Real-world prevalence of programmed death ligand 1 expression in locally advanced or metastatic non-small-cell lung cancer: The global, multicenter EXPRESS study.

OBJECTIVES: Tumor programmed death ligand 1 (PD-L1) expression is associated with improved clinical benefit from immunotherapies targeting the PD-1 pathway. We conducted a global, multicenter, retrospective observational study to determine real-world prevalence of tumor PD-L1 expression in patients with NSCLC. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Patients ≥18 years with histologically confirmed stage IIIB/IV NSCLC and a tumor tissue block (≤5 years old) obtained before treatment were identified in 45 centers across 18 countries. Tumor samples from eligible patients were selected consecutively, when possible. PD-L1 expression was evaluated at each center using the PD-L1 IHC 22C3 pharmDx kit (Agilent, Santa Clara, CA, USA). RESULTS: Of 2617 patients who met inclusion criteria, 2368 (90%) had PD-L1 data; 530 (22%) patients had PD-L1 TPS ≥ 50%, 1232 (52%) had PD-L1 TPS ≥ 1%, and 1136 (48%) had PD-L1 TPS < 1%. The most common reason for not having PD-L1 data (n = 249) was insufficient tumor cells (<100) on the slide (n = 170 [6%]). Percentages of patients with PD-L1 TPS ≥ 50% and TPS ≥ 1%, respectively were: 22%/52% in Europe; 22%/53% in Asia Pacific; 21%/47% in the Americas, and 24%/55% in other countries. Prevalence of EGFR mutations (19%) and ALK alterations (3%) was consistent with prior reports from metastatic NSCLC studies. Among 1064 patients negative for both EGFR mutation and ALK alteration, the percentage with PD-L1 TPS ≥ 50% and TPS ≥ 1%, respectively, were 27% and 53%. CONCLUSIONS: This is the largest real-world study in advanced NSCLC to date evaluating PD-L1 tumor expression using the 22C3 pharmDx kit. Testing failure rate was low with local evaluation of PD-L1 TPS across a large number of centers. Prevalence of PD-L1 TPS ≥ 50% and TPS ≥ 1% among patients with stage IIIB/IV NSCLC was similar across geographic regions and broadly consistent with central testing results from clinical trial screening populations.

ESMO recommendations on the standard methods to detect NTRK fusions in daily practice and clinical research.

BACKGROUND: NTRK1, NTRK2 and NTRK3 fusions are present in a plethora of malignancies across different histologies. These fusions represent the most frequent mechanism of oncogenic activation of these receptor tyrosine kinases, and biomarkers for the use of TRK small molecule inhibitors. Given the varying frequency of NTRK1/2/3 fusions, crucial to the administration of NTRK inhibitors is the development of optimal approaches for the detection of human cancers harbouring activating NTRK1/2/3 fusion genes. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Experts from several Institutions were recruited by the European Society for Medical Oncology (ESMO) Translational Research and Precision Medicine Working Group (TR and PM WG) to review the available methods for the detection of NTRK gene fusions, their potential applications, and strategies for the implementation of a rational approach for the detection of NTRK1/2/3 fusion genes in human malignancies. A consensus on the most reasonable strategy to adopt when screening for NTRK fusions in oncologic patients was sought, and further reviewed and approved by the ESMO TR and PM WG and the ESMO leadership. RESULTS: The main techniques employed for NTRK fusion gene detection include immunohistochemistry, fluorescence in situ hybridization (FISH), RT-PCR, and both RNA-based and DNA-based next generation sequencing (NGS). Each technique has advantages and limitations, and the choice of assays for screening and final diagnosis should also take into account the resources and clinical context. CONCLUSION: In tumours where NTRK fusions are highly recurrent, FISH, RT-PCR or RNA-based sequencing panels can be used as confirmatory techniques, whereas in the scenario of testing an unselected population where NTRK1/2/3 fusions are uncommon, either front-line sequencing (preferentially RNA-sequencing) or screening by immunohistochemistry followed by sequencing of positive cases should be pursued.

Multicenter validation of cancer gene panel-based next-generation sequencing for translational research and molecular diagnostics.

