Two dose levels of once-weekly fosravuconazole versus daily itraconazole in combination with surgery in patients with eumycetoma in Sudan: a randomised, double-blind, phase 2, proof-of-concept superiority trial.

BACKGROUND: Eumycetoma is an implantation mycosis characterised by a large subcutaneous mass in the extremities commonly caused by the fungus Madurella mycetomatis. Despite the long duration of treatment, commonly a minimum of 12 months, treatment failure is frequent and can lead to amputation. We aimed to compare the efficacy of two doses of fosravuconazole, a synthetic antifungal designed for use in onychomycosis and repurposed for mycetoma, with standard-of-care itraconazole, both in combination with surgery. METHODS: This phase 2, randomised, double-blind, active-controlled, superiority trial was conducted in a single centre in Sudan. Patients with eumycetoma caused by M mycetomatis, who were aged 15 years or older, with a set lesion diameter (>2 cm and ≤16 cm) requiring surgery were included. There was a limit of 20 female patients in the initial enrolment, owing to preclinical toxicity concerns. Exclusion criteria included previous surgical or medical treatment for eumycetoma; presence of loco-regional lymphatic extension; osteomyelitis, or other bone involvement; pregnancy or lactation; severe concomitant diseases; a BMI under 16 kg/m2; contraindication to use of the study drugs; pre-existing liver disease; lymphatic extension; osteomyelitis; transaminase levels more than two times the laboratory's upper limit of normal, or elevated levels of alkaline phosphatase or bilirubin; or any history of hypersensitivity to any azole antifungal drug. Patients were randomly allocated in a 1:1:1 ratio to 300 mg fosravuconazole weekly for 12 months (group 1); 200 mg fosravuconazole weekly for 12 months (group 2); or 400 mg itraconazole daily for 12 months (group 3) using a random number list with non-disclosed fixed blocks of size 12, with equal allocation to each of the three arms within a block. To ensure masking between groups, placebo pills were used to disguise the difference in dosing schedules. All groups took pills twice daily with meals. In all groups, surgery was performed at 6 months. The primary outcome was complete cure at end of treatment at the month 12 visit, as evidenced by absence of mycetoma mass, sinuses, and discharge; normal ultrasonography or MRI examination of the eumycetoma site; and, if a mass was present, negative fungal culture from the former mycetoma site. The primary outcome was assessed in the modified intention-to-treat (mITT) population (all patients who received one or more treatment dose with one or more primary efficacy assessment). Safety was assessed in all patients who received one or more doses of the study drug. This study is registered with ClinicalTrials.gov (NCT03086226) and is complete. FINDINGS: Between May 9, 2017, and June 10, 2021, 104 patients were randomly allocated (34 in group 1 and 2, respectively, and 36 in group 3). 86 (83%) of 104 patients were male and 18 (17%) patients were female. After an unplanned second interim analysis, the study was terminated early for futility. Complete cure at 12 months in the mITT population was 17 (50%) of 34 (95% CI 32-68) for group 1, 22 (65%) of 34 (47-80) for group 2, and 27 (75%) of 36 (58-88) in group 3. Neither dose of fosravuconazole was superior to itraconazole (p=0·35 for 200 mg fosravuconazole vs p=0·030 for 300 mg fosravuconazole). 83 patients had a total of 205 treatment-emergent adverse events, and two patients had serious adverse events that led to discontinuation, neither related to treatment. INTERPRETATION: Treatment with either dose of fosravuconazole was not superior to itraconazole, and the two doses had a numerically lower efficacy. However, fosravuconazole presented no new safety signals, and its lower pill burden and reduced risk of drug-drug interactions compared with the relatively expensive and inaccessible itraconazole suggests further research into effective treatments with a shorter duration and higher cure rate, without the need for surgery are warranted. FUNDING: Drugs for Neglected Diseases initiative.

Rifampicin and clarithromycin (extended release) versus rifampicin and streptomycin for limited Buruli ulcer lesions: a randomised, open-label, non-inferiority phase 3 trial.

