Mutational load distribution analysis yields metrics reflecting genetic instability during pancreatic carcinogenesis.

Considering carcinogenesis as a microevolutionary process, best described in the context of metapopulation dynamics, provides the basis for theoretical and empirical studies that indicate it is possible to estimate the relative contribution of genetic instability and selection to the process of tumor formation. We show that mutational load distribution analysis (MLDA) of DNA found in pancreatic fluids yields biometrics that reflect the interplay of instability, selection, accident, and gene function that determines the eventual emergence of a tumor. An in silico simulation of carcinogenesis indicates that MLDA may be a suitable tool for early detection of pancreatic cancer. We also present evidence indicating that, when performed serially in individuals harboring a p16 germ-line mutation bestowing a high risk for pancreatic cancer, MLDA may be an effective tool for the longitudinal assessment of risk and early detection of pancreatic cancer.

Characterization of a recurrent germ line mutation of the E-cadherin gene: implications for genetic testing and clinical management.

PURPOSE: To identify germ line CDH1 mutations in hereditary diffuse gastric cancer (HDGC) families and develop guidelines for management of at risk individuals. EXPERIMENTAL DESIGN: We ascertained 31 HDGC previously unreported families, including 10 isolated early-onset diffuse gastric cancer (DGC) cases. Screening for CDH1 germ line mutations was done by denaturing high-performance liquid chromatography and automated DNA sequencing. RESULTS: We identified eight inactivating and one missense CDH1 germ line mutation. The missense mutation conferred in vitro loss of protein function. Two families had the previously described 1003C>T nonsense mutation. Haplotype analysis revealed this to be a recurrent and not a founder mutation. Thirty-six percent (5 of 14) of the families with a documented DGC diagnosed before the age of 50 and other cases of gastric cancer carried CDH1 germ line mutations. Two of 10 isolated cases of DGC in individuals ages <35 years harbored CDH1 germ line mutations. One mutation positive family was ascertained through a family history of lobular breast cancer (LBC) and another through an individual with both DGC and LBC. Occult DGC was identified in five of six prophylactic gastrectomies done on asymptomatic, endoscopically negative 1003C>T mutation carriers. CONCLUSIONS: In addition to families with a strong history of early-onset DGC, CDH1 mutation screening should be offered to isolated cases of DGC in individuals ages <35 years and for families with multiple cases of LBC, with any history of DGC or unspecified GI malignancies. Prophylactic gastrectomy is potentially a lifesaving procedure and clinical breast screening is recommended for asymptomatic mutation carriers.

BRCA1 and pancreatic cancer: pedigree findings and their causal relationships.

Anecdotal reports and series studies indicate that 5-10% of pancreatic cancer (PC) cases are familial. In addition, PC is associated with a variety of hereditary cancer syndromes. PC appears to be an integral cancer in the hereditary breast-ovarian cancer (HBOC) syndrome, with most notice given to the role of BRCA2. Our purpose is to call attention to BRCA1, which also predisposes to PC. Using data from our familial breast cancer registry, we identified 19 BRCA1/2 families that contain PC affecteds in the pedigrees, 15 with BRCA1 mutations and 4 with BRCA2 mutations. The association between BRCA2 and pancreatic cancer is well established; however, a definite link with pancreatic cancer in families carrying a BRCA1 mutation has been far less studied. Thus, the focus of this report is on 9 of the 15 BRCA1 families, in which PC affecteds were either confirmed carriers of the BRCA1 mutation or were inferred as probable obligate BRCA1 mutation carriers. The numbers are small, but nevertheless illustrate the finding of others of an apparent association between PC and BRCA1-mutation-bearing families. Given the dismal prognosis of PC, with the only current hope for survival being through surgical extirpation of the pancreas prior to metastasis, it is prudent that we realize the potential predisposition toward PC via BRCA1, in the hope of early diagnosis and prevention.

Familial pancreatic carcinoma in Jews.

