Relationship between risk factors for impaired bone health and HR-pQCT in young adults with type 1 diabetes.

Objective: In type 1 diabetes, risk factors associated with impaired bone health contribute to increased risk of fracture. The aim of this study was to (1): compare the high-resolution peripheral quantitative computed tomography (HR-pQCT) parameters of young adults with type 1 diabetes with those of healthy controls (2), identify sex differences, and (3) evaluate the association between diabetes and bone health risk factors, with HR-pQCT. Methods: This is a cross-sectional study in young Canadian adults with childhood onset type 1 diabetes. Z-scores were generated for HR-pQCT parameters using a large healthy control database. Diet, physical activity, BMI, hemoglobin A1C (A1C) and bone health measures were evaluated, and associations were analyzed using multivariate regression analysis. Results: Eighty-eight participants (age 21 ± 2.2 years; 40 males, 48 females, diabetes duration 13.9 ± 3.4 years) with type 1 diabetes were studied. Low trabecular thickness and elevated cortical geometry parameters were found suggesting impaired bone quality. There were no sex differences. Significant associations were found: Vitamin D (25(OH)D) with trabecular parameters with possible synergy with A1C, parathyroid hormone with cortical parameters, BMI with cortical bone and failure load, and diabetes duration with trabecular area. Conclusions: Our data suggests impairment of bone health as assessed by HR-pQCT in young adults with type 1 diabetes. Modifiable risk factors were associated with trabecular and cortical parameters. These findings imply that correction of vitamin D deficiency, prevention and treatment of secondary hyperparathyroidism, and optimization of metabolic control may reduce incident fractures.

Patient-reported outcomes in those consuming medical cannabis: a prospective longitudinal observational study in chronic pain patients.

PURPOSE: We investigated patients with chronic pain seeking medical cannabis. We assessed their demographics, patterns of cannabis use, and the long-term effectiveness of cannabis on their pain and functional domains. METHODS: This observational study enrolled patients between 8 September 2015 and 31 July 2018 from community-based cannabis clinics in Ontario, Canada. In addition to collecting demographic information, the primary outcomes studied were pain intensity and pain-related interference scores assessed at baseline, three, six, and 12 months. Using validated questionnaires, we also assessed anxiety, depression, quality of life (QoL), general health symptoms, neuropathic pain, self-reported opioid consumption, and adverse events. RESULTS: Of the 1,000 patients consented, 757 (76%) participated at one or more of the study time points. At six and 12 months, 230 (30.4%) and 104 (13.7%) of participants were followed up, respectively. Most participants were female (62%), Caucasian (91%), and sought cannabis for pain relief (88%). Time was a significant factor associated with improvement in pain intensity (P < 0.001), pain-related interference scores (P < 0.001), QoL (P < 0.001), and general health symptoms (P < 0.001). Female sex was significantly associated with worse outcomes than male sex including pain intensity (P < 0.001) and pain-related interference (P < 0.001). The proportion of individuals who reported using opioids decreased by half, from 40.8% at baseline to 23.9% at 12 months. CONCLUSION: Despite significant challenges to collecting long-term observational data on patients who attempted a trial of cannabis products, approximately one-third of patients in the cohort remained on medical cannabis for six months. In this cohort, pain intensity and pain-related interference scores were reduced and QoL and general health symptoms scores were improved compared with baseline.

RéSUMé: OBJECTIF: Nous avons étudié des patients souffrant de douleur chronique et cherchant à obtenir du cannabis médical. Nous avons évalué leurs données démographiques, leurs habitudes de consommation de cannabis et l'efficacité à long terme du cannabis sur leur douleur et leurs domaines fonctionnels. MéTHODE: Cette étude observationnelle a recruté des patients entre le 8 septembre 2015 et le 31 juillet 2018 dans des cliniques communautaires de cannabis en Ontario, au Canada. En plus de recueillir des renseignements démographiques, les critères d'évaluation principaux étudiés étaient l'intensité de la douleur et les scores d'interférence liés à la douleur évalués au début de l'étude et à trois, six et 12 mois. À l'aide de questionnaires validés, nous avons également évalué l'anxiété, la dépression, la qualité de vie (QdV), les symptômes généraux de santé, la douleur neuropathique, la consommation d'opioïdes rapportée et les effets indésirables. RéSULTATS: Sur les 1000 patients consentants, 757 (76 %) ont participé à un ou plusieurs des points d'analyse de l'étude. À six et douze mois, 230 (30,4 %) et 104 (13,7 %) patients ont participé, respectivement. La plupart des participants étaient des femmes (62 %) d'origine caucasienne (91 %) et cherchaient à soulager leur douleur avec du cannabis (88 %). Le temps était un facteur important associé à l'amélioration de l'intensité de la douleur (P < 0,001), aux scores d'interférence liés à la douleur (P < 0,001), à la QdV (P < 0,001), et aux symptômes de santé généraux (P < 0,001). Le sexe féminin a été significativement associé à des pronostics moins bons que le sexe masculin, y compris en matière d'intensité de la douleur (P < 0,001) et d'interférences liées à la douleur (P < 0,001). La proportion de personnes qui ont déclaré utiliser des opioïdes a diminué de moitié, passant de 40,8 % au début de l'étude à 23,9 % à 12 mois. CONCLUSION: Malgré des défis importants dans la collecte de données observationnelles à long terme concernant les patients qui participent à une étude sur les produits du cannabis, environ un tiers des patients de la cohorte ont continué à prendre du cannabis médical pendant six mois. Dans cette cohorte, l'intensité de la douleur et les scores d'interférence liés à la douleur ont été réduits, et les scores de QdV et de symptômes généraux de santé se sont améliorés par rapport au début de la période à l'étude.

Perioperative Pain and Addiction Interdisciplinary Network (PAIN) clinical practice advisory for perioperative management of buprenorphine: results of a modified Delphi process.

Until recently, the belief that adequate pain management was not achievable while patients remained on buprenorphine was the impetus for the perioperative discontinuation of buprenorphine. We aimed to use an expert consensus Delphi-based survey technique to 1) specify the need for perioperative guidelines in this context and 2) offer a set of recommendations for the perioperative management of these patients. The major recommendation of this practice advisory is to continue buprenorphine therapy in the perioperative period. It is rarely appropriate to reduce the buprenorphine dose irrespective of indication or formulation. If analgesia is inadequate after optimisation of adjunct analgesic therapies, we recommend initiating a full mu agonist while continuing buprenorphine at some dose. The panel believes that before operation, physicians must distinguish between buprenorphine use for chronic pain (weaning/conversion from long-term high-dose opioids) and opioid use disorder (OUD) as the primary indication for buprenorphine therapy. Patients should ideally be discharged on buprenorphine, although not necessarily at their preoperative dose. Depending on analgesic requirements, they may be discharged on a full mu agonist. Overall, long-term buprenorphine treatment retention and harm reduction must be considered during the perioperative period when OUD is a primary diagnosis. The authors recognise that inter-patient variability will require some individualisation of clinical practice advisories. Clinical practice advisories are largely based on lower classes of evidence (level 4, level 5). Further research is required in order to implement meaningful changes in practitioner behaviour for this patient group.