Large-scale data mining of four billion human antibody variable regions reveals convergence between therapeutic and natural antibodies that constrains search space for biologics drug discovery.

The naïve human antibody repertoire has theoretical access to an estimated > 1015 antibodies. Identifying subsets of this prohibitively large space where therapeutically relevant antibodies may be found is useful for development of these agents. It was previously demonstrated that, despite the immense sequence space, different individuals can produce the same antibodies. It was also shown that therapeutic antibodies, which typically follow seemingly unnatural development processes, can arise independently naturally. To check for biases in how the sequence space is explored, we data mined public repositories to identify 220 bioprojects with a combined seven billion reads. Of these, we created a subset of human bioprojects that we make available as the AbNGS database (https://naturalantibody.com/ngs/). AbNGS contains 135 bioprojects with four billion productive human heavy variable region sequences and 385 million unique complementarity-determining region (CDR)-H3s. We find that 270,000 (0.07% of 385 million) unique CDR-H3s are highly public in that they occur in at least five of 135 bioprojects. Of 700 unique therapeutic CDR-H3, a total of 6% has direct matches in the small set of 270,000. This observation extends to a match between CDR-H3 and V-gene call as well. Thus, the subspace of shared ('public') CDR-H3s shows utility for serving as a starting point for therapeutic antibody design.

Benchmarking antibody clustering methods using sequence, structural, and machine learning similarity measures for antibody discovery applications.

Antibodies are proteins produced by our immune system that have been harnessed as biotherapeutics. The discovery of antibody-based therapeutics relies on analyzing large volumes of diverse sequences coming from phage display or animal immunizations. Identification of suitable therapeutic candidates is achieved by grouping the sequences by their similarity and subsequent selection of a diverse set of antibodies for further tests. Such groupings are typically created using sequence-similarity measures alone. Maximizing diversity in selected candidates is crucial to reducing the number of tests of molecules with near-identical properties. With the advances in structural modeling and machine learning, antibodies can now be grouped across other diversity dimensions, such as predicted paratopes or three-dimensional structures. Here we benchmarked antibody grouping methods using clonotype, sequence, paratope prediction, structure prediction, and embedding information. The results were benchmarked on two tasks: binder detection and epitope mapping. We demonstrate that on binder detection no method appears to outperform the others, while on epitope mapping, clonotype, paratope, and embedding clusterings are top performers. Most importantly, all the methods propose orthogonal groupings, offering more diverse pools of candidates when using multiple methods than any single method alone. To facilitate exploring the diversity of antibodies using different methods, we have created an online tool-CLAP-available at (clap.naturalantibody.com) that allows users to group, contrast, and visualize antibodies using the different grouping methods.

LAP: Liability Antibody Profiler by sequence & structural mapping of natural and therapeutic antibodies.

Antibody-based therapeutics must not undergo chemical modifications that would impair their efficacy or hinder their developability. A commonly used technique to de-risk lead biotherapeutic candidates annotates chemical liability motifs on their sequence. By analyzing sequences from all major sources of data (therapeutics, patents, GenBank, literature, and next-generation sequencing outputs), we find that almost all antibodies contain an average of 3-4 such liability motifs in their paratopes, irrespective of the source dataset. This is in line with the common wisdom that liability motif annotation is over-predictive. Therefore, we have compiled three computational flags to prioritize liability motifs for removal from lead drug candidates: 1. germline, to reflect naturally occurring motifs, 2. therapeutic, reflecting chemical liability motifs found in therapeutic antibodies, and 3. surface, indicative of structural accessibility for chemical modification. We show that these flags annotate approximately 60% of liability motifs as benign, that is, the flagged liabilities have a smaller probability of undergoing degradation as benchmarked on two experimental datasets covering deamidation, isomerization, and oxidation. We combined the liability detection and flags into a tool called Liability Antibody Profiler (LAP), publicly available at lap.naturalantibody.com. We anticipate that LAP will save time and effort in de-risking therapeutic molecules.

Structural modeling of antibody variable regions using deep learning-progress and perspectives on drug discovery.

AlphaFold2 has hallmarked a generational improvement in protein structure prediction. In particular, advances in antibody structure prediction have provided a highly translatable impact on drug discovery. Though AlphaFold2 laid the groundwork for all proteins, antibody-specific applications require adjustments tailored to these molecules, which has resulted in a handful of deep learning antibody structure predictors. Herein, we review the recent advances in antibody structure prediction and relate them to their role in advancing biologics discovery.

Machine-designed biotherapeutics: opportunities, feasibility and advantages of deep learning in computational antibody discovery.

Antibodies are versatile molecular binders with an established and growing role as therapeutics. Computational approaches to developing and designing these molecules are being increasingly used to complement traditional lab-based processes. Nowadays, in silico methods fill multiple elements of the discovery stage, such as characterizing antibody-antigen interactions and identifying developability liabilities. Recently, computational methods tackling such problems have begun to follow machine learning paradigms, in many cases deep learning specifically. This paradigm shift offers improvements in established areas such as structure or binding prediction and opens up new possibilities such as language-based modeling of antibody repertoires or machine-learning-based generation of novel sequences. In this review, we critically examine the recent developments in (deep) machine learning approaches to therapeutic antibody design with implications for fully computational antibody design.