Mapping and Ablation of Atypical Atrial Flutters.

Atypical atrial flutters are complex, hard-to-manage atrial arrhythmias. Catheter ablation has progressively emerged as a successful treatment option with a remarkable role played by irrigated-tip catheters and 3D electroanatomic mapping systems. However, despite the improvement of these technologies, the ablation results may be still suboptimal due to the progressive atrial substrate modification occurring in diseased hearts. Hence, a patient-tailored approach is required to improve the long-term success rate in this scenario, aiming at achieving specific procedure end points and detecting any potential arrhythmogenic substrate in each patient.

Arrhythmias Involving Variants of Accessory Pathways.

In some cases, atrioventricular reentrant arrhythmias are sustained by accessory pathways with peculiar electrophysiologic properties related to their specific anatomy. Most of these fibers, which may be responsible for variants of ventricular preexcitation, show decremental conduction properties due to a nodelike aspect or a peculiar tortuous anatomic route across the atrioventricular groove. Moreover, some fibers do not actively sustain any reentrant circuit and can be only involved as bystander in other arrhythmias. Although rare, these accessory pathway variants should be properly diagnosed using noninvasive and invasive methods to guide catheter ablation procedures when needed.

Efficacy and safety of cryoablation of para-Hisian and mid-septal accessory pathways using a specific protocol: single-center experience in consecutive patients.

PURPOSE: Radiofrequency (RF) catheter ablation of para-Hisian (P-H) and mid-septal (M-S) accessory pathways (APs) is a potentially harmful procedure due to their close location to the A-V node. Conversely, cryoablation (CA) appears safer in this setting. The aim of this study was to assess the efficacy and safety of CA of these APs using a specific protocol. METHODS: Fifty-three patients undergoing CA for P-H (45) or M-S (8) APs were included. CA was performed with a 4-mm catheter at - 75 °C for 480 s in the site where conduction block over the AP was obtained by a specific cryomapping protocol. Optimal catheter-tissue contact was achieved by inferior or superior vena cava approach. In case of failure, a 6-mm catheter and/or trans-septal catheterization (TSC) were considered. Normal AV conduction was monitored throughout CA, which was interrupted in case of its inadvertent modifications. RESULTS: In 46 patients (87%), CA was successful. Reasons for failure were as follows: lack of AP interruption (3 patients), intraprocedure AP conduction resumption (3), or transient A-H interval prolongation (1). Failure was associated with more aggressive approach including multiple procedures, greater use of 6-mm catheters, TSC, and longer CA applications. No major complications were observed. Three out of 46 patients (6.5%) experienced relapse of AP conduction during follow-up and were successfully re-treated by CA. CONCLUSIONS: CA of P-H and M-S APs is highly safe and effective and a specific protocol for cryomapping and CA could lead to a low recurrence rate at follow-up.

[Asymptomatic ventricular pre-excitation: what management?] / Pre-eccitazione ventricolare in assenza di sintomi: che strada percorrere?

The management of asymptomatic patients with ventricular pre-excitation diagnosed occasionally is controversial. In fact, the lack of clinical arrhythmias does not necessarily define a benign condition: it could be possibly due to poor conduction over the accessory pathway or, conversely, to peculiar and individual conditions, which, even if the accessory pathway is capable of fast conduction, can prevent the onset of arrhythmias. These can occur unexpectedly during follow-up and may include malignant ventricular arrhythmias, although sudden death is very rare in this clinical scenario. An aggressive strategy aiming at extensive ablation in all cases with asymptomatic ventricular pre-excitation is not justified, as well as the "wait-and-see" approach. Clinically, it is important to accurately define the individual risk of any arrhythmia related to the accessory pathway, which may require treatment. For decades, the management of asymptomatic ventricular pre-excitation has been quite inhomogeneous among centers and in some cases it is still very different. Recently, a consensus document proposed the combined use of non-invasive and invasive diagnostic tools for accurate screening of these patients. If non-invasive methodologies are unable to demonstrate poor conduction over the accessory pathway, then an invasive approach is justified for arrhythmia risk definition and, if necessary, adequate therapy.

Optimization of catheter/tissue contact during pulmonary vein isolation: the impact of atrial rhythm.

Aims: During pulmonary vein isolation (PVI), even if operators are aware of the contact force (CF), its values may greatly vary and the impact of cardiac rhythm has not been thoroughly investigated yet. This study aims at assessing the actual values of CF, the applications with suboptimal CF, and the impact of cardiac rhythm on CF during PVI. Methods and results: Twenty patients undergoing point-by-point PVI with a CF-sensing catheter were considered. CF target was between 6 and 40 g. The mean CF per application (mCF) was evaluated and considered suboptimal if ≤5 g. The real-time graphic of CF was also evaluated and classified as pulsatile if regular variations synchronous with the atrial rate were seen; otherwise it was irregular. To achieve PVI, 1458 applications were delivered; 287 (19.68%) had suboptimal mCF. A great variability of mCF was seen according to anatomy, operators and patients. Compared to applications in atrial fibrillation (AF), those in sinus rhythm (SR) showed a higher median value of mCF (11 vs. 9 g; P = 0.0099) and a lower percentage of suboptimal mCF (17.95% vs. 25.15%; P = 0.0051). Compared to the irregular, the pulsatile pattern, almost exclusively observed in SR, was associated with higher mCF (14.69 ± 8.77 vs. 10.79 ± 7.89 g; P < 0.0001) and fewer suboptimal applications (8.02% vs. 27.73%; P < 0.0001). Conclusion: During PVI, several factors influence CF, which, despite optimization attempts, can be suboptimal in ∼20% of the applications. However, CF is higher in SR than in AF and this is strictly associated with a pulsatile pattern of instant CF values.

