RESUMEN
BACKGROUND: The benefits of cannabis in symptom management among cancer survivors are widely acknowledged; however, patterns of cannabis use by cancer stage at diagnosis are unknown. METHODS: Here, we examined the association between cancer stage at diagnosis and consideration of cannabis use since diagnosis. We analyzed cross-sectional survey data from 954 cancer survivors, weighted to be representative of a National Cancer Institute-Designated Comprehensive Cancer Center's patient population. We used survey-weighted multivariable logistic regression to examine the association between cancer stage at diagnosis (advanced [III/IV] versus non-advanced [I/II]) and consideration of cannabis use (yes versus no) since diagnosis. RESULTS: Sixty percent of the population was diagnosed with non-advanced stages of cancer, and 42% had considered using cannabis since diagnosis. The odds of consideration of cannabis use were 63% higher (odds ratio = 1.63, 95% confidence interval = 1.06 to 2.49) among cancer survivors diagnosed at stages III/IV than among those diagnosed at stages I/II. CONCLUSION: Cancer stage may be a predictor of consideration of cannabis use after diagnosis.
Asunto(s)
Supervivientes de Cáncer , Estadificación de Neoplasias , Neoplasias , Humanos , Supervivientes de Cáncer/estadística & datos numéricos , Femenino , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Estudios Transversales , California/epidemiología , Neoplasias/epidemiología , Adulto , Anciano , Adulto JovenRESUMEN
BACKGROUND: The legal climate for cannabis use has dramatically changed with an increasing number of states passing legislation legalizing access for medical and recreational use. Among cancer patients, cannabis is often used to ameliorate adverse effects of cancer treatment. Data are limited on the extent and type of use among cancer patients during treatment and the perceived benefits and harms. This multicenter survey was conducted to assess the use of cannabis among cancer patients residing in states with varied legal access to cannabis. METHODS: A total of 12 NCI-Designated Cancer Centers, across states with varied cannabis-access legal status, conducted surveys with a core questionnaire to assess cannabis use among recently diagnosed cancer patients. Data were collected between September 2021 and August 2023 and pooled across 12 cancer centers. Frequencies and 95% confidence intervals for core survey measures were calculated, and weighted estimates are presented for the 10 sites that drew probability samples. RESULTS: Overall reported cannabis use since cancer diagnosis among survey respondents was 32.9% (weighted), which varied slightly by state legalization status. The most common perceived benefits of use were for pain, sleep, stress and anxiety, and treatment side effects. Reported perceived risks were less common and included inability to drive, difficulty concentrating, lung damage, addiction, and impact on employment. A majority reported feeling comfortable speaking to health-care providers though, overall, only 21.5% reported having done so. Among those who used cannabis since diagnosis, the most common modes were eating in food, smoking, and pills or tinctures, and the most common reasons were for sleep disturbance, followed by pain and stress and anxiety with 60%-68% reporting improved symptoms with use. CONCLUSION: This geographically diverse survey demonstrates that patients use cannabis regardless of its legal status. Addressing knowledge gaps concerning benefits and harms of cannabis use during cancer treatment is critical to enhance patient-provider communication.
Asunto(s)
Marihuana Medicinal , Neoplasias , Humanos , Neoplasias/epidemiología , Neoplasias/psicología , Neoplasias/terapia , Femenino , Masculino , Estados Unidos/epidemiología , Persona de Mediana Edad , Prevalencia , Adulto , Marihuana Medicinal/uso terapéutico , Marihuana Medicinal/efectos adversos , National Cancer Institute (U.S.) , Encuestas y Cuestionarios , Instituciones Oncológicas/estadística & datos numéricos , Anciano , PercepciónRESUMEN
BACKGROUND: Many patients with cancer use cannabis to help alleviate untreated cancer symptoms and side effects. METHODS: We examined associations of perceived benefits and risks and postdiagnosis cannabis use in a weighted sample of adult cancer survivors through a 1-time survey. Fifteen perceived cannabis use benefits and 19 perceived risks were operationalized as both summary scores and report of any benefits or risks. Survey-weighted logistic regression provided covariate-adjusted odds of postdiagnosis cannabis use for each benefit-risk measure. RESULTS: Among the weighted population of 3785 survivors (mean [SD] age = 62.2 [13.5] years), one-third used cannabis after diagnosis. Perceiving any benefits increased the odds of postdiagnosis cannabis use more than 500%, and perceiving any risks lowered the odds by 59%. Each SD increase in endorsed benefits doubled the odds of postdiagnosis cannabis use, while each SD increase in endorsed risks reduced the odds by 36%. CONCLUSION: An accurate understanding of benefits and risks is critical for informed decision making.