Pancreatic cancer (PC) is the most fatal of all gastrointestinal cancers, wherein its mortality compares strikingly with its incidence. Unfortunately, 80-90% of PCs are diagnosed in the nonresectable stage. While the lifetime risk of PC in developed countries is approximately 1-3%, it is the fifth most common cause of cancer deaths among both males and females in Western countries. It occurs in excess in Jews. Approximately 5-10% of PC shows familial clustering. Examination of such familial clusters must take into consideration cancers of diverse anatomic sites, such as malignant melanoma in the familial atypical multiple melanoma (FAMMM) syndrome due to the CDKN2A (p16) germline mutation, and combinations of colorectal and endometrial carcinoma, ovarian carcinoma, and several other cancers in hereditary nonpolyposis colorectal cancer (HNPCC), which are due to mismatch repair germline mutations, the most common of which are MSH2 and MLH1 . Other hereditary disorders predisposing to PC include Peutz-Jeghers syndrome, due to the STK11 mutation, familial pancreatitis due to the cationic trypsinogen gene, site-specific familial pancreatic cancer which may be due to the 4q32-34 mutation, hereditary breast-ovarian cancer (HBOC) syndrome that is due to BRCA2 and possibly some families with HBOC that is due to BRCA1 , familial adenomatous polyposis due to the ATP gene, and ataxia telangiectasia due to the ATM germline mutation. This extant heterogeneity mandates that the physician be knowledgeable about these PC-prone syndromes which play such an important role when considering the differential diagnosis of hereditary PC. Unfortunately, there are no PC screening programs with acceptable sensitivity and specificity. However, the gold standard for screening at this time is endoscopic ultrasound. Clearly, there is a great need for the development of novel screening approaches with acceptable sensitivity and specificity. Further research is needed to elucidate those etiologic factors that contribute to the apparent excess of PC in Ashkenazi Jews. Attention should also be given to the search for mutations predisposing to PC in Jews so that opportunities to learn more about the disease's pathogenesis, as well as screening and control, may take place.

Familial sarcoma: challenging pedigrees.

BACKGROUND: Partially due to the rare occurrence of soft tissue and osteogenic sarcomas in the general population, scant attention has been given to their hereditary etiology. Their overall poor prognosis might be ameliorated through an understanding of their environmental and hereditary causal factors, and/or their interactions, thereby contributing to earlier diagnosis and even the development of molecularly based targeted therapy. METHODS: The authors selected 10 sarcoma-prone families from their extensive hereditary cancer-prone family resource and focused on their challenging diagnostic, surveillance, and management features. The family study protocol included the compilation of a detailed family history of malignant disease of all anatomic sites and the collection of all available primary medical and pathology documents for verification. Genetic counseling was provided before DNA collection and at disclosure of results. RESULTS: These families displayed marked phenotypic and genotypic heterogeneity. In one of these families, 16 relatives had sarcomas, with 2 of the 16 each having 2 metachronous sarcomas; to our knowledge, this represents the greatest number of sarcomas reported in any family described to date. Two familial atypical multiple-mole melanoma syndrome kindreds with the CDKN2A mutation showed the association of sarcoma with malignant melanoma, whereas one family had several pancreatic carcinomas. Other families with sarcoma had hereditary nonpolyposis colorectal carcinoma with MSH2 mutation, hereditary breast carcinoma with BRCA1 mutation, and p53 mutation in a Li-Fraumeni syndrome. CONCLUSIONS: Sarcoma-prone families reported in the current study were selected carefully to depict clinicopathology and compliance features, the understanding of which could elucidate the etiologic role of genetic factors in concert with the phenotypic and genotypic heterogeneity encountered in such families. The lack of a population-based data set for these families posed a limitation.

Germline splicing mutations of CDKN2A predispose to melanoma.

