Mesenchymal Stem Cell Extracellular Vesicles as a New Treatment Paradigm in Solid Abdominal Organ Transplantation: A Case Series.

Solid abdominal organ transplantation is fraught with variable rates of rejection and graft versus host disease (GVHD). We sought to determine the safety and efficacy of an advanced extracellular vesicle (EV) investigational product (IP) derived from mesenchymal stem cells (MSC) in the transplant patient population. Seven separate emergency investigational new drug (eNIDs) were filed with the Food and Drug Administration (FDA) for the emergency treatment of rejection of an isolated intestinal graft (n = 2), liver allograft graft (n = 2), modified multivisceral graft (n = 3), and GVHD in isolated intestinal transplant patients (n = 2). Fifteen milliliters of IP was administered intravenously on Day 0, 2, 4, and this treatment cycle was repeated up to four times in each patient depending on the treatment protocol allowed by the FDA. Safety (adverse event reporting) and efficacy (clinical status, serologies, and histopathology) were evaluated. There were no adverse events related to IP. All patients had improvement in clinical symptoms within 24 h, improved serologic laboratory evaluation, improved pulmonary symptoms and dermatologic manifestations of GVHD, and complete histologic resolution of graft inflammation/rejection within 7 days of IP administration. Systemic use of a MSC-derived EV IP was successful in achieving histological clearance of intestinal, liver, and multivisceral graft inflammation, and skin and pulmonary manifestations of GVHD.

Correction to: Post-transplant inflow modulation for early allograft dysfunction after living donor liver transplantation.

An amendment to this paper has been published and can be accessed via the original article.

Post-transplant inflow modulation for early allograft dysfunction after living donor liver transplantation.

BACKGROUND: To treat small-for-size syndrome (SFSS) after living donor liver transplantation (LDLT), many procedures were described for portal flow modulation before, during, or after transplantation. The selection of the procedure as well as the best timing remains controversial. CASE PRESENTATION: A 43-year-old female with end-stage liver disease underwent LDLT with extended left with caudate lobe graft from her donor who was her 41-year-old brother (graft volume/standard liver volume (GV/SLV), 35.7%; graft to recipient weight ratio (GRWR), 0.67%). During the surgery, splenectomy could not be performed owing to severe peri-splenic adhesions to avoid the ruined bleedings. The splenic artery ligation was not also completely done because it was dorsal to the pancreas and difficult to be approached. Finally, adequate portal vein (PV) inflow was confirmed after portal venous thrombectomy. As having post-transplant optional procedures that are accessible for PV flow modulation, any other procedures for PV modulation during LDLT were not done until the postoperative assessment of the graft function and PV flow for possible postoperative modulation of the portal flow accordingly. Postoperative PV flow kept as high as 30 cm/s. By the end of the 1st week, there was a progressive deterioration of the total bilirubin profile (peak as 19.4 mg/dL) and ascitic fluid amount exceeded 1000 mL/day. Therefore, splenic artery embolization was done effectively and safely on the 10th postoperative day (POD) to reverse early allograft dysfunction as PV flow significantly decreased to keep within 20 cm/s and serum total bilirubin levels gradually declined with decreased amounts of ascites below 500 mL on POD 11 and thereafter. The patient was discharged on POD 28 with good condition. CONCLUSIONS: SFSS can be prevented or reversed by the portal inflow modulation, even by post-transplant procedure. This case emphasizes that keeping accessible angiographic treatment options for PV modulation, such as splenic artery embolization, after LDLT is quite feasible.