Violence in the emergency department: a quantitative survey study of healthcare providers in India.

BACKGROUND: Workplace violence (WPV) in Emergency Departments (EDs) is an increasingly recognized challenge healthcare providers face in low-resource settings. While studies have highlighted the increased prevalence of WPV in healthcare, most of the existing research has been conducted in developed countries with established laws and repercussions for violence against healthcare providers. More data on WPV against ED providers practicing in low-resource settings is necessary to understand these providers' unique challenges. OBJECTIVE: This study aims to gain insight into the incidence and characteristics of WPV among ED healthcare providers in India. METHODS: This study was conducted at two EDs in geographically distinct regions of India. A survey was designed to assess violence in EDs among healthcare providers. Surveys were distributed to ED workplace providers, completed by hand, and returned anonymously. Data was entered and stored in the RedCAP database to facilitate analysis. RESULTS: Two hundred surveys were completed by physicians, nurses, and paramedics in Indian EDs. Most reported events involved verbal abuse (68%), followed by physical abuse (26%), outside confrontation (17%), and stalking (5%). By far, the most common perpetrators of violence against healthcare workers were bystanders including patient family members or other accompanying individuals. Notably, reporting was limited, with most cases conveyed to ED or hospital administration. CONCLUSION: These results underscore the prevalence of WPV among Indian ED healthcare providers. High rates of verbal abuse followed by physical abuse are of concern. Most perpetrators of WPV against healthcare providers in this study were patient family members or bystanders rather than the patients themselves. It is imperative to prioritize implementing prevention strategies to create safer work environments for healthcare workers.

Introduction of a formative assessment tool in a post-graduate training program in India: a mixed methods evaluation.

BACKGROUND: Our institution has longstanding post-graduate education and training partnership programs in Emergency Medicine (EM) across India. A programmatic challenge has been the integration and uptake of evidence-based medicine and lifelong learning concepts. Formative assessment (FA) is intended to enable learners to monitor learning, identify strengths and weaknesses, and target areas of growth. As part of a program improvement initiative, we introduced an online FA tool to existing summative assessments. This study investigates how the FA tool was used and perceived by trainees. METHODS: 246 trainees across 19 sites were given access to the FA tool. Usage metrics were monitored over 12 months. Semi-structured interviews were conducted in person with trainees using a purposive sampling methodology. A hybrid thematic analysis approach was used to determine themes. Interviews were coded independently by two blinded researchers using NVivo software. The study was deemed exempt by our institutional review board. RESULTS: There was high variability in trainees' utilization of the FA tool. Trainees who used the FA tool more performed better on summative exams (r = 0.35, p < 0.001). Qualitative analysis revealed that trainees were motivated to learn for improved clinical knowledge and to be a good physician, not only passing exams. Benefits of the tool included the relationship to clinical practice and thorough explanation of answers, while disadvantages included topics unrelated to India. CONCLUSION: The integration of a FA tool has provided positive outcomes for trainees in EM education programs in India. Lessons learned may apply globally to other contexts and programs.

Contribution of 15 Years (2007-2022) of Indo-US Training Partnerships to the Emergency Physician Workforce Capacity in India.

