Sex-based utilization and outcomes of cold-stored whole blood for trauma resuscitation: Analysis of a prospective multicenter study.

BACKGROUND: Resuscitation with cold-stored whole blood (WB) has outcome benefits, but benefits varied by patient sex is unknown. There are also concerns about alloimmunization risk for premenopausal females given WB, leading to some protocols excluding this cohort. We sought to analyze WB utilization, outcomes, and disparities by patient sex. METHODS: This is a secondary analysis of a prospective multicenter study of WB resuscitation. Patients were stratified by sex and compared by transfusion strategy of WB or component therapy (CT). Generalized estimated equation models using inverse probability of treatment weighting were utilized. RESULTS: There were 1,617 patients (83% male; 17% female) included. Females were less likely to receive WB versus males (55% vs. 76%; p < 0.001), with wide variability between individual centers (0%-33% female vs. 66%-100% male, p < 0.01). Male WB had more blunt trauma (45% vs. 31%) and higher shock index (1.0 vs. 0.8) compared with the male CT cohort (all p < 0.05) but similar Injury Severity Score. The female WB cohort was older (53 vs. 36) and primarily blunt trauma (77% vs. 62%) compared with the female CT cohort (all p < 0.05) but had similar shock index and Injury Severity Score. Male WB had lower early and overall mortality (27% vs. 42%), but a higher rate of acute kidney injury (16% vs. 6%) vs. the male CT cohort (all p < 0.01). Female cohorts had no difference in mortality, but the WB cohort had higher bleeding complications. Whole blood use was independently associated with decreased mortality (OR, 0.6; p < 0.01) for males but not for females (OR, 0.9; p = 0.78). CONCLUSION: Whole blood was independently associated with a decreased mortality for males with no difference identified for females. Whole blood was significantly less utilized in females and showed wide variability between centers. Further study of the impact of patient sex on outcomes with WB and WB utilization is needed. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Prognostic/Epidemiological; Level IV.

Mechanism Matters: Differential benefits of cold-stored whole blood for trauma resuscitation from a prospective multicenter study.

BACKGROUND: Resuscitation with cold-stored low-titre whole blood (LTOWB) has increased despite the paucity of robust civilian data. Most studies are in predominately blunt trauma and lack analysis of specific subgroups or mechanism of injury. We sought to compare outcomes between patients receiving LTOWB vs. balanced component therapy (BCT) after blunt (BL) and penetrating (PN) trauma. METHODS: Secondary analysis of a prospective multicenter study of patients receiving either LTWOB-containing or BCT resuscitation was performed. Patients were grouped by mechanism of injury (BL vs PN). A generalized estimated equations model using inverse probability of treatment weighting was employed. Primary outcome was mortality and secondary outcomes were acute kidney injury, venous thromboembolism, pulmonary complications, and bleeding complications. Additional analyses were performed on non-traumatic brain injury (TBI), severe torso injury, and LTOWB-only resuscitation patients. RESULTS: 1617 patients (BL 47% vs PN 54%) were identified; 1175 (73%) of which received LTOWB. PN trauma patients receiving LTOWB demonstrated improved survival compared to BCT (77% vs. 56%; p<0.01). Interval survival was higher at 6 hrs (95% vs. 88%), 12 hrs (93% vs. 80%) and 24 hrs (88% vs. 57%) (all p<0.05). The survival benefit following LTOWB was also seen across PN non-TBI (83% vs. 52%), and severe torso injuries (75% vs. 43%) (all p <0.05). After controlling for age, sex, injury severity, and trauma center, LTWOB was associated with decreased odds of death (OR .31, p<.05) in PN trauma. However, no difference in overall mortality was seen across the BL groups. Both PN and BL patients receiving LTOWB had more frequent AKI compared to BCT (19% vs. 7% and 12% vs 6%, respectively; p<0.05). CONCLUSIONS: LTOWB resuscitation was independently associated with decreased mortality following PN trauma, but not BL trauma. Further analysis in BL trauma is required to identify subgroups that may demonstrate survival benefit. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Therapeutic/Care Management, III.

Is barbed better? Evaluation of triclosan-coated barbed suture on wound complications following emergency laparotomy.

