Complications of the Prone Transpsoas Lateral Lumbar Interbody Fusion for Degenerative Lumbar Spine Disease: A Multicenter Study.

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVES: The prone transpsoas (PTP) approach for lateral lumbar interbody fusion (LLIF) is a novel technique for degenerative lumbar spine disease. However, there is a paucity of information in the literature on the complications of this procedure, with all published data consisting of small samples. We aimed to report the intraoperative and postoperative complications of PTP in the largest study to date. METHODS: A retrospective electronic medical record review was conducted at 11 centers to identify consecutive patients who underwent LLIF through the PTP approach between January 1, 2021, and December 31, 2021. The following data were collected: intraoperative characteristics (operative time, estimated blood loss [EBL], intraoperative complications [anterior longitudinal ligament (ALL) rupture, cage subsidence, vascular and visceral injuries]), postoperative complications, and hospital stay. RESULTS: A total of 365 patients were included in the study. Among these patients, 2.2% had ALL rupture, 0.3% had cage subsidence, 0.3% had a vascular injury, 0.3% had a ureteric injury, and no other visceral injuries were reported. Mean operative time was 226.2 ± 147.9 minutes. Mean EBL was 138.4 ± 215.6 mL. Mean hospital stay was 2.7 ± 2.2 days. Postoperative complications included new sensory symptoms-8.2%, new lower extremity weakness-5.8%, wound infection-1.4%, cage subsidence-0.8%, psoas hematoma-0.5%, small bowel obstruction and ischemia-0.3%, and 90-day readmission-1.9%. CONCLUSION: In this multicenter case series, the PTP approach was well tolerated and associated with a satisfactory safety profile.

Radiographic alignment outcomes after the single-position prone transpsoas approach: a multi-institutional retrospective review of 363 cases.

OBJECTIVE: The aim of this paper was to evaluate the changes in radiographic spinopelvic parameters in a large cohort of patients undergoing the prone transpsoas approach to the lumbar spine. METHODS: A multicenter retrospective observational cohort study was performed for all patients who underwent lateral lumber interbody fusion via the single-position prone transpsoas (PTP) approach. Spinopelvic parameters from preoperative and first upright postoperative radiographs were collected, including lumbar lordosis (LL), pelvic incidence (PI), and pelvic tilt (PT). Functional indices (visual analog scale score), and patient-reported outcomes (Oswestry Disability Index) were also recorded from pre- and postoperative appointments. RESULTS: Of the 363 patients who successfully underwent the procedure, LL after fusion was 50.0° compared with 45.6° preoperatively (p < 0.001). The pelvic incidence-lumbar lordosis mismatch (PI-LL) was 10.5° preoperatively versus 2.9° postoperatively (p < 0.001). PT did not significantly change (0.2° ± 10.7°, p > 0.05). CONCLUSIONS: The PTP approach allows significant gain in lordotic augmentation, which was associated with good functional results at follow-up.

Porous Polyetheretherketone Interbody Cages for Anterior Cervical Discectomy and Fusion at 3 or More Levels: Clinical and Radiographic Outcomes.

BACKGROUND: Anterior cervical discectomy and fusion (ACDF) at 3 or more levels remains challenging, with reported high pseudarthrosis rates and implant-related complications. Porous surface polyetheretherketone (PEEK) interbody cages are newer implants for ACDF with limited data available for their use in ACDF procedures at 3 or more levels. The objective of this study was to assess the clinical and radiographic outcomes of porous PEEK devices for ACDF at 3 or more levels. STUDY DESIGN: Retrospective case series. METHODS: Consecutive patients who underwent primary ACDF for degenerative cervical disc disease at 3 or more levels with porous PEEK cages with anterior plate instrumentation were included. Clinical outcome scores, radiographic parameters, pseudarthrosis rates, and cage subsidence rates were assessed. Preoperative and postoperative clinical outcomes and radiographic measures were compared using paired t tests. RESULTS: A total of 33 patients with ACDF at 3 or more levels with porous PEEK cages were included, with minimum 1-year follow-up. Two patients had cage subsidence (6.1%), and 1 patient had pseudarthrosis (3.0%). There were significant postoperative increases in overall cervical lordosis, sagittal vertical axis, fusion segment lordosis, T1 slope, and disc height. Clinical outcomes showed significant improvement from the preoperative visit to the final postoperative follow-up. CONCLUSIONS: High rates of fusion (97.0%) were observed in this challenging patient cohort, which compares favorably with previously published rates of fusion in ACDF at 3 or more levels. CLINICAL RELEVANCE: The optimal management of cervical spinal pathology regarding approach, technique, and implants used is an active area of ongoing investigation. The high levels of radiographic and clinical success utilizing a relatively novel implant material in a high-risk surgical cohort reported here may influence surgical decision making.

Cost-Utility Analysis of Sacroiliac Joint Fusion in High-Risk Patients Undergoing Multi-Level Lumbar Fusion to the Sacrum.

