A risk-based monitoring approach to source data monitoring and documenting monitoring findings.

BACKGROUND: Clinical trial monitoring is evolving from labor-intensive to targeted approaches. The traditional 100% Source Data Monitoring (SDM) approach fails to prioritize data by significance, diverting attention from critical elements. Despite regulatory guidance on Risk-Based Monitoring (RBM), its widespread implementation has been slow. METHODS: Our study teams assess the study's overall risk, document heightened and critical risks, and create a study-specific risk-based monitoring plan, integrating SDM and Central Data Monitoring (CDM). SDM combines a fixed list of pre-identified variables and a list of randomly identified variables to monitor. Identifying variables follows a two-step approach: first, a random sample of participants is selected, second, a random set of variables for each participant selected is identified. Sampling weights prioritize critical variables. Regular team meetings are held to discuss and compile significant findings into a Study Monitoring Report. RESULTS: We present a random SDM sample and a Study Monitoring Report. The random SDM output includes a look-up table for selected database elements. The report provides a holistic view of the study issues and overall health. CONCLUSIONS: The proposed random sampling method is used to monitor a representative set of critical variables, while the Study Monitoring Report is written to summarize significant monitoring findings and data trends. The report allows the sponsor to assess the current status of the study and data effectively. Communicating and sharing emerging insights facilitates timely adjustments of future monitoring activities, optimizing efficiencies, and study outcomes.

Hyperkalemia Recurrence Following Medical Nutrition Therapy in Patients with Stage 3-4 Chronic Kidney Disease: The REVOLUTIONIZE I Real-World Study.

INTRODUCTION: The REVOLUTIONIZE I study aimed to characterize the relationships between medical nutrition therapy (MNT) and hyperkalemia recurrence in patients with stage 3-4 chronic kidney disease (CKD) and hyperkalemia who received MNT in real-world clinical practice. METHODS: This observational cohort study used de-identified electronic health record data from patients aged ≥ 18 years with stage 3-4 CKD who received MNT between January 2019 and October 2022 and had hyperkalemia (serum potassium > 5.0 mmol/L) within 30 days before MNT. Patients were followed for 6 months or until the first censoring event (death, prescription of outpatient potassium binder, or study end). The primary outcome was the percentage of patients with ≥ 1 hyperkalemia recurrence during follow-up. Secondary outcomes included the number of hyperkalemia recurrences per patient, time to each recurrence, and hyperkalemia-related healthcare resource utilization. Exploratory outcomes included all-cause healthcare resource utilization and mortality. RESULTS: The final cohort comprised 2048 patients; 1503 (73.4%) patients remained uncensored after 6 months. During the 6-month follow-up period, 56.0% of patients had ≥ 1 hyperkalemia recurrence and 37.4% had ≥ 1 recurrence within the first month. Patients with ≥ 1 hyperkalemia recurrence during follow-up had a mean ± standard deviation (SD) of 2.6 ± 2.2 recurrences. The mean ± SD time to first hyperkalemia recurrence was 45 ± 46 days; the time between recurrences decreased with subsequent episodes. Hyperkalemia-related hospitalizations and emergency department visits were recorded for 13.7% and 1.5% of patients, respectively. Sensitivity analyses showed that results were consistent across patient subgroups, including those with comorbid heart failure and patients receiving renin-angiotensin-aldosterone system inhibitor therapy at baseline. CONCLUSION: Most patients with stage 3-4 CKD had hyperkalemia recurrence, and MNT alone was inadequate to prevent recurrence. These patients may require additional long-term treatment, such as novel potassium binders, to maintain normokalemia and prevent hyperkalemia recurrence following MNT. Infographic available for this article. INFOGRAPHIC.

Patients with chronic kidney disease (CKD) typically receive dietary counseling from a registered dietician, referred to as medical nutrition therapy, to help reduce their risk of complications of CKD while addressing their specific nutritional needs. Patients with CKD have an increased risk of elevated blood potassium levels (hyperkalemia), which has potentially life-threatening consequences. Although medical nutrition therapy may help patients with hyperkalemia to manage their dietary potassium intake, its effects in preventing recurrence are unclear. Our aim was to determine whether medical nutrition therapy can help prevent hyperkalemia recurrence after an initial event in patients with non-dialysis-dependent (stage 3­4) CKD in real-world clinical practice. We used data from de-identified electronic health records to study hyperkalemia recurrence over 6 months in patients with stage 3­4 CKD who received medical nutrition therapy within 30 days after experiencing hyperkalemia. Over half of the patients (56.0%) had at least one hyperkalemia recurrence within an average of 45 days during the 6 months after medical nutrition therapy; these patients had an average of 2.6 distinct recurrences in 6 months. In patients with two or more hyperkalemia recurrences, the time between these became shorter than 30 days. Our real-world study results show that hyperkalemia is a chronic, recurring condition in patients with stage 3­4 CKD, and that medical nutrition therapy is not enough to prevent its recurrence. This suggests that these patients may need additional long-term treatment for hyperkalemia, such as novel potassium binder therapy, to prevent hyperkalemia recurrence.

