Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 20 de 69
Filtrar
1.
J Natl Cancer Inst Monogr ; 2015(51): 90-6, 2015 May.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-26063896

RESUMEN

Expert consensus-based recommendations regarding key issues in the use of primary (or neoadjuvant) systemic treatment (PST) in patients with early breast cancer are a valuable resource for practising oncologists. PST remains a valuable therapeutic approach for the assessment of biological antitumor activity and clinical efficacy of new treatments in clinical trials. Neoadjuvant trials provide endpoints, such as pathological complete response (pCR) to treatment, that potentially translate into meaningful improvements in overall survival and disease-free survival. Neoadjuvant trials need fewer patients and are less expensive than adjuvant trial, and the endpoint of pCR is achieved in months, rather than years. For these reasons, the neoadjuvant setting is ideal for testing emerging targeted therapies in early breast cancer. Although pCR is an early clinical endpoint, its role as a surrogate for long-term outcomes is the key issue. New and better predictors of treatment efficacy are needed to improve treatment and outcomes. After PST, accurate management of post-treatment residual disease is mandatory. The surgery of the sentinel lymph-node could be an acceptable option to spare the axillary dissection in case of clinical negativity (N0) of the axilla at the diagnosis and/or after PST. No data exists yet to support the modulation of the extent of locoregional radiation therapy on the basis of the response attained after PST although trials are underway.


Asunto(s)
Protocolos de Quimioterapia Combinada Antineoplásica/uso terapéutico , Neoplasias de la Mama/tratamiento farmacológico , Consenso , Testimonio de Experto , Terapia Neoadyuvante/métodos , Neoplasias de la Mama/metabolismo , Neoplasias de la Mama/cirugía , Quimioterapia Adyuvante/métodos , Femenino , Humanos , Cooperación Internacional , Terapia Molecular Dirigida/métodos , Neoplasia Residual/diagnóstico , Evaluación de Resultado en la Atención de Salud/métodos , Pronóstico , Receptor ErbB-2/metabolismo , Inducción de Remisión , Biopsia del Ganglio Linfático Centinela
2.
BMC Cancer ; 14: 184, 2014 Mar 14.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-24628963

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND: We assessed the activity and toxicity of the XELBEVOCT regimen in patients with metastatic well-to-moderately differentiated neuroendocrine neoplasms (WMD-NEN). Ancillary studies evaluated hypertension, proteinuria, and vascular endothelial growth factor (VEGF) polymorphisms in predicting progression-free survival (PFS) and the predictive role of serum vitamin D in progression-free survival and proteinuria onset. METHODS: This prospective phase 2 study included 45 patients with WMD-NEN arising from various primary sites. The treatment regimen was octreotide long-acting release (LAR), 20 mg monthly, metronomic capecitabine, 2000 mg/daily, and intravenous bevacizumab, 5 mg/kg every 2 weeks, without interruption for 9 months. Bevacizumab was continued until disease progression. RESULTS: Partial response was obtained in 8 patients (17.8%, 95% confidence interval [CI], 6.4%-28.2%); tumor response was more frequent in pancreatic than in non-pancreatic malignancies. The median PFS was 14.9 months; median overall survival was not attained. Biochemical and symptomatic responses were observed in 52.9% and 82.3% of cases, respectively. The treatment was well tolerated. Grade 3 toxicities included hand and foot syndrome (11.1%), proteinuria (4.4%), and renal toxicity (2.2%). Proteinuria (all grades) was correlated with longer PFS (p = 0.017). There was an inverse relationship between proteinuria and vitamin D levels. VEGF polymorphisms were not associated with patient outcome. CONCLUSION: The XELBEVOCT regimen is active and well tolerated in patients with metastatic WMD-NEN. Proteinuria correlated with hypovitaminosis D status and was the best predictive factor of treatment efficacy. TRIAL REGISTRATION: Trial registration number NCT01203306.


Asunto(s)
Anticuerpos Monoclonales Humanizados/administración & dosificación , Protocolos de Quimioterapia Combinada Antineoplásica/administración & dosificación , Tumores Neuroendocrinos/tratamiento farmacológico , Octreótido/administración & dosificación , Administración Metronómica , Adulto , Anciano , Anticuerpos Monoclonales Humanizados/efectos adversos , Protocolos de Quimioterapia Combinada Antineoplásica/efectos adversos , Bevacizumab , Capecitabina , Desoxicitidina/análogos & derivados , Supervivencia sin Enfermedad , Femenino , Fluorouracilo/análogos & derivados , Humanos , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Metástasis de la Neoplasia , Estadificación de Neoplasias , Tumores Neuroendocrinos/patología , Octreótido/efectos adversos , Resultado del Tratamiento
3.
Breast ; 22(2): 109-120, 2013 Apr.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-23462680

RESUMEN

Gene expression profiling tests are used in an attempt to determine the right treatment for the right person with early-stage breast cancer that may have spread to nearby lymph nodes but not to distant parts of the body. These new diagnostic approaches are designed to spare people who do not need additional treatment (adjuvant therapy) the side effects of unnecessary treatment, and allow people who may benefit from adjuvant therapy to receive it. In the present review we discuss in detail the major diagnostic tests available such as MammaPrint dx, Oncotype dx, PAM50, Mammostrat, IHC4, MapQuant DX, Theros-Breast Cancer Gene Expression Ratio Assay, and their potential clinical applications.