Purpose: Multi-level lumbar fusion to the sacrum (MLF) can lead to increased stress and angular motion across the sacroiliac joint (SIJ), with an incidence of post-operative SIJ pain estimated at 26-32%. SIJ fusion (SIJF) can help obviate the need for revisions by reducing range of motion and screw stresses. We aimed to evaluate the cost-utility of MLF + SIJF compared to MLF alone among high-risk patients from a payer perspective, where high risk is defined as high body mass index and high pelvic incidence. Methods: A Markov process decision-analysis model was developed to evaluate cumulative 5-year costs, quality-adjusted life years (QALYs), and incremental cost-effectiveness ratio (ICER) of MLF + SIJF compared to MLF alone using published data; costs from Medicare claims data analyses and health state utility values (derived from EQ-5D) informed by three prospective, multicenter, clinical trials. The base case assumed a reduction in post-operative SIJ pain from 30% to 10% (relative risk reduction [RRR] of 67%). Costs and utilities were discounted 3% annually. The ICER is reported in 2020 US dollars. One-way, multi-way, and probabilistic sensitivity analyses were performed. Results: With an assumed 30% incidence of SIJ pain after MLF alone, stabilizing with SIJF was associated with an additional 5-year cost of $2421 and a gain of 0.14 QALYs, resulting in an ICER of $17,293 per QALY gained (similar to total knee arthroplasty and more favorable than open discectomy). ICERs were most sensitive to the RRR of post-operative SIJ pain conferred by SIJF, time horizon, and probability of successful treatment with MLF alone. At a willingness-to-pay threshold of $50,000/QALY gained, MLF + SIJF has a 97.7% probability of being cost-effective in the target patient population. Conclusion: Fusing the SIJ in high-risk patients undergoing MLF was cost-effective when the incidence of post-operative SIJ pain after MLF alone exceeds approximately 25%, providing value-based healthcare from a payer perspective.

Optimal timing of preoperative radiation for prophylaxis against heterotopic ossification. A rabbit hip model.

BACKGROUND: In a previous study, we developed a rabbit model of heterotopic ossification and demonstrated that 800 or 1200 cGy of radiation before an operation on the hip significantly decreased postoperative ectopic bone formation compared with that seen after the operation on the non-irradiated, contralateral hip. The purpose of this study was to determine the optimal preoperative timing of radiation prophylaxis against heterotopic ossification following hip surgery in this same experimental model. METHODS: Seventy-two hips in thirty-six New Zealand White rabbits were divided into four treatment groups corresponding to four preoperative points in time (four hours, twenty-four hours, seventy-two hours, and three weeks). The hips were irradiated with 1200 cGy at the different preoperative time points (eighteen hips at each time) to investigate the efficacy of the four preoperative radiation protocols. The rabbits then underwent bilateral hip surgery. They were killed and radiographs were made four months postoperatively. Heterotopic ossification was graded according to a modification of the scale of Brooker et al. The mean grade, the interobserver and intraobserver reliability, and the significance (p < 0.05) of the differences between the groups were evaluated. RESULTS: Radiation delivered at twenty-four hours preoperatively was significantly more effective for prophylaxis against heterotopic ossification than was radiation delivered at four hours or seventy-two hours preoperatively (p < 0.05), and the difference between the twenty-four-hour and three-week groups approached significance (p = 0.088). Furthermore, the twenty-four-hour group had a significantly lower percentage of hips with high-grade heterotopic ossification than did the four-hour (p = 0.02), seventy-two-hour (p = 0.002), and three-week (p = 0.03) groups. CONCLUSIONS: Preoperative irradiation to prevent heterotopic ossification optimally should be administered twenty-four hours before the operation. This latency period probably allows expression of radiation-induced sublethal mutations in the genetic code of pluripotential stem cells and precludes differentiation to osteoblastic cell lines.

The origin of osteoprogenitor cells responsible for heterotopic ossification following hip surgery: an animal model in the rabbit.

PURPOSE: To investigate the source of osteoprogenitor cells responsible for heterotopic ossification (HO) following total hip arthroplasty in an animal model. METHODS: New Zealand White (NZW) rabbits (n = 20) received a radiation treatment 24 h preoperatively to the hip joint of one hindquarter and to the femoral shaft of the contralateral side. Subjects underwent bilateral hip surgery 24 h after treatment. Subjects were euthanized and radiographed 4 months postoperatively. Heterotopic ossification was graded according to a modified Brooker scale. Mean grade, intra-observer reliability, and statistical significance (p < 0.05) were evaluated to compare the severity of heterotopic ossification between hindquarters treated with hip irradiation versus those treated with femoral shaft irradiation. RESULTS: The Fleiss Weighted Kappa Statistic indicated "almost perfect" (0.872) intra-rater reliability of radiographic heterotopic ossification grading. The average heterotopic ossification grade for the group receiving radiation to the hip was significantly greater than that for the group receiving radiation to the femoral shaft (2.575 versus 2.0, p < 0.02). CONCLUSION: Although both have some beneficial effect, our results demonstrate that irradiation of the femoral canal is significantly more effective than irradiation of the hip joint and abductor musculature for heterotopic ossification prophylaxis. This suggests that osteoprogenitor cells responsible for heterotopic ossification originate from both the hip abductors and the femoral canal, but the data provide indirect evidence that the femoral canal may be a more dominant source of these cells in the rabbit model.