Asunto(s)
Supervivientes de Cáncer , Neoplasias , Humanos , Femenino , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Neoplasias/diagnóstico , Neoplasias/epidemiología , Neoplasias/psicología , Supervivientes de Cáncer/estadística & datos numéricos , Supervivientes de Cáncer/psicología , Anciano , Medición de Riesgo , Adulto , Marihuana Medicinal/uso terapéutico , Marihuana Medicinal/efectos adversos , Encuestas y Cuestionarios/estadística & datos numéricos , Percepción , Cannabis/efectos adversosRESUMEN
Background: Incentive salience processes are important for the development and maintenance of addiction. Eye characteristics such as gaze fixation time, pupil diameter, and spontaneous eyeblink rate (EBR) are theorized to reflect incentive salience and may serve as useful biomarkers. However, conventional cue exposure paradigms have limitations that may impede accurate assessment of these markers. Objective: This study sought to evaluate the validity of these eye-tracking metrics as indicators of incentive salience within a virtual reality (VR) environment replicating real-world situations of nicotine and tobacco product (NTP) use. Methods: NTP users from the community were recruited and grouped by NTP use patterns: nondaily (n=33) and daily (n=75) use. Participants underwent the NTP cue VR paradigm and completed measures of nicotine craving, NTP use history, and VR-related assessments. Eye-gaze fixation time (attentional bias) and pupillometry in response to NTP versus control cues and EBR during the active and neutral VR scenes were recorded and analyzed using ANOVA and analysis of covariance models. Results: Greater subjective craving, as measured by the Tobacco Craving Questionnaire-Short Form, following active versus neutral scenes was observed (F1,106=47.95; P<.001). Greater mean eye-gaze fixation time (F1,106=48.34; P<.001) and pupil diameter (F1,102=5.99; P=.02) in response to NTP versus control cues were also detected. Evidence of NTP use group effects was observed in fixation time and pupillometry analyses, as well as correlations between these metrics, NTP use history, and nicotine craving. No significant associations were observed with EBR. Conclusions: This study provides additional evidence for attentional bias, as measured via eye-gaze fixation time, and pupillometry as useful biomarkers of incentive salience, and partially supports theories suggesting that incentive salience diminishes as nicotine dependence severity increases.
RESUMEN
Background: Telehealth implementation can be challenging for persons with serious mental illness (SMI), which may impact their quality of care and health outcomes. The literature on telehealth's impacts on SMI care outcomes is mixed, necessitating further investigation. Objective: We examined the impacts of facility-level telehealth adoption on quality of care metrics over time among patients with SMI. Methods: We analyzed Veterans Affairs (VA) administrative data across 138 facilities from January 2021 to December 2022. We performed longitudinal mixed-effects regressions to identify the relationships between the proportion of facility-level telehealth visits and SMI specialty care quality metrics: engagement with primary care; access and continuity of care across a range of mental health services including psychotherapy or psychosocial rehabilitation, SMI-specific intensive outpatient programs, and intensive case management; and continuity of mental health care after a high-risk event (eg, suicide attempt). Results: Facilities with a higher proportion of telehealth visits had reduced access and continuity of physical and mental health care for patients with SMI (P<.05). Higher telehealth adoption was associated with reduced primary care engagement (z=-4.04; P<.001), reduced access to and continuity in SMI-specific intensive case management (z=-4.49; P<.001; z=-3.15; P<.002), reductions in the continuity of care within psychotherapy and psychosocial rehabilitation (z=-3.74; P<.001), and continuity of care after a high-risk event (z=-2.46; P<.01). Telehealth uptake initially increased access to intensive outpatient but did not improve its continuity over time (z=-4.47; P<.001). Except for continuity within SMI-specific intensive case management (z=2.62; P<.009), continuity did not improve over time as telehealth became routinized. Conclusions: Although telehealth helped preserve health care access during the pandemic, telehealth may have tradeoffs with regard to quality of care for some individuals with SMI. These data suggest that engagement strategies used by SMI-specific intensive case management may have preserved quality and could benefit other settings. Strategies that enhance telehealth implementation-selected through a health equity lens-may improve quality of care among patients with SMI.