BACKGROUND: Indo-US Masters in Emergency Medicine (MEM) certification courses are rigorous three-year emergency medicine (EM) training courses that operate as a partnership between affiliate hospitals or universities in the United States with established EM training programs and local partner sites in India. Throughout their 15 years of operation, these global training partnerships have contributed to the EM workforce in India. Our objective in this study was to describe Indo-US MEM program graduates, their work environments, and their contribution to the growth of academic EM and to the coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) response. METHODS: An electronic survey was created by US and Indian MEM course stakeholders and distributed to 714 US-affiliated MEM program graduates. The survey questions investigated where graduates were working, their work environments and involvement in teaching and research, and their involvement in the COVID-19 response. We consolidated the results into three domains: work environment and clinical contribution; academic contribution; and contribution to the COVID-19 response. RESULTS: The survey response rate was 46.9% (335 responses). Most graduates reported working within India (210, 62.7%) and in an emergency department (ED) setting (304, 91.0%). The most common reason for practicing outside of India was difficulty with formal MEM certificate recognition within India (97, 79.5%). Over half of graduates reported dedicating over 25% of their work hours to teaching others about EM (223, 66.6%), about half reported presenting research projects at conferences on the regional, national, or international level (168, 50.5%), and almost all graduates were engaged in treating COVID-19 patients during the pandemic (333, 99.4%). Most graduates agreed or strongly agreed that they were satisfied with their overall MEM training (296, 88.4%) and confident in their ability to practice EM (306, 91.6%). CONCLUSION: Indo-US MEM graduates have made a notable contribution to EM in India through clinical service delivery, teaching, and research, even more essential in the context of the COVID-19 pandemic. The roles of these graduates should be acknowledged and can contribute further to expand EM specialty and systems development across India.

Pediatric Code Cart Challenge for Emergency Medicine Trainees in Emergency Departments in India.

BACKGROUND: Code carts provide accessible emergency medication, supplies, and equipment to resuscitate a child. Unfortunately, there are limited studies on pediatric code cart use in resource-limited settings, including in India. METHODS: This was a Pediatric Code Cart Challenge for emergency medicine (EM) trainees in India. After receiving education on pediatric code carts, participants created their code carts and submitted a video showcasing their project. Reviewers evaluated each team's code cart using a rubric. A six-month follow-up survey assessed participants' use of code carts and their perception and satisfaction. RESULTS: Forty-nine participants across six sites completed the survey. The median number of pediatric code cart uses in the past six months was two. Materials frequently used from the code cart included medications (76%), followed by airway equipment (59%), and intravenous (IV) equipment (57%). Only 4% of respondents used an intraosseous (IO) catheter. Two of six sites reported modifying their code cart within the past six months by rearranging and/or adding equipment and medications. Local protocols, pediatric advanced life support guidelines, and references from other hospitals led to changes. Most respondents rated the pediatric code cart useful and appreciated its accessibility, ease of use, organization, and equipment. Respondents said they would add more pediatric equipment, including IO supplies, to improve their code cart. CONCLUSION: Participating sites now have pediatric medications and equipment accessible and organized in their code carts. Additionally, EM trainees learned what is needed and how to improve their current pediatric code carts. Future steps include expanding this pilot project to additional sites in low- and middle-income countries.

The Impact of Global Health Experiences on the Emergency Medicine Residency Milestones.

OBJECTIVES: Identify the impact of experiences in global health (GH) on the Accreditation Council for Graduate Medical Education (ACGME) competencies in emergency medicine (EM) residents and describe the individual characteristics of EM residents with global health experience compared to those without. METHODS: From 2015 to 2018, 117 residents from 13 nationally accredited United States EM residency training programs were surveyed. Specifically, the survey gathered demographic data and information regarding timing, type, location and duration of short term experiences in global health (STEGH). The survey collected both qualitative and quantitative data regarding resident experiences, including number of procedures performed and self-assessment of the impact on their residency milestones. ACGME milestone data from survey respondents was collected from each resident's training program coordinators. Chi-squared analysis and t-tests were conducted to assess differences between residents with STEGH and those without. A generalized linear model (GLM) was utilized to assess the effects of time and experience with interaction on achieving milestones in each of the competency domains, to compare milestone achievement over time between residents with STEGH and those without. RESULTS: Out of 117 EM residents, 60 were female (44%), the mean age was 30 years (standard deviation = 3.1), and 84 (71.8%) reported STEGH in general, including prior to residency (64.5%). 33 (28.2%) reported having completed STEGH during residency. The results of the GLM analysis showed that residents with STEGH during residency had significantly higher scores compared to those without the experience or STEGH pre-residency across all six competencies. CONCLUSIONS: STEGH in EM residents was associated with higher milestone achievement in certain ACGME competency domains including medical knowledge, practice-based learning and improvement, and professionalism. Participation in STEGH during residency appeared to show the strongest effect, with higher scores across all six competencies.