INTRODUCTION: Emergent laparotomy is associated with significant wound complications including surgical site infections (SSIs) and fascial dehiscence. Triclosan-coated barbed (TCB) suture for fascial closure has been shown to reduce local complications but primarily in elective settings. We sought to evaluate the effect of TCB emergency laparotomy fascial closure on major wound complications. METHODS: Adult patients undergoing emergency laparotomy were prospectively evaluated over 1 year. Patients were grouped into TCB versus polydioxanone (PDS) for fascial closure. Subanalysis was performed on patients undergoing single-stage laparotomy. Primary outcomes were SSI and fascial dehiscence. Multivariate analysis identified independent factors associated with SSI and fascial dehiscence. RESULTS: Of the 206 laparotomies, 73 (35%) were closed with TCB, and 133 (65%) were closed with PDS. Trauma was the reason for laparotomy in 73% of cases; damage-control laparotomy was performed in 27% of cases. The overall rate of SSI and fascial dehiscence was 18% and 10%, respectively. Operative strategy was similar between groups, including damage-control laparotomy, wound vac use, skin closure, and blood products. Surgical site infection events trended lower with TCB versus PDS closure (11% vs. 21%, p = 0.07), and fascial dehiscence was significantly lower with TCB versus PDS (4% vs. 14%, p < 0.05). Subanalysis of trauma and nontrauma cases showed no difference in SSI or fascial dehiscence. Multivariable analysis found that TCB decreased the likelihood of fascial dehiscence (odds ratio, 0.07; p < 0.05) following emergency laparotomy. Increased odds of fascial dehiscence were seen in damage-control laparotomy (odds ratio, 3.1; p < 0.05). CONCLUSION: Emergency laparotomy fascial closure with TCB showed significantly decreased rates of fascial dehiscence compared with closure with PDS and a strong trend toward lower SSI events. Triclosan-coated barbed suture was independently associated with decreased fascial dehiscence rates after emergency laparotomy. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Therapeutic/Care Management; Level III.

Paradigm Shifts in Vascular Surgery: Analysis of the Top 100 Innovative and Disruptive Academic Publications.

BACKGROUND: Disruption score (DS) is a novel bibliometric created to identify research that shifts paradigms, which may be overlooked by citation count (CC). We analyzed the most disruptive, compared to the most cited, literature in vascular surgery, and hypothesized that DS and CC would not correlate. METHODS: A PubMed search identified vascular surgery publications from 1954 to 2014. The publications were linked to the iCite NIH tool and DS algorithm to identify the top 100 studies by CC and DS, respectively. The publications were reviewed for study focus, design, and contribution, and subsequently compared. RESULTS: A total of 56,640 publications were identified. The top 100 DS papers were frequently published in J Vasc Sur (43%) and Eur J Vasc Endovasc Surg (13%). The top 100 CC papers were frequently published in N Engl J Med (32%) and J Vasc Sur (20%). The most cited article is the fifth most disruptive; the most disruptive article is not in the top 100 cited papers. The DS papers had a higher mean DS than the CC papers (.17 vs .0001, P < .0001). The CC papers had a higher mean CC than the DS papers (866 vs 188, P < .0001). DS and CC are weakly correlated metrics (r = .22, P = .03). DISCUSSION: DS was weakly correlated with CC and captured a unique subset of literature that created paradigm shifts in vascular surgery. DS should be utilized as an adjunct to CC to avoid overlooking impactful research and influential researchers, and to measure true academic productivity.

Disruption of trauma research: an analysis of the top cited versus disruptive trauma research publications.

