Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 4 de 4
Filtrar
Más filtros












Base de datos
Intervalo de año de publicación
2.
3.
J Invasive Cardiol ; 34(11): E824, 2022 11.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-36318464

RESUMEN

This case example illustrates the challenging nature of managing axillary vein spasm. Once axillary vein spasm has been diagnosed, unnecessary attempts at venous puncture should be avoided as this can result in worsening of the spasm. Intravenous fluids should be infused from the ipsilateral venous access. Intravenous nitroglycerin from the ipsilateral access in incremental doses of 100-200 µg can help in relieving the spasm. It is imperative to wait for 5-10 minutes before re-attempting puncture. A repeat venogram should be performed to demonstrate resolution of spasm and guide the puncture. If spasm persists, puncture may be attempted in the medial part of the axillary vein or the subclavian vein. In refractory cases where the above measures fail, contralateral venous access may be required.


Asunto(s)
Vena Axilar , Marcapaso Artificial , Humanos , Vena Subclavia , Flebografía , Espasmo
4.
Indian J Med Res ; 155(5&6): 526-537, 2022.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-36124497

RESUMEN

Background & objectives: The high mortality associated with the thrombotic events in hospitalized COVID-19 patients resulted in the usage of anticoagulants in varying doses. Whether high-dose anticoagulants have led to better outcomes or higher incidence of clinically significant bleeding events is debatable. Thus, this study was conducted to find the incidence of clinically significant bleeding events in moderate-to-severe COVID-19 ARDS (acute respiratory distress syndrome) patients on therapeutic anticoagulation and their outcomes. Methods: In this retrospective, single-centre study of 155 critically ill COVID-19 patients, the incidence of clinically significant bleeding was observed. Multivariate regression models were used to evaluate the association between anticoagulant regimen, coagulation and inflammatory markers with the incidence of bleeding and thrombotic events. Results: The incidence of clinically relevant non-major bleeding was 33.54 per cent (26.17-41.46%) and major bleeding was 9.03 per cent (5.02-14.69%). The anticoagulation intensity at baseline had a high odds of major bleeding when enoxaparin and dual antiplatelet therapy were used together [adjusted odds ratio OR of 434.09 (3.81-49502.95), P<0.05]. At admission, bleeders had a poorer PaO2/FiO2 ratio with more patients on invasive ventilation. At the time of bleeding, the bleeders had a higher D-dimer, ferritin, C-reactive protein and procalcitonin compared to non-bleeders. The subhazard ratio for death in bleeders was 3.35 (95% confidence interval, 1.97-5.65; P<0.001). Interpretation & conclusions: The incidence of bleeding in critically ill COVID-19 patients on therapeutic anticoagulation may increase with the severity of the disease as well as with concurrent use of dual antiplatelets. Major bleeding may also contribute to higher mortality.


Asunto(s)
Tratamiento Farmacológico de COVID-19 , COVID-19 , Síndrome de Dificultad Respiratoria , Trombosis , Humanos , Anticoagulantes , COVID-19/complicaciones , Estudios Retrospectivos , Enfermedad Crítica , Incidencia , Hemorragia/inducido químicamente , Hemorragia/epidemiología
SELECCIÓN DE REFERENCIAS
DETALLE DE LA BÚSQUEDA
...