Characterization of Magnetic Resonance Thermal Imaging Signal Artifact During Magnetic Resonance Guided Laser-Induced Thermal Therapy.

BACKGROUND: Magnetic resonance-guided laser interstitial thermal therapy (MRgLITT) is a minimally invasive procedure that utilizes intraoperative magnetic resonance thermal imaging (MRTI) to generate a thermal damage estimate (TDE) of the ablative area. In select cases, the MRTI contains a signal artifact or defect that distorts the ablative region. No study has attempted to characterize this artifact. OBJECTIVE: To characterize MRTI signal the artifact in select cases to better understand its potential relevance and impact on the ablation procedure. METHODS: All ablations were performed using the Visualase magnetic resonance imaging-guided laser ablation system (Medtronic). Patients were included if the MRTI contained signal artifact that distorted the ablative region during the first thermal dose delivered. Ablation artifact was quantified using MATLAB version R2018a (Mathworks Inc, Natick, Massachusetts). RESULTS: A total of 116 patients undergoing MRgLITT for various surgical indications were examined. MRTI artifact was observed in 37.0% of cases overall. Incidence of artifact was greater at higher powers (P < .001) and with longer ablation times (P = .024), though artifact size did not correlate with laser power or ablation duration. CONCLUSION: MRTI signal artifact is common during LITT. Higher powers and longer ablation times result in greater incidence of ablation artifact, though artifact size is not correlated with power or duration. Future studies should aim to evaluate effects of artifact on postoperative imaging and, most notably, patient outcomes.

Effects of Intraoperative Magnetic Resonance Thermal Imaging Signal Artifact During Laser Interstitial Thermal Therapy on Thermal Damage Estimate and Postoperative Magnetic Resonance Imaging Ablative Area Concordance.

BACKGROUND: Magnetic resonance-guided laser interstitial thermal therapy (MRgLITT) is a minimally invasive procedure that utilizes intraoperative magnetic resonance thermal imaging (MRTI) to generate a thermal damage estimate (TDE) of the ablative area. In select cases, the MRTI contains a signal artifact or defect that distorts the ablative region. No study has considered the impact of this artifact on TDE accuracy. OBJECTIVE: To determine the effect of intraoperative MRTI signal artifact on postoperative magnetic resonance imaging (MRI)-predicted ablative area. METHODS: All ablations were performed using the Visualase MRI-Guided Laser Ablation System (Medtronic). Patients were grouped based on whether the intraoperative MRTI contained signal artifact that distorted the ablative region. Cross-sectional area of the ablative lesion from the MRI image was measured, and the difference between intraoperative TDE and postoperative MRI cross-sectional area was calculated and compared between groups with and without intraoperative MRTI artifact. RESULTS: A total of 91 patients undergoing MRgLITT for various surgical indications were examined. MRTI artifact was observed in 43.9% of cases overall. The mean absolute difference between TDE and the postoperative MRI cross-sectional area was 94.8 mm2 (SEM = 11.6) in the group with intraoperative MRTI artifact and 54.4 mm2 (SEM = 5.5) in the nonartifact group. CONCLUSION: MRTI signal artifact is common during LITT. The presence of signal artifact during intraoperative MRTI results in higher variation between intraoperative TDE and postoperative MRI cross-sectional ablative area. In cases in which intraoperative MRTI artifact is observed, there may be a larger degree of variation between observed intraoperative TDE and measured postoperative MRTI ablative area.

Understanding the Relationship Between Real-Time Thermal Imaging and Thermal Damage Estimate During Magnetic Resonance-Guided Laser Interstitial Thermal Therapy.

OBJECTIVE: Magnetic resonance-guided laser interstitial thermal therapy is a minimally invasive procedure that uses intraoperative magnetic resonance thermometry (MRT) to generate a thermal damage estimate (TDE) of the ablative area. This study aimed to compare areas produced by the MRT heat map with the system-generated TDE produced by Visualase software. METHODS: All ablations were performed using the Visualase laser ablation system. MRT heat map and TDE were quantified using MATLAB version R2014a. TDE was compared with the summed area of green, yellow, and red areas (heat map 63.9 [HM63.9]) and the summed area of light blue, green, yellow, and red areas (heat map 50.4 [HM50.4]) produced by the MRT heat map. RESULTS: Fifty-six patients undergoing magnetic resonance-guided laser interstitial thermal therapy were examined. Mean TDE produced was 236 mm2 (SEM = 9.5). Mean HM63.9 was 231 mm2 (SEM = 8.7), and mean HM50.4 was 370 mm2 (SEM = 12.8). There was no significant difference between TDE and HM63.9 (P = 0.51). There was a significant difference between TDE and HM50.4 (P < 0.001) and between HM63.9 and HM50.4 (P < 0.001). CONCLUSIONS: The system-generated TDE consistently remains contained within the boundaries of the MRT heat map. At standard factory settings, TDE and the area produced within the periphery of HM63.9 are similar in magnitude. The light blue portion of the MRT heat map may serve as an additional means of predicting when critical structures may be at risk during laser ablation if exposed to further thermal stress.