Asunto(s)
Neoplasias de la Mama/genética , Perfilación de la Expresión Génica , Biomarcadores de Tumor/genética , Neoplasias de la Mama/tratamiento farmacológico , Neoplasias de la Mama/patología , Femenino , Perfilación de la Expresión Génica/clasificación , Perfilación de la Expresión Génica/instrumentación , Perfilación de la Expresión Génica/métodos , Regulación Neoplásica de la Expresión Génica , Humanos , Inmunohistoquímica , Metástasis de la Neoplasia , Pronóstico , Reacción en Cadena de la Polimerasa de Transcriptasa Inversa/instrumentación , Reacción en Cadena de la Polimerasa de Transcriptasa Inversa/métodos , Sensibilidad y Especificidad
4.
BJU Int ; 111(1): 44-52, 2013 Jan.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-22928785

RESUMEN

OBJECTIVE: To determine the efficacy and toxicity of danusertib (formerly PHA-739358) administered i.v. over two different dosing schedules with equivalent dose intensity in patients with metastatic castration-resistant prostate cancer with progressive disease after docetaxel-based treatment. PATIENTS AND METHODS: In this open-label, multicentre phase II trial 88 patients were randomly assigned (1:1 ratio) to receive either danusertib 330 mg/m(2) over 6 h i.v. on days 1, 8 and 15 (arm A, n = 43) or 500 mg/m(2) over 24 h i.v. on days 1 and 15 (arm B, n = 38), every 4 weeks. The primary endpoint chosen for this exploratory study was PSA response rate at 3 months. RESULTS: Sixty patients (31/43 in arm A and 29/38 in arm B) were evaluable for the primary endpoint. Median progression-free survival was 12 weeks in both arms. PSA response occurred in one patient in each arm; best overall response was stable disease in eight (18.6%) and 13 (34.2%) patients in arms A and B, respectively. Eleven out of 81 (13.6%) treated patients had stable disease for ≥6 months. Danusertib was generally well tolerated; the most common grade 3 and 4 drug-related adverse event was neutropenia which occurred in 37.2% (arm A) and 15.8% (arm B) of the patients. CONCLUSION: Danusertib monotherapy shows minimal efficacy in patients with castration-resistant prostate cancer. Further studies are required to establish specific biomarkers predictive for either response or prolonged disease stabilization.


Asunto(s)
Antineoplásicos/administración & dosificación , Benzamidas/administración & dosificación , Neoplasias de la Próstata/tratamiento farmacológico , Pirazoles/administración & dosificación , Taxoides/uso terapéutico , Anciano , Anciano de 80 o más Años , Antineoplásicos/efectos adversos , Aurora Quinasas , Benzamidas/efectos adversos , Neoplasias Óseas/secundario , Castración , Supervivencia sin Enfermedad , Docetaxel , Esquema de Medicación , Resistencia a Antineoplásicos , Humanos , Infusiones Intravenosas , Estimación de Kaplan-Meier , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Neutropenia/inducido químicamente , Proteínas Serina-Treonina Quinasas/antagonistas & inhibidores , Pirazoles/efectos adversos , Insuficiencia del Tratamiento
5.
Urol Oncol ; 31(3): 352-8, 2013 Apr.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-21803612

RESUMEN

OBJECTIVES: To compare the occurrence of depression, anxiety, self body image perception, sleep disturbances, and diminished quality of life in prostate cancer patients undergoing adjuvant androgen-deprivation therapy (ADT) as opposed to patients in follow-up alone. METHODS AND MATERIALS: Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale, Pittsburgh Sleep Quality Index, Restless Legs Syndrome Study Group essential diagnostic criteria, Body Image Scale and Functional Assessment of Cancer Therapy Prostate were administered to consecutive prostate cancer patients who underwent radical prostatectomy or radiation therapy and are presently either under adjuvant ADT or included in a follow-up program. RESULTS: Of the 103 patients enrolled, 49 (47.6%) were receiving adjuvant ADT and 54 (52.4%) were not. Compared with the controls, the patients undergoing ADT showed higher levels of depression (P = 0.002), worse self body image perception (P = 0.001), worse quality of life (P = 0.0001) and worse sleep quality (P = 0.04). ADT was significantly associated with depression at multivariate analysis after adjustment for age, stage, Gleason score, as well as demographic and social variables (P = 0.001). Depression scores showed a strong inverse correlation with quality of life scores (P < 0.01). CONCLUSIONS: Adjuvant ADT is associated with depression, worse quality of life, and altered self body image in prostate cancer patients.


