Delivery of Rapamycin Using In Situ Forming Implants Promotes Immunoregulation and Vascularized Composite Allograft Survival.

Vascularized composite allotransplantation (VCA), such as hand and face transplantation, is emerging as a potential solution in patients that suffered severe injuries. However, adverse effects of chronic high-dose immunosuppression regimens strongly limit the access to these procedures. In this study, we developed an in situ forming implant (ISFI) loaded with rapamycin to promote VCA acceptance. We hypothesized that the sustained delivery of low-dose rapamycin in proximity to the graft may promote graft survival and induce an immunoregulatory microenvironment, boosting the expansion of T regulatory cells (Treg). In vitro and in vivo analysis of rapamycin-loaded ISFI (Rapa-ISFI) showed sustained drug release with subtherapeutic systemic levels and persistent tissue levels. A single injection of Rapa-ISFI in the groin on the same side as a transplanted limb significantly prolonged VCA survival. Moreover, treatment with Rapa-ISFI increased the levels of multilineage mixed chimerism and the frequency of Treg both in the circulation and VCA-skin. Our study shows that Rapa-ISFI therapy represents a promising approach for minimizing immunosuppression, decreasing toxicity and increasing patient compliance. Importantly, the use of such a delivery system may favor the reprogramming of allogeneic responses towards a regulatory function in VCA and, potentially, in other transplants and inflammatory conditions.

Local Injections of Tacrolimus-loaded Hydrogel Reduce Systemic Immunosuppression-related Toxicity in Vascularized Composite Allotransplantation.

BACKGROUND: Routine application of vascularized composite allotransplantation is hampered by immunosuppression-related health comorbidities. To mitigate these, we developed an inflammation-responsive hydrogel for local immunosuppression. Here, we report on its long-term effect on graft survival, immunological, and toxicological impact. METHODS: Brown Norway-to-Lewis rat hindlimb transplantations were treated either systemically with daily injections of 1 mg/kg tacrolimus (TAC) or with subcutaneous intragraft injections of hydrogel containing 7 mg TAC, every 70 days. Animals were monitored for rejection or other pathology for 280 days. Systemic and graft TAC levels, regulatory T cells, and donor cell chimerism were measured periodically. At endpoint, markers for kidney, liver, and metabolic state were compared to naive age-matched rats. RESULTS: Both daily systemic TAC and subcutaneous intragraft TAC hydrogel at 70-day intervals were able to sustain graft survival longer than 280 days in 5 of 6 recipients. In the hydrogel group, 1 graft progressed to grade 3 rejection at postoperative day 149. In systemic TAC group, 1 animal was euthanized due to lymphoma on postoperative day 275. Hydrogel treatment provided stable graft and reduced systemic TAC levels, and a 4 times smaller total TAC dose compared with systemic immunosuppression. Hydrogel-treated animals showed preserved kidney function, absence of malignancies or opportunistic infections and increased hematopoietic chimerism compared with systemic immunosuppression. CONCLUSIONS: Our findings demonstrate that localized immunosuppression with TAC hydrogel is a long-term safe and reliable treatment. It may reduce the burden of systemic immunosuppression in vascularized composite allotransplantation, potentially boosting the clinical application of this surgical intervention.

Intra-graft injection of tacrolimus promotes survival of vascularized composite allotransplantation.

BACKGROUND: Immunosuppressive therapies derived from solid organ transplantation are effective in promoting survival of vascularized composite allotransplantation (VCA), but they cause serious side effects that are difficult to justify for this non-life-saving procedure. Unlike solid organ transplantation, hand and face transplants offer the possibility of site-specific immunosuppression for reducing systemic exposure while increasing intra-graft concentrations of the drug. Therefore, in this study, we tested whether a single intra-graft injection tacrolimus could promote VCA survival. METHODS: Brown Norway-to-Lewis hind limb transplantations were performed, and animals were left untreated (group I), treated with a daily injection of 1-mg/kg tacrolimus for 21 days (group 2) or injected with 7-mg tacrolimus directly into the transplanted limb on day 1 (group III). Graft rejection was monitored, and animals were sacrificed at grade 3 rejection or 200 days after transplantation. RESULTS: Intra-graft injection of tacrolimus significantly prolonged allograft survival as compared to untreated animals or animals treated with systemic tacrolimus. Half of the intra-graft-treated rats rejected their graft on average at day 70.5. Interestingly, the other half remained rejection-free for more than 200 days without signs of kidney or liver toxicity. In these animals, tacrolimus was detected in the VCA skin but not in the blood until day 200. Long-term survival was not linked to induction of donor-specific tolerance but to a higher level of lymphocyte chimerism. CONCLUSIONS: Intra-graft delivery of tacrolimus may promote VCA survival by increasing tissue drug availability and promoting the establishment of transient chimerism and thus long-term graft acceptance.