Efficacy and safety of zibotentan and dapagliflozin in patients with chronic kidney disease: study design and baseline characteristics of the ZENITH-CKD trial.

BACKGROUND: Sodium-glucose co-transporter 2 inhibitors (SGLT2is) are part of the standard of care for patients with chronic kidney disease (CKD), both with and without type 2 diabetes. Endothelin A (ETA) receptor antagonists have also been shown to slow progression of CKD. Differing mechanisms of action of SGLT2 and ETA receptor antagonists may enhance efficacy. We outline a study to evaluate the effect of combination zibotentan/dapagliflozin versus dapagliflozin alone on albuminuria and estimated glomerular filtration rate (eGFR). METHODS: We are conducting a double-blind, active-controlled, Phase 2b study to evaluate the efficacy and safety of ETA receptor antagonist zibotentan and SGLT2i dapagliflozin in a planned 415 adults with CKD (Zibotentan and Dapagliflozin for the Treatment of CKD; ZENITH-CKD). Participants are being randomized (1:2:2) to zibotentan 0.25 mg/dapagliflozin 10 mg once daily (QD), zibotentan 1.5 mg/dapagliflozin 10 mg QD and dapagliflozin 10 mg QD alone, for 12 weeks followed by a 2-week off-treatment wash-out period. The primary endpoint is the change in log-transformed urinary albumin-to-creatinine ratio (UACR) from baseline to Week 12. Other outcomes include change in blood pressure from baseline to Week 12 and change in eGFR the study. The incidence of adverse events will be monitored. Study protocol-defined events of special interest include changes in fluid-related measures (weight gain or B-type natriuretic peptide). RESULTS: A total of 447 patients were randomized and received treatment in placebo/dapagliflozin (n = 177), zibotentan 0.25 mg/dapagliflozin (n = 91) and zibotentan 1.5 mg/dapagliflozin (n =  179). The mean age was 62.8 years, 30.9% were female and 68.2% were white. At baseline, the mean eGFR of the enrolled population was 46.7 mL/min/1.73 m2 and the geometric mean UACR was 538.3 mg/g. CONCLUSION: This study evaluates the UACR-lowering efficacy and safety of zibotentan with dapagliflozin as a potential new treatment for CKD. The study will provide information about an effective and safe zibotentan dose to be further investigated in a Phase 3 clinical outcome trial. CLINICAL TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER: NCT04724837.

Leveraging the Expertise of the CTSA Program to Increase the Impact and Efficiency of Clinical Trials.

Importance: Multicenter clinical trials play a critical role in the translational processes that enable new treatments to reach all people and improve public health. However, conducting multicenter randomized clinical trials (mRCT) presents challenges. The Trial Innovation Network (TIN), established in 2016 to partner with the Clinical and Translational Science Award (CTSA) Consortium of academic medical institutions in the implementation of mRCTs, consists of 3 Trial Innovation Centers (TICs) and 1 Recruitment Innovation Center (RIC). This unique partnership has aimed to address critical roadblocks that impede the design and conduct of mRCTs, in expectation of accelerating the translation of novel interventions to clinical practice. The TIN's challenges and achievements are described in this article, along with examples of innovative resources and processes that may serve as useful models for other clinical trial networks providing operational and recruitment support. Observations: The TIN has successfully integrated more than 60 CTSA institution program hubs into a functional network for mRCT implementation and optimization. A unique support system for investigators has been created that includes the development and deployment of novel tools, operational and recruitment services, consultation models, and rapid communication pathways designed to reduce delays in trial start-up, enhance recruitment, improve engagement of diverse research participants and communities, and streamline processes that improve the quality, efficiency, and conduct of mRCTs. These resources and processes span the clinical trial spectrum and enable the TICs and RIC to serve as coordinating centers, data centers, and recruitment specialists to assist trials across the National Institutes of Health and other agencies. The TIN's impact has been demonstrated through its response to both historical operational challenges and emerging public health emergencies, including the national opioid public health crisis and the COVID-19 pandemic. Conclusions and Relevance: The TIN has worked to reduce barriers to implementing mRCTs and to improve mRCT processes and operations by providing needed clinical trial infrastructure and resources to CTSA investigators. These resources have been instrumental in more quickly and efficiently translating research discoveries into beneficial patient treatments.