Asunto(s)
Trastornos Mentales , Calidad de la Atención de Salud , Telemedicina , United States Department of Veterans Affairs , Humanos , Telemedicina/estadística & datos numéricos , Estados Unidos , Estudios Retrospectivos , Trastornos Mentales/terapia , Trastornos Mentales/rehabilitación , Trastornos Mentales/epidemiología , Masculino , Femenino , Veteranos/estadística & datos numéricos , Veteranos/psicología , Servicios de Salud Mental/normas , Persona de Mediana Edad , Continuidad de la Atención al Paciente/estadística & datos numéricos , Continuidad de la Atención al Paciente/normas , Accesibilidad a los Servicios de Salud/estadística & datos numéricos , AdultoRESUMEN
INTRODUCTION: Cannabis and nicotine/tobacco products (NTP) are commonly co-used in adolescence and young adulthood; however, limited research has been done on predictive health behaviors to co-use. The current study is a preliminary investigation into the relationships of modifiable health behaviors on cannabis and NTP co-use in adolescents and young adults. METHOD: 221 participants (ages 16-22) were characterized into cannabis use only (N = 55), NTP use only (N = 20), cannabis and NTP co-use (used cannabis and NTP; N = 96) and control (no use; N = 50) groups based on past 30-day use. Self-report measures for physical activity, sleep quality, mental health, and reward responsivity were utilized. Participants were given a comprehensive neurocognitive battery. Logistic regressions of self-report measures and fluid intelligence composite scores on substance use group status were run stratified by sex. RESULTS: Higher approach reward sensitivity traits were associated with increased likelihood of cannabis use only (Odds Ratio (OR) = 1.15, p = .036) in female participants. Increased aerobic activity was associated with decreased likelihood of cannabis use only (OR = 0.91, p = .047) and cannabis and NTP co-use (OR = 0.88, p = .007) in female participants. Higher anxiety was associated with increased likelihood of cannabis NTP co-use (OR = 1.51, p = 0.025) in male participants. DISCUSSION: Several health behaviors were linked with cannabis use and cannabis and NTP co-use in both females and male adolescents and young adults. Health markers differed by sex suggesting differing mechanisms of substance co-use. This study informs targetable health behaviors for prevention and intervention efforts.
Asunto(s)
Ejercicio Físico , Humanos , Masculino , Adolescente , Femenino , Adulto Joven , Factores Sexuales , Ejercicio Físico/psicología , Recompensa , Calidad del Sueño , Uso de la Marihuana/psicología , Uso de la Marihuana/epidemiología , Conductas Relacionadas con la Salud , Salud Mental , Fumar Marihuana/psicología , Fumar Marihuana/epidemiología , Ansiedad/psicología , Ansiedad/epidemiologíaRESUMEN
The use of e-cigarettes ("vaping") by young adults has increased substantially in the past decade. Although health risks of long-term e-cigarette use remain unknown, there is evidence of acute physiological harms. Most young adults who vape report intent to quit, but little is known about effective interventions. This protocol paper reports on the development and design of a pilot trial of a vaping intervention for young military Veterans. Young adult Veterans accessing VA healthcare (n = 20) who vape daily and have been referred for cessation services will be enrolled. To maximize accessibility the intervention will be delivered virtually; participants will be randomized to receive behavioral counseling by telephone or by video telehealth. The intervention was adapted from an existing program targeting young adult cigarette smokers and will include 6 individual counseling sessions delivered over 8 weeks. Assessment visits will occur at baseline, at end-of-treatment, and 4 weeks later. Analyses will evaluate feasibility and acceptability of the intervention overall, and will compare telephone and video telehealth modalities. Longitudinal regression will be used to evaluate changes in vaping behavior and in nicotine dependence over time. This study will provide assessment of a novel intervention adapted for Veterans who vape nicotine. The comparison of two modalities of virtual intervention delivery will increase knowledge and the potential to disseminate across VA and other healthcare systems. Findings from this pilot trial will inform the design of future, larger studies of vaping cessation interventions for younger Veterans.
