RESUMEN
Background: Acute cholangitis (AC) is an infection of the biliary tract superimposed on stasis. This study aimed to investigate the effects of smoking on inpatient outcomes of AC. Methods: We identified primary AC hospitalizations using the National Inpatient Sample database (2017-2020). Using a 1:1 matching method, we created a matched comparison cohort of AC patients who were non-smokers, based on demographics, hospital characteristics and comorbidities. Results: We matched 3960 smoker patients with 3960 non-smoker patients within the AC population. Non-smokers were older than smokers (70 vs. 59 years, P<0.001). Smokers had a stronger association with bile duct calculi (74.37% vs. 69.29%, P<0.001) and other bile duct disorders (clots, parasites, extrinsic compression and other rare disorders) (6.82% vs. 5.05%, P=0.011). No significant difference in inpatient mortality, median length of stay (LOS), or median inpatient cost (MIC) was found between the matched cohorts (P>0.05). However, smoking was associated with higher odds of complications, including sepsis without shock (0.88% vs. 0.51%, P=0.042), sepsis with shock (1.26% vs. 0.51%, P<0.001), biliary pancreatitis (6.57% vs. 4.42%, P<0.001) and myocardial infarction (6.19% vs. 3.54%, P<0.001), as well as a greater need for inpatient endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography (ERCP) (72.85% vs. 63.76%, P<0.001) and early ERCP (50.76% vs. 42.32%, P<0.001) compared to non-smokers. Conclusions: This study found no difference in mortality, LOS, or MIC in acute cholangitis-related hospitalizations associated with smoking. However, smoking was associated with a higher risk of complications and a greater need for ERCP and early ERCP.
RESUMEN
Upper gastrointestinal bleeding results in significant morbidity, mortality, and healthcare burden. This study aimed to evaluate inpatient outcomes of nonvariceal upper gastrointestinal bleeding (NVUGIB) during the year 2020 of the COVID-19 pandemic. The National Inpatient Sample databases were used to identify NVUGIB-related hospitalizations. Outcomes of interest for the year 2019 were compared to 2020 and included inpatient mortality, length of stay, mean inpatient cost, odds of getting esophagogastroduodenoscopy (EGD), mean time to EGD, early EGD (within 1 day of hospitalization), endoscopic intervention for hemostasis, and the odds of developing complications. NVUGIB-related hospitalizations increased by 8.1% in 2020. NVUGIB-related hospitalizations in 2020 were also associated with an 11.1% higher mortality (adjusted odds ratio [aOR] = 1.11, confidence interval [CI] = 1.06-1.17, P < 0.01), 0.15-day longer mean time to EGD (aOR = 0.15, CI = 0.08-0.24, P < 0.01), 4% lower odds of getting an EGD (aOR = 0.96, CI = 0.93-0.99, P = 0.02), 8% lower odds of getting an early EGD (aOR = 0.92, CI = 0.89-0.96, P < 0.01), and $6340 higher mean inpatient cost (aOR = 6340, CI = 1762-10919, P = 0.01) compared to 2019. We conclude that there was an increase in NVUGIB-related hospitalizations and mortality in 2020 when the COVID-19 pandemic started.
RESUMEN
Background and objective Colectomies are common general surgical procedures performed for a variety of gastrointestinal disorders ranging from benign to malignant. Early definitive fascial closure has been shown to improve outcomes in patients following abdominal surgery. Conventional loop sutures and their accompanying knots present several disadvantages and require technical expertise. Reducing complications has been a strong driver for innovations such as the use of barbed sutures. Barbed sutures consist of axially spaced barbed segments on each side of a midpoint at which the barbs change directions. This study is a retrospective case-matched review that evaluates the effects of barbed sutures compared to non-barbed sutures on the rates and severity of postoperative complications following colectomies for abdominal fascial closure. Materials and methods The study enrolled 151 patients who underwent open and minimally invasive colorectal abdominal surgeries from January 1, 2017, to November 30, 2019. Primary outcome measures included operative time, length of hospital stay, and postoperative complications compared between barbed and non-barded suture types. The sub-analysis further compared the surgical approach (open vs. robotic/laparoscopic) and incision type (Pfannenstiel vs. midline and other) between the suture types. Results The mean operative time for barbed sutures was 177 minutes, while it was 157 minutes for non-barbed sutures, resulting in a significant difference (p=0.0264). No significant difference was noted in postoperative complications between the groups. Conclusions The results of this study indicate that the use of barbed sutures in colorectal surgery does not increase the chances of postoperative infections, prolonged hospital stays, or other postoperative complications. Barbed sutures resulted in fewer class IV complications and more class I complications when compared to non-barbed sutures. Barbed sutures have proven to be beneficial in cases that require good wound approximation in high-tension areas and they eliminate the need for knots.