Effect of Intensive Blood Pressure Control on Kidney Outcomes: Long-Term Electronic Health Record-Based Post-Trial Follow-Up of SPRINT.

BACKGROUND: Intensive BP lowering in the Systolic Blood Pressure Intervention Trial (SPRINT) produced acute decreases in kidney function and higher risk for AKI. We evaluated the effect of intensive BP lowering on long-term changes in kidney function using trial and outpatient electronic health record (EHR) creatinine values. METHODS: SPRINT data were linked with EHR data from 49 (of 102) study sites. The primary outcome was the total slope of decline in eGFR for the intervention phase and the post-trial slope of decline during the observation phase using trial and outpatient EHR values. Secondary outcomes included a ≥30% decline in eGFR to <60 ml/min per 1.73 m 2 and a ≥50% decline in eGFR or kidney failure among participants with baseline eGFR ≥60 and <60 ml/min per 1.73 m 2 , respectively. RESULTS: EHR creatinine values were available for a median of 8.3 years for 3041 participants. The total slope of decline in eGFR during the intervention phase was -0.67 ml/min per 1.73 m 2 per year (95% confidence interval [CI], -0.79 to -0.56) in the standard treatment group and -0.96 ml/min per 1.73 m 2 per year (95% CI, -1.08 to -0.85) in the intensive treatment group ( P < 0.001). The slopes were not significantly different during the observation phase: -1.02 ml/min per 1.73 m 2 per year (95% CI, -1.24 to -0.81) in the standard group and -0.85 ml/min per 1.73 m 2 per year (95% CI, -1.07 to -0.64) in the intensive group. Among participants without CKD at baseline, intensive treatment was associated with higher risk of a ≥30% decline in eGFR during the intervention (hazard ratio, 3.27; 95% CI, 2.43 to 4.40), but not during the postintervention observation phase. In those with CKD at baseline, intensive treatment was associated with a higher hazard of eGFR decline only during the intervention phase (hazard ratio, 1.95; 95% CI, 1.03 to 3.70). CONCLUSIONS: Intensive BP lowering was associated with a steeper total slope of decline in eGFR and higher risk for kidney events during the intervention phase of the trial, but not during the postintervention observation phase.

Decentralized clinical trials in the trial innovation network: Value, strategies, and lessons learned.

New technologies and disruptions related to Coronavirus disease-2019 have led to expansion of decentralized approaches to clinical trials. Remote tools and methods hold promise for increasing trial efficiency and reducing burdens and barriers by facilitating participation outside of traditional clinical settings and taking studies directly to participants. The Trial Innovation Network, established in 2016 by the National Center for Advancing Clinical and Translational Science to address critical roadblocks in clinical research and accelerate the translational research process, has consulted on over 400 research study proposals to date. Its recommendations for decentralized approaches have included eConsent, participant-informed study design, remote intervention, study task reminders, social media recruitment, and return of results for participants. Some clinical trial elements have worked well when decentralized, while others, including remote recruitment and patient monitoring, need further refinement and assessment to determine their value. Partially decentralized, or "hybrid" trials, offer a first step to optimizing remote methods. Decentralized processes demonstrate potential to improve urban-rural diversity, but their impact on inclusion of racially and ethnically marginalized populations requires further study. To optimize inclusive participation in decentralized clinical trials, efforts must be made to build trust among marginalized communities, and to ensure access to remote technology.

Medical Costs in Patients with Hyperkalemia on Long-Term Sodium Zirconium Cyclosilicate Therapy: The RECOGNIZE II Study.