RESUMEN
PURPOSE: Resident physicians experience high rates of burnout and depression but rarely prioritize their well-being or seek mental health care. The Accreditation Council for Graduate Medical Education mandated that training programs prioritize resident wellness and emotional and mental health to ensure readily available and accessible mental health care. To help meet that requirement and circumvent barriers to accessing care, the University of California San Diego Healer Education Assessment & Referral (HEAR) Program offers residents and fellows short-term therapy for coping with challenges that threaten their well-being. This report describes the results of a pilot study designed to evaluate the feasibility and effectiveness of the HEAR Program's resident therapy program. METHOD: The cohort included residents and fellows who completed at least 1 postbaseline assessment from January to May 2022. Measures of fulfillment, burnout, self-compassion, quality of life, depression, and suicidal ideation were assessed and compared before and up to 12 weeks after enrollment. RESULTS: Of the 39 residents who consented to participation, 30 completed at least 1 postbaseline assessment. Most outcomes improved after therapy, with significant increases in fulfillment (mean [SE] coefficient, 0.24 [0.08]; z score, 2.86; P = .004), self-compassion (mean [SE] coefficient, 0.37 [0.07]; z score, 5.72; P < .001), and quality of life ( P < .001) and significant reductions in burnout (Stanford burnout scale: mean [SE] coefficient, -0.27 [0.07]; z score, -4.01; P < .001; single-item burnout scale: mean [SE] coefficient, -0.34 [0.08]; z score, -4.37; P < .001) and depression severity (mean [SE] coefficient, -1.08 [0.25]; z score, -4.36; P < .001). CONCLUSIONS: This pilot study noted improvements in fulfillment, compassion, quality of life, and function, as well as reductions in burnout and depression severity, among resident physicians. Future studies in larger cohorts are needed to validate these findings and inform further optimization of this program.
RESUMEN
Hoarding Disorder (HD) is a prominent and disabling neuropsychiatric condition defined by the inability to discard objects resulting in impairing levels of clutter. The prevalence rate is 2-6 % and increases with age. The aging Veteran population is a high risk group for impairment associated with HD. Medical and psychiatric comorbidities as well as associated rates of disability and poor quality of life are very common in both HD and the related disorder of OCD. We examined rates of HD and OCD diagnoses at the VA San Diego Healthcare System. Data were obtained from medical records for all Veterans with these diagnoses over 8-years and included information on medical and psychiatric care, homelessness services, and Care Assessment Needs (CAN) scores. Rates of diagnosis for both HD and OCD were well below epidemiological estimates. Veterans with HD were older, had higher rates of medical hospital admissions with longer stays; had more cardiac, neurological, and acquired medical conditions; had more psychiatric comorbidities; had more interactions with the suicide prevent team and homelessness services; and had higher CAN scores than Veterans with OCD. The low rate of diagnosis and high services utilization of Veterans with HD demonstrates an area of unmet need.
Asunto(s)
Trastorno de Acumulación , Veteranos , Humanos , Veteranos/estadística & datos numéricos , Trastorno de Acumulación/epidemiología , Trastorno de Acumulación/diagnóstico , Trastorno de Acumulación/terapia , Masculino , Femenino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Anciano , Adulto , Comorbilidad , Estados Unidos/epidemiología , Anciano de 80 o más Años , Servicios de Salud Mental/estadística & datos numéricos , Trastorno Obsesivo Compulsivo/epidemiología , Trastorno Obsesivo Compulsivo/diagnóstico , Trastorno Obsesivo Compulsivo/terapiaRESUMEN
Vaccines are one component to the public health strategies to alleviate the COVID-19 pandemic. Hesitancy regarding COVID-19 vaccines in the United States has been problematic, which is not surprising given increasing overall vaccine hesitancy in recent decades. Most vaccines are administered during childhood years. Consequently, understanding hesitancy toward administration of vaccines in this age group may provide insight into possible interventions to reduce vaccine hesitancy. The present study analyzed a subset of over 130,000 public comments posted in response to a notice of meeting of the vaccine advisory group to the Food and Drug Administration. The meeting addressed whether to recommend Emergency Use Authorization ('EUA') of the COVID-19 vaccine for children ages 5-11. The results of the study demonstrate that most comments opposed EUA and these comments were associated with statements that indicated misperceptions of risk. Findings provide interesting insights regarding the role of public comments generally but also suggest that the public participation process in notice and comment can be modified to serve as an intervention to align individual perceptions of risk more closely with evidence-based assessment of risk. In addition, the findings provide opportunities to consider strategies for public health messaging.
