Impact of the implementation of a standard for preanalytical handling of samples for microbiological diagnostics on the quality of results at a neurocritical care unit.

ABSTRACT: Antibiotic stewardship (ABS) programs intend to improve outcomes of nosocomial infections and to counteract the emergence of further antimicrobial resistances. At the anesthesiologic-neurosurgical intensive care unit (ICU) of the University Medical Center Regensburg (Germany) we implemented a standard operating procedure (SOP) with clear instructions for the preanalytical handling and storage of microbiological samples. We intended to find out whether the instructions given in the SOP led to a higher rate of ideal material being sent to the laboratory and to overall better quality of the received results.We retraced retrospectively all samples taken in cases of suspected pneumonia, urinary tract infection, bloodstream infection, catheter infection associated with a central venous or arterial catheter and ventriculitis due to external ventricular drainage as well as all smears taken for the screening for multi-resistant bacteria within a time period of 1 year before to 1 year after the implementation of the SOP.In the case of suspected pneumonia and urinary tract infection, large amounts of ideal material were sent to the microbiological laboratory. A remarkable improvement after the implementation of the SOP, however, could only be observed regarding the number of urine samples taken from older urinary catheters, which was significantly lower in the "SOP group". Samples for microbiological diagnostics were taken much more often in the daytime, although storage of the probes did not lead to worse results.Concrete instructions enable adequate preanalytical handling of microbiological probes. However, we could not recognize substantial improvements probably due to a preexisting high process quality on the ICU. Microbiological diagnostics during the night shift has to be improved.

Impact of hydroxyethyl starch and modified fluid gelatin on granulocyte phenotype and function.

BACKGROUND: Patients with neutropenia or granulocyte dysfunction may require granulocyte transfusions for adequate immune restoration. High-molecular-weight hydroxyethyl starch (HES) is the most commonly used sedimentation agent to enhance granulocyte collection efficiency. However, authorities recently restricted the use of HES due to its unfavorable risk-benefit profile. As modified fluid gelatin (MFG) is already used as an alternative sedimentation agent, we tested the hypothesis that MFG is not inferior to HES in terms of the functionality and viability of granulocytes. STUDY DESIGN AND METHODS: Granulocytes from ten healthy donors were isolated, aliquoted and incubated in parallel for 2 hours with either 0% (control), 7.5%, 15%, or 30% MFG (Gelafundin) or HES (Hespan), respectively, and granulocyte migration, chemotaxis, reactive oxygen species (ROS) production, neutrophil extracellular trap formation (NETosis), antigen expression, and viability were subsequently investigated in vitro. RESULTS: Relative to the controls, all three concentrations of HES compared to only 15% and 30% MFG lowered migration distances, and the 15% and 30% concentrations of both sedimentation agents reduced track straightness. HES resulted in lower CD11b expression and higher CD62L expression compared to MFG and the controls, whereas the differences for CD66b did not reach statistical significance. No significant differences in the timing of ROS production or NETosis, or in neutrophil viability or respiratory burst were observed. CONCLUSION: These results indicate that MFG is not inferior to HES in terms of granulocyte function in vitro when used at equal concentrations, and that potential impairment of granulocyte function can occur with HES.