RESUMEN
The virtual conference 'Transforming Care: Supporting Older Adults Post-COVID in Ontario' was held in October 2021. It was organized by Specialized Geriatric Services (SGS) East and held over three half-days. The guiding themes included: The Need, The Innovation, and The Transformation. Over 500 participants heard from ~50 clinicians, researchers, administrators, older adults, care partners, and community partners. The pandemic uncovered and exacerbated existing issues and pushed us to explore new ways to support older adults living with complex health conditions. The following key priorities were identified: older adults and their care partners call for personalized care experiences, and a lifespan approach to care delivery; aging in the community remains the most common preference; an integrated community care system that supports aging at-home should be prioritized; care delivery by SGS interprofessional teams and specialists is paramount to providing comprehensive care; building health human resource capacity should be a system priority; and promising innovations should be scaled and spread. Evidence shows that we cannot return to status-quo; post-pandemic planning of both who we serve and how we serve needs to be anchored in system renewal, not just recovery. Renewal means integrating lessons learned during the pandemic into the redesign of our systems of care. Investments in innovative, upstream strategies that support home and community-based care, and target health promotion and prevention are necessary. The provincial and regional infrastructure of SGS has the expertise and capacity to assist Ontario Health Teams in responding to the evolving health and social needs of this population.
RESUMEN
Every year, millions of patients worldwide undergo cognitive testing. Unfortunately, new barriers to the use of free open access cognitive screening tools have arisen over time, making accessibility of tools unstable. This article is in follow-up to an editorial discussing alternative cognitive screening tools for those who cannot afford the costs of the Mini-Mental State Examination and Montreal Cognitive Assessment (see www.dementiascreen.ca). The current article outlines an emerging disruptive "free-to-fee" cycle where free open access cognitive screening tools are integrated into clinical practice and guidelines, where fees are then levied for the use of the tools, resulting in clinicians moving on to other tools. This article provides recommendations on means to break this cycle, including the development of tool kits of valid cognitive screening tools that authors have contracted not to charge for (i.e., have agreed to keep free open access). The PRACTICAL.1 Criteria (PRACTIcing Clinician Accessibility and Logistical Criteria Version 1) are introduced to help clinicians select from validated cognitive screening tools, considering barriers and facilitators, such as whether the cognitive screening tools are easy to score and free of cost. It is suggested that future systematic reviews embed the PRACTICAL.1 criteria, or refined future versions, as part of the standard of review. Methodological issues, the need for open access training to insure proper use of cognitive screening tools, and the need to anticipate growing ethnolinguistic diversity by developing tools that are less sensitive to educational, cultural, and linguistic bias are discussed in this opinion piece. J Am Geriatr Soc 68:2207-2213, 2020.
