Pattern Electroretinogram Parameters and their Associations with Optical Coherence Tomography in Glaucoma Suspects.

Aim: To investigate whether steady state pattern electroretinogram (ssPERG) could identify retinal ganglion cell (RGC) dysfunction, and to assess the relationship between ssPERG with optical coherence tomography (OCT) measurements in glaucoma suspects (GS). Materials and methods: This was a prospective cohort study of GS, identified based on suspicious optic disk appearance and glaucoma risk factors. Complete eye exam, Standard automated perimetry, OCT, and ssPERG were performed. Magnitude (Mag), Magnitude D (MagD), and MagD/Mag ratio were subsequently used in the correlation and linear regression analyses between ssPERG parameters and the RNFL, GCL/IPL, and macular thicknesses measurements. Results: Forty-nine eyes of 26 patients were included. Mag and MagD were significantly correlated with the superior, inferior, and average RNFL thicknesses (avRNFLT). All ssPERG parameters were significantly correlated with the average and minimum GCL/IPL thicknesses and the inner macular sector thicknesses. Mag and MagD significantly predicted the superior, inferior, and avRNFLT in the regression analysis. All ssPERG parameters were predictive of GCL/IPL thickness in all sectors as well as the average and minimum GCL/IPL thicknesses. All ssPERG parameters were predictive of all inner macular sector thicknesses and MagD was also predictive of some outer macular sector thicknesses as well. Conclusion: ssPERG has significant correlations with and is predictive of RNFL, GCL/IPL, and macular thicknesses in glaucoma suspects. Clinical significance: ssPERG may serve as a useful objective functional tool for identifying and following the progression of disease in glaucoma suspects. How to cite this article: Tirsi A, Wong A, Zhu D, et al. Pattern Electroretinogram Parameters and their Associations with Optical Coherence Tomography in Glaucoma Suspects. J Curr Glaucoma Pract 2022;16(2):96-104.

Pattern Electroretinogram Parameters Are Associated with Optic Nerve Morphology in Preperimetric Glaucoma after Adjusting for Disc Area.

PURPOSE: We examined the relationships between pattern electroretinogram and optical coherence tomography derived optic nerve head measurements, after controlling for disc area. METHODS: Thirty-two eyes from 20 subjects with preperimetric glaucoma underwent pattern electroretinogram and optical coherence tomography. Pattern electroretinogram parameters (Magnitude, MagnitudeD, and MagnitudeD/Magnitude ratio) and optic nerve head measurements (rim area, average cup to disc ratio, vertical cup to disc ratio, cup volume, retinal nerve fiber layer thickness sectors, and Bruch's membrane opening-minimum rim width thickness sectors) were analyzed after controlling for disc area. RESULTS: Magnitude and MagnitudeD were significantly associated with rim area (r ≥ 0.503, p ≤ 0.004). All pattern electroretinogram parameters significantly correlated with Bruch's membrane opening-minimum rim width sectors-temporal superior and nasal inferior (r = 0.400, p=0.039)-and retinal nerve fiber layer sectors-superior, nasal superior, and inferior (r ≥ 0.428, p ≤ 0.026). Magnitude and MagnitudeD explained an additional 26.8% and 25.2% of variance in rim area (B = 0.174 (95% CI: 0.065, 0.283), p=0.003, and B = 0.160 (95% CI: 0.056, 0.265), p=0.004), respectively. MagnitudeD and MagnitudeD/Magnitude ratio explained an additional 13.4% and 12.8% of the variance in Bruch's membrane opening-minimum rim width global (B = 38.921 [95% CI: 3.872, 73.970], p=0.031, and B = 129.024 (95% CI: 9.589, 248.460), p=0.035), respectively. All Bruch's membrane opening-minimum rim width sectors and retinal nerve fiber layer sectors (nasal superior, nasal inferior, and inferior) were significantly correlated with rim area (r ≥ 0.389, p ≤ 0.045). CONCLUSION: PERG abnormalities can predict rim area loss in preperimetric glaucoma after controlling for disc area. We recommend controlling for disc area to increase diagnostic accuracy in early glaucoma.

Sensitivity and specificity of short-duration transient visual evoked potentials (SD-tVEP) in discriminating normal from glaucomatous eyes.

PURPOSE: To evaluate the ability of the short-duration transient visual evoked potential (SD-tVEP) to discriminate between healthy eyes and eyes with early to advanced glaucomatous visual field loss. METHODS: We tested 30 eyes of 30 healthy controls and 45 eyes of 35 glaucoma patients. Normal eyes had 20/30 or better visual acuity and normal 24-2 Swedish interactive thresholding algorithm (SITA) Standard visual fields. Glaucoma was staged as mild (mean deviation, MD > -6.0 dB), moderate (MD between -6.0 and -12.0 dB), and severe (MD < -12.0 dB). There were 15 eyes in each group. SD-tVEPs were recorded using the Diopsys NOVA-LX System. Each eye was stimulated with a low (Lc) and a high (Hc) Michelson contrast checkerboard pattern. Each test resulted in an Lc and an Hc SD-tVEP response. Each response was evaluated for overall waveform quality, P100 latency, and P100 amplitude referenced to the N75. The sensitivity, specificity, negative predictor value (NPV), and positive predictor value (PPV) were calculated. RESULTS: Lc latency showed the highest accuracy for discrimination using receiver operating characteristic curves for high and low contrast parameters. The analysis for all subjects resulted in a 91.1% sensitivity, 93.3% specificity, 95.3% PPV, and an 87.5% NPV. Evaluating the mean Lc latency of the mild, moderate, and severe glaucoma patients against controls showed discrimination consistent with the glaucoma severity. CONCLUSIONS: Short-duration transient VEP objectively identified decreased visual function and discriminated between healthy and glaucomatous eyes, and also showed good differentiation between healthy eyes and those with early visual field loss. VEP may be useful for early diagnosis of glaucoma.

