Psychophysiologic symptom relief therapy for chronic back pain: hypothesis and trial rationale.

Chronic pain syndromes affect over one-third of the US adult population and often lead to significant disability and a reduced quality of life. Despite their high prevalence, causal links between chronic pain syndromes and anatomic abnormalities are often not apparent. Most current chronic pain treatments provide modest, if any, relief. Thus, there is a pressing need to understand the causal mechanisms implicated in chronic pain as a means to develop more targeted interventions for improvement in clinical outcomes and reduction in morbidity and financial burden. In the present manuscript, we summarize the current literature on treatment for chronic pain, and hypothesize that non-specific chronic back pain (without a clear organic etiology, such as tumors, infections or fractures) is of psychophysiologic origin. Based on this hypothesis, we developed Psychophysiologic Symptom Relief Therapy (PSRT), a novel pain reduction intervention for understanding and treating chronic pain. In this manuscript, we provide the rationale for PSRT, which we have tested in a pilot trial with a subsequent larger randomized trial underway. In the proposed trial, we will evaluate whether non-specific chronic back pain can be treated by addressing the underlying stressors and psychological underpinnings without specific physical interventions.

Oxygen metabolism after cardiac arrest: Patterns and associations with survival.

Aim: Whether changes in oxygen metabolism, as measured by oxygen consumption (VO2), carbon dioxide production (VCO2) and the respiratory exchange ratio (RER), are associated with survival after cardiac arrest is poorly understood. In this prospective observational study, we investigated the association between VO2, VCO2, and RER in the initial 12 and 24 h after return of spontaneous circulation (ROSC) and survival to hospital discharge. Methods: Adults with ROSC after cardiac arrest, admitted to the intensive care unit, requiring mechanical ventilation and treated with targeted temperature management were included. VO2 and VCO2 were measured continuously for 24 h after ROSC, using a noninvasive anesthesia monitor. Area under the curve for VO2, VCO2 & RER was calculated using all available values over 12 and 24 h after ROSC. Using logistic regression, we evaluated the relationship between these metabolic variables and survival to hospital discharge. Analyses were adjusted for temperature, vasopressors, and neuromuscular blockade. Results: Sixty four patients were included. Mean age was 64 ± 16 years, and 59% were women. There was no significant association between the area under the curve of VO2 or VCO2 and survival. A higher RER in the initial 12 h was associated with better survival (aOR = 3.97, 95% CI [1.01,15.6], p = 0.048). Survival was lower in those with median RER < 0.7 in the initial 12 h compared with those with a median RER ≥ 0.7 (25% vs 67%, p = 0.011). Conclusion: Higher RER in the initial 12 h was associated with survival after cardiac arrest. The etiology of unusually low RERs in this patient population remains unclear.

Corticosteroids to Reduce Inflammation in Severe Pancreatitis (CRISP) protocol and statistical analysis plan: a prospective, multicentre, double-blind, randomized, placebo controlled clinical trial.

INTRODUCTION: Acute pancreatitis is a common disease which, in its severe form, is associated with significant morbidity and mortality. Currently, there is no specific therapy known to attenuate organ failure in severe pancreatitis and treatment consists primarily of supportive care. Corticosteroids have been shown to be beneficial in disease processes associated with systemic inflammation and could potentially improve outcomes in severe acute pancreatitis. METHODS: The Corticosteroids to Reduce Inflammation in Severe Pancreatitis (CRISP) trial is a multi-centre, double-blind, randomized, placebo-controlled clinical trial that aims to determine the impact of corticosteroids versus placebo on organ injury in patients with severe acute pancreatitis. Patients are randomized to receive 100 mg of hydrocortisone parenterally versus matching placebo every 8 h for 3 days. Clinical and laboratory data are collected at the time of study enrollment, at 24, 48 and 72 h. The primary end-point for the trial is the difference in 72-h change in the Sequential Organ Failure Assessment (SOFA) score between hydrocortisone and placebo groups. Additional key secondary outcomes include ventilator free days and 28-day mortality. DISCUSSION: This study will add to the evidence base in the treatment of severe acute pancreatitis. The results will inform clinical practice and future studies in the field. Trial registration number The trial is registered on clinicaltrials.gov (NCT05160506). It was posted on December 16th, 2021. The study protocol was approved by the Beth Israel Deaconess Medical Center Committee on Clinical Investigation (CCI) (protocol 2021 P-000803).

Thiamine as a metabolic resuscitator after out-of-hospital cardiac arrest.