Characteristics and expectations among emergency department patients in India.

In India, and many low-middle income countries (LMICs), emergency medicine (EM) remains a poorly defined specialty and an unregulated field of clinical practice. Recognition of the attitudes, understanding, and expectations of patients presenting to Indian EDs will be crucial to the continued development of EM as a specialty. This is a multicenter, prospective, cross sectional study of adult and pediatric patients presenting to the ED in three geographically distinct regions of India. Participants were surveyed about their expectations regarding the type of care that they expected to receive, previous treatment options they have utilized, basic understanding of ED operations, factors contributing to their decision to seek ED care, and basic demographic information. 779 patients were approached to participate in the study, of which 698 (90%) completed the survey. Common ways that patients reported learning about the ED were referral from another healthcare provider (45%) and recommendation by a family member (61%). Participants chose the ED was because they thought they would be seen quickly (89%), would receive acute pain management (45%), their regular outpatient care was closed (45%), or were sent by another doctor (45%). Patients expected to wait 0.3 hours (18 minutes) on average to see a doctor in the ED. Over 75% or patients expected to see a specialist consultant in the ED and 12% expected to see their personal physician. Eighty-five percent of patients were triaged as moderate or high acuity, and 74% of patients were admitted. This study found that ED in India is utilized by a population with an extremely high acuity of medical illness that attempts to access healthcare through multiple avenues. Patients most frequently visit the ED due to a referral from another healthcare provider or family member. Most patients are aware of the existence of the ED, though understanding of available services may be lacking. Future research should focus on community outreach and education initiatives on ED services.

Utilization of Automated Keyword Search to Identify E-Scooter Injuries in the Emergency Department.

Background and objective Accurate identification and categorization of injuries from medical records can be challenging, yet it is important for injury epidemiology and prevention efforts. Coding systems such as the International Classification of Diseases (ICD) have well-known limitations. Utilizing computer-based techniques such as natural language processing (NLP) can help augment the identification and categorization of diseases in electronic health records. We used a Python program to search the text to identify cases of scooter injuries that presented to our emergency department (ED). Materials and methods This retrospective chart review was conducted between March 2017 and June 2019 in a single, urban academic ED with approximately 80,000 annual visits. The physician documentation was stored as combined PDF files by date. A Python program was developed to search the text from 186,987 encounters to find the string "scoot" and to extract the 100 characters before and after the phrase to facilitate a manual review of this subset of charts. Results A total of 890 charts were identified using the Python program, of which 235 (26.4%) were confirmed as e-scooter cases. Patients had an average age of 36 years and 53% were male. In 81.7% of cases, the patients reported a fall from the scooter and only 1.7% reported wearing a helmet during the event. The most commonly injured body areas were the upper extremity (57.9%), head (42.1%), and lower extremity (36.2%). The most frequently consulted specialists were orthopedic and trauma surgeons with 28% of cases requiring a consult. In our population, 9.4% of patients required admission to the hospital. Conclusions The number of results and data returned by the Python program was easy to manage and made it easier to identify charts for abstraction. The charts obtained allowed us to understand the nature and demographics of e-scooter injuries in our ED. E-scooters continue to be a popular mode of transportation, and understanding injury patterns related to them may inform and guide opportunities for policy and prevention.

Effectiveness of remote practical boards and telesimulation for the evaluation of emergency medicine trainees in India.