The simultaneous detection of multiple somatic mutations in the context of molecular diagnostics of cancer is frequently performed by means of amplicon-based targeted next-generation sequencing (NGS). However, only few studies are available comparing multicenter testing of different NGS platforms and gene panels. Therefore, seven partner sites of the German Cancer Consortium (DKTK) performed a multicenter interlaboratory trial for targeted NGS using the same formalin-fixed, paraffin-embedded (FFPE) specimen of molecularly pre-characterized tumors (n = 15; each n = 5 cases of Breast, Lung, and Colon carcinoma) and a colorectal cancer cell line DNA dilution series. Detailed information regarding pre-characterized mutations was not disclosed to the partners. Commercially available and custom-designed cancer gene panels were used for library preparation and subsequent sequencing on several devices of two NGS different platforms. For every case, centrally extracted DNA and FFPE tissue sections for local processing were delivered to each partner site to be sequenced with the commercial gene panel and local bioinformatics. For cancer-specific panel-based sequencing, only centrally extracted DNA was analyzed at seven sequencing sites. Subsequently, local data were compiled and bioinformatics was performed centrally. We were able to demonstrate that all pre-characterized mutations were re-identified correctly, irrespective of NGS platform or gene panel used. However, locally processed FFPE tissue sections disclosed that the DNA extraction method can affect the detection of mutations with a trend in favor of magnetic bead-based DNA extraction methods. In conclusion, targeted NGS is a very robust method for simultaneous detection of various mutations in FFPE tissue specimens if certain pre-analytical conditions are carefully considered.

ALK-Testing in non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC): Immunohistochemistry (IHC) and/or fluorescence in-situ Hybridisation (FISH)?: Statement of the Germany Society for Pathology (DGP) and the Working Group Thoracic Oncology (AIO) of the German Cancer Society e.V. (Stellungnahme der Deutschen Gesellschaft für Pathologie und der AG Thorakale Onkologie der Arbeitsgemeinschaft Onkologie/Deutsche Krebsgesellschaft e.V.).

The EML4-ALK pathway plays an important role in a significant subset of non-small cell lung cancer patients. Treatment options such as ALK tyrosine kinase inhibitors lead to improved progression free survival and overall survival. These therapeutic options are chosen on the basis of the identification of the underlying genetic signature of the EML-ALK translocation. Efficient and easily accessible testing tools are required to identify eligible patients in a timely fashion. While FISH techniques are commonly used to detect this translocation, the broad implementation of this type of ALK testing into routine diagnostics is not optimal due to technical, structural and financial reasons. Immunohistochemical techniques to screen for EML4-ALK translocations may therefore play an important role in the near future. This consensus paper provides recommendations for the test algorithm and quality of the respective test approaches, which are discussed in the light of the current literature.

[Subgroup Analysis of the Non-interventional REASON Study: PFS and OS According to Age, Smoking History, Gender, and Histology in NSCLC Patients Treated with Gefitinib or Chemotherapy]. / Subgruppenanalyse aus der nicht-interventionellen Beobachtungsstudie REASON: PFS und OS gemäß Alter, Raucherstatus, Geschlecht und histologischem Subtyp unter Verwendung von Gefitinib bzw. chemotherapeutischer Behandlung bei NSCLC-Patienten.

PURPOSE: Assessment of several clinical factors on progression-free (PFS) and overall survival (OS) in NSCLC patients (pts.) (stage IV) with mutated epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFRm+) treated with gefitinib (gef) or with chemotherapy (CT) under real-world conditions. METHODS: 285 EGFRm+ pts. of the non-interventional REASON study treated with gef (n = 206) or CT (n = 79) as first-line therapy or with gef (n = 213) or CT (n = 61) in any line throughout the course of therapy were analyzed according to age, gender, smoking history and histology. RESULTS: Compared with CT, patients treated with gef showed prolongation of PFS and OS in all subgroups. PFS was significantly increased in women and non-smokers. OS was significantly increased in women, non-smokers, (ex)-smokers, patients with adenocarcinoma and elderly patients when treated with gef compared to CT. Female gender turned out to be an independent positive predictive factor for OS in patients treated with gef (HRmale: 1.74, p = 0.0009). CONCLUSION: A clinical benefit of gef was shown for all analyzed clinical subgroups of EGFRm+ pts. This was confirmed for the female gender in a multivariate analysis.

[HER2 testing in gastric cancer - results of a German expert meeting]. / HER2-Testung beim Magenkarzinom - Ergebnisse eines deutschen Expertentreffens.