RESUMEN
BACKGROUND: Nicotine and tobacco product (NTP) and cannabis use are common in adolescence/young adulthood and increase risk for negative psychosocial outcomes. This study investigated associations among adolescent/young adults' initial experiences with NTPs, lifetime frequency of substance use, substance-related problems, and mental health symptoms. METHOD: Adolescents and young adults enrolled in a study on NTP and cannabis use were asked at what age they initiated the use of NTPs and were assigned to groups based on which product or substance(s) they reported using at the earliest age. Participants who reported use of NTPs (in isolation, without cannabis) first (N = 78, "NTP-only"), simultaneous use of NTPs and cannabis first (e.g., blunt or bowl; N = 25, "Simult-only"), use of both NTPs in isolation and simultaneous use at the same age (N = 48, "NTP + Simult"), and no NTP use (N = 53, "NTP-naïve") were compared on substance use, substance-related problems, and mental health symptoms. RESULTS: Groups differed on lifetime frequency of NTP, simultaneous, and cannabis use, with NTP users reporting more substance use episodes and substance-related problems than the NTP-naïve group. The lifetime frequency of cannabis use did not differ across NTP use groups. NTP use was associated with increased anxiety and depression, with no significant differences between groups. CONCLUSIONS: Adolescents and young adults who use nicotine may be at increased risk for greater nicotine use and mental health consequences, but initiating NTP use simultaneously with cannabis may not increase the risk of negative outcomes above and beyond nicotine initiation. Prospective longitudinal research is needed to establish temporal associations between first-used NTP/cannabis products and relevant outcomes.
Asunto(s)
Cannabis , Sistemas Electrónicos de Liberación de Nicotina , Alucinógenos , Fumar Marihuana , Trastornos Relacionados con Sustancias , Tabaquismo , Adulto Joven , Humanos , Adolescente , Adulto , Nicotina/efectos adversos , Fumar Marihuana/psicología , Estudios Prospectivos , Trastornos Relacionados con Sustancias/psicología , Tabaquismo/psicología , Productos de TabacoRESUMEN
Nicotine and tobacco product (NTP) use remains prevalent in adolescence/young adulthood. The effects of NTPs on markers of brain health during this vulnerable neurodevelopmental period remain largely unknown. This report investigates associations between NTP use and gray matter cerebral blood flow (CBF) in adolescents/young adults. Adolescent/young adult (16-22 years-old) nicotine users (NTP; N = 99; 40 women) and non-users (non-NTP; N = 95; 56 women) underwent neuroimaging sessions including anatomical and optimized pseudo-continuous arterial spin labeling scans. Groups were compared on whole-brain gray matter CBF estimates and their relation to age and sex at birth. Follow-up analyses assessed correlations between identified CBF clusters and NTP recency and dependence measures. Controlling for age and sex, the NTP vs. non-NTP contrast revealed a single cluster that survived thresholding which included portions of bilateral precuneus (voxel-wise alpha < 0.001, cluster-wise alpha < 0.05; ≥7 contiguous voxels). An interaction between NTP group contrast and age was observed in two clusters including regions of the left posterior cingulate (PCC)/lingual gyrus and right anterior cingulate cortex (ACC): non-NTP exhibited positive correlations between CBF and age in these clusters, whereas NTP exhibited negative correlations between CBF and age. Lower CBF from these three clusters correlated with urine cotinine (rs=-0.21 - - 0.16; ps < 0.04) and nicotine dependence severity (rs=-0.16 - - 0.13; ps < 0.07). This is the first investigation of gray matter CBF in adolescent/young adult users of NTPs. The results are consistent with literature on adults showing age- and nicotine-related declines in CBF and identify the precuneus/PCC and ACC as potential key regions subserving the development of nicotine dependence.
Asunto(s)
Sustancia Gris , Tabaquismo , Recién Nacido , Adulto Joven , Humanos , Adolescente , Femenino , Adulto , Sustancia Gris/diagnóstico por imagen , Nicotina , Imagen por Resonancia Magnética/métodos , Tabaquismo/diagnóstico por imagen , Encéfalo/fisiología , Circulación Cerebrovascular/fisiologíaRESUMEN
Nicotine craving typically develops shortly after last use and is conceptualized as essential to the development, maintenance, and treatment of nicotine dependence. Previous research has primarily examined the relationship between craving and use among individuals trying to quit smoking, and less is known about this relationship among active users, particularly e-cigarette users. The current study evaluated the association between craving and use by assessing both constructs twice daily over 7 days in a sample of daily (n = 80) and non-daily (n = 34) users of combustible tobacco and e-cigarette products. We used negative binomial regression modeling to analyze the relationship between nicotine craving and use in two ways. First, we evaluated a lagged model in which craving at the time of assessment predicted use during the next time period. Next, we evaluated a model in which maximum craving since the last assessment predicted use during the same time period. Maximum craving was significantly and positively associated with nicotine product use (p <.05) while craving at the time of assessment was not. These associations did not differ depending on use frequency or on specific products used. Findings provide evidence that self-report ratings of craving are associated with greater nicotine and tobacco product use for both frequent and intermittent users. Furthermore, these results may be useful in developing or modifying interventions for a wide variety of nicotine users, including those who are not yet intending to make a change to their nicotine use.
