The free cortisol calculated: correlation with the free cortisol concentrations measured with liquid chromatography-tandem mass spectrometry after equilibrium dialysis and establishment of reference intervals.

BACKGROUND: Changes in cortisol binding globulin (CBG) impact the total serum cortisol concentration and affect the accurate assessment of adrenal function. Free biologically cortisol can be calculated using different equations or directly measured after complicated procedures. METHODS: The free cortisol index (FCI) obtained using the Bonte formula as well as the free cortisol concentration calculated (Coolens equation) were first estimated for 45 healthy workers. The CBG level was determined by a competitive radioimmunoassay and the total cortisol concentration, was measured with an electrochemiluminescent assay. The correlations between FCI, the free cortisol concentrations calculated and the free cortisol levels measured with liquid chromatography-tandem mass spectrometry after equilibrium dialysis were studied for those 45 samples. Reference limits were established on 158 healthy hospital workers and patients with serum samples collected between 7:30 am and 10 am. RESULTS: The FCI as well as the free cortisol concentrations calculated obtained for the 45 samples correlated significantly with the free cortisol levels measured. Although the cortisol and CBG levels were statistically higher in women using contraceptives compared with women not taking them as well as men, the calculated FCI and free cortisol concentrations did not differ between these groups. The medians (P2.5-P97.5) obtained for the 158 healthy workers were respectively 26.4% (12.3-51.6%) and 10.6 nmol/L (4.3-26.7 nmol/L). CONCLUSIONS: This study highlighted a significant correlation between the FCI, the free cortisol concentrations calculated and the free cortisol levels measured with LC-MS/MS, it has also allowed the establishment of reference intervals for calculated FCI and free cortisol.

Assessment of the Androstenedione Assay on a Roche Analytical Platform and Comparison with Different Methods.

BACKGROUND: D4-androstenedione (D4ASD) is an intermediate hormone of androgen biosynthesis by the gonads and the adrenal glands. The interest in D4ASD concentration assessment resides in diagnostics of androgenic hyperproduction pathologies. Currently, many D4ASD quantification methods are available on the market including immunological methods that remain problematic due to the possible cross-reactivity with endogenous or exogenous steroids. METHODS: Recently Roche® launched a new fully automated instrument for the measurement of D4ASD concentration. In this paper, the criteria of analytical performance (repeatability and intermediate precision) of the D4ASD Roche® assay were assessed and compared with 2 different methods including a radioimmunoassay (RIA) as well as a liquid chromatography tandem mass spectrometry (LC-MS/MS) method. RESULTS: Repeatability and intermediate precision of the D4ASD Roche® were acceptable according to the prede-fined RICOS standard (CV ≤ 7.9%) and the assay showed a good correlation with other assays considering the 95% CI obtained for the slope and the y-intercept. CONCLUSIONS: This method demonstrates acceptable criteria of analytical performance with an intermediate imprecision and a trueness within the fixed acceptance limits.

Cascadion™ SM Clinical Analyzer: Evaluation of the whole blood immunosuppressants quantification and routine usability.

BACKGROUND: Liquid chromatography coupled with tandem mass spectrometry (LC- MS/MS) tends to overcome other methods for therapeutic drugs monitoring (TDM) due to its very good analytical performances. Nevertheless, the lack of automation still limits its use in laboratory medicine. The Cascadion SM Clinical Analyzer (Thermo Fisher Scientific) is the first fully automated LC-MS/MS instrument available. We evaluated its immunosuppressant drugs (ISD) assay and the incorporation of such instrument into a core-laboratory. METHODS: An extended analytical verification of the Cascadion ISD panel including cyclosporin A, tacrolimus, everolimus and sirolimus was performed. It was compared to the MassTox ISD assay (Chromsystems). Different preanalytical and analytical conditions were tested. Finally, a turnaround-time evaluation and a satisfaction survey of users after 11 months of use in a core-laboratory were performed. RESULTS: Precision and linearity results were within the analytical goals fixed. The comparison with the MassTox ISD assay showed results in agreement except for cyclosporin A where a bias of -11.6% was observed, probably due to a greater trueness of the Cascadion method. Additional experiments showed good performances. The random accessibility and the ease of use by non-specialized staff members allowed a wider working time range and a reduction of the turnaround-time of 55%. CONCLUSION: The Cascadion ISD Panel held its promises in term of analytical performances, workflow aspects and ease of use by non-specialized staff.

Development and validation of a simple correction method for the measurement of neuron-specific enolase in hemolyzed serum samples.