Valid HER2 testing is essential for optimal therapy of patients with HER2 positive gastric cancer and the correct use of first-line treatment. While each breast cancer is routinely being tested for the HER2 status, HER2 testing in gastric cancer has still not become part of the routine and is often only done upon request by the therapist. An interdisciplinary German expert group took the challenges of HER2 testing in gastric cancer as an opportunity to address essential aspects and questions for the practical use of HER2 testing in this indication from the perspective of pathologists and therapists. The recommendations made in this manuscript reflect the consensus of all participants and correspond to their opinions and long-term experience.

[Exon-dependent Subgroup-analysis of the Non-interventional REASON-Study: PFS and OS in EGFR-mutated NSCLC Patients Treated with Gefitinib or Chemotherapy]. / Exonabhängige Subgruppenanalyse der nicht-interventionellen REASON-Studie: PFS und OS beim EGFR-mutierten NSCLC mit Behandlung von Gefitinib versus Chemotherapie.

PURPOSE: To analyze the influence of the localization of mutations in the epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR) gene on progression-free (PFS) and overall survival (OS) in patients (pts) with locally advanced or metastatic non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) treated with gefitinib (gef) or chemotherapy (CT) under real world conditions within the REASON study. METHODS: Subgroups of pts with mutations in exon 19 (n = 141), 18/20 (n = 43), and 21 (n = 104) were analyzed for PFS and OS according to gef or CT treatment and compared using the log-rank test. RESULTS: Pts with mutations in exon 19 and 18/20 treated with gef as first line therapy showed increased PFS and OS compared to CT. This increase was statistically significant in pts with exon 19 mutation (11.3 vs. 6.5 months), but was not found in pts with exon 21 mutation (9.1 vs. 9.3 months). Also, OS was significantly increased in patients with mutation in exon 19 treated with gef ever over all treatment lines compared to CT (21.8 vs. 10.6 months), whereas this was not found in pts with mutation in exon 21 (14.1 vs. 13.9 months). CONCLUSION: Localization and nature of EGFR mutations influences gefitinib treatment outcomes under routine conditions and should therefore be analyzed in detail.

[Predictive PD-L1 immunohistochemistry for non-small cell lung cancer : Current state of the art and experiences of the first German harmonization study]. / Prädiktive PD-L1-Immunhistochemie beim nichtkleinzelligen Bronchialkarzinom : Aktueller Stand und Erfahrungen der ersten deutschen Harmonisierungsstudie.

BACKGROUND: Antibodies against PD-1 and PD-L1 can cause strong and durable anti-tumor immune responses in non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC). Immunohistochemistry for PD-L1 (PD-L1 IHC) was tested as a predictive biomarker. Several IHC assays and interpretation criteria were developed in parallel. AIM: The clinical significance of PD-L1 IHC in NSCLC and the optimum method for staining and interpretation of the results are the subject of ongoing studies. The diagnostic application of immunotherapy in NSCLC necessitates harmonization of PD-L1 IHC to obtain evidence for guidelines; therefore, a consensus opinion on a well-founded diagnostic mode of testing should be defined based on published studies and the results of the first German PD-L1 IHC harmonization study. METHODS: 1. Summary of the current data situation. 2. Evaluation of the first German PD-L1 IHC harmonization study (centralized, staining with PD-L1 IHC analogous to studies, 15 cases of NSCLC, 4 IHC study assays [28­8, 22C3, SP142 and SP263] and scoring by 9 pathologists). RESULTS: The use of PD-L1 IHC in NSCLC is suitable for identification of patients with an increased probability of a clinical benefit from immunotherapy. The various proportional cut-offs used to interpret the staining results can be summarized in a total score, which can be reproducibly assessed. The staining patterns of the four assays investigated were, however, not congruent in all situations. DISCUSSION: In principle, the use of PD-L1 IHC for assessment of the expression in tumor cells is a reliably determinable biomarker. Evaluation algorithms should be based on published clinical trials. For NSCLC approvals with obligatory PD-L1 IHC are to be expected but it remains to be seen to what extent PD-L1 IHC will be implemented in the clinical routine.

[HER2 testing in gastric cancer : Results of a meeting of German experts]. / HER2-Testung beim Magenkarzinom : Ergebnisse eines deutschen Expertentreffens.