Introduction: The analysis of surgical research using bibliometric measures has become increasingly prevalent. Absolute citation counts (CC) or indices are commonly used markers of research quality but may not adequately capture the most impactful research. A novel scoring system, the disruptive score (DS) has been found to identity academic work that either changes paradigms (disruptive (DIS) work) or entrenches ideas (developmental (DEV) work). We sought to analyze the most DIS and DEV versus most cited research in civilian trauma. Methods: The top papers by DS and by CC from trauma and surgery journals were identified via a professional literature search. The identified publications were then linked to the National Institutes of Health iCite tool to quantify total CC and related metrics. The top 100 DIS and DEV publications by DS were analyzed based on the area of focus, citation, and perceived clinical impact, and compared with the top 100 papers by CC. Results: 32 293 articles published between 1954 and 2014 were identified. The most common publication location of selected articles was published in Journal of Trauma (31%). Retrospective reviews (73%) were common in DIS (73%) and top CC (67%) papers, while DEV papers were frequently case reports (49%). Only 1 publication was identified in the top 100 DIS and top 100 CC lists. There was no significant correlation between CC and DS among the top 100 DIS papers (r=0.02; p=0.85), and only a weak correlation between CC and DS score (r=0.21; p<0.05) among the top 100 DEV papers. Conclusion: The disruption score identifies a unique subset of trauma academia. The most DIS trauma literature is highly distinct and has little overlap with top trauma publications identified by standard CC metrics, with no significant correlation between the CC and DS. Level of evidence: Level IV.

Proximal protective diverting ostomy following colon anastomosis for penetrating trauma may not be protective: A matched cohort study.

INTRODUCTION: Despite the shift toward liberal primary anastomosis in penetrating colon injuries, some surgeons recommend a protective diverting ostomy (DO) proximal to the anastomosis. This study evaluates the effect of DO on outcomes in patients undergoing colon resection and anastomosis following penetrating trauma. METHODS: The TQIP database (2013-2018) was queried for penetrating colon injuries undergoing colectomy and anastomosis. Patients receiving DO were propensity matched to patients without diverting ostomy (woDO) (1:3). Outcomes were compared between groups. RESULTS: After matching, 89 DO patients were analyzed. The DO group had more surgical site infections (32 â€‹% vs. 21 â€‹%; p â€‹< â€‹0.05) and longer hospital stay (20 [13-27] vs. 15 [9-25]; p â€‹< â€‹0.05) compared to the woDO group. Mortality and unplanned operations were similar between groups. CONCLUSIONS: Diverting ostomy after colon resection and anastomosis is associated with increased infectious complications without decreasing unplanned operations or mortality. Its routine role in penetrating colon trauma needs reassessment.

Is Adolescent Obesity Associated With a Higher Risk for Pelvic Fractures in Motor Vehicle Collisions?

INTRODUCTION: The impact of obesity on the incidence of blunt pelvic fractures in adults is unclear, and adolescents may have an increased risk of fracture due to variable bone mineral density and leptin levels. Increased subcutaneous adipose tissue may provide protection, though the association between obesity and pelvic fractures in adolescents has not been studied. This study hypothesized that obese adolescents (OAs) presenting after motor vehicle collision (MVC) have a higher rate of pelvic fractures, and OAs with such fractures have a higher associated risk of complications and mortality compared to non-OAs. METHODS: The 2017-2019 Trauma Quality Improvement Program database was queried for adolescents (12-16 y old) presenting after MVC. The primary outcome was a pelvic fracture. Adolescents with a body mass index ≥30 (OA) were compared to adolescents with a body mass index <30 (non-OA). Subgroup analyses for high-risk and low-risk MVCs were performed. Multivariable logistic regression analyses were also performed adjusting for age and sex. RESULTS: From 22,610 MVCs, 3325 (14.7%) included OAs. The observed rate of pelvic fracture was similar between all OA and non-OA MVCs (10.2% versus 9.4%, P = 0.16), as well as subanalyses of minor or high-risk MVC (both P > 0.05). OAs presenting with a pelvic fracture after high-risk MVC had a similar risk of complications, pelvic surgery, and mortality compared to non-OAs (all P > 0.05). However, OAs with a pelvic fracture after minor MVC had a higher associated risk of complications (OR 2.27, CI 1.10-4.69, P = 0.03), but a similar risk of requiring pelvic surgery, and mortality (all P > 0.05). CONCLUSIONS: This national analysis found a similar observed incidence of pelvic fractures for OAs versus non-OAs involved in an MVC, including subanalyses of minor and high-risk MVC. Furthermore, there was no difference in the associated risk of morbidity and mortality except for OAs involved in a minor MVC had a higher risk of complication.

Propensity Score Analysis of Resuscitative Endovascular Balloon Occlusion of the Aorta: Zone-1 Versus Zone-3 Resuscitative Endovascular Balloon Occlusion of the Aorta Odds of Mortality.