Asunto(s)
Antagonistas de Andrógenos/efectos adversos , Neoplasias de la Próstata/tratamiento farmacológico , Neoplasias de la Próstata/psicología , Estrés Psicológico/etiología , Anciano , Anciano de 80 o más Años , Ansiedad/inducido químicamente , Imagen Corporal/psicología , Depresión/inducido químicamente , Humanos , Modelos Logísticos , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Análisis Multivariante , Clasificación del Tumor , Evaluación de Resultado en la Atención de Salud , Antígeno Prostático Específico/sangre , Neoplasias de la Próstata/patología , Calidad de Vida/psicología , Trastornos del Sueño-Vigilia/inducido químicamente
6.
Neuroendocrinology ; 96(1): 32-40, 2012.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-22205326

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND: Knowledge of clinical course in advanced jejunoileal neuroendocrine tumors (NETs) is poor. AIM: To investigate progression-free survival (PFS), overall survival (OS), and possible predictors for disease progression (DP) in advanced jejunoileal NETs. PATIENTS AND METHODS: We carried out a multicenter, retrospective analysis of incoming patients with sporadic advanced jejunoileal NETs. PFS and OS were assessed by Kaplan-Meier analysis. Risk factors for progression were analyzed by the Cox proportional hazards method. RESULTS: Of the 114 patients enrolled, 46.5% had functioning tumors, 93.9% had stage IV disease, and 57.3 and 42.7% were G1 and G2 tumors, respectively. During a median follow-up of 48 months (interquartile range 29-84 months), DP occurred in 61.4% of patients, after 19 months (interquartile range 10-41 months) from diagnosis. Median PFS was 36 months. The 2-year and 5-year PFS were 59 and 33%, respectively, while 5-year OS was 77.5%. Ki67 was the sole strong independent risk factor for unfavorable outcome according to multivariate analysis, being significantly associated with both PFS and OS. CONCLUSIONS: DP occurred in the majority of patients with advanced jejunoileal NETs, with median PFS being 36 months. Ki67 was a significant predictor of DP and should be considered in determining appropriate treatments and planning follow-up for these patients.


Asunto(s)
Neoplasias del Íleon/terapia , Neoplasias del Yeyuno/terapia , Antígeno Ki-67/metabolismo , Tumores Neuroendocrinos/terapia , Protocolos de Quimioterapia Combinada Antineoplásica/uso terapéutico , Progresión de la Enfermedad , Supervivencia sin Enfermedad , Femenino , Estudios de Seguimiento , Humanos , Neoplasias del Íleon/mortalidad , Neoplasias del Yeyuno/mortalidad , Estimación de Kaplan-Meier , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Estadificación de Neoplasias , Tumores Neuroendocrinos/mortalidad , Estudios Retrospectivos , Factores de Riesgo , Resultado del Tratamiento
8.
J Natl Cancer Inst Monogr ; 2011(43): 67-70, 2011.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-22043044

RESUMEN

Breast cancer is a heterogeneous disease. Predictive molecular markers are crucial in patient management, but the only recommended predictive biomarkers are estrogen and progesterone receptors and HER2. There are many new targeted therapies, and although the target pathway expression is readily analyzed on conventional pathology, the dynamic response cannot be assessed and pathway expression is no guarantee it has a major driver role, even if mutated. Selecting therapies requires considering the patient, the molecular characteristics of the tumor, and the microenvironment of the tumor. Thus, the integration of molecular pathology, imaging, and early tumor biological response to therapy may provide evidence of drug activity and allow more rapid changes of therapy. The adaptive response of the tumor is a key resistance mechanism that can be assessed readily in the neoadjuvant setting. Although there are no markers that meet all surrogacy criteria, their use could provide crucial information on mechanisms of drug sensitivity/resistance. Validation of such markers requires a major emphasis on neoadjuvant trials to relate early-biomarker response to outcome.


Asunto(s)
Antineoplásicos/uso terapéutico , Biomarcadores de Tumor/metabolismo , Neoplasias de la Mama/tratamiento farmacológico , Neoplasias de la Mama/metabolismo , Ensayos Clínicos como Asunto/métodos , Terapia Neoadyuvante/métodos , Medicina de Precisión , Antineoplásicos/farmacología , Neoplasias de la Mama/genética , Quimioterapia Adyuvante , Femenino , Perfilación de la Expresión Génica , Regulación Neoplásica de la Expresión Génica , Humanos , Inmunohistoquímica , Células Neoplásicas Circulantes , Medicina de Precisión/métodos , Medicina de Precisión/tendencias , Receptor ErbB-2/metabolismo , Receptores de Estrógenos/metabolismo , Receptores de Progesterona/metabolismo , Reproducibilidad de los Resultados , Proyectos de Investigación/normas , Proyectos de Investigación/tendencias , Resultado del Tratamiento
9.
J Natl Cancer Inst Monogr ; 2011(43): 142-6, 2011.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-22043062

RESUMEN

Primary systemic therapy (PST) in breast cancer offers the opportunity to explore interactions between tumor biology and administered treatment. Changes in clinical, tissue-based, or imaging markers can provide information on the mechanisms of PST activity (activity endpoints) or predict treatment efficacy (surrogate endpoints). The most frequently used intermediate endpoint for PST is pathological complete response, but its role as a surrogate parameter of efficacy has not yet been demonstrated. Changes in tumor biology after PST may occur already a few days after treatment start; this implies that new potential surrogates occurring much earlier than pathological complete response (ie, the proliferation marker Ki67) can be identified and that short-term preoperative trials (window-of-opportunity trials) can be designed using a biological parameter as a primary endpoint. From these small trials, crucial information can be gleaned about the activity of new drugs for the design of large clinical trials.


