RESUMEN
OBJECTIVE: Clinical approbation of previously obtained normative criteria for evaluating erectograms using the Androscan MIT hardware complex, as well as comparing the monitoring indicators of nocturnal penile tumescence (NPT) with the results of the standard questionnaire International Index of Erectile Function-15 (IIEF-15). MATERIALS AND METHODS: The study included 120 patients aged 19 to 72 years. Erectile function was assessed using the IIEF-15 questionnaire and the Androscan MIT hardware complex. To assess erectile function, previously developed normative criteria for the relative increase in the diameter of the penis (OP) and the duration of NTP were used. Statistical data processing was carried out using the STATISTICA 12 software. A systematic literature search on the normative criteria for monitoring NTP was carried out in the Medline database. RESULTS: After performing androscanning, patients were divided according to the degree of ED: there were 12 patients without ED, 58 patients with grade 1 ED, 27 patients with grade 2 ED, and 23 patients with grade 3 ED. According to the results obtained, a positive correlation was found between the OD value and the results of the IIEF-15 questionnaire. CONCLUSION: The obtained data on the correlation between the results of the IIEF -15 questionnaire and the NTP monitoring parameters are consistent with most of the currently available foreign data.
Asunto(s)
Disfunción Eréctil , Erección Peniana , Humanos , Masculino , Disfunción Eréctil/diagnóstico , Pene , Encuestas y Cuestionarios , Adulto Joven , Adulto , Persona de Mediana Edad , AncianoRESUMEN
Aim To evaluate clinical efficacy of the proactive anti-inflammatory therapy in patients hospitalized for COVID-19 with pneumonia and a risk of "cytokine storm".Material and methods The COLORIT study was a comparative study with randomization into 4 groups: colchicine (n=21) 1 mg for the first 3 days followed by 0.5âmg/day through day 12 or discharge from the hospital; secukinumab 300âmg/day, s.c., as a single dose (n=20); ruxolitinib 5âmg, twice a day (n=10); and a control group with no anti-inflammatory therapy (n=22). The effect was evaluated after 12±2 days of inpatient treatment or upon discharge, what comes first. For ethical reasons, completely randomized recruitment to the control group was not possible. Thus, for data analysis, 17 patients who did not receive any anti-inflammatory therapy for various reasons not related with inclusion into the study were added to the control group of 5 randomized patients. Inclusion criteria: presence of coronavirus pneumonia (positive PCR test for SARS-CoV-2 RNA or specific clinical presentation of pneumonia; IDC-10 codes U07.1 and U07.2); C-reactive protein (CRP) concentration >60âmg/l or its threefold increase from baseline; at least 2 of 4 symptoms (fever >37.5 °C, persistent cough, shortness of breath with inspiratory rate >20 per min or blood saturation with oxygen <94â% by the 7th-9th day of disease. The study primary endpoint was changes in COVID Clinical Condition Scale (CCS-COVID) score. The secondary endpoints were the dynamics of CRP and changes in the area of lung lesion according to data of computed tomography (CT) of the lungs from the date of randomization to 12±2 days.Results All three drugs significantly reduced inflammation, improved the clinical course of the disease, and decreased the disease severity as evaluated by the CCS score: in the ruxolitinib group, by 5.5 (p=0.004); in the secukinumab group, by 4 (p=0.096); in the colchicine group, by 4 (p=0.017), and in the control group, by 2 (Ñ=0.329). In all three groups, the CCS-COVID score was 2-3 by the end of observation period, which corresponded to a mild process, while in the control group, the score was 7 (Ñ=0.005). Time-related changes in CRP were significant in all three anti-inflammatory treatment groups with no statistical difference between the groups. By the end of the study, changes in CT of the lungs were nonsignificant.Conclusion In severe СOVID-19 with a risk of "cytokine storm", the proactive therapy with ruxolitinib, colchicine, and secukinumab significantly reduces the inflammation severity, prevents the disease progression, and results in clinical improvement.