Valid HER2 testing is essential for the optimal care of patients with HER2-positive gastric cancer and the correct use of first-line treatment. Although all cases of breast cancer are routinely tested for the HER2 status, HER2 testing in gastric cancer has still not become part of the routine and is usually only done upon request by the therapist. An interdisciplinary group of German experts has taken on the challenges of HER2 testing in gastric cancer as an opportunity to address essential aspects and questions on the practical use of HER2 testing in this indication from the perspective of pathologists and therapists. The recommendations made in this article reflect the consensus of all participants and correspond to their opinions and long-term experience.

[ALK-Diagnostics in NSCLC - Immunohistochemistry (IHC) and/or Fluorescence-in-situ Hybridisation (FISH)]. / ALK-Testung beim nicht-kleinzelligen Lungenkarzinom (NSCLC): Immunhistochemie (IHC) und/oder Fluoreszenz-in-situ-Hybridisierung (FISH)?

The EML4-ALK pathway plays an important role in a significant subset of non-small cell lung cancer patients. Treatment options such as tyrosine kinase inhibitors directed against the EML4-ALK signalling pathway lead to improved progression free and overall survival. These therapeutic options are chosen on the basis of the identification of the underlying genetic signature of the EML-ALK translocation. Efficient and easily accessible testing tools are required to identify the patients in time. While FISH techniques have been implemented to characterize this translocation for some time, the implementation of this testing is hampered by its broad use of resources. Immunohistochemical techniques to identify and screen for EML4-ALK translocations may play an important role in the near future. This consensus paper offers recommendations of the sequence and quality of the respective test approaches which are validated on the basis of the current literature.

Uncoupling of EGFR-RAS signaling and nuclear localization of YBX1 in colorectal cancer.

The transcription factor YBX1 can act as a mediator of signals transmitted via the EGFR-RAS-MAPK axis. YBX1 expression has been associated with tumor progression and prognosis in multiple types of cancer. Immunohistochemical studies have revealed dependency between YBX1 expression and individual EGFR family members. We analyzed YBX1 and EGFR family proteins in a colorectal cancer (CRC) cohort and provide functional analyses of YBX1 in the context of EGFR-RAS-MAPK signaling. Immunohistochemistry for YBX1 and EGFR family receptors with two antibodies for YBX1 and EGFR were performed and related to clinicopathological data. We employed Caco2 cells expressing an inducible KRASV12 gene to determine effects on localization and levels of YBX1. Mouse xenografts of Caco2-KRASV12 cells were used to determine YBX1 dynamics in a tissue context. The two different antibodies against YBX1 showed discordant immunohistochemical stainings in cell culture and clinical specimens. Expression of YBX1 and EGFR family members were not correlated in CRC. Analysis of Caco2 xenografts displayed again heterogeneity of YBX1 staining with both antibodies. Our results suggest that YBX1 is controlled via complex regulatory mechanisms involving tumor stroma interaction and signal transduction processes. Our study highlights that YBX1 antibodies have different specificities, advocating their use in a combined manner.

A 2015 update on predictive molecular pathology and its role in targeted cancer therapy: a review focussing on clinical relevance.

