N1 -Methylnicotinamide as Biomarker for MATE-Mediated Renal Drug-Drug Interactions: Impact of Cimetidine, Rifampin, Verapamil, and Probenecid.

N1 -methylnicotinamide (NMN) has been proposed as endogenous biomarker for drug-drug interactions mediated by inhibition of multidrug and toxin extrusion proteins (MATEs) at the renal proximal tubule. We analyzed NMN in plasma and urine samples of two clinical trials investigating a new probe drug cocktail (consisting of digoxin, metformin, furosemide, and rosuvastatin) dedicated to clinically relevant drug transporters. In trial 1, NMN was investigated after single-dose treatment with individual cocktail components or after cocktail treatment. In trial 2, NMN was investigated after treatment with cocktail alone or with cocktail + inhibitor (cimetidine, a MATE inhibitor; or rifampin, verapamil, or probenecid, inhibitors of other transporters). In trial 1, NMN kinetics in plasma and urine were essentially not affected by individual cocktail components or after cocktail treatment. In trial 2, NMN renal clearance from 0 to 12 hours (CLR,0-12 ) geometric mean ratio (GMR) after cocktail + cimetidine vs. cocktail alone was 75% (90% confidence interval (CI): 65-87%). NMN CLR GMR after cocktail + verapamil, + rifampin, or + probenecid vs. cocktail alone was 99% (90% CI: 81-121%), 91% (90% CI: 75-111%), and 107% (90% CI: 91-126%), respectively. Compared with creatinine CLR and creatinine area under the plasma-concentration time curve, NMN CLR was more specific and more sensitive for renal MATE inhibition. Absence of impact of the cocktail on NMN in trial 1 allows for utilization of NMN in studies using this transporter cocktail. Trial 2 data support that NMN CLR is a specific and sensitive marker for MATE-mediated renal drug-drug interactions.

The Randomized AMBORA Trial: Impact of Pharmacological/Pharmaceutical Care on Medication Safety and Patient-Reported Outcomes During Treatment With New Oral Anticancer Agents.

PURPOSE: Oral anticancer drugs (eg, kinase inhibitors) play an important role in cancer therapy. However, considerable challenges regarding medication safety of oral anticancer drugs have been reported. Randomized, controlled, multicenter studies on the impact of intensified clinical pharmacological/pharmaceutical care on patient safety and patient treatment perception are lacking. METHODS: Patients were eligible for the randomized, multicenter AMBORA study, if they were newly started on any of the oral anticancer drugs approved in 2001 or later without restriction to certain tumor entities. Patients were randomly assigned to receive either standard of care (control group) or an additional, intensified clinical pharmacological/pharmaceutical care, which included medication management and structured patient counseling, over a period of 12 weeks (intervention group). Primary end points were the number of antitumor drug-related problems (ie, side effects and unresolved medication errors) and patient treatment satisfaction with the oral anticancer therapy after 12 weeks measured with the Treatment Satisfaction Questionnaire for Medication, category convenience. RESULTS: Two hundred two patients were included. Antitumor drug-related problems were significantly lower in the intervention compared with the control group (3.85 v 5.81 [mean], P < .001). Patient treatment satisfaction was higher in the intervention group (Treatment Satisfaction Questionnaire for Medication, convenience; 91.6 v 74.4 [mean], P < .001). The hazard ratio for the combined end point of severe side effects (Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events ≥ 3), treatment discontinuation, unscheduled hospital admission, and death was 0.48 (95% CI, 0.32 to 0.71, P < .001) in favor of the intervention group. CONCLUSION: Treatment with oral anticancer drugs is associated with a broad range of medication errors and side effects. An intensified clinical pharmacological/pharmaceutical care has considerable, positive effects on the number of medication errors, patient treatment perception, and severe side effects.

Quantification of 24 circulating endocannabinoids, endocannabinoid-related compounds, and their phospholipid precursors in human plasma by UHPLC-MS/MS.

Endocannabinoids and endocannabinoid-related compounds (ERCs) are involved in many physiological processes. They are released on demand from phosphoinositide and N-acylphosphatidyl ethanolamine (NAPE) precursors and comprise 2-monoacylglycerols (2-MGs) and FA ethanolamides (FEAs). Despite the abundance of advanced quantitative methods, however, their determined concentrations in blood plasma are inconsistent because 2-MGs and FEAs undergo artifactual de novo formation, chemical isomerization, and degradation during sample collection and storage. For a comprehensive survey of these compounds in blood and plasma, we have developed and validated an ultra-HPLC-MS/MS method to quantify 24 endocannabinoids, ERCs, and their phospholipid precursors. Immediate acidification of EDTA-blood to pH 5.8 blocked artifactual FEA formation for at least 4 h on ice. The 2-MGs were stabilized after plasma harvest with 0.5 M potassium thiocyanate at pH 4.7. FEA and MG plasma concentrations in six healthy volunteers ranged between 0.04-3.48 and 0.63-6.18 ng/ml, respectively. Interestingly, only 1-5% of circulating FEAs were present in their free form, while the majority was bound to NAPEs. Similarly, 97% of 2-arachidonoylglycerol (2-AG) was bound to a potential phosphoinositide pool. The herein-described stabilization and extraction methods may now be used to reliably and comprehensively quantify endocannabinoids, ERCs, and their phospholipid precursors in clinical studies.