Asunto(s)
COVID-19 , Humanos , SARS-CoV-2 , Pacientes Internos , Estudios Prospectivos , ARN Viral , Inflamación , Colchicina , Antiinflamatorios , Resultado del Tratamiento , CitocinasRESUMEN
OBJECTIVE: a systematic review of the available literature sources about criteria for nocturnal penile tumescences (NPT) registration, as well as the development our own criteria for evaluating erectograms obtained from Androscan "MIT" software complex. MATERIALS AND METHODS: a systematic search about NPT criteria was conducted in the Medline database. A PRISMA flowchart was used to visually represent the design of the study. The necessary calculations were carried out using the STATISTICA 12 software. RESULTS: Normal erectile function is characterized by a relative increase in penis diameter (RIn) of 30% or more with the duration of such NPTs of more than 60 minutes. For a mild ED in the case of a good RIn (30% or more) with a duration of NPT with such RIn less than 10 minutes (the time of 1 effective erection), it is advisable to determine the duration of the NPT with a RIn of 20% or more. If RIn is less than 30% it is advisable to use the duration of sufficient erections (with a relative increase in diameter of 20% or more) and the border value in this case is 60 minutes or more. Severe ED is characterized by RIn less than 20% or duration of NPT of less than 10 minutes with any RIn. CONCLUSION: at the moment there are no uniform criteria for the diagnosis of ED using the Androscan "MIT" software complex. As part of the unification of ED diagnostics we first introduced the terms of "effective erection", "sufficient erection", "relative increase" and also developed regulatory criteria and an algorithm for evaluating erectograms which will ensure continuity as well as the possibility of comparison of the results from different research groups.
Asunto(s)
Disfunción Eréctil , Erección Peniana , Algoritmos , Humanos , Masculino , Pene , Programas InformáticosRESUMEN
Actuality The course of the novel coronavirus disease (COVID-19) is unpredictable. It manifests in some cases as increasing inflammation to even the onset of a cytokine storm and irreversible progression of acute respiratory syndrome, which is associated with the risk of death in patients. Thus, proactive anti-inflammatory therapy remains an open serious question in patients with COVID-19 and pneumonia, who still have signs of inflammation on days 7-9 of the disease: elevated C-reactive protein (CRP)>60 mg/dL and at least two of the four clinical signs: fever >37.5°C; persistent cough; dyspnea (RR >20 brpm) and/or reduced oxygen blood saturation <94% when breathing atmospheric air. We designed the randomized trial: COLchicine versus Ruxolitinib and Secukinumab in Open-label Prospective Randomized Trial in Patients with COVID-19 (COLORIT). We present here data comparing patients who received colchicine with those who did not receive specific anti-inflammatory therapy. Results of the comparison of colchicine, ruxolitinib, and secukinumab will be presented later.Objective Compare efficacy and safety of colchicine compared to the management of patients with COVID-19 without specific anti-inflammatory therapy.Material and Methods Initially, 20 people were expected to be randomized in the control group. However, enrollment to the control group was discontinued subsequently after the inclusion of 5 patients due to the risk of severe deterioration in the absence of anti-inflammatory treatment. Therefore, 17 patients, who had not received anti-inflammatory therapy when treated in the MSU Medical Research and Educational Center before the study, were also included in the control group. The effects were assessed on day 12 after the inclusion or at discharge if it occurred earlier than on day 12. The primary endpoint was the changes in the SHOCS-COVID score, which includes the assessment of the patient's clinical condition, CT score of the lung tissue damage, the severity of systemic inflammation (CRP changes), and the risk of thrombotic complications (D-dimer) [1].Results The median SHOCS score decreased from 8 to 2 (p = 0.017), i.e., from moderate to mild degree, in the colchicine group. The change in the SHOCS-COVID score was minimal and statistically insignificant in the control group. In patients with COVID-19 treated with colchicine, the CRP levels decreased rapidly and normalized (from 99.4 to 4.2 mg/dL, p<0.001). In the control group, the CRP levels decreased moderately and statistically