Holmium Laser Enucleation vs Bipolar Plasmakinetic Enucleation of a Large Volume Benign Prostatic Hyperplasia: A Randomized Controlled Trial.

Objectives: To compare safety and efficacy of bipolar plasmakinetic enucleation of prostate (BPEP) vs holmium laser enucleation of prostate (HoLEP) for management of large benign prostatic hyperplasia (BPH) (>80 g). Patients and Methods: Patients with failed medical treatment, International Prostate Symptom Score (IPSS) >13, peak urinary flow rate (Qmax)<15 mL/s and prostate size ≥80 g were enrolled in this randomized controlled trial from November 2016 to February 2018 and managed by HoLEP (Group A; 33 patients) or BPEP (Group B; 31 patients). Patients on anticoagulants (AC) were not excluded. Patients were followed up for 12 months. Perioperative data were compared between both groups using Student's-t, Mann-Whitney, Paired-t, Wilcoxon signed rank, chi-square, or Fisher-exact tests as appropriate. Results: There was no significant difference between both groups in age, rate of presentation with urinary retention, recurrent hematuria, frequency of patients on ACs/antiplatelets, prostate size, prostate specific antigen (PSA), Qmax, IPSS, quality of life (QoL), and post-void residual urine (PVRU). Operative time was significantly longer in BPEP (p = 0.003) and catheterization duration (p = 0.019). Other perioperative parameters including level of Na+ and hemoglobin, resected tissue weight, hospital stay, and complications were not significantly different between both groups. There was no need for blood transfusion in all patients. There was significant postoperative improvement in IPSS, PVRU, QoL, PSA, and Qmax in each group. However, there was no significant difference between both groups in these parameters. Conclusion: HoLEP and BPEP are comparable regarding safety and efficacy for treatment of BPH (>80 g) including patients on ACs. However, BPEP required a longer catheterization duration and operative time. ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: NCT03998150.

Low-dose bacille Calmette-Guérin for non-muscle-invasive bladder cancer: Results of a prospective study.

OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the efficacy and safety of low-dose (45 mg) intravesical bacille Calmette-Guérin (BCG) therapy in the treatment of patients with non-muscle-invasive bladder cancer (NMIBC), as intravesical BCG is the most acceptable adjuvant therapy for NMI transitional cell carcinoma of the bladder. However, in the standard regimen, undesirable effects are the main cause of treatment discontinuation. PATIENTS AND METHODS: The present study included 37 men with primary NIMBC. All patients underwent complete TURB and 2 weeks later, a 6-week course of 45 mg BCG diluted in 50 mL isotonic saline was instilled into the bladder and retained for 2 h. Patients were evaluated for BCG efficacy (recurrence with or without progression) and safety by documentation of minor and/or major side-effects. RESULTS: There were no major or severe side-effects and no treatment discontinuations. Local adverse effects occurred in 20 patients, while systemic effects, in the form of fever, occurred in six patients (16.2%). There was recurrence in 14 patients (37.8%) after 18-34 months, with disease progression (muscle invasion) in four (10.8%) after 6-18 months. The recurrence index was 0.39/100 patients/month and the mean (range) tumour-free period was 30.97 (7-36) months. CONCLUSION: Low-dose BCG intravesical therapy is an effective adjuvant treatment in NMIBC. However, this needs to be validated in future studies and in comparison with other proposed doses and/or regimens.

LAPAROSCOPIC MANAGEMENT OF DISTAL URETERIC STONE IN BILHARZIAL URETER: RESULTS OF A SINGLE CENTER PROSPECTIVE STUDY.

No doubt, Bilharzial ureters are complicated by distal stricture due to precipitation of Bilharzial ova in distal ureter. These cases are associated with poorly functioning and grossly hydronephroic kidneys that hinder endoscopic manipulation of the coexistent distal, high burden, long standing impacted stones. Thus, laparoscopic uretrolithotomy was performed in 51 bilharzial patients with distal ureteric stones 4 trocars were used. The ureter was opened directly over the stone and the stone was extracted. A double-J stent was inserted into the ureter which was closed by 4-0 polyglactin running suture. The results showed that among 51 cases 33 males and 18 females; the mean age was 40.13 years. the mean stone size was 2.73 cm. Conversion to open surgery was in only one case; the mean operative time 92.05 (range 75-120 minutes); postoperative pain score ranged from 20 to 60, the mean number of PO analgesic request was 1.72 (range 1-3); it was once in 21, twice in 23 and thrice in 7 cases. Hospital stay ranged from 2 to 5 with a mean of 2.74 days; total duration of follow up ranged from 7 to 12 with a mean of 9.68. Stone recurrence reported in 4 cases; ureteric stricture reported in 2 cases. Stone free rate was reported to be 100%.

Laparoscopic management of distal ureteric stones in a bilharzial ureter: Results of a single-centre prospective study.

OBJECTIVE: To determine the efficacy and safety of the laparoscopic management of an impacted distal ureteric stone in a bilharzial ureter, as bilharzial ureters are complicated by distal stricture caused by the precipitation of bilharzial ova in the distal ureter. These cases are associated with poorly functioning and grossly hydronephrotic kidneys that hinder the endoscopic manipulation of the coexistent distal high burden of, and long-standing, impacted stones. PATIENTS AND METHODS: We used laparoscopic ureterolithotomy, with four trocars, to manage 51 bilharzial patients (33 men and 18 women; mean age 40.13 years) with distal ureteric stones. The ureter was opened directly over the stone and the stone was extracted. A JJ stent was inserted into the ureter, which was then closed with a 4-0 polyglactin running suture. RESULTS: The mean stone size was 2.73 cm. Conversion to open surgery was required in only one patient. The mean operative duration was 92 min, the postoperative pain score was 20-60, the mean (range) number of analgesic requests after surgery was 1.72 (1-3), comprising once in 21 patients, twice in 23 and thrice in seven. The mean hospital stay was 2.74 days, and the total duration of follow-up was 7-12 months. The stone recurred in four patients and a ureteric stricture was reported in two. All patients were rendered stone-free. CONCLUSION: Laparoscopy is a safe and effective minimally invasive procedure for distal ureteric stones in a bilharzial ureter with hydronephrosis.