Serial changes in renal indices in chronic HCV patients with and without HIV co-infection receiving sofosbuvir and tenofovir-based therapies.

BACKGROUND: Sofosbuvir (SOF) is authorized for hepatitis C virus (HCV) patients. The nephrotoxicity of SOF on HCV mono-infected and HCV-human immunodeficiency virus (HIV) individuals receiving antiretroviral therapy (ART) remains controversial. METHODS: A prospective study including 159 HCV mono-infected and 124 HCV-HIV individuals (47 were ART naïve and 77 were tenofovir [TDF]-based ART) who presented with an estimated glomerular filtration rate (eGFR) ≥30 ml/min/1.73 m2 at baseline and were treated with SOF-daclatasvir for 12 weeks. The eGFR was estimated using the Chronic Kidney Disease Epidemiology Collaboration equation over the study period. RESULTS: HCV patients had a progressive decline in median levels of eGFR compared with HCV-HIV patients who were ART naïve and those receiving TDF-based ART during and after discontinuing SOF-DAC treatment (96, 109 and 114 at baseline vs 94, 117 and 108 at the end of treatment [EOT]) vs 95, 114 and 115 ml/min/1.73 m2 at 12 weeks after treatment [SVR12], respectively). Moreover, the rate of eGFR stage worsening was more pronounced in HCV mono-infected compared with HCV-HIV individuals who were ART naïve and those receiving TDF-based ART (21.4% vs 8.5% and 14.3% at EOT; 21.4% vs 2.1% and 6.5% at SVR12, respectively). Multivariable regression analysis showed that baseline variables were not independent predictors of eGFR stage worsening either at EOT or SVR12. CONCLUSIONS: Because the changes in eGFR were minimal and not of clinical significance, and TDF was not associated with an increase in renal dysfunction, SOF-based direct-acting antivirals could be safely used in HCV mono-infected and HCV-HIV individuals, even in those on TDF-based ART.

Real-life experience of treating HCV co-infection among HIV-infected population in Egypt: single-center experience.

BACKGROUND: Liver disease has emerged as a leading cause of death among PLHIV coinfected with HCV. METHODS: A retrospective study involving all HCV viremic patients coinfected with HIV who presented to HCV/HIV multidisciplinary clinics located at Embaba fever hospital. Patients were assigned to receive DAAs according to the national treatment guidelines. The primary endpoint was SVR12. RESULTS: Of the 519 patients enrolled, 38.73% LTFU; either not initiated (n = 170) or did not complete the treatment (n = 31). The main identified reasons behind LTFU were schedule conflict (19%) or hospitalization (13%). Among 318 patients who completed their DAAs course, nine patients had a relapse after the end of treatment and 97% had attained SVR12. There were significant differences among different virological response groups in baseline factors including smoking (p = 0.005), history of dental procedure (p = 0.007), CD4 count (p = 0.007), and HIV viral load (p = <0.001). Among responders (n = 309), there was a significant reduction of baseline hemoglobin and significant improvement of baseline platelets (p = 0.005) at on-treatment week 8. Baseline necro-inflammatory markers showed significant improvement across follow-up time points (p < 0.001). CONCLUSIONS: DAAs are an effective and safe choice to treat HCV in PLHIV. Social stigma could be a major cause for lacking adherence to follow-up visits.Abbreviations: ALT: Alanine Aminotransferase; ARV: Antiretroviral treatment; AST: Aspartate Aminotransferase; DAAs: Direct acting antivirals; ARVs: antiretroviral therapy; EMR: Eastern Mediterranean region; HCV: Hepatitis C virus; kPa: Kilopascal; LTFU: Patient lost to follow up; NCCVH: The National Committee for Control of Viral Hepatitis; PWID: People who inject drugs; SVR: Sustained virological response;UNAIDS: The Joint United Nations Programme on HIV/AIDS.