BACKGROUND: Buruli ulcer is a neglected tropical disease caused by Mycobacterium ulcerans infection that damages the skin and subcutis. It is most prevalent in western and central Africa and Australia. Standard antimicrobial treatment with oral rifampicin 10 mg/kg plus intramuscular streptomycin 15 mg/kg once daily for 8 weeks (RS8) is highly effective, but streptomycin injections are painful and potentially harmful. We aimed to compare the efficacy and tolerability of fully oral rifampicin 10 mg/kg plus clarithromycin 15 mg/kg extended release once daily for 8 weeks (RC8) with that of RS8 for treatment of early Buruli ulcer lesions. METHODS: We did an open-label, non-inferiority, randomised (1:1 with blocks of six), multicentre, phase 3 clinical trial comparing fully oral RC8 with RS8 in patients with early, limited Buruli ulcer lesions. There were four trial sites in hospitals in Ghana (Agogo, Tepa, Nkawie, Dunkwa) and one in Benin (Pobè). Participants were included if they were aged 5 years or older and had typical Buruli ulcer with no more than one lesion (caterories I and II) no larger than 10 cm in diameter. The trial was open label, and neither the investigators who took measurements of the lesions nor the attending doctors were masked to treatment assignment. The primary clinical endpoint was lesion healing (ie, full epithelialisation or stable scar) without recurrence at 52 weeks after start of antimicrobial therapy. The primary endpoint and safety were assessed in the intention-to-treat population. A sample size of 332 participants was calculated to detect inferiority of RC8 by a margin of 12%. This study was registered with ClinicalTrials.gov, NCT01659437. FINDINGS: Between Jan 1, 2013, and Dec 31, 2017, participants were recruited to the trial. We stopped recruitment after 310 participants. Median age of participants was 14 years (IQR 10-29) and 153 (52%) were female. 297 patients had PCR-confirmed Buruli ulcer; 151 (51%) were assigned to RS8 treatment, and 146 (49%) received oral RC8 treatment. In the RS8 group, lesions healed in 144 (95%, 95% CI 91 to 98) of 151 patients, whereas lesions healed in 140 (96%, 91 to 99) of 146 patients in the RC8 group. The difference in proportion, -0·5% (-5·2 to 4·2), was not significantly greater than zero (p=0·59), showing that RC8 treatment is non-inferior to RS8 treatment for lesion healing at 52 weeks. Treatment-related adverse events were recorded in 20 (13%) patients receiving RS8 and in nine (7%) patients receiving RC8. Most adverse events were grade 1-2, but one (1%) patient receiving RS8 developed serious ototoxicity and ended treatment after 6 weeks. No patients needed surgical resection. Four patients (two in each study group) had skin grafts. INTERPRETATION: Fully oral RC8 regimen was non-inferior to RS8 for treatment of early, limited Buruli ulcer and was associated with fewer adverse events. Therefore, we propose that fully oral RC8 should be the preferred therapy for early, limited lesions of Buruli ulcer. FUNDING: WHO with additional support from MAP International, American Leprosy Missions, Fondation Raoul Follereau France, Buruli ulcer Groningen Foundation, Sanofi-Pasteur, and BuruliVac.

Pharmacokinetics, Safety, and Efficacy of an Allometric Miltefosine Regimen for the Treatment of Visceral Leishmaniasis in Eastern African Children: An Open-label, Phase II Clinical Trial.

BACKGROUND: Convenient, safe, and effective treatments for visceral leishmaniasis in Eastern African children are lacking. Miltefosine, the only oral treatment, failed to achieve adequate efficacy, particularly in children, in whom linear dosing (2.5 mg/kg/day for 28 days) resulted in a 59% cure rate, with lower systemic exposure than in adults. METHODS: We conducted a Phase II trial in 30 children with visceral leishmaniasis, aged 4-12 years, to test whether 28 days of allometric miltefosine dosing safely achieves a higher systemic exposure than linear dosing. RESULTS: Miltefosine accumulated during treatment. Median areas under the concentration time curve from days 0-210 and plasma maximum concentration values were slightly higher than those reported previously for children on linear dosing, but not dose-proportionally. Miltefosine exposure at the start of treatment was increased, with higher median plasma concentrations on day 7 (5.88 versus 2.67 µg/mL). Concentration-time curves were less variable, avoiding the low levels of exposure observed with linear dosing. The 210-day cure rate was 90% (95% confidence interval, 73-98%), similar to that previously described in adults. There were 19 treatment-related adverse events (AEs), but none caused treatment discontinuation. There were 2 serious AEs: both were unrelated to treatment and both patients were fully recovered. CONCLUSIONS: Allometric miltefosine dosing achieved increased and less-variable exposure than linear dosing, though not reaching the expected exposure levels. The new dosing regimen safely increased the efficacy of miltefosine for Eastern African children with visceral leishmaniasis. Further development of miltefosine should adopt allometric dosing in pediatric patients. CLINICAL TRIALS REGISTRATION: NCT02431143.