INTRODUCTION: There are two zones for the placement of a Resuscitative Endovascular Balloon Occlusion of the Aorta (REBOA) in trauma patients: above the mesenteric vessels (Zone-1) or below the renal arteries (Zone-3). Zone-1 REBOA diverts blood away from the visceral organs which leads to a systemic inflammatory response and reperfusion injury. We hypothesized that patients undergoing Zone-1 REBOA placement had a higher odds of mortality. METHODS: The 2017-2019 Trauma Quality Improvement Program database was queried for patients undergoing either Zone-1 or Zone-3 REBOA. We excluded all patients with prehospital cardiac arrest. We compared Zone-1 versus Zone-3 REBOA using a 1:2 propensity-score model, matching for age, mechanism, sex, hypotension, tachycardia, blunt solid organ injury grade, pelvic fracture, and injuries to the aorta, iliac artery, iliac vein, and inferior vena cava. RESULTS: We matched 130 Zone-1 REBOA patients to 260 Zone-3 REBOA patients. There were no statistically significant differences in the matched variables (P > 0.05). Compared to Zone-3 REBOA, patients with Zone-1 REBOA who survived ≥48 h had similar rates of acute kidney injury (18.6% versus 10.9%, P = 0.19). Zone-1 REBOA patients had a higher mortality rate (71.4% versus 48.8%, P = 0.002) and mortality odds ratio (OR) (OR 1.85, OR 1.18-2.89, P = 0.007). Zone-1 REBOA remained associated with a higher odds of mortality after controlling for traumatic brain injury and injury severity score (OR 1.86, OR 1.18-2.92, P = 0.007). CONCLUSIONS: Compared to Zone-3, using a REBOA in Zone-1 is associated with higher odds of mortality. The use of REBOA Zone-1 deployment should be done with caution.

Injury Patterns and Treatment Strategies in Civilian and Military Isolated Abdominal Gunshot Wounds.

BACKGROUND: Combat-related gunshot wounds (GSW) may differ from those found in civilian trauma centers. Missile velocity, resources, logistics, and body armor may affect injury patterns and management strategies. This study compares injury patterns, management, and outcomes in isolated abdominal GSW between military (MIL) and civilian (CIV) populations. METHODS: The Department of Defense Trauma Registry (DoDTR) and TQIP databases were queried for patients with isolated abdominal GSW from 2013 to 2016. MIL patients were propensity score matched 1:3 based on age, sex, and extraabdominal AIS. Injury patterns and in-hospital outcomes were compared. Initial operative management strategies, including selective nonoperative management (SNOM) for isolated solid organ injuries, were also compared. RESULTS: Of the 6435 patients with isolated abdominal GSW, 183 (3%) MIL were identified and matched with 549 CIV patients. The MIL group had more hollow viscus injuries (84% vs. 66%) while the CIV group had more vascular injuries (10% vs. 21%) (p < .05 for both). Operative strategy differed, with more MIL patients undergoing exploratory laparotomy (95% vs. 82%) and colectomy (72% vs. 52%) (p < .05 for both). However, no difference in ostomy creation was appreciated. More SNOM for isolated solid organ injuries was performed in the CIV group (34.1% vs. 12.5%; p < 0.05). In-hospital outcomes, including mortality, were similar between groups. CONCLUSIONS: MIL abdominal GSW lead to higher rates of hollow viscus injuries compared to CIV GSW. MIL GSW are more frequently treated with resection but with similar ostomy creation compared to civilian GSW. SNOM of solid organ injuries is infrequently performed following MIL GSW.

Citation versus disruption in the military: Analysis of the top disruptive military trauma research publications.

