Prognostic Implications of the Extent of Cardiac Damage in Patients With Fabry Disease.

BACKGROUND: There is limited evidence on the risk stratification of cardiovascular outcomes in patients with Fabry disease (FD). OBJECTIVES: This study sought to classify FD patients into disease stages, based on the extent of the cardiac damage evaluated by echocardiography, and to assess their prognostic impact in a multicenter cohort. METHODS: Patients with FD from 5 Italian referral centers were categorized into 4 stages: stage 0, no cardiac involvement; stage 1, left ventricular (LV) hypertrophy (LV maximal wall thickness >12 mm); stage 2, left atrium (LA) enlargement (LA volume index >34 mL/m2); stage 3, ventricular impairment (LV ejection fraction <50% or E/e' ≥15 or TAPSE <17 mm). The study endpoint was the composite of all-cause death, hospitalization for heart failure, new-onset atrial fibrillation, major bradyarrhythmias or tachyarrhythmias, and ischemic stroke. RESULTS: A total of 314 patients were included. Among them, 174 (56%) were classified as stage 0, 41 (13%) as stage 1, 57 (18%) as stage 2 and 42 (13%) as stage 3. A progressive increase in the composite event rate at 8 years was observed with worsening stages of cardiac damage (log-rank P < 0.001). On multivariable Cox regression analysis, the staging was independently associated with the risk of cardiovascular events (HR: 2.086 per 1-stage increase; 95% CI: 1.487-2.927; P < 0.001). Notably, cardiac staging demonstrated a stronger and additive prognostic value, as compared with the degree of LV hypertrophy. CONCLUSIONS: In FD patients, a novel staging classification of cardiac damage, evaluated by echocardiography, is strongly associated with cardiovascular outcomes and may be helpful to refine risk stratification.

Standard ECG for differential diagnosis between Anderson-Fabry disease and hypertrophic cardiomyopathy.

OBJECTIVES: To evaluate the role of the ECG in the differential diagnosis between Anderson-Fabry disease (AFD) and hypertrophic cardiomyopathy (HCM). METHODS: In this multicentre retrospective study, 111 AFD patients with left ventricular hypertrophy were compared with 111 patients with HCM, matched for sex, age and maximal wall thickness by propensity score. Independent ECG predictors of AFD were identified by multivariate analysis, and a multiparametric ECG score-based algorithm for differential diagnosis was developed. RESULTS: Short PR interval, prolonged QRS duration, right bundle branch block (RBBB), R in augmented vector left (aVL) ≥1.1 mV and inferior ST depression independently predicted AFD diagnosis. A point-by-point ECG score was then derived with the following diagnostic performances: c-statistic 0.80 (95% CI 0.74 to 0.86) for discrimination, the Hosmel-Lemeshow χ2 6.14 (p=0.189) for calibration, sensitivity 69%, specificity 84%, positive predictive value 82% and negative predictive value 72%. After bootstrap resampling, the mean optimism was 0.025, and the internal validated c-statistic for the score was 0.78. CONCLUSIONS: Standard ECG can help to differentiate AFD from HCM while investigating unexplained left ventricular hypertrophy. Short PR interval, prolonged QRS duration, RBBB, R in aVL ≥1.1 mV and inferior ST depression independently predicted AFD. Their systematic evaluation and the integration in a multiparametric ECG score can support AFD diagnosis.

Pediatric Restrictive Cardiomyopathies.

Restrictive cardiomyopathy (RCM) is the least frequent phenotype among pediatric heart muscle diseases, representing only 2.5-3% of all cardiomyopathies diagnosed during childhood. Pediatric RCM has a poor prognosis, high incidence of pulmonary hypertension (PH), thromboembolic events, and sudden death, is less amenable to medical or surgical treatment with high mortality rates. In this scenario, heart transplantation remains the only successful therapeutic option. Despite a shared hemodynamic profile, characterized by severe diastolic dysfunction and restrictive ventricular filling, with normal ventricle ejection fraction and wall thickness, RCM recognizes a broad etiological spectrum, consisting of genetic/familial and acquired causes, each of which has a distinct pathophysiology and natural course. Hence, the aim of this review is to cover the causes, clinical presentation, diagnostic evaluation, treatment, and prognosis of pediatric RCM.