insignificantly and achieved 22.8 mg/dL by the end of the follow-up period, which was still more than four times higher than normal. The most informative criterion for inflammation lymphocyte-to-C-reactive protein ratio (LCR) increased in the colchicine group by 393 versus 54 in the control group (p = 0.003). After treatment, it was 60.8 in the control group, which was less than 100 considered safe in terms of systemic inflammation progression. The difference from 427 in the colchicine group was highly significant (p = 0.003).The marked and rapid decrease in the inflammation factors was accompanied in the colchicine group by the reduced need for oxygen support from 14 (66.7%) to 2 (9.5%). In the control group, the number of patients without anti-inflammatory therapy requiring oxygen support remained unchanged at 50%. There was a trend to shorter hospital stays in the group of specific anti-inflammatory therapy up to 13 days compared to 17.5 days in the control group (p = 0.079). Moreover, two patients died in the control group, and there were no fatal cases in the colchicine group. In the colchicine group, one patient had deep vein thrombosis with D-dimer elevated to 5.99 µg/mL, which resolved before discharge.Conclusions Colchicine 1 mg for 1-3 days followed by 0.5 mg/day for 14 days is effective as a proactive anti-inflammatory therapy in hospitalized patients with COVID-19 and viral pneumonia. The management of such patients without proactive anti-inflammatory therapy is likely to be unreasonable and may worsen the course of COVID-19. However, the findings should be treated with caution, given the small size of the trial.
Asunto(s)
COVID-19 , Colchicina/uso terapéutico , Infecciones por Coronavirus , SARS-CoV-2 , Antiinflamatorios/uso terapéutico , Infecciones por Coronavirus/tratamiento farmacológico , Humanos , Estudios Prospectivos , Resultado del TratamientoRESUMEN
Introduction The aim of this study was to assess the efficacy and safety of a combination of bromhexine at a dose of 8 mg 4 times a day and spironolactone 50 mg per day in patients with mild and moderate COVID 19.Material and methods It was an open, prospective comparative non-randomized study. 103 patients were included (33 in the bromhexine and spironolactone group and 70 in the control group). All patients had a confirmed 2019 novel coronavirus infection (COVID 19) based on a positive polymerase chain reaction (PCR) for SARS-CoV-2 virus RNA and/or a typical pattern of viral pneumonia on multispiral computed tomography. The severity of lung damage was limited to stage I-II, the level of CRP should not exceed 60 mg / dL and SO2 in the air within 92-98%. The duration of treatment is 10 days.Results The decrease in scores on the SHOKS-COVID scale, which, in addition to assessing the clinical status, the dynamics of CRP (a marker of inflammation), D-dimer (a marker of thrombus formation), and the degree of lung damage on CT (primary endpoint) was statistically significant in both groups and differences between them was not identified. Analysis for the group as a whole revealed a statistically significant reduction in hospitalization time from 10.4 to 9.0 days (by 1.5 days, p=0.033) and fever time from 6.5 to 3.9 days (by 2.5 days, p<0.001). Given the incomplete balance of the groups, the main analysis included 66 patients who were match with using propensity score matching. In matched patients, temperature normalization in the bromhexine/spironolactone group occurred 2 days faster than in the control group (p=0.008). Virus elimination by the 10th day was recorded in all patients in the bromhexine/spironolactone group; the control group viremia continued in 23.3% (p=0.077). The number of patients who had a positive PCR to the SARS-CoV-2 virus on the 10th day of hospitalization or longer (≥10 days) hospitalization in the control group was 20/21 (95.2%), and in the group with bromhexine /spironolactone -14/24 (58.3%), p=0.012. The odds ratio of having a positive PCR or more than ten days of hospitalization was 0.07 (95% CI: 0.008 - 0.61, p=0.0161) with bromhexine and spironolactone versus controls. No side effects were reported in the study group.Conclusion The combination of bromhexine with spironolactone appeared effective in treating a new coronavirus infection by achieving a faster normalization of the clinical condition, lowering the temperature one and a half times faster, and reducing explanatory combine endpoint the viral load or long duration of hospitalization (≥ 10 days).