RESUMEN
(1) Background: Multiple myeloma is a rare cancer that primarily affects the bone marrow. Osteoclasts are responsible for increased bone resorption and, therefore, bone destruction. Bisphosphonates are a class of drugs that can slow down bone resorption by reducing the number and action of osteoclasts. Intravenous injections of bisphosphonates (generally Zoledronic Acid) are administered to patients affected by Multiple Myeloma, but BRONJ is described as a serious side effect. This 5-year retrospective study aims to evaluate the efficacy of appropriate dental treatment protocols prior to initiating bisphosphonate therapy to prevent the development of BRONJ. (2) Methods: A total of 99 patients with symptomatic multiple myeloma were involved in this study (41-90 years, mean age 65 years, standard deviation 5 years). The data relating to the visits were tracked using a specific server and consulting the clinical reports. The AAOMS (American Association of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgeons) position was applied for both diagnosis and treatment. A total of 79 patients were examined before the administration of bisphosphonates (group A) and 20 after (group B). (3) Results: The entire sample required dental treatment: 23.2% underwent restorative therapy, 8% endodontic treatments, 44.4% tooth extractions. Periodontal disease was present in 41.4% of the patients. No osteonecrosis was observed in the first group, whereas BRONJ was found in five patients of the second one (25%) and two patients (10%) showed osteosclerotic areas under investigation [OR 0.026 (CI 0.0027 to 0.2454)]. (4) Conclusions: In the literature, there are no precise data about the prevalence of BRONJ. Despite the limitation of the present study, we point out that dental treatment before the treatment with intravenous bisphosphonates can help in reducing the incidence of BRONJ and good dental status is necessary for BRONJ prevention.
RESUMEN
BACKGROUND: Bone overheating during osteotomy is a potential cause of necrosis and consequent failure of dental implant osseointegration. The aim of this study is to identify any differences between conventional osteotomy with drills of increasing size and the use of a single drill in terms of the temperature increase in the bone during implant site preparation. METHODS: Thirty-eight implant sites were prepared in ex vivo human mandibles, 19 using the conventional method with drills of increasing diameter (group A) and 19 using a single-drill method (group B), with no irrigation in either procedure. An infrared thermometer was used to measure the temperature difference (T°) induced by the drills at each site. Student's t-test (with P<0.05) was used to compare the temperature increase induced by the last drill in group A, and by the single drill in group B. RESULTS: The mean ΔT° in group A was 0.64 °C, while in group B it was 1.47 °C. The difference between the temperatures obtained in the two groups was statistically significant (P=0.0073). CONCLUSIONS: In statistical terms, the two methods differ significantly in the temperature increase induced by the drilling procedure, but this difference is clinically irrelevant.
