Vaccinations Do Not Increase Arthritis Flares in Juvenile Idiopathic Arthritis: A Study of the Relationship between Routine Childhood Vaccinations on the Australian Immunisation Schedule and Arthritis Activity in Children with Juvenile Idiopathic Arthritis.

BACKGROUND: Juvenile idiopathic arthritis (JIA) is a collective term for a group of inflammatory conditions of uncertain origin, which causes chronic arthritis in one or more joints. The clinical course of JIA is characterised by episodes of increased activity, termed flares. Vaccinations have previously been proposed as a "trigger" for some flares, although evidence supporting this is scant. OBJECTIVE: To explore whether routine childhood vaccinations are associated with an increased risk of flares of arthritis activity in children with JIA. METHODS: Patients aged below 6 years with a diagnosis of JIA were recruited from the Rheumatology Clinical Database at the Royal Children's Hospital, Melbourne, Australia, from 1 January 2010 to 30 April 2016. Patient immunisation status was cross-checked with the Australian Childhood Immunisation Register (ACIR). The self-controlled case series methodology (Rowhani-Rahbar et al., 2012) was applied to determine whether the risk of arthritis flares in the three months following immunisation was greater than the baseline risk for each patient. RESULTS: 138 patients were included in the study. 32 arthritis flares occurred in the 90 days following immunisation. The risk of arthritis flares during the 90 days following immunisation was reduced compared with patients' baseline risk (RR 0.59 (95% CI 0.39-0.89, p = 0.012)). CONCLUSION: Routine childhood immunisations were not associated with arthritis flare onset in patients with JIA. The risk of arthritis flares in the 90 days following vaccination was lower than the baseline risk. In the context of COVID19, vaccination will not increase interaction with the healthcare system beyond the immunisation encounter.

Bacillus Calmette-Guérin (BCG) vaccine adverse events in Victoria, Australia: analysis of reports to an enhanced passive surveillance system.

BACKGROUND: Bacillus Calmette-Guérin (BCG) vaccine is used worldwide, with high efficacy against childhood Mycobacterium tuberculosis (TB) meningitis and miliary TB. BCG vaccine is considered safe, with serious systematic adverse events following immunization (AEFI) of immunocompetent recipients being rare, although adverse event rates vary between differing BCG strains. In Victoria, Australia, AEFI are reported to SAEFVIC (Surveillance of Adverse Events Following Vaccination In the Community), an enhanced passive surveillance system operational since 2007. OBJECTIVE: To describe the epidemiology of reported BCG AEFI in Victoria, Australia, particularly following the 2012 recall of Connaught BCG vaccine, substitution with Denmark-SSI vaccine and subsequent programme delivery adjustments. METHODS: Retrospective analysis of reported BCG AEFI in Victoria, Australia, for the 6-year period 2008-2013. Incidence rates were calculated using available doses-distributed, doses-administered and population data denominators with 95 % confidence intervals. RESULTS: The predominant BCG AEFI reported were abscess and lymphadenopathy, with higher reports for males than for females (p = 0.039).The rates of AEFI per 10,000 doses distributed were similar for the Connaught and Denmark-SSI strains, at 11.6 and 15.4, respectively (p = 0.414). When doses administered rather than doses distributed were considered, the rate of reported Denmark-SSI AEFI was much higher, at 62.8 per 10,000 doses administered. Meaningful result interpretation was hampered by a lack of a BCG vaccination register, multiple disparate providers and absent doses-administered data prior to the recall. CONCLUSION: Effective AEFI surveillance is of paramount importance as countries are faced with unplanned vaccine strain changes following the 2012 BCG recall and subsequent global vaccine supply shortages. The Australian experience and lessons learned serve as a timely reminder to BCG vaccination programmes worldwide to review AEFI surveillance systems.

Consumer reporting of adverse events following immunization.

Surveillance of adverse events following immunisation (AEFI) is an essential component of vaccine safety monitoring. The most commonly utilized passive surveillance systems rely predominantly on reporting by health care providers (HCP). We reviewed adverse event reports received in Victoria, Australia since surveillance commencement in July 2007, to June 2013 (6 years) to ascertain the contribution of consumer (vaccinee or their parent/guardian) reporting to vaccine safety monitoring and to inform future surveillance system development directions. Categorical data included were: reporter type; serious and non-serious AEFI category; and, vaccinee age group. Chi-square test and 2-sample test of proportions were used to compare categories; trend changes were assessed using linear regression. Consumer reporting increased over the 6 years, reaching 21% of reports received in 2013 (P<0.001), most commonly for children aged less than 7 years. Consumer reports were 5% more likely to describe serious AEFI than HCP (P=0.018) and 10% more likely to result in specialist clinic attendance (P<0.001). Although online reporting increased to 32% of all report since its introduction in 2010, 85% of consumers continued to report by phone. Consumer reporting of AEFI is a valuable component of vaccine safety surveillance in addition to HCP reporting. Changes are required to AEFI reporting systems to implement efficient consumer AEFI reporting, but may be justified for their potential impact on signal detection sensitivity.

Active surveillance for adverse events following immunization.

Comprehensive surveillance of adverse events following immunization (AEFI) is required to detect potential serious adverse events that may not be identified in prelicensure vaccine trials. Surveillance systems have traditionally been passive, relying upon spontaneous reporting, but increasingly active surveillance and supplemental strategies are being incorporated into vaccine safety programs. These include active screening for targeted conditions of interest (e.g., hospitalization), monitoring of new data sources and real-time methodologies to detect changes in vaccine safety data in these sources. The role of improved causality assessment in AEFI surveillance is discussed, with its important role in determining whether a temporal association may have occurred by chance alone. Strong local vaccine safety networks are required to support national immunization programs, with recent progress in developing a framework for low- and middle-income countries. Global collaboration is increasingly required to address challenges in active AEFI surveillance, particularly for rare serious adverse events.