Asunto(s)
Sistemas Electrónicos de Liberación de Nicotina , Cese del Hábito de Fumar , Productos de Tabaco , Tabaquismo , Humanos , Nicotina , Ansia , Cese del Hábito de Fumar/métodos , Tabaquismo/terapiaRESUMEN
Because COVID-19 is a respiratory and cardiovascular disease, understanding behaviors that impact cardiopulmonary health, such as tobacco use, is particularly important. While early studies suggested no change in prevalence of tobacco use as COVID-19 emerged, pandemic fatigue, shifting levels of COVID-19 transmission, and vaccine availability have all changed since the start of the pandemic. The current study examined whether time, COVID-19 surges, and/or vaccination status were associated with likelihood of daily and non-daily tobacco use over the first 24 months of the pandemic. Data were obtained from electronic health records of healthcare visits (n = 314,787) to four Southern California VA healthcare systems. Multinomial logistic regression analyses indicated that the likelihood of reporting both daily and non-daily tobacco use (versus non-use) increased over time. Daily and non-daily tobacco use were less common at visits that occurred during COVID-19 surges, as well as among veterans vaccinated against COVID-19. Our findings provide new insight into changes of tobacco use patterns and correlates across the first two years of this pandemic, and understanding these associations may facilitate understanding of health-related behaviors and inform clinical treatment of tobacco use disorder during the COVID-19 pandemic.
Asunto(s)
COVID-19 , Uso de Tabaco , Vacunación , Humanos , COVID-19/epidemiología , Pandemias , Uso de Tabaco/epidemiologíaRESUMEN
INTRODUCTION: There is increasing recognition that non-daily cigarette smoking is common in early adulthood but less is known about its stability over time, or what influences transitions to heavier or nonsmoking. We examined the stability of non-daily smoking in a sample of young adults, and tested whether social and cognitive factors predicted transitions to other smoking patterns over time. AIMS AND METHODS: Participants were 579 young adults (18-24 years old at enrollment, 52% male) who were non-daily and never-daily cigarette smokers and California residents. Participants completed 13 waves of assessment over 3 years. We used descriptive statistics to evaluate the frequency of consistent abstinence, defined as no cigarette use at two consecutive waves and no cigarette use at any subsequent waves. Cox and logistic regression were used to test predictors of consistent abstinence. RESULTS: We found that 55% of participants smoked intermittently throughout the study, while 43% were consistently abstinent by the end of the study; few transitioned to daily smoking. Stopping smoking was associated with having fewer smoking friends, smoking less in social situations, having lower positive reinforcement expectancies for smoking, and having stronger intent to quit. Post hoc analyses indicated those who stopped smoking tended to report reductions in positive reinforcement expectancies and increased intent to quit in the 6 months before stopping. CONCLUSIONS: Findings suggest a substantial minority of young adult non-daily smokers may stop on their own, but that the majority continue smoking and may require intervention. Interventions for this population should address social motives and reinforcement expectancies. IMPLICATIONS: The majority of young adults who are non-daily cigarette smokers appear to maintain this habit over an extended period and may require intervention. Interventions that focus on reducing expectancies for positive effects of and social motives for cigarette use and on increasing intent to quit smoking may be most effective.