Purpose: Hyperkalemia, defined as abnormally high serum potassium levels of ≥5.1 mmol/L, is associated with increased medical costs. This real-world study evaluated the impact of long-term sodium zirconium cyclosilicate (SZC) therapy on medical costs in patients with hyperkalemia. Patients and Methods: This retrospective, comparative study used claims data from IQVIA PharMetrics® Plus. Patients aged ≥18 years with hyperkalemia who had outpatient SZC fills (>3-month supply over 6 months) between July 2019 and December 2021 and continuous insurance coverage 6 months before and 6 months after the first SZC fill were included. These patients (SZC cohort) were 1:1 exact- and propensity score-matched on baseline variables with patients with hyperkalemia who did not receive SZC (non-SZC cohort). The primary endpoint was hyperkalemia-related medical costs to payers over 6 months. Results: Each cohort included 661 matched patients. Mean per-patient hyperkalemia-related medical costs were reduced by 49.5% ($3728.47) for the SZC versus non-SZC cohort ($3798.04 vs $7526.51; P<0.001), whereas mean all-cause medical costs were reduced by 21.0% ($5492.20; $20,722.23 vs $26,214.43; P<0.01). A 39.8% ($3621.03) increase in all-cause pharmacy costs ($12,727.20 vs $9106.17; P<0.01) was offset by the medical cost savings. Conclusion: This study demonstrated that long-term (>3 months) outpatient treatment with SZC was associated with medical cost savings compared with no SZC therapy.

Impact of Sodium Zirconium Cyclosilicate Plus Renin-Angiotensin-Aldosterone System Inhibitor Therapy on Short-Term Medical Costs in Hyperkalemia: OPTIMIZE II Real-World Study.

INTRODUCTION: Patients receiving cardiorenal-protective renin-angiotensin-aldosterone system inhibitors (RAASis) are at increased risk of developing hyperkalemia, which is associated with increased medical costs. The aim of this study was to evaluate the impact of adding sodium zirconium cyclosilicate (SZC) therapy on 3-month medical costs in patients who experienced hyperkalemia while receiving RAASi therapy. METHODS: The retrospective OPTIMIZE II study used medical and pharmacy claims data from IQVIA PharMetrics® Plus. Patients aged ≥ 18 years who received SZC (≥ 60 day supply over 3 months' follow-up) and continued RAASi between July 2019 and December 2021 (Continue RAASi + SZC cohort) were 1:1 exact and propensity score matched with patients who discontinued RAASi after hyperkalemia diagnosis and did not receive SZC (Discontinue RAASi + no SZC cohort). The primary outcome was hyperkalemia-related medical costs to payers over 3 months; all-cause medical and pharmacy costs were also analyzed. RESULTS: In the Continue RAASi + SZC (n = 467) versus Discontinue RAASi + no SZC (n = 467) cohort, there were significant reductions in mean per-patient hyperkalemia-related medical costs (reduction of $2216.07; p = 0.01) and all-cause medical costs (reduction of $6102.43; p < 0.001); mean hyperkalemia-related inpatient medical costs and all-cause inpatient and emergency department medical costs were significantly reduced. The reduction in all-cause medical cost in the Continue RAASi + SZC cohort offset an increase in the mean per-patient all-cause pharmacy cost (increase of $3117.71; p < 0.001). CONCLUSION: RAASi therapy has well-established cardiorenal benefits. In OPTIMIZE II, management of RAASi-induced hyperkalemia with SZC was associated with lower hyperkalemia-related and all-cause medical costs than RAASi discontinuation without SZC, demonstrating medical cost savings with maintaining RAASi therapy with SZC.

Risk Assessment of Kidney Disease Progression and Efficacy of SGLT2 Inhibition in Patients With Type 2 Diabetes.

OBJECTIVE: To develop a risk assessment tool to identify patients with type 2 diabetes (T2D) at higher risk for kidney disease progression and who might benefit more from sodium-glucose cotransporter 2 (SGLT2) inhibition. RESEARCH DESIGN AND METHODS: A total of 41,204 patients with T2D from four Thrombolysis In Myocardial Infarction (TIMI) clinical trials were divided into derivation (70%) and validation cohorts (30%). Candidate predictors of kidney disease progression (composite of sustained ≥40% decline in estimated glomerular filtration rate [eGFR], end-stage kidney disease, or kidney death) were selected with multivariable Cox regression. Efficacy of dapagliflozin was assessed by risk categories (low: <0.5%; intermediate: 0.5 to <2%; high: ≥2%) in Dapagliflozin Effect on Cardiovascular Events (DECLARE)-TIMI 58. RESULTS: There were 695 events over a median follow-up of 2.4 years. The final model comprised eight independent predictors of kidney disease progression: atherosclerotic cardiovascular disease, heart failure, systolic blood pressure, T2D duration, glycated hemoglobin, eGFR, urine albumin-to-creatinine ratio, and hemoglobin. The c-indices were 0.798 (95% CI, 0.774-0.821) and 0.798 (95% CI, 0.765-0.831) in the derivation and validation cohort, respectively. The calibration plot slope (deciles of predicted vs. observed risk) was 0.98 (95% CI, 0.93-1.04) in the validation cohort. Whereas relative risk reductions with dapagliflozin did not differ across risk categories, there was greater absolute risk reduction in patients with higher baseline risk, with a 3.5% absolute risk reduction in kidney disease progression at 4 years in the highest risk group (≥1%/year). Results were similar with the 2022 Chronic Kidney Disease Prognosis Consortium risk prediction model. CONCLUSIONS: Risk models for kidney disease progression can be applied in patients with T2D to stratify risk and identify those who experience a greater magnitude of benefit from SGLT2 inhibition.

