Ultrasound-Guided Peripheral Nerve Blocks: A Practical Review for Acute Cancer-Related Pain.

PURPOSE OF REVIEW: Ultrasound-guided regional techniques, including catheter-based approaches, are a subset of interventional therapies that have gained interest as an option for managing acute cancer-related pain. The authors sought to review the available published evidence and to discuss practical recommendations for expanding access to such therapies. RECENT FINDINGS: In a MEDLINE/Pubmed search of ultrasound-guided peripheral nerve blocks and peripheral nerve catheters for specific anatomic targets, a total of 28 case reports and case series were identified. Included studies described improved analgesia and reduced opioid requirements with highly variable duration of effect. Current level of evidence remains limited. Pain is a symptom that markedly impacts the quality of life of cancer patients and ultrasound-guided regional techniques are a promising therapeutic option albeit with a limited evidence base. Practical recommendations offered for coordinating access to such therapies in the inpatient, emergency department, and outpatient settings may expand interest and facilitate higher quality research.

Supraglottic airway versus endotracheal tube for transesophageal echocardiography guided watchman procedures.

Context: Atrial fibrillation (AF) is the most common arrhythmia in adults. For over 90% of non-valvular AF patients, the left atrial appendage is the primary site of thrombus formation. Left atrial appendage occlusion using the FDA-approved Watchman™ device has been shown to have better clinical outcomes with minimal post-procedural complications when compared to warfarin therapy for patients with contraindications to anticoagulation. Traditionally, this procedure requires an endotracheal tube (ETT) to facilitate transesophageal echocardiography (TEE) guidance. However, recently supraglottic airway (SGA) has emerged as a feasible, non-inferior alternative to ETT for procedures requiring TEE. Aims: Compare outcomes between TEE guided Watchman™ procedures performed with a SGA versus ETT. Settings and Design: A single tertiary care academic medical center. Methods and Materials: Retrospective Observational Study comparing SGA and ETT patients. Statistical Analysis Used: 1:4 propensity score matching of SGA and ETT patients. Results: 42 SGA patients were matched with 155 ETT patients. All patients underwent procedure with TEE. SGA patients had shorter operating room time (11 min difference, P = 0.00001) and considerably shorter PACU length of stays (45 min difference, P = 0.024). Statistically significant, but clinically trivial differences were seen in procedure times (P = 0.015) and fluoroscopy times (P = 0.017). Patients in the SGA group received lower fentanyl (P < 0.00001) dosages. No significant differences were observed in postoperative complications, organ-specific morbidity or 30-day mortality. Conclusions: General anesthesia with SGA is likely a safe, feasible alternative to ETT in Watchman™ procedures requiring TEE guidance. Use of SGA was associated with significant reductions in operating room time and PACU length of stay, potentially offering advantages in terms of resource utilization.

The Effect of Preoperative Renal Failure on Outcomes Following Infrainguinal Endovascular Interventions for Peripheral Arterial Disease.

PURPOSE: To analyze the effect of a patient's renal failure status on acute outcomes after lower extremity endovascular interventions for peripheral artery disease. MATERIALS AND METHODS: A retrospective analysis of the American College of Surgery National Surgical Quality Improvement Program database from 2014 to 2017 was conducted. Patients were included based on current procedural terminology codes. They were divided into renal failure cohorts. Six thousand seven hundred and sixty-five patients were included in the analysis, 11.0% of whom had renal failure. A univariate analysis was performed using chi-squared test or Fischer's exact test as appropriate. Multivariate logistic regression models were constructed, while controlling for relevant patient factors, to identify the effect of renal failure on several outcomes of interest after the intervention. A sensitivity analysis was performed with a propensity score-matched cohort. RESULTS: Patients with renal failure were more likely to have infrapopliteal interventions (38.0% vs 20.9%), critical limb ischemia with tissue loss (73.5% vs 38.9%), diabetes (70.9% vs 52.3%), preoperative wound infection (59.2% vs 30.7%), mortality (5.1% vs 1.3%), prolonged hospital stay (68.5% vs 46.5%), transfusion after the intervention (13.3% vs 9.1%), reoperation (18.3% vs 9.5%), and readmission (24.9% vs 12.6%), compared to patients without renal failure. The multivariate analysis found renal failure to be significant for mortality (odds ratio [OR] = 4.11, 95% confidence interval [CI] = 2.71-6.24), any complication (OR = 2.03, 95% CI = 1.72-2.39), extended length of stay (OR = 1.53, 95% CI = 1.28-1.83), sepsis (OR = 2.37, 95% CI = 1.60-3.51), readmission (OR = 1.89, 95% CI = 1.57-2.29), reoperation (OR = 1.84, 95% CI = 1.48-2.27), major adverse cardiovascular event (OR = 3.50, 95% CI = 2.54-4.84), and major adverse limb event (OR = 1.97, 95% CI = 1.55-2.51). P value was <.001 unless otherwise noted. CONCLUSIONS: Renal failure before the intervention places patients at a significantly elevated risk of morbidity and mortality following endovascular revascularization procedures for peripheral artery disease.

Point-of-Care Ultrasound Before and After Transfemoral Transcatheter Aortic Valve Implantation.

OBJECTIVE: Surgical aortic valve replacement requires a comprehensive transoesophageal echocardiography (TEE) assessment before and after the intervention by cardiac anaesthesiologists. For patients undergoing transfemoral transcatheter aortic valve implantation (TF-TAVI), TEE is not routinely used. We started using transthoracic echocardiography (TTE) as a diagnostic and monitoring modality during TF-TAVI procedures. The aim of this study is to examine the usefulness of TTE before and after TF-TAVI. We hypothesised that TTE can serve as a screening tool in TF-TAVI patients and help rule out significant paravalvular leaks (PVLs), and serve as a monitoring tool. METHODS: A retrospective, observational study of 24 patients who underwent TF-TAVI with perioperative TTE over a 3-month period was conducted. Intraoperatively, two TTE examinations were performed. The first was a baseline pre-procedural TTE examination after anaesthetic induction, and the second was performed after TAVI valve implantation. Both pre- and post-procedural examinations included five focused TTE views. PVLs were graded as none, non-significant (trace or mild) or significant (moderate or severe). RESULTS: The average age and median body mass index of the patients were 82 years and 28.5 kg m-2, respectively. The average time recorded for the pre- and post-TAVI TTE examinations were approximately 4 and 5.5 min, respectively. Non-significant PVL was detected in 6 (25%) patients, and no leak was detected in 18 (75%) patients. CONCLUSION: A focused TTE examination was found to be a useful adjunct during TF-TAVI for a cardiac anaesthesiologist in the absence of TEE, and useful in ruling out significant PVLs.