Spanish National Registry of Major Osteoporotic Fractures (REFRA) seen at Fracture Liaison Services (FLS): objectives and quality standards.

REFRA-FLS is a new registry in Spain aimed at identifying individuals over 50 years of age with a fragility fracture. Using this registry, we found hip fracture is the most prevalent fracture. Treatment for osteoporosis was 87.7%, with 65.3% adherence. REFRA-FLS provides fundamental data in the study of fragility fractures. PURPOSE: Fragility fractures are a growing public health concern in modern-aged societies. Fracture Liaison Services (FLS) have been shown to successfully lower rates of secondary fractures. A new registry (REFRA-FLS) has been created to monitor quality indicators of FLS units in Spain and to explore the occurrence and characteristic of fragility fractures identified by these centers. METHODS: We conducted a prospective cohort study based on fragility fractures recorded in the REFRA-FLS registry. Participants were individuals 50 years or above who suffered a low energy fragility fracture identified by the 10 participating FLS units during the study period. The type of FLS unit, the characteristics of the individuals at baseline, along with patient outcomes as quality indicators among those who completed 1 year of follow-up were analyzed. RESULTS: A total of 2965 patients and 3067 fragility fractures were identified, and the most frequent locations were hip (n = 1709, 55.7%) and spine (n = 492, 16.0%). A total of 43 refractures (4.5%) and 46 deaths (4.9%) were observed among 948 individuals in the follow-up analyses. Time from fracture to evaluation was less than 3 months in 76.7% of individuals. Osteoporosis treatment was prescribed in 87.7%, and adherence was 65.3% in Morisky-Green test. CONCLUSION: Our results provide a comprehensive picture of fragility fractures identified in FLS units from Spain. Overall, quality indicators are satisfactory although a much higher use of DXA would be desirable. As the registry grows with the incorporation of new FLS units and longer follow-up, incoming analyses will provide valuable insight.

[Prognostic factors of mortality one year after a hip fragility fracture. Anoia hip study]. / Factores pronósticos de mortalidad al año de una fractura de cadera por fragilidad ósea. Estudio Maluc Anoia.

INTRODUCTION: Most of the patients who had a hip fragility fracture are characterized by advanced age, frailty, multimorbidity and high mortality rate into the first year. Our aim is to describe the prognostic factors of mortality one year after a hip fragility fracture. MATERIAL AND METHODS: Observational prospective study. During the study period we included patients older than 69 years with hip fragility fracture who were admitted to the Acute Geriatric Unit. RESULTS: We have followed 364 patients, 100 of them died (27.5%). The independent prognostic factors of mortality one year after a hip fragility fracture had been: have a less basis score in Lawton and Brody Scale 0.603 (0.505-0.721) (p< 0.001); have a higher score in Charlson Comorbidity Index 2.332 (1.308-4.157) p = 0.04); have a surgical waiting time ≥ 3 days 3.013 (1.330-6.829) p = 0.008); finding hydroelectrolytic disorders and/or deterioration of glomerular filtration 1.212 (1.017-1.444) p = 0.031) during hospital stay; discriminatory capacity of the area under the curve (AUC) (± 95%): 0.888 (0.880-0.891). CONCLUSIONS: Prognostic predictors of mortality at one year after a hip fragility fracture are those variables that reflect a worse state of health, complications during hospital stay and a longer surgical waiting time.

Prognostic factors for discharge to home and residing at home 12 months after hip fracture: an Anoia hip study.

