ctDNA-based detection of molecular residual disease in stage I-III non-small cell lung cancer patients treated with definitive radiotherapy.

Background: Sensitive and reliable biomarkers for early detection of recurrence are needed to improve post-definitive radiation risk stratification, disease management, and outcomes for patients with unresectable early-stage or locally advanced non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) who are treated with definitive radiation therapy (RT). This prospective, multistate single-center, cohort study investigated the association of circulating tumor DNA (ctDNA) status with recurrence in patients with unresectable stage I-III NSCLC who underwent definitive RT. Methods: A total of 70 serial plasma samples from 17 NSCLC patients were collected before, during, and after treatment. A personalized, tumor-informed ctDNA assay was used to track a set of up to 16 somatic, single nucleotide variants in the associated patient's plasma samples. Results: Pre-treatment ctDNA detection rate was 82% (14/17) and varied based on histology and stage. ctDNA was detected in 35% (6/17) of patients at the first post-RT timepoint (median of 1.66 months following the completion of RT), all of whom subsequently developed clinical progression. At this first post-RT time point, patients with ctDNA-positivity had significantly worse progression-free survival (PFS) [hazard ratio (HR): 24.2, p=0.004], and ctDNA-positivity was the only significant prognostic factor associated with PFS (HR: 13.4, p=0.02) in a multivariate analysis. All patients who developed clinical recurrence had detectable ctDNA with an average lead time over radiographic progression of 5.4 months, and post-RT ctDNA positivity was significantly associated with poor PFS (p<0.0001). Conclusion: Personalized, longitudinal ctDNA monitoring can detect recurrence early in patients with unresectable NSCLC patients undergoing curative radiation and potentially risk-stratify patients who might benefit most from treatment intensification.

Characterization of Central Nervous System Clinico-Genomic Outcomes in ALK-Positive Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer Patients with Brain Metastases Treated with Alectinib.

INTRODUCTION: Highly effective brain-penetrant ALK-targeted tyrosine kinase inhibitors (TKIs) have been developed for the management of NSCLC patients with brain metastases (BM). Local therapy (LT) such as SRS or therapeutic craniotomy is increasingly being deferred for such patients. Herein we report detailed patient- and lesion-level intracranial outcomes and co-mutational genomic profiles from a cohort of NSCLC patients with BM treated with alectinib, with or without LT. METHODS: We retrospectively reviewed ALK fusion-positive NSCLC patients with BMs who received alectinib at the diagnosis of BM from 1/2012 and 5/2021. Outcome variables included intracranial progression-free survival (iPFS), overall survival (OS), duration of TKI therapy, and CNS response rates. Genomic characteristics from tumor specimens were assessed with MSK-IMPACT, a next-generation sequencing (NGS)-based genomic profiling assay. RESULTS: A total of 38 patients with 114 CNS lesions were included. Twelve of these patients also received contemporaneous LT (SRS, WBRT, or surgical resection). Maximal BM diameter in the TKI + LT group was greater (p < 0.003) but despite this difference, iPFS (TKI only, HR 1.21, 95 % CI 0.51-2.89; p = 0.66) and OS (TKI only, HR 5.99, 95 % CI 0.77-46.6; p = 0.052) were similar between groups and trended towards more favorable outcomes with the addition of LT. SMARCA4 co-alterations were associated with inferior OS (HR 8.76, 1.74-44.2; p = 0.009). CONCLUSIONS: Our study demonstrated that patients with ALK fusion-positive NSCLC treated with TKI + LT had larger BM and higher likelihood of pre-treatment neurologic symptoms. Despite these differences, iPFS was similar between groups. Results should be interpreted with caution as our study was limited by an underpowered sample size. SMARCA4 co-alterations were associated with inferior OS and these findings warrant further investigation.

Analysis of Tumor Mutational Burden, Progression-Free Survival, and Local-Regional Control in Patents with Locally Advanced Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer Treated With Chemoradiation and Durvalumab.

