RESUMEN
Digital Spatial Profiling (DSP) is a method for highly multiplex spatial profiling of proteins or RNAs suitable for use on formalin-fixed, paraffin-embedded (FFPE) samples. The approach relies on (1) multiplexed readout of proteins or RNAs using oligonucleotide tags; (2) oligonucleotide tags attached to affinity reagents (antibodies or RNA probes) through a photocleavable (PC) linker; and (3) photocleaving light projected onto the tissue sample to release PC oligonucleotides in any spatial pattern across a region of interest (ROI) covering 1 to ~5,000 cells. DSP is capable of single-cell sensitivity within an ROI using the antibody readout, with RNA detection feasible down to ~600 individual mRNA transcripts. We show spatial profiling of up to 44 proteins and 96 genes (928 RNA probes) in lymphoid, colorectal tumor and autoimmune tissues by using the nCounter system and 1,412 genes (4,998 RNA probes) by using next-generation sequencing (NGS). DSP may be used to profile not only proteins and RNAs in biobanked samples but also immune markers in patient samples, with potential prognostic and predictive potential for clinical decision-making.
Asunto(s)
Biología Computacional/métodos , Perfilación de la Expresión Génica/métodos , Proteómica/métodos , Secuenciación de Nucleótidos de Alto Rendimiento , Humanos , Análisis de Secuencia de ARN , Programas Informáticos , Análisis Espacial , Fijación del TejidoRESUMEN
We describe a technology, the NanoString nCounter gene expression system, which captures and counts individual mRNA transcripts. Advantages over existing platforms include direct measurement of mRNA expression levels without enzymatic reactions or bias, sensitivity coupled with high multiplex capability, and digital readout. Experiments performed on 509 human genes yielded a replicate correlation coefficient of 0.999, a detection limit between 0.1 fM and 0.5 fM, and a linear dynamic range of over 500-fold. Comparison of the NanoString nCounter gene expression system with microarrays and TaqMan PCR demonstrated that the nCounter system is more sensitive than microarrays and similar in sensitivity to real-time PCR. Finally, a comparison of transcript levels for 21 genes across seven samples measured by the nCounter system and SYBR Green real-time PCR demonstrated similar patterns of gene expression at all transcript levels.