OBJECTIVES: Hip fracture is often associated with loss of physical function and institutionalization. The aim of this study is to describe the prognostic factors for discharge to home and residing there 12 months after a hip fracture. METHODS: A prospective study that includes patients aged ≥ 69 years that live at home before the fracture, admitted from June 1st, 2010, to May 31st, 2013. We registered the demographic data, presurgical function and cognitive assessment, surgical waiting time, type of fracture and complications during hospitalization. RESULTS: We included 273 patients (mean age 84.8 ± 6.1 years; 80% women), 130 (47.6%) were discharged directly to their own home. The predictors of discharge to home were a lower Geriatrics Dementia Scale score (OR 1.42; 95% CI 1.17-1.71; p < 0.001), a higher Barthel Index score at discharge (OR 1.07; 95% CI 1.05-1.10; p < 0.001) and a longer hospital stay (OR 1.14; 95% CI 1.02-1.27; p = 0.019). At 12 months, 169 (63.5%) were still residing at home. Predictors of residing at home 12 months after the hip fracture were age (OR 1.07; 95% CI 1.02-1.12; p = 0.010), the discharge Barthel Index score (OR 0.96; 95% CI 0.94-0.98; p < 0.001), the Geriatrics Dementia Scale score (OR 1.27; 95% CI 1.05-1.52; p = 0.013), the surgical waiting time (OR 3.42; 95% CI 1.077-10.89; p = 0.037) and Charlson comorbidity index (OR 1.27; 95% CI 1.05-1.55; p = 0.016). CONCLUSION: Prognostic factors for discharging to home and remaining there 12 months after a hip fracture are those that reflect a better health condition prior to the fracture and better functionality at the hospital discharge for hip fracture.

Advantages of care for patients with hip fractures in the acute geriatric unit: Hip study Anoia.

AIM: Hip fracture as a result of bone fragility is characterized by poor health outcomes in the medium and long term. Our goal was to compare a new orthogeriatric model with the old trauma model and evaluate improvements in clinical management. METHODS: We carried out a comparative unicentric study, a historical sample (trauma model) collected from 1 June 2007 to 31 May 2010, versus a prospective sample (orthogeriatric model) collected from 1 June 2010 until 31 May 2013. We included all patients aged >69 years with hip fracture as a result of bone fragility. RESULTS: A total of 792 patients were evaluated (mean age 84.3 years). The surgical waiting period went from 2.70 days in the trauma model to 1.86 days in the orthogeriatric model (P < 0.001); the average stay was 15.76 days in the trauma model, and for the orthogeriatric model was reduced to 5.90 days (P < 0.001); mortality went from 4.5% to 1.3% (P ≤ 0.010); 1 month readmission for hip dislocation was reduced from 2.3% to 0.5% (P = 0.032). After a 6-month follow up, we had 302 trauma model patients and 287 orthogeriatric model patients. After 1 year, we had 288 patients in the trauma model and 264 patients in the orthogeriatric model. The main cause of abandonment was death, 108 patients (27.3%) in the trauma model and 100 patients (27.5%) in the orthogeriatric model (P = 0.951). CONCLUSIONS: When we compared the two models, we found statistically significant better results in the preoperative waiting period, average stay, hospital mortality and 1 month readmission as a result of hip prosthesis luxation in favor of the orthogeriatric model. Geriatr Gerontol Int 2018; 18: 407-414.

Characteristics of falls producing hip fracture in patients on oral anticoagulants.

OBJECTIVE: To analyze the demographic and clinical characteristics of patients on chronic anticoagulant therapy (CAT) admitted because of a hip fracture secondary to a fall, and to compare with patients not receiving CAT. METHODS: A prospective, observational study realized in six hospitals in the Barcelona area. Demographic and clinical characteristics of patients were collected. The index fall characteristics - cause, height, location, and time of occurrence - were evaluated. RESULTS: Of the 1225 patients included, 99 (8%) patients were on CAT. When we compare with the rest logistic regression analysis showed that patients receiving CAT were more likely to be male (odds ratio 3.7), not institutionalized (odds ratio 3.5), to take more number of drugs (odds ratio 1.3), to have dementia (odds ratio 2.1) and stroke (odds ratio 1.7). Results revealed a higher prevalence of combined factors as the cause of the index fall in the group of patients on anticoagulants. CONCLUSIONS: Characteristics of falls were very similar when comparing the group of patients receiving CAT with those who did not. A prior history of falls should lead physicians to take actions for preventing falls causing hip fracture, in all patients and particularly in these on CAT.

Clinical evidence of diabetes mellitus end-organ damage as risk factor for falls complicated by hip fracture: A multi-center study of 1225 patients.