Short-term costs in patients with chronic kidney disease treated with dapagliflozin: a retrospective cohort study.

OBJECTIVES: This real-world study evaluated the impact of dapagliflozin on short-term medical costs in patients with stage 3 chronic kidney disease (CKD). METHODS: This retrospective, observational cohort study used medical and pharmacy claims data from IQVIA PharMetrics Plus. Patients aged ≥18 years with a filled dapagliflozin prescription after stage 3 CKD diagnosis between September 2020 and December 2021 were 1:1 propensity score matched with patients with stage 3 CKD who did not receive dapagliflozin. The primary endpoint was cardiorenal medical costs to payers over 6 months; all-cause medical and pharmacy costs were also analyzed. Within the overall population, there was a new-user subgroup of patients with no sodium-glucose co-transporter-2 use during baseline. RESULTS: The new-user subgroup included 503 matched patients per cohort. Mean per-patient cardiorenal medical costs were reduced by 49.0% in the dapagliflozin versus non-dapagliflozin cohort ($3172.15 vs $6219.50; P < 0.001). Mean all-cause medical costs were reduced ($8043.58 vs $12,194.87; P < 0.001) and mean all-cause pharmacy costs were increased ($9056.98 vs $7453.23; P = 0.22). Results were similar for the overall population. CONCLUSION: This study showed dapagliflozin was associated with reduced cardiorenal medical costs over 6 months compared with no dapagliflozin treatment in patients with stage 3 CKD, demonstrating real-world medical cost savings.

Chronic kidney disease (CKD) is a condition in which the kidneys become progressively less effective at filtering blood. Patients with CKD also have an increased risk of cardiovascular disease, high blood pressure, and stroke. Dapagliflozin is a drug that can be prescribed for adults with CKD to reduce the risk of CKD worsening, hospitalization for heart failure, and death from cardiovascular disease. Because the cost of medications could affect whether they are prescribed to patients who could benefit from them, our goal was to study the impact of dapagliflozin treatment on short-term costs for patients in the United States with CKD. We used health insurance claims data to compare medical costs (sum of costs for treatment during hospital admissions and outpatient and emergency department visits) and pharmacy costs over 6 months between patients with stage 3 CKD treated with dapagliflozin with those for a matching group of patients who were not treated with dapagliflozin. The dapagliflozin group had a lower average medical cost for cardiorenal causes (related to CKD, including hospitalization for heart failure) paid by health insurance than the non-dapagliflozin group; the average cardiorenal medical cost patients paid themselves (out-of-pocket) was also lower for the dapagliflozin group. The average medical cost for all causes paid by insurance was also lower for the dapagliflozin group; this reduction was larger than the increase in the average all-cause pharmacy cost in the dapagliflozin group. Our study showed that treatment with dapagliflozin can lead to medical cost savings for patients with CKD.

Concordance between clinical outcomes in the Systolic Blood Pressure Intervention Trial and in the electronic health record.

BACKGROUND: Randomized trials are the gold standard for generating clinical practice evidence, but follow-up and outcome ascertainment are resource-intensive. Electronic health record (EHR) data from routine care can be a cost-effective means of follow-up, but concordance with trial-ascertained outcomes is less well-studied. METHODS: We linked EHR and trial data for participants of the Systolic Blood Pressure Intervention Trial (SPRINT), a randomized trial comparing intensive and standard blood pressure targets. Among participants with available EHR data concurrent to trial-ascertained outcomes, we calculated sensitivity, specificity, positive predictive value, and negative predictive value for EHR-recorded cardiovascular disease (CVD) events, using the gold standard of SPRINT-adjudicated outcomes (myocardial infarction (MI)/acute coronary syndrome (ACS), heart failure, stroke, and composite CVD events). We additionally compared the incidence of non-CVD adverse events (hyponatremia, hypernatremia, hypokalemia, hyperkalemia, bradycardia, and hypotension) in trial versus EHR data. RESULTS: 2468 SPRINT participants were included (mean age 68 (SD 9) years; 26% female). EHR data demonstrated ≥80% sensitivity and specificity, and ≥ 99% negative predictive value for MI/ACS, heart failure, stroke, and composite CVD events. Positive predictive value ranged from 26% (95% CI; 16%, 38%) for heart failure to 52% (95% CI; 37%, 67%) for MI/ACS. EHR data uniformly identified more non-CVD adverse events and higher incidence rates compared with trial ascertainment. CONCLUSIONS: These results support a role for EHR data collection in clinical trials, particularly for capturing laboratory-based adverse events. EHR data may be an efficient source for CVD outcome ascertainment, though there is clear benefit from adjudication to avoid false positives.