PURPOSE: Travel restrictions during the pandemic created a barrier to the traditional in-person, observed assessment final examination of our emergency medicine (EM) training programs in India. We conducted remote practical boards and telesimulation bringing examiners and learners from different geographical locations together using an online video conferencing platform. The goal of this paper is to describe the process of implementing a large-scale, international remote practical boards and telesimulation event. We aim to describe the evaluations of the feasibility and effectiveness of remote practical boards and telesimulation in an examination scenario and the feedback regarding the perception of fairness and attitudes from both examiners and examinees. METHODS: A total of 104 residents from 14 separate hospitals in eight cities across India were evaluated individually for practical board cases and in pairs for telesimulation. For practical boards, each examinee was evaluated twice, by two independent examiners. For telesimulation, each pair was evaluated by a local facilitator and a remote examiner via an online platform. There were 27 practical examiners and 14 local facilitators and 10 remote examiners for telesimulation. We obtained feedback in the form of a survey from local and remote examiners and examinees. RESULTS: We implemented a large-scale, international remote practical boards and telesimulation event, connecting examinees and local examiners in eight cities in India with examiners in the United States and United Kingdom. Feedback was obtained from 24 examiners and 103 examinees. A total of 96.7% examiners and 96.9% of examinees felt that this examination was fair. All respondents agreed that this format saved time and costs. CONCLUSION: This remote practical boards and telesimulation experience was a feasible and effective way to evaluate EM examinees medical knowledge, communication, and procedural skills. Technology issues was a limitation of our telesimulation experience. Future studies on telesimulation use in global EM training would be useful.

Language diversity and challenges to communication in Indian emergency departments.

BACKGROUND: Communication in emergency departments (ED) in India is complicated by the country's immense language diversity. Prior research has revealed challenges in language and communication as barriers to care. Our objective was to quantify language diversity among clinicians in Indian EDs and better understand issues related to clinician-clinician and clinician-patient communication. METHODOLOGY: A cross-sectional survey of ED clinicians was conducted. Survey participants were recruited in-person and through email at six partner sites in India. ANOVA and binary logistic regression were used for subgroup analysis. Semi-structured interviews were conducted with ED clinicians. Interview data was analyzed using the rapid assessment process to determine predominant themes. RESULTS: 106 clinicians completed the survey. On average, clinicians spoke 3.75 languages. Seventy-one percent used a non-English language to speak to fellow clinicians most of the time, and 53% reported at least one critical incident over the last year where poor communication played a part. Interviews revealed challenges including low health literacy, high patient volume, and workplace hierarchy. CONCLUSIONS: This study is the first to document the impact of language diversity and communication barriers in Indian EDs. The results highlight the need for effective strategies to improve communication between the multiple languages spoken by clinicians and patients.

Self-prescribing of antibiotics by patients seeking care in Indian emergency departments.

STUDY OBJECTIVE: Antibiotic resistance is a global health threat. India has one of the highest rates of antibiotic use in the world. The objective of this study was to evaluate the prevalence of self-prescribed antibiotic use of patients presenting with febrile and infectious disease-related complaints to Indian emergency departments. METHODS: This was a prospective observational study conducted at 6 Indian emergency departments (EDs) between January 1, 2019 and December 31, 2019. Adult patients who presented with a chief complaint of febrile illness or infectious disease complaints were included. Our principal outcomes of interest were self-prescribed use of antibiotics within the prior 6 months or for the presenting complaint. We queried respondents about source of antibiotics as well as about demographic characteristics that influenced use. RESULTS: A total of 1421 patients were enrolled. Sixty percent (n = 856) of respondents reported using antibiotics in the prior 6 months or for their current complaint. Those who reported self-prescribing antibiotics either in the past or currently had at least some college education (P < 0.001), tended to use the pharmacy (P < 0.001) or the ED (P = 0.001) for their care when sick, and were more likely to have some comorbid conditions (P = 0.014) as compared to the group that did not self-prescribe antibiotics. The most common reason respondents reported self-prescribing antibiotics was because they did not want to wait to see their doctor (n = 278, 33%). Thirty-five percent of patients who were self-prescribed antibiotics before presentation did not receive and were not prescribed antibiotics in the ED, at discharge, or both. CONCLUSIONS: Self-prescribing of antibiotics occurs commonly in India. This use increases the risk for resistance due to inappropriate or unnecessary use. Promotion of antibiotic stewardship is needed to curtail such use.

