RESUMEN
BACKGROUND: Peripheral nerve injury refers to any damage or trauma to the nerves located outside the central nervous system. Ultrasonography is a reliable, cheap, and minimally invasive method in clinical practice to give physicians useful information about nerve injury. OBJECTIVES: to assess the power of ultrasound in determining the presence, localization, and extent of neural damage in patients with clinical evidence of peripheral nerve lesions before surgery. METHODS: This cross-sectional study was conducted on 78 patients (56 females and 22 males, aged from 9 to 52 years) who had different pathologies including entrapment, tumoral, post-traumatic, and post-surgical nerve injuries at the Neurosurgery and Physical Medicine, Rheumatology, and Rehabilitation Departments, Tanta University Hospitals. All studied patients had preoperative evaluation; neurological examination, electrodiagnostic studies, and sonographic examinations with linear array transducers (frequencies ranging from 7.5 to 16 MHz). RESULTS: The most common pathological condition was entrapment neuropathy (39 patients) (50%). Ultrasound complemented the electrodiagnostic studies by determining the site of entrapment manifested by increased mean maximum cross-sectional area of the nerve proximal to the site of entrapment and nerve hypoechogenicity. In post-traumatic and iatrogenic neuropathies (35 patients) (44.9%), the ultrasound finding revealed neuroma in continuity in nine cases (11.5%), complete neurotmesis with stump neuroma in eighteen patients (23.1%), and eight cases (10.3%) showed perineural adhesion. In all cases, the nerve was hypoechoic at the site of injury. The presence of hyperechoic fibrous tissue could indicate perineural adhesion and the necessity for neurolysis. This study also included three (3.8%) cases had schwannoma, and one case (1.3%) had neurofibroma. Ultrasound was used to confirm the diagnosis by determining the tumor's size and vascular supply. CONCLUSIONS: Ultrasonography is a diagnostic and surgical planning tool that is becoming more and more useful for the management of peripheral nerve injuries. Its high resolution and real-time capability provide safe and cost-effective scans that aid in determining the extent of injuries. For patients with peripheral nerve injuries, ultrasound is advised to be added to the routine clinical and neurophysiological evaluation. It is also advised to use ultrasound as a first-line imaging modality for tumors thought to be of nerve origin.
Asunto(s)
Neuroma , Traumatismos de los Nervios Periféricos , Masculino , Femenino , Humanos , Traumatismos de los Nervios Periféricos/diagnóstico por imagen , Traumatismos de los Nervios Periféricos/cirugía , Estudios Transversales , Nervios Periféricos/diagnóstico por imagen , Nervios Periféricos/cirugía , Ultrasonografía/métodosRESUMEN
OBJECTIVE: A small number of studies supports vertebroplasty at the C2 vertebral body due to the documented technical challenges, the rarity of C2 osteolytic metastatic lesions, and the existence of potentially serious consequences linked to this particular anatomical area. Vertebroplasty, in such a situation, can be performed through a transoral, an anterolateral, or an open approach. All are supported by a limited number of studies with absence of a significant clinical trial assessing the efficacy, safety, and feasibility of vertebroplasty for the C2 vertebral body. We, herein, summarize a single-institution experience on C2 transoral vertebroplasty. PATIENTS AND METHODS: This is a retrospective analysis of the records of a single tertiary institute hospital and the clinical visits of nine patients with C2 osteolytic metastatic lesions treated by transoral fluoroscopically guided vertebroplasty between May 2016 and May 2021. RESULTS: The median period of the last clinical follow-up was 23 months (range, 9-60 months). The intraoperative amount of polymethyl methacrylate (PMMA) injected and recorded in the surgical report was 2 mL (1.5-2.5 mL). Postoperative immediate imaging showed that the cement filling percentage in relation to the C2 mass was 70% (40-85%). The PMMA leakage through the needle track and into the paravertebral spaces was observed in only one patient (11.1%), without significant vascular and neurological consequences. Stability was maintained during the follow-up period. The postoperative median pain rating scale (PRS) score was 1 (0-2) immediately after the end of the operation and 0 (0-2) at the last visit. The recorded postoperative Pain Rating Scale (PRS) score was correlated with the cement filling percentage (rs= -0.9, p = 0.0008; Spearman correlation). CONCLUSION: Transoral vertebroplasty is considered feasible and efficient technique in the treatment of secondary osteolytic lesions in the C2 vertebra. Further long-term and larger comparative randomized studies are required to perform a more comprehensive analysis of this technique.