% to 32% of the time when reporting less than 0 degrees of dorsiflexion and 0% to 29% of the time when reporting more than 20 degrees of hip flexion due to overestimation of hip flexion and underestimation of ankle dorsiflexion. These errors could lead some clinicians to presume the presence of contractures that do not actually exist. Visual assessment using the PRS does not appear to accurately measure what it is most commonly used to assess: ankle position in stance.