COVID-19 Pandemic Prompts a Paradigm Shift in Global Emergency Medicine: Multidirectional Education and Remote Collaboration.

To date, the practice of global emergency medicine (GEM) has involved being "on the ground" supporting in-country training of local learners, conducting research, and providing clinical care. This face-to-face interaction has been understood as critically important for developing partnerships and building trust. The COVID-19 pandemic has brought significant uncertainty worldwide, including international travel restrictions of indeterminate permanence. Following the 2020 Society for Academic Emergency Medicine meeting, the Global Emergency Medicine Academy (GEMA) sought to enhance collective understanding of best practices in GEM training with a focus on multidirectional education and remote collaboration in the setting of COVID-19. GEMA members led an initiative to outline thematic areas deemed most pertinent to the continued implementation of impactful GEM programming within the physical and technologic confines of a pandemic. Eighteen GEM practitioners were divided into four workgroups to focus on the following themes: advances in technology, valuation, climate impacts, skill translation, research/scholastic projects, and future challenges. Several opportunities were identified: broadened availability of technology such as video conferencing, Internet, and smartphones; online learning; reduced costs of cloud storage and printing; reduced carbon footprint; and strengthened local leadership. Skills and knowledge bases of GEM practitioners, including practicing in resource-poor settings and allocation of scarce resources, are translatable domestically. The COVID-19 pandemic has accelerated a paradigm shift in the practice of GEM, identifying a previously underrecognized potential to both strengthen partnerships and increase accessibility. This time of change has provided an opportunity to enhance multidirectional education and remote collaboration to improve global health equity.

Learner-centered Survey of Point-of-care Ultrasound Training, Competence, and Implementation Barriers in Emergency Medicine Training Programs in India.

BACKGROUND: Point-of-care ultrasound (POCUS) is important to the practice of emergency medicine (EM), but requires training to achieve competence. The purpose of this study was to describe the current state of POCUS practice and perceived barriers to the implementation in EM training programs in India. METHODS: A cross-sectional survey consisting of 28 questions was administered to 378 faculty and residents in postgraduate EM training programs across India. RESULTS: Data were collected from 159 physicians from 16 institutions; 76% of them were EM residents, with a response rate of 42%. Respondents overwhelmingly reported high interest (91%) in learning POCUS topics. Respondents identified highest levels of comfort with the performance and interpretation of trauma ultrasound (US) and echocardiography. Conversely, there was a scarce interest and low levels of competence in performing obstetric US, which may be a result of the practice of triaging these complaints to obstetricians and gynecologists. Lack of US equipment and dedicated training were the highest rated barriers by a significant margin, which 56% of respondents ranked as "very important." CONCLUSIONS: While significant interest in POCUS exists among the Indian EM physicians, comfort and competence were limited to trauma and echocardiography applications. Expansion of and comfort with POCUS use in these settings may be sought through improvement of access to US equipment and a dedicated US curriculum.

A qualitative study of workplace violence among healthcare providers in emergency departments in India.

BACKGROUND: Emergency department (ED) workplace violence is increasingly recognized as an important issue for ED providers. Most studies have occurred in developed countries with established laws and repercussions for violence against healthcare providers. There is a paucity of data on workplace violence against ED providers in less developed countries. The aim of this study was to learn more about workplace violence among healthcare providers in EDs in India. RESULTS: Semi-structured interviews were conducted in-person with physicians, nurses, and paramedics in Indian EDs. Interviews were coded independently using the NVivo qualitative research software. A hybrid thematic analysis approach was used to determine dominant themes. Sixty-three interviews were conducted at 7 sites across India. Interview participants include attending physicians (11), resident physicians (36), nurses (10), and paramedics (5). Events were most often described as involving accompanying persons to the patient, not the patient themselves. Most events involved verbal abuse, although a significant percentage of responses described some kind of physical violence. ED factors such as busy times with high patient volumes or periods of waiting are associated with increased violence, as well as incidents with unanticipated outcomes such as patients with severe illness or death. Decreased levels of health literacy among patients often contribute as the financial stressors of paying for medical care. Providers reported negative consequences of workplace violence on quality of care for patients and their own motivation to work in the ED. Communication strategies were frequently proposed as interventions to mitigate violence in the future including both provider communication as well as public awareness campaigns. CONCLUSION: Workplace violence is a frequent reality for this sample of Indian ED healthcare providers. Alarming levels of verbal and physical abuse and their impact on patient care are described. This qualitative study identified unique challenges to Indian ED providers that differ from those in more developed settings, including financial stressors, inadequate enforcement of rules governing behavior in the hospital, and an overwhelming frequency of violence emanating from patient family members and attendants rather than the patients themselves. Further investigation into preventive strategies is needed.