In April 2013 our group published a review on predictive molecular pathology in this journal. Although only 2 years have passed many new facts and stimulating developments have happened in diagnostic molecular pathology rendering it worthwhile to present an up-date on this topic. A major technical improvement is certainly given by the introduction of next-generation sequencing (NGS; amplicon, whole exome, whole genome) and its application to formalin-fixed paraffin-embedded (FFPE) tissue in routine diagnostics. Based on this 'revolution' the analyses of numerous genetic alterations in parallel has become a routine approach opening the chance to characterize patients' malignant tumors much more deeply without increasing turn-around time and costs. In the near future this will open new strategies to apply 'off-label' targeted therapies, e.g. for rare tumors, otherwise resistant tumors etc. The clinically relevant genetic aberrations described in this review include mutation analyses of RAS (KRAS and NRAS), BRAF and PI3K in colorectal cancer, KIT or PDGFR alpha as well as BRAF, NRAS and KIT in malignant melanoma. Moreover, we present several recent advances in the molecular characterization of malignant lymphoma. Beside the well-known mutations in NSCLC (EGFR, ALK) a number of chromosomal aberrations (KRAS, ROS1, MET) have become relevant. Only very recently has the clinical need for analysis of BRCA1/2 come up and proven as a true challenge for routine diagnostics because of the genes' special structure and hot-spot-free mutational distribution. The genetic alterations are discussed in connection with their increasingly important role in companion diagnostics to apply targeted drugs as efficient as possible. As another aspect of the increasing number of druggable mutations, we discuss the challenges personalized therapies pose for the design of clinical studies to prove optimal efficacy particularly with respect to combination therapies of multiple targeted drugs and conventional chemotherapy. Such combinations would lead to an extremely high complexity that would hardly be manageable by applying conventional study designs for approval, e.g. by the FDA or EMA. Up-coming challenges such as the application of methylation assays and proteomic analyses on FFPE tissue will also be discussed briefly to open the door towards the ultimate goal of reading a patients' tissue as 'deeply' as possible. Although it is yet to be shown, which levels of biological information are most informative for predictive pathology, an integrated molecular characterization of tumors will likely offer the most comprehensive view for individualized therapy approaches. To optimize cancer treatment we need to understand tumor biology in much more detail on morphological, genetic, proteomic as well as epigenetic grounds. Finally, the complex challenges on the level of drug design, molecular diagnostics, and clinical trials make necessary a close collaboration among academic institutions, regulatory authorities and pharmaceutical companies.

[Molecular pathology for breast cancer: Importance of the gene expression profile]. / Molekulare Pathologie beim Mammakarzinom: Wertigkeit der Genexpressionsprofile.

Gene expression arrays are currently used to guide therapy decisions in breast cancer. The indications for gene expression tests are especially important in the group of hormone receptor negative, HER2 positive tumors to decide whether endocrine therapy alone is sufficient or additional chemotherapy is necessary. In this group of luminal tumors conventional clinicopathological parameters are often not suitable to select patients who would benefit from an endocrine therapy alone. Gene expression tests can provide additional information and, therefore, support decision-making and avoid unnecessary chemotherapy. There are a variety of test systems available which poses the questions of which tests should be selected for which patients and how the test results should be evaluated in a direct comparison. This report provides information about three currently available gene expression tests (i.e. OncotypeDx®, Endopredict® and PAM50/Prosigna®), comments on similarities and differences and discusses the impact on therapy decisions. The focus of this article is on a discussion of clinical studies that have compared the different molecular tests in the same clinical study cohort. These investigations allow a first comparative evaluation of the various assays for breast cancer.

Prognostic impact of neuroendocrine differentiation in high-grade serous ovarian carcinoma.

Neuroendocrine differentiation in high-grade serous ovarian carcinomas has only rarely been described. However, in our consultancy experience, we have been pointed at a case of neuroendocrine relapse in a patient with high-grade serous ovarian carcinoma where retrospectively, a minor neuroendocrine component in the primary tumor could be detected. Hypothesizing that immunohistochemical evidence of neuroendocrine differentiation might be more frequent in ovarian carcinoma than suspected by morphology, we immunophenotyped the tissue microarrays (TMAs) of a cohort of 178 high-grade serous carcinomas for chromogranin and synaptophysin expression. Synaptophysin expression was found in 12 (6.7 %) out of 172 patients, and chromogranin A expression was seen in 36 (20.7 %) out of 174 patients. Kaplan-Meier analysis revealed that carcinomas with synaptophysin expression of >20 % of positive cells (n = 4) had a significantly shorter survival time than those with 0-20 % of positive cells (p < 0.0001). Synaptophysin expression remained a significant prognostic factor in multivariate analysis (HR = 10.82, 95 % confidence interval 3.10-37.71, p < 0.0001), independently of age, FIGO stage, and residual tumor after surgery. A trend toward shorter survival was seen in patients with tumors that expressed chromogranin, irrespective of the amount of positive cells (p = 0.173). A neuroendocrine differentiation is important to keep in mind when a neuroendocrine tumor of unknown primary is detected in regional or temporal connection with an ovarian carcinoma. A minor neuroendocrine component in ovarian high-grade serous carcinomas might imply a dismal prognosis.

Frequency of therapy-relevant staging shifts in colorectal cancer through the introduction of pN1c in the 7th TNM edition.

