RESUMEN
BACKGROUND: Although radiofrequency ablation of the cavotricuspid isthmus (CTI), responsible for sustaining atrial flutter, is a highly effective procedure, in extended patients' observations following this procedure, more than every tenth becomes unsuccessful. Therefore, this study aimed to provide helpful information about the anatomy of the CTI in transthoracic echocardiography, which can aid in better planning of the CTI radiofrequency ablation in patients with typical atrial flutter. MATERIALS AND METHODS: 56 patients with typical atrial flutter after radiofrequency ablation were evaluated at the end of the 24-month observation period. With substernal modified transthoracic echocardiographic (mTTE) evaluation, we identified four main anatomical obstacles impeding radiofrequency ablation. These obstacles were tricuspid annular plane systolic excursion, cavotricuspid isthmus length, cavotricuspid isthmus morphology, and the presence of a prominent Eustachian ridge/Eustachian valve. All intraprocedural radiofrequency ablation data were collected for analysis and correlated with anatomical data. RESULTS: In the 24-month observation period, freedom from atrial flutter was 67.86%. The mean length of the isthmus was 30.34 ± 6.67 mm. The isthmus morphology in 56 patients was categorized as flat (n = 27; 48.2%), concave (n = 10; 17.85%), and pouch (n = 19, 33.9%). A prominent Eustachian ridge was observed in 23 patients (41.1%). Lack of anatomical obstacles in mTTE evaluation resulted in 100% efficacy, while the presence of at least two obstacles significantly increased the risk of unsuccessful ablation with more than two (OR 12.31 p = 0.01). Generally, 8 mm electrodes were the most effective for non-difficult CTI, while 3.5 mm electrodes used with a 3D system had highest performance for complex CTI. Notably, aging was the only factor that worsened the long-term outcome (OR 1.07 p = 0.044). CONCLUSIONS: Preoperative usage of mTTE evaluation helps predict difficulty in cavotricuspid isthmus radiofrequency ablation, thus allowing better planning of the radiofrequency ablation strategy using the most accurate radiofrequency ablation electrode.