Asunto(s)
Protocolos de Quimioterapia Combinada Antineoplásica/uso terapéutico , Biomarcadores de Tumor/metabolismo , Neoplasias de la Mama/tratamiento farmacológico , Neoplasias de la Mama/patología , Antineoplásicos Hormonales/uso terapéutico , Neoplasias de la Mama/metabolismo , Femenino , Humanos , Antígeno Ki-67/metabolismo , Estadificación de Neoplasias , Resultado del Tratamiento
10.
J Natl Cancer Inst Monogr ; 2011(43): 147-51, 2011.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-22043063

RESUMEN

A panel of international breast cancer experts formulated a declaration of consensus regarding many key issues in the use of primary systemic therapy (PST) either in clinical routine or research practice. The attainment of pathological complete response (pCR), defined as no residual invasive tumor in the surgical specimens both in breast and in axillary nodes, is one of the main goals of PST, and pCR can be used as the primary objective in prospective clinical trials. However, pCR is not a reliable endpoint with all treatment approaches, and alternatives such as Ki67 index of the residual invasive disease or after 2 weeks of PST are also potential endpoints. PST has several advantages: breast conservation and the unique opportunity to obtain information on the interaction between treatment and tumor biology. Changes in tumor biology after PST are an early phenomenon; so, an additional core biopsy performed after 14 days from treatment start should be considered in clinical trials.


Asunto(s)
Antineoplásicos/uso terapéutico , Biomarcadores de Tumor/metabolismo , Neoplasias de la Mama/tratamiento farmacológico , Neoplasias de la Mama/metabolismo , Terapia Neoadyuvante , Antineoplásicos Hormonales/uso terapéutico , Protocolos de Quimioterapia Combinada Antineoplásica/uso terapéutico , Biopsia/métodos , Neoplasias de la Mama/patología , Neoplasias de la Mama/cirugía , Quimioterapia Adyuvante , Ensayos Clínicos como Asunto , Femenino , Humanos , Antígeno Ki-67/metabolismo , Metaanálisis como Asunto , Terapia Neoadyuvante/métodos , Palpación , Receptor ErbB-2/metabolismo , Inducción de Remisión , Resultado del Tratamiento , Ultrasonografía Mamaria
11.
Oncologist ; 16(9): 1215-27, 2011.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-21835895

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND: Whether or not hypovitaminosis D can influence the prognosis of cancer patients and whether or not vitamin D (vitD) supplementation improves outcome remain controversial. DESIGN: Studies evaluating the prognostic role of vitD and vitD receptor (VDR) in cancer patients and trials evaluating the efficacy of vitD administration on patient outcome were identified by a search of MEDLINE, EMBASE, ISI Web of Knowledge, and the Cochrane Library through June 2010. RESULTS: Twenty-five studies were included. A negative prognostic role for low serum vitD level was observed in five cohort studies including patients with breast cancer (one study), colon cancer (two studies), prostate cancer (one study), and melanoma (one study), but not in two studies on non-small cell lung cancer and one study on breast cancer. Three of four studies showed that VDR(+) tumors carry a better prognosis than VDR(-) tumors, whereas VDR polymorphisms were significantly associated with prognosis in five of 10 studies. A significant interaction between serum vitD level and VDR polymorphism was observed in one study. Three randomized trials involving advanced prostate cancer patients explored the prognostic role of vitD supplementation. A meta-analysis of these trials showed no effect on survival (pooled risk ratio, 1.07; 95% confidence interval, CI, 0.93-1.23), with strong heterogeneity among studies. CONCLUSION: Hypovitaminosis D seems to be associated with a worse prognosis in some cancers, but vitD supplementation failed to demonstrate a benefit in prostate cancer patients. The currently available evidence is insufficient to recommend vitD supplementation in cancer patients in clinical practice.


Asunto(s)
Neoplasias/sangre , Neoplasias/tratamiento farmacológico , Vitamina D/administración & dosificación , Vitamina D/sangre , Suplementos Dietéticos , Femenino , Humanos , Masculino , Pronóstico , Estudios Prospectivos
12.
J Clin Oncol ; 29(17): 2372-7, 2011 Jun 10.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-21555696