Importance: The addition of consolidative durvalumab to chemoradiation has improved disease control and survival in locally advanced non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC). However, there remains a need to identify biomarkers for response to this therapy to allow for risk adaptation and personalization. Objectives: To evaluate whether TMB or other variants associated with radiation response are also associated with outcomes following definitive chemoradiation and adjuvant durvalumab among patients with locally advanced unresectable NSCLC. Design, Setting, and Participants: This cohort study included consecutive patients with unresectable locally advanced NSCLC treated with chemoradiation and adjuvant durvalumab between November 2013 and March 2020 who had prospective comprehensive genomic profiling. This study was completed at a multisite tertiary cancer center. The median (IQR) follow-up time was 26 (21-36) months. Statistical analysis was conducted from April to October 2022. Exposures: Patients were grouped into TMB-high (≥10 mutations/megabase [mt/Mb]) and TMB-low (<10 mt/Mb) groups and were additionally evaluated by the presence of somatic alterations associated with radiation resistance (KEAP1/NFE2L2) or radiation sensitivity (DNA damage repair pathway). Main Outcomes and Measures: The primary outcomes were 24-month local-regional failure (LRF) and progression-free survival (PFS). Results: In this cohort study of 81 patients (46 [57%] male patients; median [range] age, 67 [45-85] years), 36 patients (44%) had TMB-high tumors (≥10 mt/Mb). Patients with TMB-high vs TMB-low tumors had markedly lower 24-month LRF (9% [95% CI, 0%-46%] vs 51% [95% CI, 36%-71%]; P = .001) and improved 24-month PFS (66% [95% CI, 54%-84%] vs 27% [95% CI, 13%-40%]; P = .003). The 24-month LRF was 52% (95% CI, 25%-84%) among patients with KEAP1/NFE2L2-altered tumors compared with 27% (95% CI, 17%-42%) among patients with KEAP1/NFE2L2-wildtype tumors (P = .05). On Cox analysis, only TMB status was associated with LRF (hazard ratio [HR], 0.17; 95% CI, 0.03-0.64; P = .02) and PFS (HR, 0.45; 95% CI, 0.21-0.90; P = .03). Histology, disease stage, Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group status, programmed cell death ligand 1 expression, and pathogenic KEAP1/NFE2L2, KRAS, and DNA damage repair pathway alterations were not significantly associated with LRF or PFS. Conclusions and Relevance: In this cohort study, TMB-high status was associated with improved local-regional control and PFS after definitive chemoradiation and adjuvant durvalumab. TMB status may facilitate risk-adaptive radiation strategies in unresectable locally advanced NSCLC.

A Phase 1 Safety Study of Avelumab Plus Stereotactic Body Radiation Therapy in Malignant Pleural Mesothelioma.

Introduction: Single-agent monoclonal antibody therapy against programmed death-ligand 1 (PD-L1) has modest effects in malignant pleural mesothelioma. Radiation therapy can enhance the antitumor effects of immunotherapy. Nevertheless, the safety of combining anti-PD-L1 therapy with stereotactic body radiation therapy (SBRT) is unknown. We present the results of a phase 1 trial to evaluate the safety of the anti-PD-L1 antibody avelumab plus SBRT in patients with malignant pleural mesothelioma. Methods: This was a single-arm, investigator-initiated trial in patients who progressed on prior chemotherapy. Avelumab was delivered every other week, and SBRT was delivered to one lesion in three to five fractions (minimum of 30 Gy) followed by continuation of avelumab up to 24 months or until disease progression. The primary end point of the study was safety on the basis of grade 3+ nonhematologic adverse events (AEs) within 3 months of SBRT. Results: Thirteen assessable patients received a median of seven cycles (range: 2-26 cycles) of avelumab. There were 27 grade 1, 17 grade 2, four grade 3, and no grade 4 or 5 avelumab-related AEs. The most common were infusion-related allergic reactions (n = 6), anorexia or weight loss (n = 6), fatigue (n = 6), thyroid disorders (n = 5), diarrhea (n = 3), and myalgia or arthralgias (n = 3). There were 10 grade 1, four grade 2, one grade 3, and no grade 4 or 5 SBRT-related AEs. The most common were diarrhea (n = 3), chest pain/myalgia (n = 2), fatigue (n = 2), cough (n = 2), dyspnea (n = 2), and nausea/vomiting (n = 2). Conclusions: Combination avelumab plus SBRT seems tolerable on the basis of the prespecified toxicity end points of the first stage of this Simon two-stage design phase 1 study.