New Directions in Phosphorus Management in Dialysis.

Current phosphate management strategies in end-stage renal disease (dietary phosphate restriction, dialysis, and phosphate binders) are inadequate to maintain target phosphate levels in most patients. Dietary phosphate restriction is challenging due to "hidden phosphates" in processed foods, and dialysis and phosphate binders are insufficient to match average dietary phosphate intake. As phosphate binders must be taken with each meal, patients need to ingest many, large pills several times a day, negatively impacting quality of life. Recent advances in our understanding of phosphate absorption pathways have led to the development of new nonbinder therapies that block phosphate absorption. This review describes the limitations of current phosphate management strategies and discusses new therapies in development that inhibit phosphate absorption pathways. These new therapies present an opportunity to rethink phosphate management, potentially by prescribing phosphate absorption inhibitors as a primary therapy and adding phosphate binders if needed.

The Trial Innovation Network Liaison Team: building a national clinical and translational community of practice.

In 2016, the National Center for Advancing Translational Science launched the Trial Innovation Network (TIN) to address barriers to efficient and informative multicenter trials. The TIN provides a national platform, working in partnership with 60+ Clinical and Translational Science Award (CTSA) hubs across the country to support the design and conduct of successful multicenter trials. A dedicated Hub Liaison Team (HLT) was established within each CTSA to facilitate connection between the hubs and the newly launched Trial and Recruitment Innovation Centers. Each HLT serves as an expert intermediary, connecting CTSA Hub investigators with TIN support, and connecting TIN research teams with potential multicenter trial site investigators. The cross-consortium Liaison Team network was developed during the first TIN funding cycle, and it is now a mature national network at the cutting edge of team science in clinical and translational research. The CTSA-based HLT structures and the external network structure have been developed in collaborative and iterative ways, with methods for shared learning and continuous process improvement. In this paper, we review the structure, function, and development of the Liaison Team network, discuss lessons learned during the first TIN funding cycle, and outline a path toward further network maturity.

Development, implementation, and dissemination of operational innovations across the trial innovation network.

Improving the quality and conduct of multi-center clinical trials is essential to the generation of generalizable knowledge about the safety and efficacy of healthcare treatments. Despite significant effort and expense, many clinical trials are unsuccessful. The National Center for Advancing Translational Science launched the Trial Innovation Network to address critical roadblocks in multi-center trials by leveraging existing infrastructure and developing operational innovations. We provide an overview of the roadblocks that led to opportunities for operational innovation, our work to develop, define, and map innovations across the network, and how we implemented and disseminated mature innovations.

Decentralized research technology use in multicenter clinical research studies based at U.S. academic research centers.

Introduction: During the COVID-19 pandemic, research organizations accelerated adoption of technologies that enable remote participation. Now, there's a pressing need to evaluate current decentralization practices and develop appropriate research, education, and operations infrastructure. The purpose of this study was to examine current adoption of decentralization technologies in a sample of clinical research studies conducted by academic research organizations (AROs). Methods: The setting was three data coordinating centers in the U.S. These centers initiated coordination of 44 clinical research studies during or after 2020, with national recruitment and enrollment, and entailing coordination between one and one hundred sites. We determined the decentralization technologies used in these studies. Results: We obtained data for 44/44 (100%) trials coordinated by the three centers. Three technologies have been adopted across nearly all studies (98-100%): eIRB, eSource, and Clinical Trial Management Systems. Commonly used technologies included e-Signature (32/44, 73%), Online Payments Portals (26/44, 59%), ePROs (23/44, 53%), Interactive Response Technology (22/44, 50%), Telemedicine (19/44, 43%), and eConsent (18/44, 41%). Wearables (7/44,16%) and Online Recruitment Portals (5/44,11%) were less common. Rarely utilized technologies included Direct-to-Patient Portals (1/44, 2%) and Home Health Nurse Portals (1/44, 2%). Conclusions: All studies incorporated some type of decentralization technology, with more extensive adoption than found in previous research. However, adoption may be strongly influenced by institution-specific IT and informatics infrastructure and support. There are inherent needs, responsibilities, and challenges when incorporating decentralization technology into a research study, and AROs must ensure that infrastructure and informatics staff are adequate.

