Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 3 de 3
Filtrar
Más filtros












Base de datos
Intervalo de año de publicación
1.
Phys Med Biol ; 68(6)2023 03 10.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-36780696

RESUMEN

Objective.90Y selective internal radiation therapy (SIRT) treatment of hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) can potentially underdose lesions, as identified on post-therapy PET/CT imaging. This study introduces a methodology and explores the feasibility for selectively treating SIRT-underdosed HCC lesions, or lesion subvolumes, with stereotactic body radiation therapy (SBRT) following post-SIRT dosimetry.Approach. We retrospectively analyzed post-treatment PET/CT images of 20 HCC patients after90Y SIRT. Predicted tumor response from SIRT was quantified based on personalized post-therapy dosimetry and corresponding response models. Predicted non-responding tumor regions were then targeted with a hypothetical SBRT boost plan using a framework for selecting eligible tumors and tumor subregions. SBRT boost plans were compared to SBRT plans targeting all tumors irrespective of SIRT dose with the same prescription and organ-at-risk (OAR) objectives. The potential benefit of SIRT followed by a SBRT was evaluated based on OAR dose and predicted toxicity compared to the independent SBRT treatment.Main results. Following SIRT, 14/20 patients had at least one predicted non-responding tumor considered eligible for a SBRT boost. When comparing SBRT plans, 10/14 (71%) SBRTboostand 12/20 (60%) SBRTaloneplans were within OAR dose constraints. For three patients, SBRTboostplans were within OAR constraints while SBRTaloneplans were not. Across the 14 eligible patients, SBRTboostplans had significantly less dose to the healthy liver (decrease in mean dose was on average ± standard deviation, 2.09 Gy ± 1.99 Gy, ) and reduced the overall targeted PTV volume (39% ± 21%) compared with SBRTalone.Significance. A clinical methodology for treating HCC using a synergized SIRT and SBRT approach is presented, demonstrating that it could reduce normal tissue toxicity risk in a majority of our retrospectively evaluated cases. Selectively targeting SIRT underdosed HCC lesions, or lesion subvolumes, with SBRT could improve tumor control and patient outcomes post-SIRT and allow SIRT to function as a target debulking tool for cases when SBRT is not independently feasible.


Asunto(s)
Carcinoma Hepatocelular , Neoplasias Hepáticas , Radiocirugia , Humanos , Carcinoma Hepatocelular/radioterapia , Neoplasias Hepáticas/radioterapia , Radiocirugia/métodos , Estudios Retrospectivos , Tomografía Computarizada por Tomografía de Emisión de Positrones , Estudios de Factibilidad , Dosificación Radioterapéutica , Planificación de la Radioterapia Asistida por Computador/métodos
2.
Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys ; 109(1): 212-219, 2021 01 01.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-32853708

RESUMEN

PURPOSE: Previous reports of stereotactic body radiation therapy (SBRT) for hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) suggest unacceptably high rates of toxicity in patients with Child-Turcotte-Pugh (CTP) B liver disease. We hypothesized that an individualized adaptive treatment approach based on midtreatment liver function would maintain good local control while limiting toxicity in this population. METHODS AND MATERIALS: Patients with CTP-B liver disease and HCC were treated on prospective trials of individualized adaptive SBRT between 2006 and 2018. Patients underwent pre- and midtreatment liver function assessments using indocyanine green. Treatment-related toxicity was defined as a ≥2-point increase in CTP score from pretreatment within 6 months of treatment. In addition, we performed analyses with a longitudinal model to assess changes in CTP score over 12 months after SBRT. RESULTS: Eighty patients with CTP-B (median tumor size, 2.5 cm) were treated: 37 patients were CTP-B-7, 28 were CTP-B-8, and 15 were CTP-B-9. The median treatment dose was 36 Gy in 3 fractions. One-year local control was 92%. In a multivariate model controlling for tumor size, treatment dose, and baseline CTP score, higher treatment dose was associated with improved freedom from local progression (hazard ratio: 0.97; 95% confidence interval, 0.94-1.00; P = .04). Eighteen patients (24%) had a ≥2-point increase in CTP score within 6 months of SBRT. In a longitudinal model assessing changes in CTP score over 12 months after SBRT, controlling for baseline CTP and tumor size, increasing mean liver dose was associated with larger increases in CTP score (P = .04). CONCLUSIONS: An individualized adaptive treatment approach allows for acceptable toxicity and effective local control in patients with HCC and CTP-B liver disease. Because increasing dose may increase both local control and toxicity, further work is needed to optimize treatment in patients with compromised liver function.


Asunto(s)
Carcinoma Hepatocelular/complicaciones , Carcinoma Hepatocelular/radioterapia , Cirrosis Hepática/complicaciones , Neoplasias Hepáticas/complicaciones , Neoplasias Hepáticas/radioterapia , Radiocirugia/efectos adversos , Seguridad , Anciano , Femenino , Humanos , Cirrosis Hepática/patología , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Medicina de Precisión , Planificación de la Radioterapia Asistida por Computador , Estudios Retrospectivos , Análisis de Supervivencia
3.
Oral Oncol ; 60: 32-40, 2016 09.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-27531870

RESUMEN

OBJECTIVE: To identify predictive factors of severe long-term toxicity after re-irradiation of recurrent/persistent or second-primary head and neck cancer. METHODS: Outcomes and treatment plans of patients who underwent modern IMRT based re-irradiation to the head and neck from 2008-2015 were reviewed. Co-variables including demographic, clinical and oncologic factors, as well as interval to re-irradiation and re-irradiated planning tumor volume (PTV) were analyzed as predictors of developing severe (CTCAE grade⩾3) long-term toxicity with death as a competing risk. RESULTS: A total of 66 patients who met inclusion criteria were eligible for analysis. A median re-irradiation dose of 70Gy was delivered at a median of 37.5months after initial radiotherapy. Re-irradiation followed surgical resection in 25 (38%) patients, and concurrent chemotherapy was delivered to 41 (62%) patients. Median follow-up after re-irradiation was 23months and median overall survival was 22months (predicted 2year overall survival 49%). Of the 60 patients who survived longer than 3months after re-irradiation, 16 (25%) patients experienced severe long-term toxicity, with the majority (12 of 16) being feeding tube -dependent dysphagia. In multivariable analysis, shorter intervals to re-irradiation (<20months) and larger re-irradiated PTVs (>100cm(3)) were independent predictors of developing severe long-term toxicity. Patients with longer disease-free intervals and smaller PTVs had a 94% probability of being free of severe toxicity at two years. CONCLUSION: Selection of patients with longer re-irradiation intervals and requiring smaller re-irradiated PTVs can independently predict avoidance of severe long-term toxicity.


Asunto(s)
Neoplasias de Cabeza y Cuello/radioterapia , Radioterapia de Intensidad Modulada/efectos adversos , Anciano , Anciano de 80 o más Años , Femenino , Humanos , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Análisis de Supervivencia
SELECCIÓN DE REFERENCIAS
DETALLE DE LA BÚSQUEDA
...