RESUMEN

PURPOSE: Knowledge of clinical course of pancreatic endocrine carcinomas (PECs) is poor. This study aimed to determine the time to progression of advanced PECs, and to identify predictors capable of selecting subgroups with higher risk of progression. PATIENTS AND METHODS: In this multicenter retrospective analysis, patients with advanced PECs were enrolled. Staging was according to European Neuroendocrine Tumors Society guidelines. Grading was based on proliferation index using Ki67 immunohistochemistry. The primary end point was progression-free survival (PFS), which was assessed using the Kaplan-Meier method. The Cox regression proportional hazard model was used to identify predictors for tumor progression. RESULTS: Two hundred two patients with PECs were enrolled, including 172 with well-differentiated and 30 with poorly differentiated endocrine carcinomas. There were 34 patients with stage III and 168 with stage IV tumors. G1 tumors were present in 19.7% of patients, whereas 60.1% of patients had G2 tumors, and the remaining 20.2% had G3 tumors. Disease progression occurred in 166 patients (82.2%), at a median interval of 10 months (interquartile range, 5 to 22) from diagnosis. Median PFS was 14 months. Different PFS were observed depending on G grade (P < .001) and tumor differentiation (P < .001) and in patients who did not receive any antitumor treatment (P = .002). The major risk factor for progression was the proliferation index Ki67 (hazard ratio, 1.02 for each increasing unit; P < .001). Overall 5-year survival was 44.1%. CONCLUSION: The vast majority of patients with advanced PECs undergo disease progression. The major risk factor for progression is Ki67 index, which should lead physicians dealing with PECs to plan appropriate follow-up programs and therapeutic strategies.


Asunto(s)
Neoplasias Pancreáticas/patología , Anciano , Progresión de la Enfermedad , Supervivencia sin Enfermedad , Femenino , Humanos , Antígeno Ki-67/análisis , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Metástasis de la Neoplasia , Neoplasias Pancreáticas/mortalidad , Neoplasias Pancreáticas/terapia , Estudios Retrospectivos , Factores de Riesgo
13.
Breast Cancer Res ; 13(1): R16, 2011 Feb 03.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-21291529

RESUMEN

INTRODUCTION: The purpose of the present study was to investigate the relationship of expression of hypoxia inducible factor (HIF)-1α-modifying enzymes prolyl hydroxylase (PHD)1, PHD2 and PHD3 to response of tumours and survival in breast cancer patients enrolled in a phase II trial of neoadjuvant anthracycline and tamoxifen therapy. METHODS: The expression of PHD1, PHD2 and PHD3 together with HIF-1α and the HIF-inducible genes vascular endothelial cell growth factor (VEGF) and carbonic anhydrase IX were assessed by immunohistochemistry using a tissue microarray approach in 211 patients with T2-4 N0-1 breast cancer enrolled in a randomised trial comparing single-agent epirubicin versus epirubicin and tamoxifen as the primary systemic treatment. RESULTS: PHD1, PHD2 and PHD3 were detected in 47/179 (26.7%), 85/163 (52.2%) and 69/177 (39%) of tumours at baseline. PHD2 and PHD3 expression was moderate/strong whereas PHD1 expression was generally weak. There was a significant positive correlation between HIF-1α and PHD1 (P = 0.002) and PHD3 (P < 0.05) but not PHD2 (P = 0.41). There was a significant positive relationship between VEGF and PHD1 (P < 0.008) and PHD3 (P = 0.001) but not PHD2 (P = 0.09). PHD1, PHD2 and PHD3 expression was significantly increased after epirubicin therapy (all P < 0.000) with no significant difference in PHD changes between the treatment arms. There was no significant difference in response in tumours that expressed PHDs and PHD expression was not associated with survival. CONCLUSIONS: Although expression of the PHDs was not related to response or survival in patients receiving neoadjuvant epirubicin, our data provide the first evidence that these enzymes are upregulated on therapy in breast cancer and that the biological effects independent of HIF make them therapeutic targets.


Asunto(s)
Antineoplásicos/uso terapéutico , Neoplasias de la Mama/tratamiento farmacológico , Neoplasias de la Mama/enzimología , Epirrubicina/uso terapéutico , Prolil Hidroxilasas/metabolismo , Tamoxifeno/uso terapéutico , Antineoplásicos/farmacología , Biomarcadores de Tumor/metabolismo , Neoplasias de la Mama/genética , Epirrubicina/farmacología , Femenino , Regulación Neoplásica de la Expresión Génica/efectos de los fármacos , Humanos , Subunidad alfa del Factor 1 Inducible por Hipoxia/metabolismo , Prolina Dioxigenasas del Factor Inducible por Hipoxia/metabolismo , Pronóstico , Prolil Hidroxilasas/genética , Tamoxifeno/farmacología , Factor A de Crecimiento Endotelial Vascular/metabolismo
14.
Qual Life Res ; 20(5): 683-90, 2011 Jun.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-21080084

RESUMEN

PURPOSE: To explore the use of CAM (Complementary/Alternative Medicine) in a population of cancer patients undergoing antineoplastic therapy, and to compare differences in sociodemographics, quality of life, and psychological features between CAM users and non-users. METHODS: The study population was consecutive cancer patients undergoing antineoplastic treatment in three Piedmont cancer centers. Data were collected from anonymous questionnaires investigating CAM use or not, and what type if used, and sociodemographics, and through validated psychometric instruments to assess psychological features: Functional Assessment of Cancer Therapy-General, the Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale, and the Mini Mental Adjustment to Cancer Scale. RESULTS: Of the 288 evaluable patients, 52 (18.1%) reported using one or more types of CAM; the most often cited were herbs, special diets and body-based practices, such as plantar reflexology, chiropractic application, and massage. On quality of life assessment, CAM users scored lower than CAM non-users for physical wellbeing (P = 0.006); no significant differences emerged for anxiety and depression and coping styles. CONCLUSIONS: CAM use is less prevalent in northern Italy than in most other European countries. CAM users were found to have a lower quality of life than CAM non-users.