Asunto(s)
Fumar Cigarrillos , Sistemas Electrónicos de Liberación de Nicotina , Cese del Hábito de Fumar , Productos de Tabaco , Adulto Joven , Masculino , Humanos , Adulto , Adolescente , Femenino , Fumar Cigarrillos/epidemiología , Cese del Hábito de Fumar/psicología , Fumadores/psicologíaRESUMEN
OBJECTIVE: Safety planning is a suicide prevention intervention that relies partly on an individual's social relationships as distractions during or help in a suicidal crisis. The primary objectives of this study were to estimate rates of missingness on social aspects of safety plans to determine whether rates differ by demographic characteristics and diagnoses and to examine whether missing social contacts on safety plans may affect clinical outcomes. METHODS: Data were drawn from the U.S. Department of Veterans Affairs San Diego Healthcare System's electronic medical record (N=1,602 individuals) from 2018 to 2021. Safety plans were coded according to the absence of listed distraction or help contacts, and clinical records of suicide attempts, suicide deaths, and use of crisis services were recorded for 1 year after completion of the safety plan. RESULTS: In total, 30% of plans lacked a contact for distraction or help. Male veterans were less likely to have a distraction contact listed, and veterans identifying as Hispanic or Latino were more likely to have a help contact listed. The lack of a help contact (odds ratio [OR]=2.11) and having neither distraction nor help contacts (OR=2.45) were associated with a markedly higher risk for next-year suicide attempt or death. The lack of a help contact was associated with increased odds of a next-year psychiatric inpatient hospitalization (OR=1.90) and an emergency department visit (OR=1.88). CONCLUSIONS: A lack of social contacts on safety plans may be a potential indicator for increased suicide risk among veterans.
Asunto(s)
Veteranos , Humanos , Masculino , Veteranos/psicología , Ideación Suicida , Intento de Suicidio/prevención & control , Intento de Suicidio/psicología , Prevención del Suicidio , Atención a la SaludRESUMEN
Decreasing smoking initiation remains a public health priority. In 2016, California, in the United States, enacted the Tobacco 21 law, which raised the minimum age for the purchase of tobacco products from age 18 to age 21. This paper evaluates whether the enactment and implementation of the Tobacco 21 law changed how young adults perceive the risk(s) of smoking. Data were drawn from a cohort of emerging adults (n = 575) in California who were non-daily smokers at enrollment and followed quarterly for 3 years. Data were collected during 2015-2019. Piecewise multilevel regression models were used to test for changes in smoking status and perceived risks of cigarettes after Tobacco 21 enforcement began. Findings indicated that the prevalence of current smoking and perceived risks of smoking both declined following Tobacco 21 implementation (ps < 0.001). Post-hoc analyses suggested that post-implementation changes in perceived risk occurred primarily among ongoing smokers. Findings suggest that Tobacco 21 and associated public health measures have been effective, but additional research is needed to disentangle the effects of specific components. Understanding the impact and efficacy of tobacco laws provides great social value to research and implement policies that create intervention(s) on reducing tobacco use initiation.
Asunto(s)
Nicotiana , Productos de Tabaco , Adulto Joven , Humanos , Estados Unidos , Adolescente , Fumar/epidemiología , Percepción , California/epidemiología , Prevención del Hábito de FumarRESUMEN
INTRODUCTION: Military Veterans have an increased risk of suicide compared to the general population, but less is known about changes in risk with the onset of the COVID-19 pandemic, or whether any changes have been moderated by psychiatric or demographic factors. The primary objective was to test the hypothesis that the likelihood of suicide attempt or death by suicide was stable during the first year of the pandemic versus the preceding year for the full sample. A second objective was to test the hypothesis that, in contrast, risk increased for Veteran subgroups characterized by traditional risk factors (e.g., psychiatric diagnosis). MATERIALS AND METHODS: We extracted electronic health record data for 771,570 Veterans who received one or more health care visits between March 13, 2019, and March 12, 2021, at eight VA hospitals across the southwestern United States. Primary outcome measures were suicide attempts and deaths by suicide. Predictor variables included psychiatric diagnoses and demographic factors. RESULTS: Multivariable models indicated that the odds of death by suicide did not change during the first year of the COVID-19 pandemic, while the odds of making a suicide attempt declined. Veterans treated for major depression were at heightened risk for attempting suicide in both years, but the association was smaller during the pandemic than the year prior. In contrast, the relative risk of attempt for Veterans who were never married and Veterans treated for a non-alcohol, non-opioid substance-use disorder increased during the pandemic. CONCLUSIONS AND RELEVANCE: The findings suggest that the pandemic has not led to an increase in suicidal behavior, which is consistent with other studies, although the degree of decline varied across diagnostic and demographic groups. Further longitudinal research is needed to evaluate whether the prolonged nature of COVID-19 may lead to changes in risk over time.