Coding mutations of the CDKN2A gene on chromosome 9p21 cosegregate with 25-60% of familial melanoma cases, but there remains a number of 9p21-linked kindreds that lack germline coding mutations of CDKN2A. We sequenced CDKN2A exons 1alpha, 2, 3, and the adjacent intronic regions in 167 melanoma-prone families (at least two affected first-degree relatives), and detected four splice site variations, three of which cosegregate with the disease. RT-PCR experiments verified that these three variants, including an AGgt to ATgt mutation that demonstrates a founder effect, do affect splicing. While an exon 1alpha splice donor site mutation incompletely abolishes splicing, the correctly spliced mRNA yields a protein (Q50P) that cannot effectively interact with CDK4. We also performed RT-PCR on mRNA from 16 melanoma-prone kindreds to search for cryptic splice sites deep within introns, but identified no splice variants. Meanwhile, we screened 139 affected families using allele-specific PCR for the recently discovered IVS2-105A>G mutation, but found only one family that possesses this alteration. We conclude that splice site mutations do predispose to disease in a subset of melanoma-prone kindreds. Characterization of additional splice site variants and other noncoding alterations of CDKN2A should allow us to detect a wider range of mutations in at-risk patients.

Challenging pancreatic cancer-prone pedigrees: a nosologic dilemma.

OBJECTIVES: Our objective is to describe 11 pancreatic cancer (PC)-prone families, none of which are consonant with known hereditary cancer syndromes, in an attempt to portray familial aggregations of this disease that might be encountered in a clinical practice setting. METHODS: We selected 11 families containing two or more first- and/or second-degree relatives affected with PC from a registry of 200 PC-prone kindreds. Each proband and/or key relative(s) was interviewed and completed a detailed family history questionnaire (after providing informed consent) that allowed us to extend the pedigree as far as possible with retrieval of primary medical and pathology documents, whenever available. RESULTS: All of the 11 families show PC features that merit clinical attention and raise questions as to whether this familial clustering could be due to "chance" alone, exposure to certain common environmental factors, such as cigarette smoking, and/or polygenic, multifactorial, or Mendelian inherited factors. CONCLUSIONS: It is estimated that about 5% of PC may have a primary hereditary etiology. Because of early death, reduced penetrance, and often profuse phenotypic and genotypic heterogeneity, particularly with respect to variable age of onset and association with diverse patterns of cancer at different anatomic sites, the pedigrees require extension for ultimate diagnosis. Physician knowledge about PC's natural history and syndrome delineation should ultimately foster earlier diagnoses and possibly prevention of this disease. These high-risk patients may provide a source of DNA for formal linkage analysis in the search for culprit cancer-prone susceptibility loci.

Phenotypic variation in eight extended CDKN2A germline mutation familial atypical multiple mole melanoma-pancreatic carcinoma-prone families: the familial atypical mole melanoma-pancreatic carcinoma syndrome.

BACKGROUND: Hereditary pancreatic carcinoma shows extant phenotypic and genotypic heterogeneity as evidenced by its integral association with a variety of hereditary cancer syndromes inclusive of the familial atypical multiple mole melanoma (FAMMM) syndrome in concert with CDKN2A (p16) germline mutations. METHODS: Creighton University's familial pancreatic carcinoma resource comprises 159 families of which 19 (12%) show the FAMMM cutaneous phenotypes. The authors describe eight families with the FAMMM-pancreatic carcinoma (FAMMM-PC) association in concert with a CDKN2A germline mutation. Each family was thoroughly educated about all facets of the study, including the molecular genetics, reduced penetrance of CDKN2A mutations, and their variable expressivity. Genetic counseling was provided to each patient. RESULTS: Diversity in cancer presentation within and among the families was noteworthy, wherein melanoma predominated in certain of the families whereas pancreatic carcinoma predominated in others. Early-onset pancreatic carcinoma (at ages 35, 45, 46, and 49 years) appeared in some of the families whereas markedly later-onset pancreatic carcinoma occurred in others. There were four incidences of melanoma and pancreatic carcinoma as double primaries in the same individuals. One patient with melanoma and pancreatic carcinoma had a third primary of breast carcinoma. Another patient had sarcoma, esophageal carcinoma, and two melanoma primaries, whereas his daughter had sarcoma and was a carrier of a CDKN2A mutation. CONCLUSIONS: The authors suggest that these tumors may collectively, in concert with CDKN2A mutations, constitute a "new" putative hereditary carcinoma syndrome referred to as FAMMM-PC. More clinical and molecular genetic research on additional families with pancreatic carcinoma in concert with the FAMMM will be required.