Diabetic Proteinuria Revisited: Updated Physiologic Perspectives.

Albuminuria, a hallmark of diabetic nephropathy, reflects not only injury and dysfunction of the filtration apparatus, but is also affected by altered glomerular hemodynamics and hyperfiltration, as well as by the inability of renal tubular cells to fully retrieve filtered albumin. Albuminuria further plays a role in the progression of diabetic nephropathy, and the suppression of glomerular albumin leak is a key factor in its prevention. Although microalbuminuria is a classic manifestation of diabetic nephropathy, often progressing to macroalbuminuria or overt proteinuria over time, it does not always precede renal function loss in diabetes. The various components leading to diabetic albuminuria and their associations are herein reviewed, and the physiologic rationale and efficacy of therapeutic interventions that reduce glomerular hyperfiltration and proteinuria are discussed. With these perspectives, we propose that these measures should be initiated early, before microalbuminuria develops, as substantial renal injury may already be present in the absence of proteinuria. We further advocate that the inhibition of the renin-angiotensin axis or of sodium-glucose co-transport likely permits the administration of a normal recommended or even high-protein diet, highly desirable for sarcopenic diabetic patients.

Effect of Intensive versus Standard BP Control on AKI and Subsequent Cardiovascular Outcomes and Mortality: Findings from the SPRINT EHR Study.

Background: Adjudication of inpatient AKI in the Systolic Blood Pressure Intervention Trial (SPRINT) was based on billing codes and admission and discharge notes. The purpose of this study was to evaluate the effect of intensive versus standard BP control on creatinine-based inpatient and outpatient AKI, and whether AKI was associated with cardiovascular disease (CVD) and mortality. Methods: We linked electronic health record (EHR) data from 47 clinic sites with trial data to enable creatinine-based adjudication of AKI. Cox regression was used to evaluate the effect of intensive BP control on the incidence of AKI, and the relationship between incident AKI and CVD and all-cause mortality. Results: A total of 3644 participants had linked EHR data. A greater number of inpatient AKI events were identified using EHR data (187 on intensive versus 155 on standard treatment) as compared with serious adverse event (SAE) adjudication in the trial (95 on intensive versus 61 on standard treatment). Intensive treatment increased risk for SPRINT-adjudicated inpatient AKI (HR, 1.51; 95% CI, 1.09 to 2.08) and for creatinine-based outpatient AKI (HR, 1.40; 95% CI, 1.15 to 1.70), but not for creatinine-based inpatient AKI (HR, 1.20; 95% CI, 0.97 to 1.48). Irrespective of the definition (SAE or creatinine based), AKI was associated with increased risk for all-cause mortality, but only creatinine-based inpatient AKI was associated with increased risk for CVD. Conclusions: Creatinine-based ascertainment of AKI, enabled by EHR data, may be more sensitive and less biased than traditional SAE adjudication. Identifying ways to prevent AKI may reduce mortality further in the setting of intensive BP control.

Dapagliflozin and Prevention of Kidney Disease Among Patients With Type 2 Diabetes: Post Hoc Analyses From the DECLARE-TIMI 58 Trial.

OBJECTIVE: In patients with moderate to severe albuminuric kidney disease, sodium-glucose cotransporter 2 inhibitors reduce the risk of kidney disease progression. These post hoc analyses assess the effects of dapagliflozin on kidney function decline in patients with type 2 diabetes (T2D), focusing on populations with low kidney risk. RESEARCH DESIGN AND METHODS: In the Dapagliflozin Effect on Cardiovascular Events-Thrombolysis in Myocardial Infarction 58 (DECLARE-TIMI 58) trial, patients with T2D at high cardiovascular risk were randomly assigned to dapagliflozin versus placebo. Outcomes were analyzed by treatment arms, overall, and by Kidney Disease: Improving Global Outcomes (KDIGO) risk categories. The prespecified kidney-specific composite outcome was a sustained decline ≥40% in the estimated glomerular filtration rate (eGFR) to <60 mL/min/1.73 m2, end-stage kidney disease, and kidney-related death. Other outcomes included incidence of categorical eGFR decline of different thresholds and chronic (6 month to 4 year) or total (baseline to 4 year) eGFR slopes. RESULTS: Most participants were in the low-moderate KDIGO risk categories (n = 15,201 [90.3%]). The hazard for the kidney-specific composite outcome was lower with dapagliflozin across all KDIGO risk categories (P-interaction = 0.97), including those at low risk (hazard ratio [HR] 0.54, 95% CI 0.38-0.77). Risks for categorical eGFR reductions (≥57% [in those with baseline eGFR ≥60 mL/min/1.73 m2], ≥50%, ≥40%, and ≥30%) were lower with dapagliflozin (HRs 0.52, 0.57, 0.55, and 0.70, respectively; P < 0.05). Slopes of eGFR decline favored dapagliflozin across KDIGO risk categories, including the low KDIGO risk (between-arm differences of 0.87 [chronic] and 0.55 [total] mL/min/1.73 m2/year; P < 0.0001). CONCLUSIONS: Dapagliflozin mitigated kidney function decline in patients with T2D at high cardiovascular risk, including those with low KDIGO risk, suggesting a role of dapagliflozin in the early prevention of diabetic kidney disease.