AIMS: To identify the differential characteristics of patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus (T2DM) complicated by end-organ damage who experience a fall-related hip fracture. METHODS: We analyzed the socio-demographic data and index fall clinical characteristics of a group of patients with nephropathy, neuropathy or retinopathy related to T2DM consecutively admitted to six hospitals in Barcelona, Spain because of a fall-related hip fracture. RESULTS: Out of 1225 patients admitted because of a fall-related hip fracture, 107 (8.7%) had clinical evidence of end-organ damage related to T2DM. Among this cohort the mean number of falls during the year prior to the index admission was 2.6±3.2; and 29 of them (27.1%) had already experienced three or more falls. Most falls leading to the index admission took place at the patients' home, from a standing position, and during daylight time. An intrinsic cause of falling was identified in all but one of these patients. Multiple stepwise logistic regression analysis showed that, compared to patients without this diagnosis, patients with complicated T2DM were younger (odds ratio 0.762), had less prevalence of dementia (odds ratio 0.078), but had experienced a higher number of falls in the previous year (odds 1.183). CONCLUSIONS: A significant amount of patients with clinical evidence of end-organ damage due to T2DM who experience a fall-related hip fracture have a history of recurrent falling in the previous year. These patients should be identified and offered preventive actions aimed at reducing their risk of falling.

[Use of benzodiazepines according to the admission diagnosis]. / Utilización de benzodiacepinas según el motivo de ingreso.

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVE: Chronic consumption of benzodiazepines is common in elderly patients. The aim of the study was to analyse the possible differences between patients taking benzodiazepines and those without them. We also determined, among patients on benzodiazepines, if any differences were related to medical or surgical admissions. PATIENTS AND METHODS: We performed a prospective and multicentre study of 393 patients admitted consecutively for medical reasons to 6 geriatrics acute units; these patients were compared to 1,225 patients hospitalized for a hip fracture. We collected sociodemographic data, functional capacity by the Barthel's index (BI), comorbidity by the Charlson's index and cognitive impairment by the Pfeiffer test. RESULTS: We evaluated 1,618 patients, with a median age of 82.9 (6.5) years. Among patients admitted for medical causes, 581 (35.9%) were taking benzodiazepines chronically as did 449 (36.6%) patients in the hip fracture group (p=0.27). In the multivariate analysis, factors associated with the use of benzodiazepines included older age, institutionalization and a higher number of drug consumption. Differences according to the admission reason showed that patients admitted for medical causes lived more frequently in the community and had less falls, worse BI as well as a higher number of comorbidities and polypharmacy. CONCLUSIONS: More than one third of elderly patients hospitalized for medical or traumatology causes were taking benzodiazepines chronically. Different patients' profiles can be observed according to whether they are or not taking benzodiazepines and to the admission's cause in the subgroup of patients on benzodiazepines.

[Falls and osteoporotic fractures prevention units: proposed Osteoporosis, Falls and Fractures Group of the Spanish Society of Geriatrics and Gerontology]. / Unidades de prevención de caídas y de fracturas osteoporóticas. Propuesta del Grupo de Osteoporosis, Caídas y Fracturas de la Sociedad Española de Geriatría y Gerontología.

Since forming the Osteoporosis, Falls and Fractures Group of the Spanish Society (GOCF) of Geriatrics and Gerontology (SEGG) a review was performed of the epidemiology of falls, along with a description of measures that have shown a degree of effectiveness in prevention. We also present the proposal of a common basic model of action in fall prevention units, mainly addressed to the community. Finally, a consensus model falls register is presented, common to community level and institutional areas, with the objective of being useful and easy to fill in at any care level.

[Geriatric assessment in the emergency departments of acute hospitals]. / Abordaje del anciano en el servicio de urgencias de un hospital de agudos.

Elderly people use often and in an appropriate way the Emergency Department (ED). However, we don't dispose of evidences that demonstrate utility of a specific model of geriatric assessment (GA) applied in ED. Nowadays; GA in ED should be used being adapted to the environment and with some clear objectives that allow to carry out a multidimensional diagnosis and to establish therapeutic priorities. GA contributes benefits in the continuity of care on the part of the Primary Attention when elderly people are discharged from an ED.