Asunto(s)
Antineoplásicos/uso terapéutico , Terapias Complementarias/estadística & datos numéricos , Neoplasias/tratamiento farmacológico , Psicometría , Calidad de Vida/psicología , Adaptación Psicológica , Adolescente , Adulto , Anciano , Ansiedad , Distribución de Chi-Cuadrado , Depresión , Femenino , Humanos , Italia/epidemiología , Modelos Lineales , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Neoplasias/epidemiología , Neoplasias/psicología , Prevalencia , Estadística como Asunto , Estrés Psicológico , Encuestas y Cuestionarios , Adulto Joven
15.
Breast Cancer Res Treat ; 123(3): 795-804, 2010 Oct.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-20680681

RESUMEN

Vascular endothelial growth factor A (VEGF-A) and vascular endothelial growth factor receptor 2 (VEGFR2) are the key factors mediating neo-vascularization. They are often coexpressed in breast cancer. Sex steroids may stimulate angiogenesis via the estrogen receptor (ER) pathway. We investigated to compare the effects of the addition of tamoxifen to epirubicin versus epirubicin alone on VEGF and VEGFR2 expression in breast cancer patients. The expression of VEGF and VEGFR2 was assessed on tissue microarray by immunohistochemistry at baseline conditions and after treatments in the case of 191 patients with T2-4 N0-1 breast cancer enrolled in a randomized trial comparing four cycles of single agent epirubicin versus epirubicin plus tamoxifen as primary systemic treatment. Epirubicin alone failed to induce changes in VEGF expression (P = 0.54), while the addition of tamoxifen to epirubicin resulted in a significant reduction in VEGF expression (P < 0.001). As a consequence, baseline VEGF had a negative prognostic role in patients who received epirubicin alone but not in patients receiving epirubicin plus tamoxifen (interaction test P < 0.05). VEGFR2 expression increased at residual tumor histology in both treatment arms, with a lesser extent in patients receiving tamoxifen plus epirubicin. Decrease in VEGFR2 expression was significantly associated with response rate (P = 0.02). The addition of tamoxifen to epirubicin resulted in a suppression of a key angiogenic pathway. These data suggest a potential synergism of these two drugs.


Asunto(s)
Protocolos de Quimioterapia Combinada Antineoplásica/uso terapéutico , Neoplasias de la Mama/tratamiento farmacológico , Neovascularización Patológica/prevención & control , Inhibidores de la Angiogénesis/administración & dosificación , Neoplasias de la Mama/irrigación sanguínea , Neoplasias de la Mama/metabolismo , Neoplasias de la Mama/mortalidad , Neoplasias de la Mama/patología , Distribución de Chi-Cuadrado , Supervivencia sin Enfermedad , Sinergismo Farmacológico , Epirrubicina/administración & dosificación , Femenino , Humanos , Inmunohistoquímica , Italia , Estimación de Kaplan-Meier , Estadificación de Neoplasias , Neovascularización Patológica/metabolismo , Modelos de Riesgos Proporcionales , Estudios Prospectivos , Medición de Riesgo , Factores de Riesgo , Tamoxifeno/administración & dosificación , Factores de Tiempo , Análisis de Matrices Tisulares , Resultado del Tratamiento , Factor A de Crecimiento Endotelial Vascular/metabolismo , Receptor 2 de Factores de Crecimiento Endotelial Vascular/metabolismo
16.
Endocr Relat Cancer ; 17(2): 445-53, 2010 Jun.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-20410174

RESUMEN

Adrenocortical carcinoma (ACC) is a rare neoplasm characterized by poor prognosis. First-line systemic treatments in advanced disease include mitotane, either alone or in combination with chemotherapy. Studies evaluating second-line therapy options have obtained disappointing results. This trial assessed the activity and toxicity of gemcitabine plus metronomic fluoropyrimidines in heavily pretreated advanced ACC patients. From 1998 to 2008, 28 patients with advanced ACC progressing after mitotane plus one or two systemic chemotherapy lines were enrolled. They received a combination of i.v. gemcitabine (800 mg/m(2), on days 1 and 8, every 21 days) and i.v. 5-fluorouracil protracted infusion (200 mg/m(2)/daily without interruption until progression) in the first six patients, or oral capecitabine (1500 mg/daily) in the subsequent patients. Mitotane administration was maintained in all cases. The rate of non-progressing patients after 4 months of treatment was 46.3%. A complete response was observed in 1 patient (3.5%); 1 patient (3.5%) obtained a partial regression, 11 patients (39.3%) obtained a disease stabilization and 15 patients (53.7%) progressed. Treatment was well tolerated, with grade III and IV toxicities consisting of leukopenia in six patients (21.4%), thrombocytopenia in one patient (3.5%), and mucositis in one patient (3.5%). Median time to progression and overall survival in the patient population were 5.3 (range: 1-43) and 9.8 months (range: 3-73) respectively. Gemcitabine plus metronomic fluoropyrimidines is a well-tolerated and moderately active regimen in heavily pretreated ACC patients.