Agenesia of the left atrial appendage: possible but very rare.

: Agenesia of the left atrial appendage in a patient with atrial fibrillation is shown. Although of interest, the prevalence of this abnormality is very low.

Invasive electrophysiological evaluation and ablation in patients with asymptomatic ventricular pre-excitation persistent at exercise stress test.

AIMS: In patients with asymptomatic ventricular pre-excitation (VPE) persistent at exercise stress test, this study evaluates the proportion of cases with adverse conduction properties of the atrioventricular accessory pathway (AP) at invasive electrophysiological study and the long-term follow-up after they received treatment according to pre-determined criteria. METHODS AND RESULTS: Over 10 years, asymptomatic patients with VPE persistent at exercise stress test referred for invasive electrophysiological evaluation including isoproterenol (IPN) infusion were included. Ablation was planned if they had at least one of the following criteria: (i) shortest pre-excited R-R interval (SPERRI) ≤250 ms and/or (ii) inducible atrioventricular re-entrant tachycardia (AVRT). Cryoablation was electively used in para-hisian and mid-septal APs. Patients non-eligible for ablation received no therapy. Sixty-three patients (45 males; mean age 26 ± 14 years) underwent electrophysiological evaluation: 7 had fasciculo-ventricular fibres and were excluded, whereas 56 had 58 APs. Thirty-one patients (55%) were eligible and underwent successful ablation: 87% had at least the SPERRI ≤ 250 ms and 61% had at least inducible AVRT. In 15 cases (48%) the ablation criteria were met only during IPN infusion. During follow-up (73 ± 33 months), one patient was successfully retreated for resumption of VPE in the ablation group, whereas no event was observed in the group of patients who received no treatment. CONCLUSION: In this subset of patients with asymptomatic VPE, invasive electrophysiological evaluation shows fast antegrade conduction over the AP and/or inducible AVRT in about half of the cases. Patients who received no therapy because of a benign electrophysiological profile had an event-free follow-up.

Left atrial diverticula in patients undergoing atrial fibrillation ablation: morphologic analysis and clinical impact.

INTRODUCTION: Left atrial diverticula (LAD) have been reported to be (1) at risk for intracavitary thrombosis and cardiac perforation during ablation and (2) sites of extrapulmonary vein foci. In atrial fibrillation (AF) ablation, their presence might undermine procedure safety and efficacy. This observational study evaluates the morphology and clinical impact of LAD in patients undergoing AF ablation. METHODS AND RESULTS: Consecutive patients undergoing computed tomography scan (Aquilion 64, Toshiba, Otawara, Japan) and AF ablation with imaging integration (CARTO 3 Merge, Biosense Webster, CA, USA) in our center were included. Morphologic analysis was performed by 2 independent radiologists. Ablation was obtained by irrigated radiofrequency energy (Navistar Thermocool or Thermocool SF, Biosense Webster). Out of 212 patients, 58 (27.3%) had LAD; 74.4% of LAD were located in the anterosuperomedial left atrium. In patients with and without LAD, the prevalence of prior cerebrovascular events was similarly low. The rate of major periprocedure complications did not differ significantly: 1.7% versus 2.6% (P = 1) in patients with and without LAD, respectively. However, 1 case of cardiac perforation occurred during ablation in a diverticulum. During follow-up, survival free from arrhythmia recurrences was comparable in the 2 groups. CONCLUSION: LAD are present in about one-fourth of patients undergoing AF ablation and, in general, they have no impact on its safety and efficacy. However, occasionally, radiofrequency energy delivery in a LAD can cause tissue overheating and perforation.

Simulator training reduces radiation exposure and improves trainees' performance in placing electrophysiologic catheters during patient-based procedures.

BACKGROUND: Currently, training in interventional electrophysiology is based on conventional methodologies, and a paucity of data on the usefulness of simulation in this field is available. OBJECTIVE: The purpose of this study was to evaluate the impact of simulator training on trainees' performance in electrophysiologic catheter placement during the early phase of their learning curve. METHODS: Inexperienced electrophysiology fellows were considered. A hybrid high-fidelity simulator (Procedicus VIST, version 7.0, Mentice AB Gothenburg, Sweden for Biosense Webster) was used. The following parameters were evaluated in 3 consecutive patient-based procedures before and after two training sessions of at least 1.5 hours on the simulator: (1) ability to place catheters in conventional recording/pacing sites (coronary sinus, His-bundle area, high right atrium, and right ventricular apex); (2) amount of help provided by the supervisor (scale from 1-3; 3 for maximal help); (3) fluoroscopy time; and (4) positioning time. RESULTS: Seven fellows performed 168 catheter placements during 42 patient-based procedures with no complications. Comparing parameters before and after simulator training, there was a significant reduction in the mean amount of help and in fluoroscopy and positioning times per placement: from 1.71 ± 1.24 to 0.42 ± 0.68 (P <.001), from 121 ± 88 seconds to 76 ± 54 seconds (P <.001), and from 175 ± 138 seconds to 102 ± 74 seconds (P <.001), respectively. Overall fluoroscopy time per patient decreased from 567 ± 220 seconds to 305 ± 111 seconds (P <.0001). Improvement appeared to be related to simulator training alone and not to the previously performed patient-based procedures. CONCLUSION: During the early phase of the trainees' learning curve, simulator training significantly improves the independent trainees' performance with reduction in radiation exposure.