Operation Navajeevan: A Public-Private Partnership Model for Disaster Relief in Kozhikode, India.

INTRODUCTION: In August 2018, India's southern state of Kerala experienced its worst flooding in over a century. This report describes the relief efforts in Kozhikode, a coastal region of Kerala, where Operation Navajeevan was initiated. SOURCES: Data were collected from a centralized database at the command center in the District Medical Office as well as first-hand accounts from providers who participated in the relief effort. OBSERVATIONS: From August 15 through September 8, 2018, 36,846 flood victims were seen at 280 relief camps. The most common cause for presentation was exacerbation of an on-going chronic medical condition (18,490; 50.2%). Other common presentations included acute respiratory infection (7,451; 20.2%), traumatic injuries (3,736; 10.4%), and psychiatric illness (5,327; 14.5%). ANALYSIS: The prevalence of chronic disease exacerbation as the primary presentation during Operation Navajeevan represents an epidemiologic shift in disaster relief in India. It is foreseeable that as access to health care improves in low- and middle-income countries (LMICs), and climate change increases the prevalence of extreme weather events around the world, that this trend will continue.

Towards developing a consensus assessment framework for global emergency medicine fellowships.

BACKGROUND: The number of Global Emergency Medicine (GEM) Fellowship training programs are increasing worldwide. Despite the increasing number of GEM fellowships, there is not an agreed upon approach for assessment of GEM trainees. MAIN BODY: In order to study the lack of standardized assessment in GEM fellowship training, a working group was established between the International EM Fellowship Consortium (IEMFC) and the International Federation for Emergency Medicine (IFEM). A needs assessment survey of IEMFC members and a review were undertaken to identify assessment tools currently in use by GEM fellowship programs; what relevant frameworks exist; and common elements used by programs with a wide diversity of emphases. A consensus framework was developed through iterative working group discussions. Thirty-two of 40 GEM fellowships responded (80% response). There is variability in the use and format of formal assessment between programs. Thirty programs reported training GEM fellows in the last 3 years (94%). Eighteen (56%) reported only informal assessments of trainees. Twenty-seven (84%) reported regular meetings for assessment of trainees. Eleven (34%) reported use of a structured assessment of any sort for GEM fellows and, of these, only 2 (18%) used validated instruments modified from general EM residency assessment tools. Only 3 (27%) programs reported incorporation of formal written feedback from partners in other countries. Using these results along with a review of the available assessment tools in GEM the working group developed a set of principles to guide GEM fellowship assessments along with a sample assessment for use by GEM fellowship programs seeking to create their own customized assessments. CONCLUSION: There are currently no widely used assessment frameworks for GEM fellowship training. The working group made recommendations for developing standardized assessments aligned with competencies defined by the programs, that characterize goals and objectives of training, and document progress of trainees towards achieving those goals. Frameworks used should include perspectives of multiple stakeholders including partners in other countries where trainees conduct field work. Future work may evaluate the usability, validity and reliability of assessment frameworks in GEM fellowship training.

Seasonal dengue surge: Providers⬨tm) perceptions about the impact of dengue on patient volume, staffing and use of point of care testing in Indian emergency departments.

