Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 2 de 2
Filtrar
Más filtros












Base de datos
Intervalo de año de publicación
1.
J Egypt Soc Parasitol ; 45(2): 309-14, 2015 Aug.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-26485848

RESUMEN

No doubt, Bilharzial ureters are complicated by distal stricture due to precipitation of Bilharzial ova in distal ureter. These cases are associated with poorly functioning and grossly hydronephroic kidneys that hinder endoscopic manipulation of the coexistent distal, high burden, long standing impacted stones. Thus, laparoscopic uretrolithotomy was performed in 51 bilharzial patients with distal ureteric stones 4 trocars were used. The ureter was opened directly over the stone and the stone was extracted. A double-J stent was inserted into the ureter which was closed by 4-0 polyglactin running suture. The results showed that among 51 cases 33 males and 18 females; the mean age was 40.13 years. the mean stone size was 2.73 cm. Conversion to open surgery was in only one case; the mean operative time 92.05 (range 75-120 minutes); postoperative pain score ranged from 20 to 60, the mean number of PO analgesic request was 1.72 (range 1-3); it was once in 21, twice in 23 and thrice in 7 cases. Hospital stay ranged from 2 to 5 with a mean of 2.74 days; total duration of follow up ranged from 7 to 12 with a mean of 9.68. Stone recurrence reported in 4 cases; ureteric stricture reported in 2 cases. Stone free rate was reported to be 100%.


Asunto(s)
Laparoscopía/métodos , Esquistosomiasis/cirugía , Cálculos Ureterales/cirugía , Adulto , Femenino , Humanos , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Adulto Joven
2.
Arab J Urol ; 13(3): 182-6, 2015 Sep.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-26413344

RESUMEN

OBJECTIVE: To determine the efficacy and safety of the laparoscopic management of an impacted distal ureteric stone in a bilharzial ureter, as bilharzial ureters are complicated by distal stricture caused by the precipitation of bilharzial ova in the distal ureter. These cases are associated with poorly functioning and grossly hydronephrotic kidneys that hinder the endoscopic manipulation of the coexistent distal high burden of, and long-standing, impacted stones. PATIENTS AND METHODS: We used laparoscopic ureterolithotomy, with four trocars, to manage 51 bilharzial patients (33 men and 18 women; mean age 40.13 years) with distal ureteric stones. The ureter was opened directly over the stone and the stone was extracted. A JJ stent was inserted into the ureter, which was then closed with a 4-0 polyglactin running suture. RESULTS: The mean stone size was 2.73 cm. Conversion to open surgery was required in only one patient. The mean operative duration was 92 min, the postoperative pain score was 20-60, the mean (range) number of analgesic requests after surgery was 1.72 (1-3), comprising once in 21 patients, twice in 23 and thrice in seven. The mean hospital stay was 2.74 days, and the total duration of follow-up was 7-12 months. The stone recurred in four patients and a ureteric stricture was reported in two. All patients were rendered stone-free. CONCLUSION: Laparoscopy is a safe and effective minimally invasive procedure for distal ureteric stones in a bilharzial ureter with hydronephrosis.

SELECCIÓN DE REFERENCIAS
DETALLE DE LA BÚSQUEDA
...