Antihypertensive drug effects on long-term blood pressure: an individual-level data meta-analysis of randomised clinical trials.

OBJECTIVE: Evidence from randomised trials of pharmacological treatments on long-term blood pressure (BP) reduction is limited. We investigated the antihypertensive drug effects on BP over time and across different participant characteristics. METHODS: We conducted an individual patient-level data meta-analysis of 52 large-scale randomised clinical trials in the Blood Pressure Lowering Treatment Trialists' Collaboration using mixed models to examine treatment effects on BP over 4 years of mean follow-up. RESULTS: There were 363 684 participants (42% women), with baseline mean age=65 years and mean systolic/diastolic BP=152/87 mm Hg, and among whom 19% were current smokers, 49% had cardiovascular disease, 28% had diabetes and 69% were taking antihypertensive treatment at baseline. Drugs were effective in lowering BP showing maximal effect after 12 months and gradually attenuating towards later years. Based on measures taken ≥12 months postrandomisation, mean systolic/diastolic BP difference (95% CI) between more and less intense BP-lowering treatment was -11.1 (-11.3 to -10.8)/-5.6 (-5.7 to -5.4) mm Hg; between active treatment and placebo was -5.1 (-5.3 to -5.0)/-2.3 (-2.4 to -2.2) mm Hg; and between active and control arms for drug comparison trials was -1.4 (-1.5 to -1.3)/-0.6 (-0.7 to -0.6) mm Hg. BP reductions were observed across different baseline BP values and ages, and by sex, history of cardiovascular disease and diabetes and prior antihypertensive treatment use. CONCLUSION: These findings suggest that BP-lowering pharmacotherapy is effective in lowering BP, up to 4 years on average, in people with different characteristics. Appropriate treatment strategies are needed to sustain substantive long-term BP reductions.

A pre-specified analysis of the Dapagliflozin and Prevention of Adverse Outcomes in Chronic Kidney Disease (DAPA-CKD) randomized controlled trial on the incidence of abrupt declines in kidney function.

This pre-specified analysis of DAPA-CKD assessed the impact of sodium-glucose cotransporter 2 inhibition on abrupt declines in kidney function in high-risk patients based on having chronic kidney disease (CKD) and substantial albuminuria. DAPA-CKD was a randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled trial that had a median follow-up of 2.4 years. Adults with CKD (urinary albumin-to-creatinine ratio 200-5000 mg/g and estimated glomerular filtration rate 25-75 mL/min/1.73m2) were randomized to dapagliflozin 10 mg/day matched to placebo (2152 individuals each). An abrupt decline in kidney function was defined as a pre-specified endpoint of doubling of serum creatinine between two subsequent study visits. We also assessed a post-hoc analysis of investigator-reported acute kidney injury-related serious adverse events. Doubling of serum creatinine between two subsequent visits (median time-interval 100 days) occurred in 63 (2.9%) and 91 (4.2%) participants in the dapagliflozin and placebo groups, respectively (hazard ratio 0.68 [95% confidence interval 0.49, 0.94]). Accounting for the competing risk of mortality did not alter our findings. There was no heterogeneity in the effect of dapagliflozin on abrupt declines in kidney function based on baseline subgroups. Acute kidney injury-related serious adverse events were not significantly different and occurred in 52 (2.5%) and 69 (3.2%) participants in the dapagliflozin and placebo groups, respectively (0.77 [0.54, 1.10]). Thus, in patients with CKD and substantial albuminuria, dapagliflozin reduced the risk of abrupt declines in kidney function.