BACKGROUND: Bibliometric analysis of surgical research has become increasingly prevalent. Citation count (CC) is a commonly used marker of research quality, but may overlook impactful military research. The disruption score (DS) evaluates manuscripts on a spectrum from most innovative with more positive scores (disruptive [DR]) to most entrenched with more negative scores (developmental; DV). We sought to analyze the most DR and DV versus most cited research in military trauma. METHODS: Top trauma articles by DS and by CC were identified via professional literature search. All publications in military journals were included. Military trauma-related keywords were used to query additional top surgical journals for military-focused publications. Publications were linked to the iCite NIH tool for CC and related metrics. The top 100 DR and DV publications by DS were analyzed and compared with the top 100 articles by CC. RESULTS: Overall, 32,040 articles published between 1954 and 2014 were identified. The average DS and CC were 0.01 and 22, respectively. Most articles were published in Mil Med ( 68%). The top 100 DR articles were frequently published in Mil Med (51%) with a mean DS of 0.148. Of these, the most cited article was only the 40th most disruptive. The top 100 CC articles averaged a DS of 0.009 and were commonly found in J Trauma (53%). Only five publications were on both the top 100 DR and top 100 CC lists; 19 were on both the top DV and CC lists. Citation count was not correlated with DR ( r = -0.134; p = 0.07) and only weakly correlated with DV ( r = 0.215; p = 0.003). CONCLUSION: DS identifies publications that changed military paradigms and future research directions previously overlooked by citation count alone. The DR and DV articles are distinct with little overlap between highly cited military articles. Multiple bibliometric measures should be employed to avoid overlooking impactful military trauma research. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Diagnostic Test or Criteria; Level IV.

Operative management and outcomes of colorectal injuries after gunshot wounds in the deployed military setting versus civilian trauma centers.

INTRODUCTION: Colon and rectal injuries have been diverted at higher rates in military trauma compared with civilian injuries. However, in the last few years, there has been a shift to more liberal primary anastomosis in wartime injuries. The purpose of this study was to compare the management and outcomes in colorectal gunshot wounds (GSWs) between military and civilian settings. METHODS: The study included Department of Defense Trauma Registry and Trauma Quality Improvement Program database patients who sustained colorectal GSWs, during the period 2013 to 2016. Department of Defense Trauma Registry patients were propensity score matched 1:3 based on age, sex, grade of colorectal injury, and extra-abdominal Abbreviated Injury Scale. Patients without signs of life, transfers from an outside hospital, and nonspecific colorectal Organ Injury Scale were excluded. Operative management and outcomes were compared between the two groups. Subanalysis was performed on the military cohort to identify any differences in the use primary repair, colectomy, or fecal diversion based upon military affiliation or North Atlantic Treaty Organization status. RESULTS: Overall, there were 2,693 patients with colorectal GSWs; 60 patients in the military group were propensity score matched with 180 patients in the civilian group. Overall, colectomy was the most common procedure performed (72.1%) and was used more frequently in the military group (83.3% vs. 68.3%; p < 0.05). However, the rate of fecal diversion was similar in the two groups (23.3% vs. 27.8%; p = 0.500). Among those in the military group, no difference was seen in primary repair, colectomy, or fecal diversion based upon military affiliation or North Atlantic Treaty Organization status. The rates of in-hospital compilations and mortality were similar between the military and civilian groups. CONCLUSION: The severity of GSW colorectal injuries in military and civilian trauma was comparable. There was no significant difference in terms of fecal diversion, mortality, and complications between groups. Military personnel are treated similarly regardless of affiliation. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Therapeutic/Care Management; Level III.

Risk factors and outcomes in pediatric blunt cardiac injuries.

PURPOSE: Unlike adults, less is known of the etiology and risk factors for blunt cardiac injury (BCI) in children. Identifying risk factors for BCI in pediatric patients will allow for more specific screening practices following blunt trauma. METHODS: A retrospective review was performed using the Trauma Quality Improvement Program (TQIP) database from 2017 to 2019. All patients ≤ 16 years injured following blunt trauma were included. Demographics, mechanism, associated injuries, injury severity, and outcomes were collected. Univariate and multivariate regression was used to determine specific risk factors for BCI. RESULTS: Of 266,045 pediatric patients included in the analysis, the incidence of BCI was less than 0.2%. The all-cause mortality seen in patients with BCI was 26%. Motor-vehicle collisions (MVCs) were the most common mechanism, although no association with seatbelt use was seen in adolescents (p = 0.158). The strongest independent risk factors for BCI were pulmonary contusions (OR 15.4, p < 0.001) and hemothorax (OR 8.9, p < 0.001). CONCLUSIONS: Following trauma, the presence of pulmonary contusions or hemothorax should trigger additional screening investigations specific for BCI in pediatric patients.