Predictive items of 2-year mortality in nonagenarians with cognitive impairment at baseline: the NonaSantfeliu study.

We aimed to identify a set of predictors of mortality at 2-year follow-up in a cohort of nonagenarians with cognitive impairment at baseline. The following variables were evaluated; functional status determined by the indices of Barthel Index for basic and Lawton and Brody for instrumental activities of daily living, while cognition was assessed using the Spanish version of the mini-mental state examination (MEC). Cognitive impairment was graded as severe for those having MEC scores of 0-17 and mild for scores of 18-23. A total of 77 nonagenarians with a MEC score of 23 or below were included: 61 women (79.25%) and 16 men, with a mean age of 93.7 (3.4) years. The rate of mortality was 55.8%. According to MEC scores the proportion of deaths during the 2-year follow-up period ranged from 35.2% (6 out of 17) among mildly impaired participants to 61.6% (37 out of 60) among severely impaired participants (p=0.05). Multivariate regression analysis showed that the risk of dying in this cohort was associated with being older (p<0.01, OR 1.23, 95% CI 1.03-1.4) and having a previous history of heart failure (p<0.0001, OR 8.72, 95% CI 2.66-28.5). In conclusion age and heart failure predict mortality among nonagenarians with prior cognitive impairment.

Characteristics of fall-related hip fractures in community-dwelling elderly patients according to cognitive status.

BACKGROUND AND AIMS: Falls are a major cause of morbidity and mortality in older people who have cognitive impairment. The present study compared the characteristics of community-dwelling patients, with and without previous diagnosis of dementia, hospitalized because of a hip fracture. METHODS: 1024 consecutive patients >65 years (77.2% women, mean age 82.9 yrs) admitted for fall-related hip fracture to six Spanish hospitals during a 20-month period were included. Sociodemographic data, geriatric assessment and characteristics (location, time and possible cause: intrinsic, extrinsic or combined risk factor) of falls leading to hip fracture were evaluated. RESULTS: A total of 154 (15%) patients had a previous diagnosis of dementia. Analysis showed a greater number of previous falls before admission for hip fracture in demented patients. Moreover, in non-demented patients, we found both a predominance of falls during the day and of extrinsic factors. CONCLUSION: Some differences were observed, according to the cognitive status of elderly patients suffering a hip fracture due to a fall. A high percentage of dementia patients had suffered repeated falls prior to the fall-related hip fracture.

Factors associated with hip fracture-related falls among patients with a history of recurrent falling.

BACKGROUND: People who have suffered falls are at greater risk of falling again. We study the characteristics of falls leading to hip fracture in people with a history of recurrent falls, comparing them with those of people with a history of sporadic falling. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Analysis of the characteristics of a sample of 1225 patients consecutively admitted to six hospitals because of a hip fracture secondary to a fall (index fall) - index fall characteristics (location, time and the possible cause of the fall: intrinsic, extrinsic or combined risk factors) were also determined. Patients with a history of three or more falls (recurrent fallers) in the year prior to the index fall were identified as high-risk fallers; those with less than three falls were considered to be sporadic fallers. RESULTS: The mean number of falls in the year prior to the index fall was 1.7+/-6.5; 227 patients (22%) had experienced three or more falls within that period. Most index falls (880, 71.8%) took place at the patient's home, 232 (18.95%) in the street and 113 (9.2%) elsewhere; most (892, 72.9%) took place during daytime. Multiple stepwise logistic regression analysis showed that recurrent fallers were characterized by poorer baseline independence for activities of the daily living, a prior diagnosis of dementia, greater use of prescription drugs and a greater use of neuroleptics. For frequent fallers, the index fall was more often associated with an intrinsic factor than for sporadic fallers. CONCLUSIONS: A significant percentage of patients experiencing a fall followed by hip fracture have a history of recurrent falling in the year prior to a fall-related hip fracture. Poorer functional and cognitive status, polypharmacy and the use of neuroleptics are more prevalent in this subgroup of patients, and intrinsic factors as a cause of the fall are more common in this group. Whether these circumstances associated with recurrent falling are responsible for this higher prevalence of intrinsic, non-accidental falls should be addressed prospectively in order to implement preventive strategies.

