Genetic influence of ABCG2, UGT1A1 and NR1I2 on dolutegravir plasma pharmacokinetics.

OBJECTIVES: Dolutegravir has replaced efavirenz as first-line treatment in universal HIV guidelines. We sought to ascertain the contributory effect of SNPs in four key genes linked to dolutegravir disposition (UGT1A1, ABCG2, CYP3A and NR1I2) on plasma dolutegravir pharmacokinetics. METHODS: Paired pharmacogenetic/pharmacokinetic data from 93 subjects were analysed for association using multivariate linear regression. RESULTS: Co-occurring UGT1*28 and NR1I2 c.63396C>T homozygosity was associated with a 79% increase in AUC0-24 (P = 0.001; 27% if analysed individually), whilst combined ABCG2 c.421C>A and NR1I2 c.63396C>T variants were associated with a 43% increase in Cmax (P = 0.002) and a 39% increase in AUC0-24 (P = 0.002). When analysed individually, homozygosity for the NR1I2 c.63396C>T variant alleles was associated with a 28% increase in Cmax (P = 0.033) and homozygosity for the ABCG2 c.421C>A variant alleles was associated with a 28% increase in Cmax (P = 0.047). The UGT1A1*28 (rs8175347) poor metabolizer status (*28/*28; *28/*37; *37/*37) was individually associated with a 27% increase in AUC0-24 (P = 0.020). The combination of UGT1A1*28 poor metabolizer and UGT1A1*6 intermediate metabolizer statuses correlated with a 43% increase in AUC0-24 (P = 0.023). CONCLUSIONS: This study showed a pharmacogenetic association between dolutegravir pharmacokinetics and variants in the ABCG2, UGT1A1 and NR1I2 genes, particularly when combined. Further research is warranted to confirm these associations in population-specific studies and to investigate their putative relationship with dolutegravir pharmacodynamics.

Pharmacokinetics (PK) of ethinylestradiol/levonorgestrel co-administered with atazanavir/cobicistat.

Background and objectives: Access to safe and reliable contraception in the context of ARVs is essential. This study aimed to investigate the steady-state pharmacokinetics (PK) of ethinylestradiol/levonorgestrel (EE/LNG) 30/150 µg (Microgynon®) and atazanavir/cobicistat (ATV/COBI) 300/150 mg (Evotaz®), co-administered in HIV negative female volunteers, and assess its safety and tolerability.Methods: This phase 1, open label, 57-day, cross over, PK study randomized participants to one of two groups: (i) group 1 received EE/LNG alone on days 1-21, EE/LNG (21 days) + ATV/COBI (14 days) in the co-administration phase (days 22-42) and ATV/COBI alone on days 43-56; (ii) group 2 followed the same sequence but started with ATV/COBI and concluding with EE/LNG. Each group underwent intensive PK sampling on days 14, 35, and 56. EE/LNG and ATV/COBI concentrations were measured using validated LC-MS/MS methods.Results: Of 14 healthy female volunteers screened, 11 attended baseline and six completed all PK phases (five withdrew secondary to side effects). Paired data were available for analysis in six subjects for EE/LNG and eight for ATV/COBI. Geometric mean ratios (GMR, with versus without ATV/COBI) and 90% confidence intervals (CI) for LNG Cmax, AUC0-24, C24 were 0.83 (0.68-1.02), 0.92 (0.71-1.18), 1.01 (0.73-1.38). GMR and 90% CI for EE Cmax, AUC0-24, C24 were 1.05 (0.92-1.19), 1.01 (0.83-1.22), 0.75 (0.60-0.93). No grade 3 or 4 adverse events or laboratory abnormalities were observed in the women who completed the study.Conclusions: Our findings showed no significant changes in LNG concentrations and a 25% decrease in EE C24 when EE/LNG was co-administered with ATV/COBI.

Increased Dolutegravir Peak Concentrations in People Living With Human Immunodeficiency Virus Aged 60 and Over, and Analysis of Sleep Quality and Cognition.

Background: Demographic data show an increasingly aging human immunodeficiency virus (HIV) population worldwide. Recent concerns over dolutegravir-related neuropsychiatric toxicity have emerged, particularly amongst older people living with HIV (PLWH). We describe the pharmacokinetics (PK) of dolutegravir (DTG) 50 mg once daily in PLWH aged 60 and older. Additionally, to address calls for prospective neuropsychiatric toxicodynamic data, we evaluated changes in sleep quality and cognitive functioning in this population after switching to abacavir (ABC)/lamivudine (3TC)/DTG over 6 months. Methods: PLWH ≥60 years with HIV-viral load <50 copies/mL on any non-DTG-based antiretroviral combination were switched to ABC/3TC/DTG. On day 28, 24-hour PK sampling was undertaken. Steady-state PK parameters were compared to a published historical control population aged ≤50 years. We administered 6 validated sleep questionnaires and neurocognitive (Cogstate) testing pre-switch and over 180 days. Results: In total, 43 participants enrolled, and 40 completed the PK phase. Overall, 5 discontinued (2 due to sleep-related adverse events, 4.6%). DTG maximum concentration (Cmax) was significantly higher in patients ≥60 years old versus controls (geometric mean 4246 ng/mL versus 3402 ng/mL, P = .005). In those who completed day 180 (n = 38), sleep impairment (Pittsburgh Sleep Quality Index) was marginally higher at day 28 (P = .02), but not at days 90 or 180. Insomnia, daytime functioning, and fatigue test scores did not change statistically over time. Conclusions: DTG Cmax was significantly higher in older PLWH. Our data provides clinicians with key information on the safety of prescribing DTG in older PLWH.