Asunto(s)
Neoplasias de la Corteza Suprarrenal/tratamiento farmacológico , Carcinoma Corticosuprarrenal/tratamiento farmacológico , Desoxicitidina/análogos & derivados , Fluorouracilo/análogos & derivados , Fluorouracilo/administración & dosificación , Neoplasias de la Corteza Suprarrenal/mortalidad , Carcinoma Corticosuprarrenal/mortalidad , Adulto , Anciano , Antimetabolitos Antineoplásicos/administración & dosificación , Antimetabolitos Antineoplásicos/efectos adversos , Protocolos de Quimioterapia Combinada Antineoplásica/administración & dosificación , Protocolos de Quimioterapia Combinada Antineoplásica/efectos adversos , Capecitabina , Desoxicitidina/administración & dosificación , Desoxicitidina/efectos adversos , Progresión de la Enfermedad , Esquema de Medicación , Femenino , Fluorouracilo/efectos adversos , Humanos , Leucopenia/inducido químicamente , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Mucositis/inducido químicamente , Trombocitopenia/inducido químicamente , Resultado del Tratamiento , Gemcitabina
17.
Qual Life Res ; 19(4): 531-7, 2010 May.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-20195906

RESUMEN

OBJECTIVE: Restless legs syndrome (RLS) is a common sensorimotor disorder characterized by uncomfortable and unpleasant sensations in the legs that are relieved by movement. This study evaluated the prevalence of RLS in a consecutive series of cancer patients during chemotherapy and examined the relationship between presence of RLS and quality of life, anxiety, and depressive symptoms in these patients. METHODS: RLS was assessed according to the International RLS Study Group essential diagnostic criteria in two stages: a screening questionnaire first, followed by a sleep specialist-conducted structured diagnostic interview. The following questionnaires were administered: Functional Assessment of Cancer Therapy-General (FACT-G) for Quality-of-life (QoL) assessment; Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale (HADS) to evaluate the levels of anxiety and depression; and Mini Mental Adjustment to Cancer Scale (Mini-MAC) to assess coping styles. RESULTS: A total of 257 patients were evaluated. Among them 56 were identified by the screening questionnaire to meet the criteria for RLS and 47 of whom were confirmed as affected by RLS after a structured interview, rendering a prevalence rate of 18.3%. RLS was significantly more frequent in women than men (23.7 vs. 11.8%; P = 0.01), and in patients receiving antineoplastic therapies for more than 3 months than their counterpart (21.8 vs. 10.8%; P = 0.03). Compared with those without RLS, patients with RLS had higher levels of anxiety (P = 0.0009) and depression (P = 0.001) and lower quality of life (P = 0.006). Sex-chemotherapy-duration-adjusted odds ratios of anxiety and physical well-being associated with RLS were 1.1 (95% CI 1.00-1.19; P = 0.04) and 0.7 (95% CI 0.43-1.01; P = 0.04), respectively. CONCLUSIONS: The prevalence of RLS in cancer patients undergoing chemotherapy is 18.3%, about double of that expected in the general population. The occurrence of RLS is much more frequent in female patients and with longer-term chemotherapy. Cancer patients afflicted by RLS have significantly higher levels of anxiety and depression, and poorer quality of life especially in the physical well-being dimension. Recognition and treatment of RLS in cancer patients is an important target in clinical management and may improve quality of life and overall health outcomes in these patients.


Asunto(s)
Antineoplásicos/efectos adversos , Ansiedad/etiología , Depresión/etiología , Calidad de Vida , Síndrome de las Piernas Inquietas/complicaciones , Estrés Psicológico , Adaptación Psicológica , Adolescente , Adulto , Anciano , Intervalos de Confianza , Femenino , Indicadores de Salud , Humanos , Italia/epidemiología , Modelos Logísticos , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Análisis Multivariante , Neoplasias/tratamiento farmacológico , Oportunidad Relativa , Prevalencia , Psicometría , Síndrome de las Piernas Inquietas/inducido químicamente , Factores de Riesgo , Encuestas y Cuestionarios , Adulto Joven
18.
Prostate ; 70(7): 718-26, 2010 May 15.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-20087896

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND: Several data suggest that neuroendocrine (NE) differentiation in prostate cancer is implicated in the development of resistance to androgen-deprivation therapy (ADT). This study was undertaken to assess the prognostic role of tissue chromogranin A (CgA) expression in patients addressed to ADT as opposed to those who did not. METHODS: Four hundred fourteen newly diagnosed prostate cancer patients, consecutively recruited in a single institution, entered the study. Two hundred fourteen patients received ADT early after diagnosis, 200 did not. Median follow-up was 85 months. CgA expression was evaluated immunohistochemically in prostate cancer needle biopsies. RESULTS: In multivariate analysis after adjusting for Gleason score, serum PSA, disease stage and local treatments, tissue CgA expression in overall cases was significantly associated with a shorter survival (P = 0.009) but failed to be associated with PSA progression (P = 0.10). Dividing patients according to whether they received immediate ADT or not, tissue CgA was associated with a shorter time to PSA progression in ADT-treated patients (hazard ratios (HR) 1.96, 95% confidence interval (CI): 1.37-2.81, P = 0.0001), but failed to be associated in those who did not (HR 0.87, 95% CI: 0.58-1.30, P = 0.49), interaction test P = 0.007. Conversely the survival effect of tissue CgA was not modified by ADT (interaction test, P = 0.41). CONCLUSIONS: Tissue CgA expression, evaluated in prostate cancer needle biopsies at diagnosis, is an independent prognostic factor of survival in prostate cancer patients. The negative influence of NE differentiation on time to progression confined in ADT-treated patients suggests a role of NE differentiation in predicting endocrine resistance that deserves validation.