INTRODUCTION: Thiamine is a key cofactor for aerobic metabolism, previously shown to improve mortality and neurological outcomes in a mouse model of cardiac arrest. We hypothesized that thiamine would decrease lactate and improve outcomes in post-arrest patients. METHODS: Single center, randomized, blinded, placebo-controlled, Phase II trial of thiamine in adults within 4.5 hours of return of spontaneous circulation after out-of-hospital cardiac arrest (OHCA), with coma and lactate ≥ 3 mmol/L. Participants received 500 mg IV thiamine or placebo twice daily for 2 days. Randomization was stratified by lactate > 5 or ≤ 5 mmol/L. The primary outcome of lactate was checked at baseline, 6, 12, and 24 hours, and compared using a linear mixed model to account for repeated measures. Secondary outcomes included SOFA score, pyruvate dehydrogenase, renal injury, neurological outcome, and mortality. RESULTS: Of 93 randomized patients, 76 were enrolled and included in the analysis. There was no difference in lactate over 24 hours (mean difference 0.34 mmol/L (95% CI: -1.82, 2.50), p = 0.43). There was a significant interaction between randomization lactate subgroup and the effect of the intervention on mortality (p = 0.01) such that mortality was higher with thiamine in the lactate > 5 mmol/L group and lower with thiamine in the < 5 mmol/L group. This subgroup difference prompted the Data and Safety Monitoring Board to recommend the study be terminated early. PDH activity increased over 72 hours in the thiamine group. There were no differences in other secondary outcomes. CONCLUSION: In this single-center randomized trial, thiamine did not affect lactate over 24 hours after OHCA.

Thiamine as a metabolic resuscitator after in-hospital cardiac arrest.

INTRODUCTION: Elevated lactate is associated with mortality after cardiac arrest. Thiamine, a cofactor of pyruvate dehydrogenase, is necessary for aerobic metabolism. In a mouse model of cardiac arrest, thiamine improved pyruvate dehydrogenase activity, survival and neurologic outcome. AIM: To determine if thiamine would decrease lactate and increase oxygen consumption after in-hospital cardiac arrest. METHODS: Randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled phase II trial. Adult patients with arrest within 12 hours, mechanically ventilated, with lactate ≥ 3 mmol/L were included. Randomization was stratified by lactate > 5 or ≤ 5 mmol/L. Thiamine 500 mg or placebo was administered every 12 hours for 3 days. The primary outcome of lactate was checked at baseline, 6, 12, 24, and 48 hours, and compared using a linear mixed model, accounting for repeated measures. Secondary outcomes included oxygen consumption, pyruvate dehydrogenase, and mortality. RESULTS: Enrollments stopped after 36 patients due Data Safety and Monitoring Board concern about potential harm in an unplanned subgroup analysis. There was no overall difference in lactate (mean difference at 48 hours 1.5 mmol/L [95% CI -3.1-6.1], global p = 0.88) or any secondary outcomes. In those with randomization lactate > 5 mmol/L, mortality was 92% (11/12) with thiamine and 67% (8/12) with placebo (p = 0.32). In those with randomization lactate ≤ 5 mmol/L mortality was 17% (1/6) with thiamine and 67% (4/6) with placebo (p = 0.24). There was a significant interaction between randomization lactate and the effect of thiamine on survival (p = 0.03). CONCLUSIONS: In this single center trial thiamine had no overall effect on lactate after in-hospital cardiac arrest.

Thiamine as adjunctive therapy for diabetic ketoacidosis (DKAT) trial protocol and statistical analysis plan: a prospective, single-centre, double-blind, randomised, placebo-controlled clinical trial in the USA.

INTRODUCTION: Diabetic ketoacidosis (DKA) is a potentially life-threatening diabetic complication. Despite the high prevalence of DKA and the substantial associated healthcare burden, limited research on strategies to improve outcomes currently exists.Thiamine (vitamin B1) is a cofactor of pyruvate dehydrogenase, which plays a key role in aerobic glucose metabolism. Thiamine deficiency is common in patients with DKA, resulting in a shift to anaerobic metabolism and hyperlactatemia, which can prolong and complicate recovery. Therefore, we hypothesise that thiamine administration will improve aerobic metabolism and lead to faster resolution of acidemia in patients with DKA. METHODS AND ANALYSIS: In this single centre, double-blind, randomised, placebo-controlled, parallel group interventional trial, 100 patients admitted to the hospital with DKA will be randomised to receive either intravenous thiamine (200 mg in 50 mL 0.9% saline) or placebo (0.9% saline identical in appearance and volume) two times per day for 2 days. The primary outcome will be the change in bicarbonate level over 24 hours as compared between the two treatment groups. Additional secondary outcomes include the change over time in anion gap, lactate levels, oxygen consumption by circulating mononuclear cells, intensive care unit and hospital length-of-stay and hospital resource usage when comparing the two study arms. ETHICS AND DISSEMINATION: This trial was approved by the Committee on Clinical Investigations, the institutional review board of Beth Israel Deaconess Medical Center (protocol number 2018P000475). Findings will be disseminated through peer-reviewed publications and professional conference presentations. TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER: NCT03717896; clinicaltrials.gov.