The Neuron-specific enolase (NSE), a biomarker of neuroendocrine tumors or ischemic brain damage, has limited clinical applicability since its measurement is overestimated by hemolysis. In this study, an NSE correction method was developed for hemolyzed samples. The NSE concentration and the hemolysis index (HI) of serum were measured before and after spiking a hemolysate prepared with red blood cells from the serum-separating tube and extrapolating the NSE value corresponding to a HI of zero. To validate the approach (n = 46), NSE concentrations and HI were measured before (NSE0 and HI0) and after spiking the samples with 50 µL (HIA, NSEA) and 100 µL (HIB, NSEB) of hemolysate. A linear regression analysis was performed between (HIA, NSEA) and (HIB, NSEB). The y-intercept was taken as the corrected NSE concentration (NSEintercept) and compared with NSE0. On the same samples, the equation of Tolan et al. was applied and the corrected values of NSE (NSEcorr) were compared to NSE0. The average bias (±SD) between the NSE0 and the NSEintercept was equal to -3.2% (± 14.3) versus 34.6% (± 19.8) against the NSEcorr. Applying the allowable total error proposed by the European Federation of Laboratory Medicine, 72% of the NSE results were adequately corrected while the reference method corrected only 8.7% of the results. The individualized hemolysis correction method developed is simple, fast, requires one serum-separating tube, provides increased accuracy compared to the method described by Tolan et al. and should improve the quality of patient care.

Neutralizing antibody responses following natural SARS-CoV-2 infection: Dynamics and correlation with commercial serologic tests.

The prediction of SARS-CoV-2 immunity by commercially available serologic tests will be crucial to assess the efficacy of vaccination. We used plaque reduction neutralization testing as the reference standard to evaluate the diagnostic performance of six commercial serologic tests for monitoring SARS-CoV-2 neutralizing antibodies. Euroimmun ELISA anti-spike 1 IgG, Euroimmun anti-spike 1 IgG QuantiVac ELISA, Elecsys Anti-nucleocapsid protein total antibodies, Elecsys Anti-receptor-binding domain total antibodies, VIDAS anti-spike subdomain IgG, and Microblot-Array COVID-19 IgG assay were performed on 228 sera from 89 healthcare workers who participated in a six-month seroprevalence survey. Although all immunoassays demonstrated similar performances, VIDAS SARS-CoV-2 IgG and Euroimmun QuantiVac IgG (area under the curve 0.96 and 0.95 respectively) showed the better ability to detect Nabs. Except for the Elecsys Anti-SARS-CoV-2 and the Elecsys Anti-SARS-CoV-2 S assays, the commercial serologic tests evaluated here showed a significant decrease of antibody titers in the 6-month follow-up samples. Depending on the immunoassay, 21% to 33% of the participants became seronegative, and 16.9% had a loss of neutralizing antibodies. Microblot-Array assay results showed cross-reactivity with HCoVNL63 in only one sample, and this sample showed SARS-CoV-2 neutralizing capacity. In conclusion, our results support the use of VIDAS SARS-CoV-2 IgG, Euroimmun Anti-SARS-CoV-2 ELISA IgG, Euroimmun Anti-SARS-CoV-2 QuantiVac ELISA IgG and Microblot-Array COVID-19 IgG assays to monitor neutralizing antibody response following natural SARS-CoV-2 infection. These immunoassays could facilitate the prediction of post-vaccine protection in the long term and the allocation of booster doses.

SARS-CoV-2 Diagnostic Tests: Algorithm and Field Evaluation From the Near Patient Testing to the Automated Diagnostic Platform.

Introduction: Since the first wave of COVID-19 in Europe, new diagnostic tools using antigen detection and rapid molecular techniques have been developed. Our objective was to elaborate a diagnostic algorithm combining antigen rapid diagnostic tests, automated antigen dosing and rapid molecular tests and to assess its performance under routine conditions. Methods: An analytical performance evaluation of four antigen rapid tests, one automated antigen dosing and one molecular point-of-care test was performed on samples sent to our laboratory for a SARS-CoV-2 reverse transcription PCR. We then established a diagnostic algorithm by approaching median viral loads in target populations and evaluated the limit of detection of each test using the PCR cycle threshold values. A field performance evaluation including a clinical validation and a user-friendliness assessment was then conducted on the antigen rapid tests in point-of-care settings (general practitioners and emergency rooms) for outpatients who were symptomatic for <7 days. Automated antigen dosing was trialed for the screening of asymptomatic inpatients. Results: Our diagnostic algorithm proposed to test recently symptomatic patients using rapid antigen tests, asymptomatic patients using automated tests, and patients requiring immediate admission using molecular point-of-care tests. Accordingly, the conventional reverse transcription PCR was kept as a second line tool. In this setting, antigen rapid tests yielded an overall sensitivity of 83.3% (not significantly different between the four assays) while the use of automated antigen dosing would have spared 93.5% of asymptomatic inpatient screening PCRs. Conclusion: Using tests not considered the "gold standard" for COVID-19 diagnosis on well-defined target populations allowed for the optimization of their intrinsic performances, widening the scale of our testing arsenal while sparing molecular resources for more seriously ill patients.