Asunto(s)
Adenocarcinoma/metabolismo , Antagonistas de Andrógenos/uso terapéutico , Cromogranina A/metabolismo , Próstata/metabolismo , Neoplasias de la Próstata/metabolismo , Adenocarcinoma/tratamiento farmacológico , Adenocarcinoma/cirugía , Antineoplásicos Hormonales/uso terapéutico , Recuento de Células , Distribución de Chi-Cuadrado , Progresión de la Enfermedad , Humanos , Inmunohistoquímica , Masculino , Pronóstico , Modelos de Riesgos Proporcionales , Próstata/efectos de los fármacos , Próstata/cirugía , Antígeno Prostático Específico/sangre , Neoplasias de la Próstata/tratamiento farmacológico , Neoplasias de la Próstata/cirugía , Resultado del Tratamiento
19.
Open Access J Urol ; 2: 109-24, 2010 Jul 23.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-24198620

RESUMEN

Neuroendocrine (NE) differentiation is a common feature in prostate cancer (PC). The clinical significance of this phenomenon is controversial; however preclinical and clinical data are in favor of an association with poor prognosis and early onset of a castrate resistant status. NE PC cells do not proliferate, but they can stimulate the proliferation of the exocrine component through the production of paracrine growth factors. The same paracrine signals may favor the outgrowth of castrate adapted tumors through androgen receptor dependent or independent mechanisms. Noteworthy, NE differentiation in PC is not a stable phenotype, being stimulated by several agents including androgen deprivation therapy, radiation therapy, and chemotherapy. The proportion of NE positive PC, therefore, is destined to increase during the natural history of the disease. This may complicate the assessment of the prognostic significance of this phenomenon. The majority of clinical studies have shown a significant correlation between NE differentiation and disease prognosis, confirming the preclinical rationale. In conclusion the NE phenotype is a prognostic parameter in PC. Whether this phenomenon is a pure prognostic factor or whether it can influence the prognosis by favoring the onset of a castrate resistance status is a matter of future research.

20.
BMC Cancer ; 9: 388, 2009 Nov 03.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-19886987

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND: Well-differentiated neuroendocrine carcinomas are highly vascularized and may be sensitive to drugs administered on a metronomic schedule that has shown antiangiogenic properties. A phase II study was designed to test the activity of protracted 5-fluorouracil (5FU) infusion plus long-acting release (LAR) octreotide in patients with neuroendocrine carcinoma. METHODS: Twenty-nine patients with metastatic or locally advanced well-differentiated neuroendocrine carcinoma were treated with protracted 5FU intravenous infusion (200 mg/m2 daily) plus LAR octreotide (20 mg monthly). Patients were followed for toxicity, objective response, symptomatic and biochemical response, time to progression and survival. RESULTS: Assessment by Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumors (RECIST) criteria showed partial response in 7 (24.1%), stable disease in 20 (69.0%), and disease progression in 2 patients. Response did not significantly differ when patients were stratified by primary tumor site and proliferative activity. A biochemical (chromogranin A) response was observed in 12/25 assessable patients (48.0%); symptom relief was obtained in 9/15 symptomatic patients (60.0%). There was non significant decrease in circulating vascular epithelial growth factor (VEGF) over time. Median time to progression was 22.6 months (range, 2.7-68.5); median overall survival was not reached yet. Toxicity was mild and manageable. CONCLUSION: Continuous/metronomic 5FU infusion plus LAR octreotide is well tolerated and shows activity in patients with well-differentiated neuroendocrine carcinoma. The potential synergism between metronomic chemotherapy and antiangiogenic drugs provides a rationale for exploring this association in the future. TRIAL REGISTRATION: NCT00953394.


Asunto(s)
Protocolos de Quimioterapia Combinada Antineoplásica/administración & dosificación , Carcinoma Neuroendocrino/tratamiento farmacológico , Fluorouracilo/administración & dosificación , Octreótido/administración & dosificación , Adulto , Anciano , Anciano de 80 o más Años , Protocolos de Quimioterapia Combinada Antineoplásica/efectos adversos , Carcinoma Neuroendocrino/patología , Esquema de Medicación , Femenino , Fluorouracilo/efectos adversos , Humanos , Infusiones Intravenosas , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Estadificación de Neoplasias , Octreótido/efectos adversos , Resultado del Tratamiento , Adulto Joven
SELECCIÓN DE REFERENCIAS
DETALLE DE LA BÚSQUEDA
...