Pharmacokinetics of dolutegravir with and without darunavir/cobicistat in healthy volunteers.

Background: Dolutegravir combined with darunavir/cobicistat is a promising NRTI-sparing and/or salvage strategy for the treatment of HIV-1 infection. Methods: This Phase I, open-label, 57 day, crossover, pharmacokinetic (PK) study, enrolled healthy volunteers aged 18-65 years, who were randomized to one of two groups. Group 1 received dolutegravir (50 mg) once daily for 14 days followed by a 7 day washout, then a 14 day dolutegravir/darunavir/cobicistat (DTG/DRV/COBI) once-daily co-administration period followed by a 7 day washout and finally a 14 day period of darunavir/cobicistat (800/150 mg) once daily. Group 2 followed the same sequence starting with darunavir/cobicistat and concluding with dolutegravir. Each group underwent intensive PK sampling over 24 h on day 14 of each drug period and DTG/DRV/COBI concentrations were measured using validated LC-MS/MS methods. Results: Twenty participants completed all PK phases. Thirteen were female and median age and BMI were 33.5 years and 27 kg/m2. Dolutegravir geometric mean ratios (GMR, DTG/DRV/COBI versus dolutegravir alone) and 90% CI for Cmax, AUC0-24 and C24 were 1.01 (0.92-1.11), 0.95 (0.87-1.04) and 0.9 (0.8-1.0), respectively. Darunavir GMR (DRV/COBI/DTG versus darunavir/cobicistat alone) and 90% CI for Cmax, AUC0-24 and C24 were 0.90 (0.83-0.98), 0.93 (0.86-1.00) and 0.93 (0.78-1.11), respectively. No grade 3 or 4 adverse events or laboratory abnormalities were observed. Conclusions: Concentrations of dolutegravir and darunavir, when boosted with cobicistat, decreased by <10% during co-administration, suggesting this combination can be prescribed safely in the treatment of HIV-1, with no adjustment to current guideline-recommended dosages.

Once-daily atazanavir/cobicistat and darunavir/cobicistat exposure over 72 h post-dose in plasma, urine and saliva: contribution to drug pharmacokinetic knowledge.

Background: We investigated the pharmacokinetics (PK) of atazanavir/cobicistat and darunavir/cobicistat once daily over 72 h following drug intake cessation in plasma, saliva and urine. Methods: Healthy volunteers received a fixed-dose combination of 300/150 mg of atazanavir/cobicistat once daily for 10 days, followed by a 10 day washout period and then a fixed-dose combination of 800/150 mg of darunavir/cobicistat once daily for 10 days. Full PK profiles were assessed for each phase for 72 h following day 10 and parameters determined to the last measurable concentration in plasma, saliva and urine by non-compartmental methods. Results: Sixteen subjects completed the study. Geometric mean (GM) terminal elimination half-life values to 72 h of atazanavir and darunavir were 6.77 and 6.35 h, respectively. All subjects had atazanavir concentrations above the suggested minimum effective concentration of 150 ng/mL 24 h post-dose and 14/16 subjects had concentrations higher than this target at 30 h post-dose (GM of 759 and 407 ng/mL, respectively). Thirteen out of 16 subjects had darunavir concentrations higher than the target of 550 ng/mL at 24 h post-dose and 5/16 subjects had concentrations higher than the target at 30 h post-dose (GM of 1033 and 382 ng/mL, respectively). Cobicistat half-life to 72 h was 4.21 h with atazanavir and 3.62 h with darunavir. GM values 24 h after the observed dose ( C 24 ) for atazanavir and darunavir were 141 and 43 ng/mL, respectively, in saliva and 24857 and 11878 ng/mL, respectively, in urine. Concentration decay in saliva/urine mirrored plasma concentrations for both drugs. Conclusions: Different concentration decay patterns were seen for atazanavir and darunavir, which may be partially explained by cobicistat half-life (longer with atazanavir than darunavir). For the first time, we also measured drug PK forgiveness in saliva and urine, which represent easier markers of adherence.

Iatrogenic Cushing's syndrome due to drug interaction between glucocorticoids and the ritonavir or cobicistat containing HIV therapies.

Ritonavir and cobicistat, used as pharmacokinetic enhancers in combination with some antiretrovirals (ARVs) for the treatment of HIV, are potent inhibitors of the CYP3A4 isoenzyme. Most glucocorticoids are metabolised via the CYP3A4 pathway and iatrogenic Cushing's syndrome (ICS), with possible secondary adrenal insufficiency (SAI), is a recognised complication following co-administration with ritonavir or cobicistat. A structured approach for identifying and managing potentially affected individuals has not been established.We systematically identified patients with ICS/SAI and found substantial heterogeneity in clinical practice across three large London HIV centres. While this significant drug interaction and its complications are now well-recognised, it is apparent that there is no standardised approach to management or guidance for the general physician. Here we describe the management of ICS/SAI in our current practice, review the available evidence and suggest practice recommendations.