Association between ischaemic stroke aetiology and leptomeningeal collateral status: a retrospective cohort study.

INTRODUCTION: There is limited understanding of the pathomechanistic relationship between leptomeningeal collateral formation and ischaemic stroke aetiology. We aimed to assess the association of leptomeningeal collateral status and ischaemic stroke aetiology, using the widely recognised "Trial of Org 10172 in Acute Stroke Treatment" (TOAST) classification categorising strokes into five distinct aetiologies. METHODS: Retrospective study of consecutively admitted adult ischaemic stroke patients at a Swiss stroke centre. Leptomeningeal collateral status was assessed on admission with single-phase CT-angiographies using a validated 4-point score. Patients were categorised into large-artery atherosclerosis (LAA), cardioembolic (CE), small-vessel disease (SVD) and cryptogenic (CG) according to the TOAST classification. We performed ordinal and binary (poor [collaterals filling ≤50% of the occluded territory] vs good [collaterals filling >50% of the occluded territory] collateralisation) logistic regression to evaluate the impact of TOAST aetiology on collateral status. RESULTS: Among 191 patients, LAA patients had better collateral status compared to non-LAA aetiology (LAA: 2 vs CE: 2 vs SVD: 3 vs CG: 2, pLAA vs non-LAA = 0.04). In weighted multivariate logistic regression, LAA and SVD independently predicted better collateral status (binary models [adjusted odds ratio; aOR]: LAA: 3.72 [1.21-11.44] and SVD: 4.19 [1.21-14.52]; ordinal models [adjusted common odds ratio; acOR]: LAA: 2.26 [95% CI: 1.23-4.15] and SVD: 1.94 [1.03-3.66]), while CE predicted worse collateral status (binary models [aOR]: CE: 0.17 [0.07-0.41]; ordinal models [acOR]: CE: 0.24 [0.11-0.51]). CONCLUSION: The aetiology of ischaemic stroke is associated with leptomeningeal collateral status on single-phase CT-angiography, with LAA and SVD predicting better and CE predicting worse collateral status.

Efficacy and Tolerability of Intranasal Midazolam Administration for Antiseizure Treatment in Adults: A Systematic Review.

OBJECTIVE: The objective of this study was to assess the efficacy and tolerability of intranasal midazolam (in-MDZ) administration for antiseizure treatment in adults. METHODS: Embase and Medline literature databases were searched. We included randomized trials and cohort studies (excluding case series) of adult patients (≥ 18 years of age) examining in-MDZ administration for epilepsy, epileptic seizures, or status epilepticus published in English between 1985 and 2022. Studies were screened for eligibility based on predefined criteria. The primary outcome was the efficacy of in-MDZ administration, and the secondary outcome was its tolerability. Extracted data included study design, patient characteristics, intervention details, and outcomes. Risk of bias was assessed using the Cochrane Risk of Bias Tool. RESULTS: A total of 12 studies with 929 individuals treated with in-MDZ were included. Most studies were retrospective, with their number increasing over time. Administered in-MDZ doses ranged from 2.5 to 20 mg per single dose. The mean proportion of successful seizure termination after first in-MDZ administration was 72.7% (standard deviation [SD] 18%), and the proportion of seizure recurrence or persistent seizures ranged from 61 to 75%. Most frequent adverse reactions to in-MDZ were dizziness (mean 23.5% [SD 38.6%]), confusion (one study; 17.4%), local irritation (mean 16.6% [SD 9.6%]), and sedation (mean 12.7% [SD 9.7%]). CONCLUSIONS: Administration of in-MDZ seems promising for the treatment of prolonged epileptic seizures and seizure clusters in adults. Limited evidence suggests that intranasal administration is safe. Further research is warranted because of the heterogeneity of cohorts, the variation in dosages, and the lack of uniformity in defining successful seizure termination.

Lipoprotein(a) as a blood marker for large artery atherosclerosis stroke etiology: validation in a prospective cohort from a swiss stroke center.

BACKGROUND: Lipoprotein (a) [Lp(a)] serum levels are highly genetically determined and promote atherogenesis. High Lp(a) levels are associated with increased cardiovascular morbidity. Serum Lp(a) levels have recently been associated with large artery atherosclerosis (LAA) stroke. We aimed to externally validate this association in an independent cohort. METHODS: This study stems from the prospective multicentre CoRisk study (CoPeptin for Risk Stratification in Acute Stroke patients [NCT00878813]), conducted at the University Hospital Bern, Switzerland, between 2009 and 2011, in which Lp(a) plasma levels were measured within the first 24 hours after stroke onset. We assessed the association of Lp(a) with LAA stroke using multivariable logistic regression and performed interaction analyses to identify potential effect modifiers. RESULTS: Of 743 patients with ischaemic stroke, 105 (14%) had LAA stroke aetiology. Lp(a) levels were higher for LAA stroke than non-LAA stroke patients (23.0 nmol/l vs 16.3 nmol/l, p = 0.01). Multivariable regression revealed an independent association of log10and#xA0;Lp(a) with LAA stroke aetiology (aOR 1.47 [95% CI 1.03and#x2013;2.09], p = 0.03). The interaction analyses showed that Lp(a) was not associated with LAA stroke aetiology among patients with diabetes. CONCLUSIONS: In a well-characterised cohort of patients with ischaemic stroke, we validated the association of higher Lp(a) levels with LAA stroke aetiology, independent of traditional cardiovascular risk factors. These findings may inform randomised clinical trials investigating the effect of Lp(a) lowering agents on cardiovascular outcomes. The CoRisk (CoPeptin for Risk Stratification in Acute Patients) study is registered on ClinicalTrials.gov. REGISTRATION NUMBER: NCT00878813.

Absent leptomeningeal collateralization is associated with greatest benefit from mechanical thrombectomy in the 6-24 hour time window.

INTRODUCTION: The impact of leptomeningeal collateralization on the efficacy of mechanical thrombectomy (MT) in patients with anterior circulation large vessel occlusion (aLVO) presenting in the 6-24 h time window remains poorly elucidated. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Retrospective multicenter study of aLVO patients presenting between 6 and 24 h after stroke onset who received MT plus Best Medical Treatment (BMT) or BMT alone. Leptomeningeal collateralization was assessed using single-phase computed tomography angiography (grade 0: no filling; grade 1: filling ⩽50%; grade 2: filling >50% but <100%; grade 3: filling 100% of the occluded territory). Inverse probability of treatment weighted ordinal regression was performed to assess the association between treatment and shift of the modified Rankin Scale (mRS) score toward lower categories at 3 months. We used interaction analysis to explore differential treatment effects on functional outcomes (probabilities for each mRS subcategory at 3 months) at different collateral grades. RESULTS: Among 363 included patients, 62% received MT + BMT. Better collateralization was associated with better functional outcomes at 3 months in the BMT alone group (collateral grade 1 vs 0: acOR 5.06, 95% CI 2.33-10.99). MT + BMT was associated with higher odds of favorable functional outcome at 3 months (acOR 1.70, 95% CI 1.11-2.62) which was consistent after adjustment for collateral status (acOR 1.54, 95% CI 1.01-2.35). Regarding treatment effect modification, patients with absent collateralization had higher probabilities for a mRS of 0-4 and a lower mortality at 3 months for the MT + BMT group. DISCUSSION AND CONCLUSION: In the 6-to-24-h time window, aLVO patients with absent leptomeningeal collateralization benefit most from MT + BMT, indicating potential advantages for this group despite their poorer baseline prognosis.