Pseudoaneurysm after High-Grade Penetrating Solid Organ Injury and Utility of Delayed CT Angiography.

BACKGROUND: Leaving an injured solid organ in situ allows preservation of structure function but invites complications from the damaged parenchyma, including pseudoaneurysms (PSAs). Empiric PSA screening after solid organ injury is not yet established, particularly following penetrating trauma. The study objective was definition of delayed CT angiography (dCTA) yield in triggering intervention for PSA after penetrating solid organ injury. METHODS: Penetrating trauma patients at our American College of Surgeons-verified level 1 center with American Association for the Surgery of Trauma grade ≥3 abdominal solid organ injury (liver, spleen, kidney) were retrospectively screened (January 2017 to October 2021). Exclusions were age <18 y, transfers, death within <48 h, and nephrectomy/splenectomy within <4 h. Primary outcome was intervention triggered by dCTA. Statistical testing with ANOVA/chi-square compared outcomes between screened vs unscreened patients. RESULTS: A total of 136 penetrating trauma patients met study criteria: 57 patients (42%) screened for PSA with dCTA and 79 (58%) unscreened. Liver injuries were most common (n = 41, 64% vs n = 55, 66%), followed by kidney (n = 21, 33% vs n = 23, 27%) and spleen (n = 2, 3% vs n = 6, 7%) (p = 0.48). Median American Association for the Surgery of Trauma grade of solid organ injury was 3 (3 to 4) across groups (p = 0.75). dCTA diagnosed 10 PSAs (18%) at a median of hospital day 5 (3 to 9). Among screened patients, dCTA triggered intervention in 17% of liver patients, 29% of kidney patients, and 0% of spleen-injured patients, for an overall yield of 23%. CONCLUSIONS: Half of eligible penetrating high-grade solid organ injuries were screened for PSA with dCTA. dCTA identified a significant number of PSAs and triggered intervention in 23% of screened patients. dCTA did not diagnose any PSAs after splenic injury, although sample size hinders interpretation. To avoid missing PSAs and incurring their risk of rupture, universal screening of high-grade penetrating solid organ injuries may be prudent.

A review of the utility of high-frequency oscillatory ventilation in burn and trauma ICU patients.

PURPOSE OF REVIEW: The purpose was to examine the utility of high-frequency oscillatory ventilation (HFOV) in trauma and burn ICU patients who require mechanical ventilation, and provide recommendations on its use. RECENT FINDINGS: HFOV may be beneficial in burn patients with smoke inhalation injury with or without acute lung injury/acute respiratory distress syndrome (ARDS), as it improves oxygenation and minimizes ventilator-induced lung injury. It also may have a role in improving oxygenation in trauma patients with blast lung injury, pulmonary contusions, pneumothorax with massive air leak, and ARDS; however, the mortality benefit is unknown. SUMMARY: Although some studies have shown promise and improved outcomes associated with HFOV, we recommend its use as a rescue modality for patients who have failed conventional ventilation.

Worse outcomes with resuscitative endovascular balloon occlusion of the aorta in severe pelvic fracture: A matched cohort study.

BACKGROUND: Severe pelvic fracture is the most common indication for resuscitative endovascular balloon occlusion of the aorta (REBOA). This matched cohort study investigated outcomes with or without REBOA use in isolated severe pelvic fractures. METHODS: Trauma Quality Improvement Program database study, included patients with isolated severe pelvic fracture (AIS≥3), excluded associated injuries with AIS >3 for any region other than lower extremity. REBOA patients were propensity score matched to similar patients without REBOA. Outcomes were mortality and complications. RESULTS: 93 REBOA patients were matched with 279 without. REBOA patients had higher rates of in-hospital mortality (32.3% vs 19%, p = 0.008), higher rates of venous thromboembolism (14% vs 6.5%, p = 0.023) and DVT (11.8% vs 5.4%, p = 0.035). In multivariate analysis, REBOA use was independently associated with increased mortality and venous thromboembolism. CONCLUSIONS: REBOA in severe pelvic fractures is associated with higher rates of mortality, venous thromboembolism.