BACKGROUND: pN1c is a novel N-category introduced for colorectal cancer (CRC) in current TNM (Tumour, Node, Metastasis) classification. It represents cancers displaying tumour deposits (TDs) in the fat but no involvement of lymph nodes. pN1c is integrated into the UICC (International Union Against Cancer) staging system and shifts previous stage II cancers (6th edition) to stage III. We investigated the frequency of upstaging and TD prognostic significance. METHODS: 414 CRCs, consecutively collected during a population-based epidemiological study, TNM classified and UICC staged according to the 6th TNM edition were reinvestigated for TD presence. The association with survival was investigated after a median follow-up time of 5years in multivariate analyses among nodal negative and positive cases. RESULTS: TDs were found in 103 (24.9%) cancers and were strongly associated with T-, N- and M-stages (p<0.0001, each). Upstaging of previous stage II cancers by the presence of TDs (pN1c) was found in six of 140 cases (4.3% of stage II, 1.4% of all tumours). For stage III CRC, strongly reduced overall, CRC-specific and recurrence-free survival were observed with the presence of TDs (hazard ratios (HR) 2.29, 95% confidence interval 1.27-4.10, HR 2.51, 1.27-4.98, and HR 2.43, 1.32-4.48, respectively). CONCLUSIONS: Upstaging of CRCs through the introduction of pN1c occurs in less than 5% of previous stage II and less than 2% of all cancers. Given the biologic relevance of TDs, integration into the UICC staging relevant N-category is justified. The high prognostic impact of TDs, however, is not reflected in nodal positive cancers in both the TNM and UICC staging systems.

Assessing standardization of molecular testing for non-small-cell lung cancer: results of a worldwide external quality assessment (EQA) scheme for EGFR mutation testing.

BACKGROUND: The external quality assurance (EQA) process aims at establishing laboratory performance levels. Leading European groups in the fields of EQA, Pathology, and Medical and Thoracic Oncology collaborated in a pilot EQA scheme for somatic epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR) gene mutational analysis in non-small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC). METHODS: EQA samples generated from cell lines mimicking clinical samples were provided to participating laboratories, each with a mock clinical case. Participating laboratories performed the analysis using their usual method(s). Anonymous results were assessed and made available to all participants. Two subsequent EQA rounds followed the pilot scheme. RESULTS: One hundred and seventeen labs from 30 countries registered and 91 returned results. Sanger sequencing and a commercial kit were the main methodologies used. The standard of genotyping was suboptimal, with a significant number of genotyping errors made. Only 72 out of 91 (72%) participants passed the EQA. False-negative and -positive results were the main sources of error. The quality of reports submitted was acceptable; most were clear, concise and easy to read. However, some participants reported the genotyping result in the absence of any interpretation and many obscured the interpretation required for clinical care. CONCLUSIONS: Even in clinical laboratories, the technical performance of genotyping in EGFR mutation testing for NSCLC can be improved, evident from a high level of diagnostic errors. Robust EQA can contribute to global optimisation of EGFR testing for NSCLC patients.

Cancer beyond organ and tissue specificity: next-generation-sequencing gene mutation data reveal complex genetic similarities across major cancers.

Cancer medicine relies on the paradigm that cancer is an organ- and tissue-specific disease, which is the basis for classifying tumors. With the extensive genomic information now available on tumors it is possible to conduct analyses to reveal common genetic features across cancer types and to explore whether the established anatomy-based tumor classification is actually reflected on the genetic level, which might provide important guides to new therapeutic directions. Here, we have conducted an extensive analysis of the genetic similarity of tumors from 14 major cancer entities using somatic mutation data from 4,796 cases available through The Cancer Genome Atlas (TCGA) based on all available genes as well as different cancer-related gene sets. Our analysis provides a systematic account of the genetic similarity network for major cancer types and shows that in about 43% of the cases on average, tumors of a particular anatomic site are genetically more similar to tumors from different organs and tissues (trans-similarity) than to tumors of the same origin (self-similarity). The observed similarities exist not only for carcinomas from different sites but are also present among neoplasms from different tissue origin, such as melanoma, acute myeloid leukemia, and glioblastoma. The current WHO cancer classification is therefore reflected on the genetic level by only about 57% of the tumors. These results provide a rationale to reconsider organ- and tissue-specificity in cancer and contribute to the discussion about whether personalized therapies targeting specific genetic alterations may be transferred to cancers from other anatomic sites with similar genetic properties.