Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 4 de 4
Filtrar
Más filtros













Base de datos
Intervalo de año de publicación
1.
Blood ; 143(24): 2504-2516, 2024 Jun 13.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38579284

RESUMEN

ABSTRACT: Wiskott-Aldrich syndrome (WAS) is a multifaceted monogenic disorder with a broad disease spectrum and variable disease severity and a variety of treatment options including allogeneic hematopoietic stem cell transplantation (HSCT) and gene therapy (GT). No reliable biomarker exists to predict disease course and outcome for individual patients. A total of 577 patients with a WAS variant from 26 countries and a median follow-up of 8.9 years (range, 0.3-71.1), totaling 6118 patient-years, were included in this international retrospective study. Overall survival (OS) of the cohort (censored at HSCT or GT) was 82% (95% confidence interval, 78-87) at age 15 years and 70% (61-80) at 30 years. The type of variant was predictive of outcome: patients with a missense variant in exons 1 or 2 or with the intronic hot spot variant c.559+5G>A (class I variants) had a 15-year OS of 93% (89-98) and a 30-year OS of 91% (86-97), compared with 71% (62-81) and 48% (34-68) in patients with any other variant (class II; P < .0001). The cumulative incidence rates of disease-related complications such as severe bleeding (P = .007), life-threatening infection (P < .0001), and autoimmunity (P = .004) occurred significantly later in patients with a class I variant. The cumulative incidence of malignancy (P = .6) was not different between classes I and II. It confirms the spectrum of disease severity and quantifies the risk for specific disease-related complications. The class of the variant is a biomarker to predict the outcome for patients with WAS.


Asunto(s)
Genotipo , Síndrome de Wiskott-Aldrich , Humanos , Adolescente , Niño , Masculino , Síndrome de Wiskott-Aldrich/genética , Síndrome de Wiskott-Aldrich/diagnóstico , Síndrome de Wiskott-Aldrich/terapia , Femenino , Preescolar , Adulto , Estudios Retrospectivos , Lactante , Adulto Joven , Biomarcadores , Trasplante de Células Madre Hematopoyéticas , Índice de Severidad de la Enfermedad , Proteína del Síndrome de Wiskott-Aldrich/genética , Estudios de Seguimiento , Persona de Mediana Edad , Pronóstico , Tasa de Supervivencia
2.
J Clin Immunol ; 41(8): 1878-1892, 2021 11.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-34477998

RESUMEN

Patients with ataxia-telangiectasia (A-T) suffer from progressive cerebellar ataxia, immunodeficiency, respiratory failure, and cancer susceptibility. From a clinical point of view, A-T patients with IgA deficiency show more symptoms and may have a poorer prognosis. In this study, we analyzed mortality and immunity data of 659 A-T patients with regard to IgA deficiency collected from the European Society for Immunodeficiencies (ESID) registry and from 66 patients with classical A-T who attended at the Frankfurt Goethe-University between 2012 and 2018. We studied peripheral B- and T-cell subsets and T-cell repertoire of the Frankfurt cohort and survival rates of all A-T patients in the ESID registry. Patients with A-T have significant alterations in their lymphocyte phenotypes. All subsets (CD3, CD4, CD8, CD19, CD4/CD45RA, and CD8/CD45RA) were significantly diminished compared to standard values. Patients with IgA deficiency (n = 35) had significantly lower lymphocyte counts compared to A-T patients without IgA deficiency (n = 31) due to a further decrease of naïve CD4 T-cells, central memory CD4 cells, and regulatory T-cells. Although both patient groups showed affected TCR-ß repertoires compared to controls, no differences could be detected between patients with and without IgA deficiency. Overall survival of patients with IgA deficiency was significantly diminished. For the first time, our data show that patients with IgA deficiency have significantly lower lymphocyte counts and subsets, which are accompanied with reduced survival, compared to A-T patients without IgA deficiency. IgA, a simple surrogate marker, is indicating the poorest prognosis for classical A-T patients. Both non-interventional clinical trials were registered at clinicaltrials.gov 2012 (Susceptibility to infections in ataxia-telangiectasia; NCT02345135) and 2017 (Susceptibility to Infections, tumor risk and liver disease in patients with ataxia-telangiectasia; NCT03357978).