Interplay of the Organic Cation Transporters OCT1 and OCT2 with the Apically Localized Export Protein MATE1 for the Polarized Transport of Trospium.

The anticholinergic drug trospium is secreted into urine and, to a smaller extent, into bile. Chemically, it is an organic cation, and it is a substrate of the uptake transporters OCT1 and OCT2 as well as for the export proteins MATE1 and MATE2-K as determined in uptake studies using HEK293 cells. So far, neither MATE-mediated export nor the interplay of OCT-mediated uptake and MATE-mediated export have been investigated. Therefore, we used polarized monolayers of single- and double-transfected MDCKII cells (MDCK-OCT1, MDCK-OCT2, MDCK-MATE1, MDCK-OCT1-MATE1, and MDCK-OCT2-MATE1) and the respective control cells (MDCK-Co) for transcellular transport assays. We demonstrate that the transcellular, basal-to-apical transport of trospium is significantly higher in all cell lines compared to control cells over nearly the complete concentration range tested. The transcellular transport mediated by double-transfected MDCK-OCT1-MATE1 and MDCK-OCT2-MATE1 exceeded that in the single-transfected cells (MDCK-OCT1-MATE1 vs MDCK-OCT1: 2.2-fold; MDCK-OCT1-MATE1 vs MDCK-MATE1: 1.7-fold; MDCK-OCT2-MATE1 vs MDCK-OCT2: 6.1-fold; MDCK-OCT2-MATE1 vs MDCK-MATE1: 1.8-fold at a trospium concentration of 1.0 µM; p < 0.001 each). Thus, we show that MATE1 does not only mediate the uptake of trospium into HEK293 cells but also the efflux of trospium out of polarized MDCKII-cells. Furthermore, our results indicate that OCT1 or OCT2 as uptake transporters and MATE1 as an export protein contribute to the transcellular transport of trospium at concentrations normally reached during trospium therapy. These data suggest that both, OCT-mediated uptake as well as MATE1-mediated efflux may contribute to trospium renal and biliary elimination.

Efavirenz reduces renal excretion of lamivudine in rats by inhibiting organic cation transporters (OCT, Oct) and multidrug and toxin extrusion proteins (MATE, Mate).

Efavirenz (EFV) is a non-nucleoside reverse transcriptase inhibitor used in first-line combination antiretroviral therapy (cART). It is usually administered with nucleoside reverse transcriptase inhibitors (NRTI), many of which are substrates of OCT uptake solute carriers (SLC22A) and MATE (SLC47A), P-gp (MDR1, ABCB1), BCRP (ABCG2), or MRP2 (ABCC2) efflux transporters. The aim of this study was to evaluate the inhibitory potential of efavirenz towards these transporters and investigate its effects on the pharmacokinetics and tissue distribution of a known Oct/Mate substrate, lamivudine, in rats. Accumulation and transport assays showed that efavirenz inhibits the uptake of metformin by OCT1-, OCT2- and MATE1-expressing MDCK cells and reduces transcellular transport of lamivudine across OCT1/OCT2- and MATE1-expressing MDCK monolayers. Only negligible inhibition of MATE2-K was observed in HEK-MATE2-K cells. Efavirenz also reduced the efflux of calcein from MDCK-MRP2 cells, but had a rather weak inhibitory effect on Hoechst 33342 accumulation in MDCK-MDR1 and MDCK-BCRP cells. An in vivo pharmacokinetic interaction study in male Wistar rats revealed that intravenous injection of efavirenz or the control Oct/Mate inhibitor cimetidine significantly reduced the recovery of lamivudine in urine and greatly increased lamivudine retention in the renal tissue. Co-administration with efavirenz or cimetidine also increased the AUC0-∞ value and reduced total body clearance of lamivudine. These data suggest that efavirenz is a potent inhibitor of OCT/Oct and MATE/Mate transporters. Consequently, it can engage in drug-drug interactions that reduce renal excretion of co-administered substrates and enhance their retention in the kidneys, potentially compromising therapeutic safety.