BACKGROUND: Global health emergencies, such as from diseases like dengue fever, can lead to rapid surges in visits to emergency departments. The objective of our study was to evaluate the impact of dengue on factors that could impact emergency department flow, including patient volume and staffing, on Indian emergency departments. METHODS: This was a prospective cohort study of Indian emergency providers. Respondents were queried via online survey about a number of domains including practice environment, use of rapid testing, changes in ED volume and ED staffing adjustments occurring during dengue season. Data was analyzed using multivariate analysis. RESULTS: We had a total of 210 respondents to our online survey. Less than half of respondents reported that their institutions used rapid point of care testing. When asked how dengue impacted ED flow, the most common response was that dengue increased the total number of ED visits (84%). Despite this increase, only about 32% of respondents reported that their institutions increased hospital staffing. In multivariate analysis, respondents at hospitals that experienced ED visit surges over 40% of baseline were more likely to also report that their institutions also increased staffing during this time (OR 3.28, 95% CI 1.44-7.46). CONCLUSIONS: Our study shows that despite increases in visits during dengue season, ED providers noted that their EDs did not respond with staffing increases. More research is needed to better understand how emergency departments can adjust to dengue to provide optimal care for patients in India.

Faculty Development Program for Emergency Medicine Physicians in India: A Pilot Program.

BACKGROUND: The specialty of emergency medicine (EM) is developing worldwide at a rapid pace. While more and more postgraduate training programs are developing, a major gap persists in numbers and availability of well-trained academic faculty members. This article describes a pilot faculty development program (FDP) aimed to develop advanced academic skills among a group of EM physicians in India. METHODS: A FDP was developed with foundations in adult learning principles, using a combined approach of online and in-person didactic sessions. Specific expectations were established regarding academic contributions to participants' home institutions. Mentorship relationships were established between academic emergency physicians and program participants. RESULTS: A 12-month pilot program was implemented across four EM training programs in India. Nine faculty members completed the full requirements of the pilot program, eight of whom have continued to work as academic faculty members in EM training programs. Academic productivity among these physicians since completion of the program includes 11 abstract publications, six peer-reviewed articles, and 71 mentorship relationships. Program challenges included participant attrition, connectivity issues, and low rates of completion of evaluation requirements by both participants and mentors. CONCLUSIONS: This pilot program in faculty development provides a foundation from which further programs may be developed in the international sector. Effective faculty development is a cornerstone of good academic medicine, which is of particular relevance, importance, and challenge in the global context of a developing specialty.

Reducing mortality in near-hanging patients with a novel early management protocol.

BACKGROUND: Hanging is one of the most common causes of suicide world-wide, more prevalent in developing countries. There are no established protocols for early management of near-hanging patients who present to the emergency department (ED). The use of early intubation, strict blood pressure control and targeted temperature management has shown promise in small studies. OBJECTIVE: To detect changes in mortality and neurological deficits in near-hanging patients before and after implementation of a novel early management protocol in a tertiary care hospital in India. METHODS: Prospective cohort study conducted at a tertiary-care hospital in Tamil Nadu, India from August 2014-July 2016. For first year of study (pre-implementation), near-hanging patients were treated without a structured protocol. For second year of study (post-implementation), near-hanging patients were treated per a protocol including early intubation, strict blood pressure control and targeted temperature management. Primary outcomes included: (1) in-hospital mortality and (2) hospital discharge without neurological deficit. RESULTS: 65 patients were included (27 in the pre-implementation phase and 38 in the post-implementation phase.) At presentation, there was no difference between the two groups in mean heart rate, mean arterial pressure, mean oxygen saturation, Glasgow coma score, or mean respiratory rate. Protocol implementation decreased mortality (10/27 (37%) versus 2/38 (5%), P < 0.05) and increased the number of patients discharged without neurological deficit (10/27 (37%) versus 35/38 (92%), P < 0.05). CONCLUSIONS: This novel early management protocol reduced mortality and increased the number discharged without neurological deficit in near-hanging patients in a single tertiary care center in India.