Thiamine administration in septic shock: a post hoc analysis of two randomized trials.

BACKGROUND: This is a post hoc analysis of combined cohorts from two previous Phase II clinical trials to assess the effect of thiamine administration on kidney protection and mortality in patients with septic shock. METHODS: Patient-level data from the Thiamine in Septic Shock Trial (NCT01070810) and the Thiamine for Renal Protection in Septic Shock Trial (NCT03550794) were combined in this analysis. The primary outcome for the current study was survival without the receipt of renal replacement therapy (RRT). Analyses were performed on the overall cohort and the thiamine-deficient cohort (thiamine < 8 nmol/L). RESULTS: Totally, 158 patients were included. Overall, thiamine administration was associated with higher odds of being alive and RRT-free (adjusted odds ratio [aOR]: 2.05 [95% confidence interval (CI) 1.08-3.90]) and not needing RRT (aOR: 2.59 [95% CI 1.01-6.62]). In the thiamine-deficient group, thiamine administration was associated with higher odds of being alive and RRT-free (aOR: 8.17 [95% CI 1.79-37.22]) and surviving to hospital discharge (aOR: 6.84 [95% CI 1.54-30.36]). There was a significant effect modification by baseline thiamine deficiency for alive and RRT-free (interaction, p = 0.016) and surviving to hospital discharge (p = 0.019). CONCLUSION: In the combined analysis of two previous randomized trials, thiamine administration was associated with higher odds of being alive and RRT-free at hospital discharge in patients with septic shock. This signal was stronger in patients with thiamine deficiency.

A multicenter, randomized, doubleblind, placebo-controlled trial of amantadine to stimulate awakening in comatose patients resuscitated from cardiac arrest.

OBJECTIVE: We hypothesized that the administration of amantadine would increase awakening of comatose patients resuscitated from cardiac arrest. METHODS: We performed a prospective, randomized, controlled pilot trial, randomizing subjects to amantadine 100 mg twice daily or placebo for up to 7 days. The study drug was administered between 72 and 120 hours after resuscitation and patients with absent N20 cortical responses, early cerebral edema, or ongoing malignant electroencephalography patterns were excluded. Our primary outcome was awakening, defined as following two-step commands, within 28 days of cardiac arrest. Secondary outcomes included length of stay, awakening, time to awakening, and neurologic outcome measured by Cerebral Performance Category at hospital discharge. We compared the proportion of subjects awakening and hospital survival using Fisher exact tests and time to awakening and hospital length of stay using Wilcoxon rank sum tests. RESULTS: After 2 years, we stopped the study due to slow enrollment and lapse of funding. We enrolled 14 subjects (12% of goal enrollment), seven in the amantadine group and seven in the placebo group. The proportion of patients who awakened within 28 days after cardiac arrest did not differ between amantadine (n=2, 28.6%) and placebo groups (n=3, 42.9%; P>0.99). There were no differences in secondary outcomes. Study medication was stopped in three subjects (21.4%). Adverse events included a recurrence of seizures (n=2; 14.3%), both of which occurred in the placebo group. CONCLUSION: We could not determine the effect of amantadine on awakening in comatose survivors of cardiac arrest due to small sample size.

Design and implementation of the hospital airway resuscitation trial.

Guidelines for the management of in-hospital cardiac arrest resuscitation are often drawn from evidence generated in out-of-hospital cardiac arrest populations and applied to the in-hospital setting. Approach to airway management during resuscitation is one example of this phenomenon, with the recommendation to place either a supraglottic airway or endotracheal tube when performing advanced airway management during in-hospital cardiac arrest based mainly in clinical trials conducted in the out-of-hospital setting. The Hospital Airway Resuscitation Trial (HART) is a pragmatic cluster-randomized superiority trial comparing a strategy of first choice supraglottic airway to a strategy of first choice endotracheal intubation during resuscitation from in-hospital cardiac arrest. The design includes a number of innovative elements such as a highly pragmatic design drawing from electronic health records and a novel primary outcome measure for cardiac arrest trials-alive-and-ventilator free days. Many of the topics explored in the design of HART have wide relevance to other trials in in-hospital cardiac arrest populations.