RESUMEN
Honeybees are some of the smallest farmed animals, and apiculture by-products, e.g., honey, beeswax, propolis, royal jelly, and pollen contribute to animal nutrition. For the effective production of these by-products, the optimal development and nutrient supply of the honeybee is required. Beginning with the development of the mouth and anal pores on the second day of embryonic development, the digestive tract differentiates into the mouth and fore-, mid-, and hindgut during the pupal stage. The various glands within the oral cavity are particularly important, secreting enzymes and substances that are crucial for digestion and hive nutrition, e.g., invertase and royal jelly. Honeybees rely on a specialized caste system, with worker bees collecting nectar, pollen, water, and resin for the nutrition of the entire hive. Macronutrients, including proteins, carbohydrates, and lipids, obtained primarily from pollen and nectar, are essential for the growth and development of larvae and the overall health of the colony. Inadequate nutrient intake can lead to detrimental effects on larval development, prompting cannibalism within the hive. Apiculture by-products possess unique nutritional and therapeutic properties, leading to a growing interest in the use of honey, beeswax, propolis, and pollen as a feed additive. In recent years, the use of apicultural by-products in animal nutrition has been primarily limited to in vivo studies, which have demonstrated various positive impacts on the performance of farm animals. Honey, beeswax, propolis, royal jelly, and pollen are listed feed stuffs according to Regulation (EC) No. 68/2013. However, for animal nutrition there is not any specific legal definition for these products and no legal requirements regarding their ingredients as given for honey or beeswax in European food law.
RESUMEN
OBJECTIVE: Chronic bee paralysis virus (CBPV), a so far unclassified RNA virus that may cause neurological signs and hairless black syndrome in honey bees, has become increasingly prevalent in various European countries in recent years. The disease occasionally leads to immense losses of worker bees and a significant drop in performance, especially in strong colonies. The aim of this retrospective study was to analyse the spread of CBPV in Bavaria from 2018 to 2020 as well as to evaluate therapeutic measures. MATERIAL AND METHODS: In part 1 of the study, analysis results of the Tiergesundheitsdienst Bayern e. V. (Bavarian Animal Health Service) from 302 bee colonies were examined with regard to virus diagnostics and clinical signs with a focus on CBPV. In part 2, data collected with the help of a questionnaire regarding 105 CBPV-positive and symptomatic colonies were evaluated. RESULTS: In part 1, a significant (p = 0.004) increase in CBPV-positive samples from 2018 to 2020 was detected within Bavaria. In addition, the number of cases with clinical signs also increased during the last 2 years. Part 2 of the study showed a clustering of reports of initial onset of CBPV symptoms during springtime. The colonies mostly with a combination of symptoms recovered from the disease in 57 % of the cases. Therapeutic intervention was one decisive factor. A large number of different combinations of measures led to survival, and a lack of intervention mostly resulted in the death of the colony. In 62 % of the diseased and isolated colonies, isolation prevented further spread in the apiary. CONCLUSION UND CLINICAL RELEVANCE: Based on the results, CBPV occurred more frequently in connection with clinical signs in Bavaria in recent years. Due to the large number of applied combinations of measures, no evidence-based therapy recommendation may be derived based on the current evaluations. However, it has been shown that any therapeutic intervention is superior to withholding treatment. For precise therapy recommendations, trials with treatment under standard conditions are necessary.
Asunto(s)
Virus ARN , Animales , Abejas , Incidencia , Parálisis/veterinaria , Estudios RetrospectivosRESUMEN
Veterinarians are educated in prevention, diagnosis and treatment of diseases in various vertebrate species. As they are familiar with multifactorial health problems in single animals as well as in herd health management, their knowledge and skills can be beneficial for the beekeepers and honeybee health. However, in education and in practice, honeybees are not a common species for most veterinarians and the typical veterinary diagnostic methods such as blood sampling or auscultation are not applicable to the superorganism honeybee. Honeybee colonies may be affected by various biotic and abiotic factors. Among the infectious agents, RNA-viruses build the largest group, causing covert and overt infections in honeybee colonies which may lead to colony losses. Veterinarians could and should play a more substantial role in managing honeybee health-not limited to cases of notifiable diseases and official hygiene controls. This review discusses the veterinary diagnostic approach to adult bee examination with a special focus on diagnosis and differential diagnosis of the common virus diseases Acute Bee Paralysis Virus (ABPV)-Kashmir Bee Virus (KBV)-Israeli Acute Paralysis Virus (IAPV)-Complex, Chronic Bee Paralysis Virus (CBPV) and Deformed Wing Virus (DWV), as well as coinfections like Varroa spp. and Nosema spp.
RESUMEN
Chronic Bee Paralysis Virus (CBPV), a widespread honey bee RNA virus, causes massive worker bee losses, mostly in strong colonies. Two different syndromes, with paralysis, ataxia and flight incapacity on one hand and black hairless individuals with shortened abdomens on the other, can affect a colony simultaneously. This case report presents two Apis mellifera carnica colonies with symptoms of paralysis and hairless black syndrome in 2019. Via RT-PCR, a highly positive result for CBPV was detected in both samples. Further problems, such as a Nosema infection and Varroa infestation, were present in these colonies. Therapy methods were applied to colony 1 comprising queen replacement, shook swarm method and Varroa control, whereas colony 2 was asphyxiated after queen loss and colony weakening. After therapy, colony 1 was wintered without symptoms. Beekeeping and sanitary measures can save a CBPV-infected colony, while further complications result in total colony loss.
