Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 2 de 2
Filtrar
Más filtros












Base de datos
Intervalo de año de publicación
1.
Hematol Oncol Clin North Am ; 36(2): 293-305, 2022 04.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-35282953

RESUMEN

Careful consideration of the clinical history with traditional testing such as an antibody screen and direct antiglobulin test (DAT) allow for the categorization of most forms of autoimmune hemolytic anemia. Based on the initial findings, specialized testing can further categorize disease entities and increase the sensitivity of testing. In this section, we explain the diagnostic findings of both traditional and novel testing and how their appropriate interpretations help distinguish the forms of autoimmune hemolytic anemia (AIHA).


Asunto(s)
Anemia Hemolítica Autoinmune , Anemia Hemolítica Autoinmune/diagnóstico , Anemia Hemolítica Autoinmune/terapia , Prueba de Coombs , Humanos
2.
J Pers Med ; 10(4)2020 Dec 09.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-33316904

RESUMEN

PURPOSE: molecular testing is often indicated for recently transfused patients. However, there are no guidelines regarding the potential interference from donor DNA or whether it is necessary to wait for a period of time post-transfusion prior to genetic testing. While the majority of patients are transfused in the non-trauma setting using leukoreduced (LR) red blood cell products, the degree of leukoreduction varies among centers and is not universally practiced. METHODS: whole blood units collected from anonymous donors were used in an in vitro transfusion model. One unit was split: half being leukoreduced simulating a leukopenic recipient and half left untreated. Donors were simulated by leukoreduced, partially leukoreduced (PLR), or non-leukoreduced units, transfused in 2, 5, or 16 unit equivalents. DNA from the combinations were subjected to short tandem repeat (STR) analysis for chimerism detection. RESULTS: donor DNA was not detectable in any of the LR combinations, but detected in the PLR combinations, ranging from 0.1 to 1.5% donor DNA in the immunocompetent recipient and 6.3-27.8% in the leukopenic recipient. Non-LR donor DNA was also detected (13-95%). CONCLUSION: donor-derived DNA from leukoreduced blood products is unlikely to interfere with the interpretation of germline genetic testing in immunocompetent recipients but may interfere in immunocompromised recipients.

SELECCIÓN DE REFERENCIAS
DETALLE DE LA BÚSQUEDA
...