[Pharmacological treatment of delirium]. / Tratamiento farmacológico del delirium.

Delirium is a complex clinical problem requiring a multidisciplinary approach in distinct phases. The main objectives in delirium management are to identify and control of predisposing and precipitating factors, calculate the patient's risk score for developing delirium and, finally, apply preventive measures and etiologic and symptomatic treatment.

Falls in nonagenarians after 1-year of follow-up: the NonaSantfeliu study.

An increase in the rate of falls may be an indicator of frailty. This study included a 12-month follow-up investigation into the rate of falls, in people over 89 years, living in an urban community and analyzed the differences between inhabitants with falls and those without falls. The study was conducted within the framework of the NonaSantfeliu study and 140 nonagenarians participated. Sociodemograhic data, Barthel index (BI), activities of daily living (ADL), Spanish version (MEC) of the mini mental state examination (MMSE), the mini nutritional assessment (MNA) questionnaire, near visual acuity by Snellen test and auditory acuity with the Whisper test were evaluated. The fall rate was 47.1%. The 1-year incidence of falls was 26.4%. The incidence of recurrent falls (two or more falls per year) was 10% (n=14). The prevalence of previous falls within the year preceding the study was 45.7%, 64 of 140 nonagenarians fell and 17 (26.5%) of them fell again during the follow-up. Seventy-six out of 140 (54.3%) nonagenarians had not fallen during the year prior to the study and during the year of follow-up, 20 (26.3%) of them had a new fall. In conclusion, the rate of falls among nonagenarians is high. These results emphasize the need to increase the awareness, to provide recommendations and to incorporate strategies to prevent falls.

[Prevalence of delirium in patients admitted because of medical conditions]. / Prevalencia de delirium en pacientes ingresados por procesos médicos.

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVE: Delirium is a common problem among people during hospitalization. The aim of the study was to analyze the prevalence and characteristics of delirium among patients admitted by medical conditions. PATIENTS AND METHODS: We performed a transversal cohort study in 165 patients admitted to 6 tertiary teaching hospitals. We scored the Barthel index (BI) previously to their admission, and also comorbidity using the Charlson index. Diagnosis of delirium was assessed using the Confusional Assessment Method in this transversal study. RESULTS: There were 101 women (61.2%) and 64 men. The mean (SD) age was 80.3 (12) years. The average of Charlson Index was 2.6 (1.7). Previous and evaluation BI were 71.5 (27) and 40.3 (30) respectively. Forty-two patients (25.4%) had delirium. Poor BI at the evaluation and previous diagnosis of dementia were significant independent variables associated with delirium in the logistic regression analysis. CONCLUSIONS: Delirium is frequent in medical hospitalized patients. Previous dementia and low BI at the evaluation among medical patients are associated with delirium.

Differences in the characteristics of elderly patients suffering from hip fracture due to falls according to place of residence.

OBJECTIVES: To examine whether the characteristics of patients hospitalized for hip fracture differed according to whether they lived in institutional or community residences. DESIGN: Prospective cohort study. SETTING: Six hospitals in the Barcelona area, Spain. PARTICIPANTS: 872 consecutive patients (75.8% women, mean age 82.5 years) admitted for fall-related hip fracture. MEASUREMENTS: Sociodemographic data, geriatric assessment, and characteristics (location, time and possible cause: intrinsic, extrinsic, or combined risk factor) of falls leading to hip fracture. RESULTS: A total of 724 (83%) patients were living in the community and 148 were institutionalized. Multivariate analysis showed a predominance of female sex, married status, and better Barthel Index values and Charlson comorbidity scores among community-dwelling patients. In contrast, institutionalized patients were more often male and widowed, had more dementia and visual deficits, and presented higher levels of both total and psychoactive drug consumption. Although both groups fell more often in their place of residence, the proportion of community-dwelling patients falling in an exterior location was significantly higher. A history of previous falls was more common among institutionalized subjects. CONCLUSION: In elderly patients suffering a hip fracture due to a fall there are some differences according to the place of residence. A high percentage of patients had suffered repeated falls.