Short duration transient visual evoked potentials in glaucomatous eyes.

PURPOSE: To investigate the correlation between structural and functional damage in patients with asymmetric glaucoma using a newly developed short duration transient visual evoked potential (SD-tVEP) device. METHODS: Twenty-five patients with visual acuity ≥20/30 and asymmetric visual field (VF) loss [inter-eye difference in mean deviation index (MD) of at least 3 dB] were enrolled. Patients underwent optical coherence tomography (OCT) for macular thickness measurement, scanning laser polarimetry with variable corneal compensation for retinal nerve fiber layer measurement, and SD-tVEP (10% and 85% Michelson contrast, acquisition time of 20 s) in both eyes within 2 months. We correlated VF MD and structural test results with SD-tVEP P100 latency and Delta Amplitude (N75-P100). RESULTS: Using 10% contrast, there was a significant difference in SD-tVEP latency and amplitude between eyes with better and worse VF MD (P<0.001). MD correlated significantly with both SD-tVEP parameters (r>0.33, P≤0.01). When using 85% contrast, SD-tVEP amplitude differed between eyes (P=0.01) and MD values correlated significantly with amplitude results (r=0.32, P=0.01), but not with latency (P=0.46). In eyes with more advanced VF loss, there was a positive and significant correlation between SD-tVEP amplitude (85% contrast) and macular thickness on OCT (r=0.47, P=0.01), but not with retinal nerve fiber layer measured with polarimetry (P=0.26). CONCLUSIONS: In cases of asymmetric glaucoma, SD-tVEP results correlate significantly with the level of VF damage as measured by MD. In the eyes with more advanced VF loss, reduced SD-tVEP amplitude was associated with decreased macular thickness on OCT. These findings suggest that SD-tVEP may be a fast and objective method to assess or screen for functional damage in glaucomatous eyes.

Repeatability of short-duration transient visual evoked potentials in normal subjects.

To evaluate the within-session and inter-session repeatability of a new, short-duration transient visual evoked potential (SD-tVEP) device on normal individuals, we tested 30 normal subjects (20/20 visual acuity, normal 24-2 SITA Standard VF) with SD-tVEP. Ten of these subjects had their tests repeated within 1-2 months from the initial visit. Synchronized single-channel EEG was recorded using a modified Diopsys Enfant System (Diopsys, Inc., Pine Brook, New Jersey, USA). A checkerboard stimulus was modulated at two reversals per second. Two different contrasts of checkerboard reversal patterns were used: 85% Michelson contrast with a mean luminance of 66.25 cd/m(2) and 10% Michelson contrast with a mean luminance of 112 cd/m(2). Each test lasted 20 s. Both eyes, independently and together, were tested 10 times (5 times at each contrast level). The following information was identified from the filtered N75-P100-N135 complex: N75 amplitude, N75 latency, P100 amplitude, P100 latency, and Delta Amplitude (N75-P100). The median values for each eye's five SD-tVEP parameters were calculated and grouped into two data sets based on contrast level. Mean age was 27.3 +/- 5.2 years. For OD only, the median (95% confidence intervals) of Delta Amplitude (N75-P100) amplitudes at 10% and 85% contrast were 4.6 uV (4.1-5.9) and 7.1 uV (5.15-9.31). The median P100 latencies were 115.2 ms (112.0-117.7) and 104.0 ms (99.9-106.0). There was little within-session variability for any of these parameters. Intraclass correlation coefficients ranged between 0.64 and 0.98, and within subject coefficients of variation were 3-5% (P100 latency) and 15-30% (Delta Amplitude (N75-P100) amplitude). Bland-Altman plots showed good agreement between the first and fifth test sessions (85% contrast Delta Amplitude (N75-P100) delta amplitude, mean difference, 0.48 mV, 95% CI, -0.18-1.12; 85% contrast P100 latency delay, -0.82 ms, 95% CI, -3.12-1.46; 10% contrast Delta Amplitude (N75-P100) amplitude, 0.58 mV, 95% CI, -0.27-1.45; 10% contrast P100 latency delay, -2.05 mV, 95% CI, -5.12-1.01). The inter-eye correlation and agreement were significant for both SD-tVEP amplitude and P100 latency measurements. For the subset of eyes in which the inter-session repeatability was tested, the intraclass correlation coefficients ranged between 0.71 and 0.86 with good agreement shown on Bland-Altman plots. Short-duration transient VEP technology showed good within-session, inter-session repeatability, and good inter-eye correlation and agreement.

Extraction and modeling of the Oscillatory Potential: signal conditioning to obtain minimally corrupted Oscillatory Potentials.

A method of extracting a temporally bounded component of a composite signal has been developed which minimizes data corruption in signal processing. The composite signal is windowed in the time domain, padding signals are attached, and finally, the conditioned signal is filtered to extract the component of interest. The method has been utilized to extract the Oscillatory Potential (OP) from the Electroretinogram (ERG). ERGs can contain impulse like transients, including flash artifacts and a-b wave transition, which may not be related to the Oscillatory Potential. Such transients will stimulate a filter, yielding its natural (filter) response and thus distort the actual OP signal. To avoid this effect, time-domain windowing and signal conditioning is used to extract the OP from the ERG. The extraction and modeling approach is applied to ERGs obtained from patients with recent monocular central retinal vein occlusion (CRVO). Model parameters clearly differentiate affected from fellow eyes and show subtle differences between eyes with benign and complicated outcomes.