Monitoring antibody response following SARS-CoV-2 infection: diagnostic efficiency of 4 automated immunoassays.

INTRODUCTION: SARS-CoV-2 seroconversion is important for epidemiological studies as well as contact tracing. MATERIAL AND METHODS: The antibody response against SARS-CoV-2 was examined in 111 patients with a positive qRT-PCR. Seroconversion was assessed using the Elecsys from Roche, the Liaison S1/S2 IgG from Diasorin, the IgG and IgA from Euroimmun, as well as the VIDAS IgG and IgM. Specificity was estimated based on the measurement of SARS-CoV-2 antibodies in 96 residual samples collected during a non-pandemic period. RESULTS: The highest overall sensitivity for detecting seroconversion was obtained using the Elecsys (81.1%), the Euroimmun with a combined detection of IgG/IgA (86.5%), and the VIDAS with a simultaneous measurement of IgG/IgM (78.4%).The Elecsys and the VIDAS IgG/IgM demonstrated a specificity as well as a positive predictive value of 100%. CONCLUSIONS: The Elecsys and the VIDAS methods with a combination of IgG/IgM measurement demonstrated a high sensitivity with no false positive results.

Hyal2 is a glycosylphosphatidylinositol-anchored, lipid raft-associated hyaluronidase.

The rapid turnover rate of hyaluronan (HA), the major unbranched glycosaminoglycan of the extracellular matrix, is dependent on hyaluronidases. One of them, hyaluronidase-2 (Hyal2), degrades HA into smaller fragments endowed with specific biological activities such as inflammation and angiogenesis. Yet the cellular environment of Hyal2, a purported glycosylphosphatidylinositol (GPI)-anchored protein, remains uncertain. We have examined the membrane association of Hyal2 in MDA-MB231 cancer cells where it is highly expressed and in COS-7 cells transfected with native or fluorescent Hyal2 constructs. In both cell types, Hyal2 was strongly associated with cell membrane fractions from which it could be extracted using a Triton X-114 treatment (hydrophobic phase) but not an osmotic shock or an alkaline carbonate solution. Treatment of membrane preparations with phosphatidylinositol-specific phospholipase C released immunoreactive Hyal2 into the aqueous phase, confirming the protein is attached to the membrane through a functional GPI anchor. Hyal2 transfected in COS-7 cells was associated with detergent-resistant, cholesterol-rich membranes known as lipid rafts. The cellular immunofluorescent pattern of Hyal2 was conditioned by the presence of a GPI anchor. In summary, the strong membrane association of Hyal2 through its GPI anchor demonstrated in this study using biochemical methods suggests that the main activity of this enzyme is located at the level of the plasma membrane in close contact with the pericellular HA-rich glycocalyx, the extracellular matrix, or possibly endocytic vesicles.

Two novel functions of hyaluronidase-2 (Hyal2) are formation of the glycocalyx and control of CD44-ERM interactions.

It has long been predicted that the members of the hyaluronidase enzyme family have important non-enzymatic functions. However, their nature remains a mystery. The metabolism of hyaluronan (HA), their major enzymatic substrate, is also enigmatic. To examine the function of Hyal2, a glycosylphosphatidylinositol-anchored hyaluronidase with intrinsically weak enzymatic activity, we have compared stably transfected rat fibroblastic BB16 cell lines with various levels of expression of Hyal2. These cell lines continue to express exclusively the standard form (CD44s) of the main HA receptor, CD44. Hyal2, CD44, and one of its main intracellular partners, ezrin-radixin-moesin (ERM), were found to co-immunoprecipitate. Functionally, Hyal2 overexpression was linked to loss of the glycocalyx, the HA-rich pericellular coat. This effect could be mimicked by exposure of BB16 cells either to Streptomyces hyaluronidase, to HA synthesis inhibitors, or to HA oligosaccharides. This led to shedding of CD44, separation of CD44 from ERM, reduction in baseline level of ERM activation, and markedly decreased cell motility (50% reduction in a wound healing assay). The effects of Hyal2 on the pericellular coat and on CD44-ERM interactions were inhibited by treatment with the Na(+)/H(+) exchanger-1 inhibitor ethyl-N-isopropylamiloride. We surmise that Hyal2, through direct interactions with CD44 and possibly some pericellular hyaluronidase activity requiring acidic foci, suppresses the formation or the stability of the glycocalyx, modulates ERM-related cytoskeletal interactions, and diminishes cell motility. These effects may be relevant to the purported in vivo tumor-suppressive activity of Hyal2.