Asunto(s)
Ataxia Telangiectasia/inmunología , Ataxia Telangiectasia/mortalidad , Linfocitos B/inmunología , Deficiencia de IgA/inmunología , Subgrupos de Linfocitos T/inmunología , Adolescente , Adulto , Niño , Preescolar , Femenino , Humanos , Deficiencia de IgA/mortalidad , Deficiencia de IgG/inmunología , Deficiencia de IgG/mortalidad , Inmunoglobulina A/sangre , Inmunoglobulina G/sangre , Inmunoglobulina M/sangre , Lactante , Recuento de Linfocitos , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Adulto Joven
3.
Eur J Haematol ; 102(6): 447-456, 2019 Jun.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-30801785

RESUMEN

OBJECTIVE: Despite long-standing safe and effective use of immunoglobulin replacement therapy (IgRT) in primary immunodeficiency, clinical data on IgRT in patients with secondary immunodeficiency (SID) due to B-cell lymphoproliferative diseases are limited. Here, we examine the correlation between approved IgRT indications, treatment recommendations, and clinical practice in SID. METHODS: An international online survey of 230 physicians responsible for the diagnosis of SID and the prescription of IgRT in patients with hematological malignancies was conducted. RESULTS: Serum immunoglobulin was measured in 83% of patients with multiple myeloma, 76% with chronic lymphocytic leukemia, and 69% with non-Hodgkin lymphoma. Most physicians (85%) prescribed IgRT after ≥2 severe infections. In Italy, Germany, Spain, and the United States, immunoglobulin use was above average in patients with hypogammaglobulinemia, while in the UK considerably fewer patients received IgRT. The use of subcutaneous immunoglobulin was highest in France (34%) and lowest in Spain (19%). Immunologists measured specific antibody responses, performed test immunization, implemented IgRT, and used subcutaneous immunoglobulin more frequently than physicians overall. CONCLUSIONS: The management of SID in hematological malignancies varied regionally. Clinical practice did not reflect treatment guidelines, highlighting the need for robust clinical studies on IgRT in this population and harmonization between countries and disciplines.


Asunto(s)
Neoplasias Hematológicas/complicaciones , Neoplasias Hematológicas/epidemiología , Síndromes de Inmunodeficiencia/epidemiología , Síndromes de Inmunodeficiencia/etiología , Manejo de la Enfermedad , Salud Global , Humanos , Inmunoglobulinas/sangre , Inmunoglobulinas/inmunología , Inmunoglobulinas Intravenosas/uso terapéutico , Síndromes de Inmunodeficiencia/diagnóstico , Síndromes de Inmunodeficiencia/terapia , Control de Infecciones , Infecciones/etiología , Vigilancia en Salud Pública , Resultado del Tratamiento
4.
J Clin Immunol ; 38(2): 204-213, 2018 02.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-29423883

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND: Immunologists are increasingly being asked to assess patients with non-classical and secondary antibody deficiency to determine their potential need for immunoglobulin replacement therapy (IGRT). Immunoglobulin is a limited, expensive resource and no clear guidance exists for this broad patient group. The purpose of this survey is to establish what factors influence the decision to commence IGRT in adult patients, when diagnostic criteria for primary antibody deficiency are not fulfilled. METHODS: Under the auspices of the United Kingdom Primary Immunodeficiency Network (UKPIN), a study group was established which circulated an online questionnaire to the consultant body across the UK and Ireland. Results provided a snapshot of the current clinical practice of 71% of consultant immunologists, from 30 centers. RESULTS: In order of importance, factors which influence the decision to commence IGRT include number of hospital admissions with infection, serum IgG level, bronchiectasis, radiologically proven pneumonia, number of positive sputum cultures, number of antibiotic courses, and results of immunization studies. The commonest test vaccine used was Pneumovax 23 with measurement of serotype-specific responses at 4 weeks, with a threshold of 0.35 µg/ml in 2/3 of serotypes measured. Eighty-six percent of patients are treated with a trial of prophylactic antibiotics prior to consideration of IGRT. Efficacy of IGRT trial is assessed at between 6 and 12 months. CONCLUSIONS: There was consistency in clinical practice using a combination of clinical history, evidence of infections, and vaccination testing for diagnosis. However, there was some variation in the implementation of this practice, particularly in vaccine choice and assessment of response to vaccination.


Asunto(s)
Agammaglobulinemia/tratamiento farmacológico , Agammaglobulinemia/epidemiología , Inmunoglobulinas/uso terapéutico , Pautas de la Práctica en Medicina , Agammaglobulinemia/diagnóstico , Profilaxis Antibiótica , Femenino , Humanos , Inmunoglobulinas/administración & dosificación , Inmunoglobulinas Intravenosas , Irlanda/epidemiología , Masculino , Vacunas Neumococicas/administración & dosificación , Pautas de la Práctica en Medicina/estadística & datos numéricos , Derivación y Consulta , Reino Unido/epidemiología , Vacunación
SELECCIÓN DE REFERENCIAS
DETALLE DE LA BÚSQUEDA