Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 4 de 4
Filtrar
Más filtros












Base de datos
Intervalo de año de publicación
1.
Eur J Cardiothorac Surg ; 58(4): 738-744, 2020 Oct 01.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-32951033

RESUMEN

OBJECTIVES: The goal of this study was to describe the clinical features and outcomes of thoracic surgery patients during the coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) pandemic. METHODS: Thirty-five patients were treated at the 12 de Octubre University Hospital in Madrid between 1 March 2020 and 24 April 2020 during the COVID-19 pandemic. Patient demographics, surgical procedures, complications, COVID-19 symptoms and outcomes were recorded. A protocol was introduced to reduce the risk of operating on patients with COVID-19, including symptom screening, a polymerase chain reaction test for severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 and computed tomography scans of the chest. Surgical activity changed significantly during this time, from an initial period of near-normal activity, through an emergency-only period and finally a recovery period when some oncological surgical cases were restarted. Selection criteria for surgical patients are also described. RESULTS: A total of 34 patients underwent surgery during the pandemic period. We performed 22 lung resections (11 lobectomies and 11 sublobar resections). No hospital deaths were recorded. An elective surgery patient and an emergency surgery patient were diagnosed with COVID-19 (5.88%). The former died within 30 days after surgery. CONCLUSIONS: Severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 represents a tremendous limitation for thoracic surgical practice. Preoperative practices to exclude asymptomatic cases infected with the virus allowed us to perform thoracic surgical procedures.


Asunto(s)
Betacoronavirus , Infecciones por Coronavirus/prevención & control , Control de Infecciones/métodos , Pandemias/prevención & control , Atención Perioperativa/métodos , Neumonía Viral/prevención & control , Procedimientos Quirúrgicos Torácicos , Adulto , Anciano , Anciano de 80 o más Años , COVID-19 , Protocolos Clínicos , Infecciones por Coronavirus/complicaciones , Infecciones por Coronavirus/diagnóstico , Femenino , Asignación de Recursos para la Atención de Salud/métodos , Humanos , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Evaluación de Resultado en la Atención de Salud , Selección de Paciente , Neumonía Viral/complicaciones , Neumonía Viral/diagnóstico , Estudios Retrospectivos , SARS-CoV-2 , España , Centros de Atención Terciaria , Procedimientos Quirúrgicos Torácicos/mortalidad
2.
Arch Bronconeumol ; 52(7): 378-88, 2016 Jul.
Artículo en Inglés, Español | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-27237592

RESUMEN

The Thoracic Surgery and Thoracic Oncology groups of the Spanish Society of Pulmonology and Thoracic Surgery (SEPAR) have backed the publication of a handbook on recommendations for the diagnosis and treatment of non-small cell lung cancer. Due to the high incidence and mortality of this disease, the best scientific evidence must be constantly updated and made available for consultation by healthcare professionals. To draw up these recommendations, we called on a wide-ranging group of experts from the different specialties, who have prepared a comprehensive review, divided into 4 main sections. The first addresses disease prevention and screening, including risk factors, the role of smoking cessation, and screening programs for early diagnosis. The second section analyzes clinical presentation, imaging studies, and surgical risk, including cardiological risk and the evaluation of respiratory function. The third section addresses cytohistological confirmation and staging studies, and scrutinizes the TNM and histological classifications, non-invasive and minimally invasive sampling methods, and surgical techniques for diagnosis and staging. The fourth and final section looks at different therapeutic aspects, such as the role of surgery, chemotherapy, radiation therapy, a multidisciplinary approach according to disease stage, and other specifically targeted treatments, concluding with recommendations on the follow-up of lung cancer patients and surgical and endoscopic palliative interventions in advanced stages.


Asunto(s)
Carcinoma de Pulmón de Células no Pequeñas/diagnóstico , Carcinoma de Pulmón de Células no Pequeñas/terapia , Neoplasias Pulmonares/diagnóstico , Neoplasias Pulmonares/terapia , Biomarcadores de Tumor/sangre , Broncoscopía , Carcinoma de Pulmón de Células no Pequeñas/prevención & control , Quimioradioterapia , Técnicas de Diagnóstico del Sistema Respiratorio/normas , Detección Precoz del Cáncer , Humanos , Neoplasias Pulmonares/prevención & control , Estadificación de Neoplasias , Cuidados Paliativos , Neumonectomía/normas , Tomografía Computarizada por Tomografía de Emisión de Positrones , Neumología/organización & administración , Terapia Recuperativa , Cese del Hábito de Fumar , Sociedades Médicas , España , Tomografía Computarizada por Rayos X
3.
Ann Thorac Surg ; 79(6): 1872-8, 2005 Jun.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-15919275

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND: The aim of this study was to describe and to assess the effectiveness of conservative treatment as the chosen treatment for managing iatrogenic tracheobronchial injuries (ITBI). METHODS: Between January 1993 and December 2003, 33 tracheobronchial injuries were treated in our hospital. Eighteen (54.5%) were ITBI and 15 (45.5%) were traumatic noniatrogenic injuries. Of the ITBI patients, sex distribution was 15 (83%) females and 3 (17%) males with a mean age of 57.7 +/- 20.7 years (range, 17 to 88 years). Fifteen (83.3%) of the injuries were caused by orotracheal intubation and 3 (15.7%) by tracheotomy. The average diagnostic delay was 25.7 +/- 22.9 hours. The mean injury size was 2.83 +/- 1.02 cm (range, 1 to 4 cm). Nine (50%) injuries were located in the cervical trachea, 6 (33.3%) in the thoracic trachea, and 3 (16%) involved both trachea and main bronchi. Conservative treatment was chosen for 17 (94.4%) of the 18 cases. We performed surgical repair in only 1 case owing to progressive subcutaneous emphysema and increasing difficulty with mechanical ventilation. RESULTS: No complications arose from the use of conservative treatment. Four patients (22%) died in our hospital, 3 of these of non-ITBI-related causes. Mortality was not related to four variables: sex, diagnostic delay, location, or size of the ITBI. Fourteen of the 18 patients (77.7%) were discharged uneventfully, and the endoscopic and clinical follow-up examinations were satisfactory in all patients. CONCLUSIONS: Conservative treatment for ITBI is effective regardless of production, size, or site of the injuries. Surgical treatment is advisable in specific cases: rapid progression of subcutaneous and mediastinal emphysema, mediastinitis, and difficulty with mechanical ventilation.


Asunto(s)
Intubación/efectos adversos , Lesión Pulmonar , Tráquea/lesiones , Heridas y Lesiones/terapia , Adolescente , Adulto , Anciano , Anciano de 80 o más Años , Femenino , Humanos , Enfermedad Iatrogénica , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Estudios Retrospectivos , Resultado del Tratamiento
4.
Interact Cardiovasc Thorac Surg ; 3(2): 317-8, 2004 Jun.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-17670247

RESUMEN

We report a case of epidural extension of pleural empyema with cord compression and neurologic deficit. Surgical decompression was required and emergency bilateral laminectomy was performed with removal of abscess and granulation tissue. Methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus grew in cultures of pleural and epidural specimens and appropriate intravenous antibiotics were started. In spite of early diagnosis and rapid management the patient suffered severe sequelae.

SELECCIÓN DE REFERENCIAS
DETALLE DE LA BÚSQUEDA
...