Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 2 de 2
Filtrar
1.
Pediatrics ; 132(1): 37-43, 2013 Jul.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-23733795

RESUMEN

OBJECTIVE: The objective of this study was to describe rates of religious vaccination exemptions over time and the association with pertussis in New York State (NYS). METHODS: Religious vaccination exemptions reported via school surveys of the NYS Department of Health from 2000 through 2011 were reviewed by county, and the changes were assessed against incidence rates of pertussis among children reported to the NYS Department of Health Communicable Disease Electronic Surveillance System. RESULTS: The overall annual state mean prevalence (± SD) of religious exemptions for ≥1 vaccines in 2000-2011 was 0.4% ± 0.08% and increased significantly from 0.23% in 2000 to 0.45% in 2011 (P = .001). The prevalence of religious exemptions varied greatly among counties and increased by >100% in 34 counties during the study period. Counties with mean exemption prevalence rates of ≥1% reported a higher incidence of pertussis, 33 per 100 000 than counties with lower exemption rates, 20 per 100 000, P < .001. In addition, the risk of pertussis among vaccinated children living in counties with high exemption rate increased with increase of exemption rate among exempted children (P = .008). CONCLUSIONS: The prevalence of religious exemptions varies among NYS counties and increased during the past decade. Counties with higher exemption rates had higher rates of reported pertussis among exempted and vaccinated children when compared with the low-exemption counties. More studies are needed to characterize differences in the process of obtaining exemptions among NYS schools, and education is needed regarding the risks to the community of individuals opting out from recommended vaccinations.


Asunto(s)
Vacuna contra Difteria, Tétanos y Tos Ferina/administración & dosificación , Vacunación Masiva/tendencias , Religión y Medicina , Negativa del Paciente al Tratamiento/estadística & datos numéricos , Tos Ferina/epidemiología , Adolescente , Niño , Preescolar , Control de Enfermedades Transmisibles/tendencias , Estudios Transversales , Femenino , Encuestas Epidemiológicas , Humanos , Incidencia , Masculino , New York , Vigilancia de la Población , Estudiantes/estadística & datos numéricos , Tos Ferina/transmisión
2.
J Public Health Manag Pract ; 19(6): 589-97, 2013.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-23299656

RESUMEN

OBJECTIVE: To examine differences in H1N1 influenza vaccine distribution strategies that may impact the ability to rapidly administer vaccine during a pandemic or public health emergency. DESIGN: Retrospective evaluation of immunization data in the New York State Immunization Information System (NYSIIS). SETTING: Analysis of existing NYSIIS data. PARTICIPANTS: Children and adolescents younger than 19 years for whom information on at least 1 H1N1 influenza vaccine was present in NYSIIS. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURE(S): Median time to administer vaccines to children and adolescents younger than 19 years by December 31, 2009, by county; venue of H1N1 vaccine administration (local health department [LHD] or private medical provider); comparison of immunization-seeking behavior for routine childhood vaccinations and H1N1 vaccine. RESULTS: A total of 459 189 first or only doses of H1N1 influenza vaccine were recorded in NYSIIS as being administered to New York State, outside of New York City, children aged less than 19 years, between October 2, 2009, and December 31, 2009. Overall, LHD administered 31% of H1N1 vaccine doses; in counties having population less than 100,000, LHD administered 63% of H1N1 doses compared with 23% in counties having population more than 100,000. Time to median administration was faster for LHD in smaller counties and similar for LHD and private medical providers in larger counties. Children who always received routine childhood immunizations either within or outside of their county of residence often had the same practice for H1N1 vaccine, with 85% of children following these patterns. Children who did not follow these patterns were more likely to receive H1N1 influenza vaccine through LHD. CONCLUSIONS: Local health departments were able to rapidly administer large quantities of H1N1 influenza vaccine, and patterns of health care seeking relying on increased use of LHD needs to be further studied for future public health emergency planning.


Asunto(s)
Eficiencia Organizacional , Sistemas de Información en Salud , Programas de Inmunización/organización & administración , Subtipo H1N1 del Virus de la Influenza A/inmunología , Vacunas contra la Influenza/provisión & distribución , Gripe Humana/prevención & control , Pandemias/prevención & control , Adolescente , Niño , Humanos , New York , Evaluación de Programas y Proyectos de Salud , Práctica de Salud Pública , Estudios Retrospectivos
SELECCIÓN DE REFERENCIAS
DETALLE DE LA BÚSQUEDA